Re: [PATCH v2] test-lib: limit the output of the yes utility

[Johannes Schindelin]

Hi Hannes,

On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Johannes Sixt wrote:

> I'm not 100% satisfied with your version because it stomps on
> short-and-sweet shell variables $i and $y.

Please note that $y was already stomped on before my patch.

> But then the utility only occurs upstream of a pipeline in a separate
> process, so that does not matter.

That was my thinking, too.

> Please allow me to pass authorship to you, since the patch text is
> now all yours, and to forge your sign-off.

Fair enough,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v2] test-lib: limit the output of the yes utility

[Johannes Sixt]

From: Johannes Schindelin 

On Windows, there is no SIGPIPE. A consequence of this is that the
upstream process of a pipe does not notice the death of the downstream
process until the pipe buffer is full and writing more data returns an
error. This behavior is the reason for an annoying delay during the
execution of t7610-mergetool.sh: There are a number of test cases where
'yes' is invoked upstream. Since the utility is basically an endless
loop it runs, on Windows, until the pipe buffer is full. This does take
a few seconds.

The test suite has its own implementation of 'yes'. Modify it to produce
only a limited amount of output that is sufficient for the test suite.
The amount chosen should be sufficiently high for any test case, assuming
that future test cases will not exaggerate their demands of input from
an upstream 'yes' invocation.

[j6t: commit message]

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin 
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt 
---
Am 02.02.2016 um 09:21 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>> On Windows, there is no SIGPIPE.
> 
> True. But we do get some sort of write failure, no? Otherwise
> https://github.com/git/git/commit/2b86292ed would not work...

Of course. See the second sentence of the commit message.

> I agree with the idea, but I would like to have a less intrusive patch.
> Something like this should do the job as well, and is a little easier on
> the eyes IMHO:

I'm not 100% satisfied with your version because it stomps on
short-and-sweet shell variables $i and $y. But then the utility
only occurs upstream of a pipeline in a separate process, so that
does not matter.

Please allow me to pass authorship to you, since the patch text is
now all yours, and to forge your sign-off.

-- Hannes

 t/test-lib.sh | 6 --
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
index bd4b02e..51e4a88 100644
--- a/t/test-lib.sh
+++ b/t/test-lib.sh
@@ -907,9 +907,11 @@ yes () {
y="$*"
fi
 
-   while echo "$y"
+   i=0
+   while test $i -lt 99
do
-   :
+   echo "$y"
+   i=$(($i+1))
done
 }
 
-- 
2.7.0.118.g90056ae

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html