Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] push: add shorthand for --force-with-lease branch creation

2016-07-26 Thread Junio C Hamano
John Keeping  writes:

> Thanks.  I'm about to send v3 anyway to pull a test forward to address
> Jakub's comment.  I also used oidclr() for the last two changes below.

Will replace with v3.

I think v3 is ready to advance to 'next'.  Let's see if we get
further comments from others for a few days.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] push: add shorthand for --force-with-lease branch creation

2016-07-26 Thread John Keeping
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:59:04PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> John Keeping  writes:
> 
> >> > @@ -2294,6 +2294,8 @@ int parse_push_cas_option(struct push_cas_option 
> >> > *cas, const char *arg, int unse
> >> >  entry = add_cas_entry(cas, arg, colon - arg);
> >> >  if (!*colon)
> >> >  entry->use_tracking = 1;
> >> > +else if (!colon[1])
> >> > +memset(entry->expect, 0, sizeof(entry->expect));
> >> 
> >> hashclr()?
> >
> > Yes (and in the following patch as well).  I hadn't realised that
> > function exists.
> 
> Thanks; I've locally tweaked these two patches; the interdiff looks
> like this.

Thanks.  I'm about to send v3 anyway to pull a test forward to address
Jakub's comment.  I also used oidclr() for the last two changes below.

>  remote.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
> index e8b7bac..7eaf3c8 100644
> --- a/remote.c
> +++ b/remote.c
> @@ -2304,7 +2304,7 @@ int parse_push_cas_option(struct push_cas_option *cas, 
> const char *arg, int unse
>   if (!*colon)
>   entry->use_tracking = 1;
>   else if (!colon[1])
> - memset(entry->expect, 0, sizeof(entry->expect));
> + hashclr(entry->expect);
>   else if (get_sha1(colon + 1, entry->expect))
>   return error("cannot parse expected object name '%s'", colon + 
> 1);
>   return 0;
> @@ -2354,7 +2354,7 @@ static void apply_cas(struct push_cas_option *cas,
>   if (!entry->use_tracking)
>   hashcpy(ref->old_oid_expect.hash, cas->entry[i].expect);
>   else if (remote_tracking(remote, ref->name, 
> &ref->old_oid_expect))
> - memset(&ref->old_oid_expect, 0, 
> sizeof(ref->old_oid_expect));
> + hashclr(ref->old_oid_expect.hash);
>   return;
>   }
>  
> @@ -2364,7 +2364,7 @@ static void apply_cas(struct push_cas_option *cas,
>  
>   ref->expect_old_sha1 = 1;
>   if (remote_tracking(remote, ref->name, &ref->old_oid_expect))
> - memset(&ref->old_oid_expect, 0, sizeof(ref->old_oid_expect));
> + hashclr(ref->old_oid_expect.hash);
>  }
>  
>  void apply_push_cas(struct push_cas_option *cas,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] push: add shorthand for --force-with-lease branch creation

2016-07-26 Thread Junio C Hamano
John Keeping  writes:

>> > @@ -2294,6 +2294,8 @@ int parse_push_cas_option(struct push_cas_option 
>> > *cas, const char *arg, int unse
>> >entry = add_cas_entry(cas, arg, colon - arg);
>> >if (!*colon)
>> >entry->use_tracking = 1;
>> > +  else if (!colon[1])
>> > +  memset(entry->expect, 0, sizeof(entry->expect));
>> 
>> hashclr()?
>
> Yes (and in the following patch as well).  I hadn't realised that
> function exists.

Thanks; I've locally tweaked these two patches; the interdiff looks
like this.

 remote.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
index e8b7bac..7eaf3c8 100644
--- a/remote.c
+++ b/remote.c
@@ -2304,7 +2304,7 @@ int parse_push_cas_option(struct push_cas_option *cas, 
const char *arg, int unse
if (!*colon)
entry->use_tracking = 1;
else if (!colon[1])
-   memset(entry->expect, 0, sizeof(entry->expect));
+   hashclr(entry->expect);
else if (get_sha1(colon + 1, entry->expect))
return error("cannot parse expected object name '%s'", colon + 
1);
return 0;
@@ -2354,7 +2354,7 @@ static void apply_cas(struct push_cas_option *cas,
if (!entry->use_tracking)
hashcpy(ref->old_oid_expect.hash, cas->entry[i].expect);
else if (remote_tracking(remote, ref->name, 
&ref->old_oid_expect))
-   memset(&ref->old_oid_expect, 0, 
sizeof(ref->old_oid_expect));
+   hashclr(ref->old_oid_expect.hash);
return;
}
 
@@ -2364,7 +2364,7 @@ static void apply_cas(struct push_cas_option *cas,
 
ref->expect_old_sha1 = 1;
if (remote_tracking(remote, ref->name, &ref->old_oid_expect))
-   memset(&ref->old_oid_expect, 0, sizeof(ref->old_oid_expect));
+   hashclr(ref->old_oid_expect.hash);
 }
 
 void apply_push_cas(struct push_cas_option *cas,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] push: add shorthand for --force-with-lease branch creation

2016-07-26 Thread John Keeping
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:30:05PM +0200, Jakub Narębski wrote:
> W dniu 2016-07-25 o 23:59, John Keeping pisze:
> 
> > +test_expect_success 'new branch covered by force-with-lease (explicit)' '
> > +   setup_srcdst_basic &&
> > +   (
> > +   cd dst &&
> > +   git branch branch master &&
> > +   git push --force-with-lease=branch: origin branch
> > +   ) &&
> > +   git ls-remote dst refs/heads/branch >expect &&
> > +   git ls-remote src refs/heads/branch >actual &&
> > +   test_cmp expect actual
> > +'
> 
> Do we need to test the negative, that is that if branch is not
> new it prevents push (e.g. when  is HEAD), or is it
> covered by other tests?

It's covered by a test in patch 3 (at least for the implicit case added
there), but I could pull that forwards.  In fact, converting that test
to the explicit syntax will make it simpler since we won't need to set
up a non-fast-forward push.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] push: add shorthand for --force-with-lease branch creation

2016-07-26 Thread Jakub Narębski
W dniu 2016-07-25 o 23:59, John Keeping pisze:

> +test_expect_success 'new branch covered by force-with-lease (explicit)' '
> + setup_srcdst_basic &&
> + (
> + cd dst &&
> + git branch branch master &&
> + git push --force-with-lease=branch: origin branch
> + ) &&
> + git ls-remote dst refs/heads/branch >expect &&
> + git ls-remote src refs/heads/branch >actual &&
> + test_cmp expect actual
> +'

Do we need to test the negative, that is that if branch is not
new it prevents push (e.g. when  is HEAD), or is it
covered by other tests?

-- 
Jakub Narębski

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] push: add shorthand for --force-with-lease branch creation

2016-07-26 Thread John Keeping
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 03:22:48PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> John Keeping  writes:
> 
> > Allow the empty string to stand in for the null SHA-1 when pushing a new
> > branch, like we do when deleting branches.
> >
> > This means that the following command ensures that `new-branch` is
> > created on the remote (that is, is must not already exist):
> >
> > git push --force-with-lease=new-branch: origin new-branch
> >
> > Signed-off-by: John Keeping 
> > ---
> > New in v2.
> >
> >  Documentation/git-push.txt |  3 ++-
> >  remote.c   |  2 ++
> >  t/t5533-push-cas.sh| 12 
> >  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/git-push.txt b/Documentation/git-push.txt
> > index bf7c9a2..927a034 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/git-push.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/git-push.txt
> > @@ -201,7 +201,8 @@ if it is going to be updated, by requiring its current 
> > value to be
> >  the same as the specified value `` (which is allowed to be
> >  different from the remote-tracking branch we have for the refname,
> >  or we do not even have to have such a remote-tracking branch when
> > -this form is used).
> > +this form is used).  If `` is the empty string, then the named ref
> > +must not already exist.
> >  +
> >  Note that all forms other than `--force-with-lease=:`
> >  that specifies the expected current value of the ref explicitly are
> > diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
> > index a326e4e..af94892 100644
> > --- a/remote.c
> > +++ b/remote.c
> > @@ -2294,6 +2294,8 @@ int parse_push_cas_option(struct push_cas_option 
> > *cas, const char *arg, int unse
> > entry = add_cas_entry(cas, arg, colon - arg);
> > if (!*colon)
> > entry->use_tracking = 1;
> > +   else if (!colon[1])
> > +   memset(entry->expect, 0, sizeof(entry->expect));
> 
> hashclr()?

Yes (and in the following patch as well).  I hadn't realised that
function exists.

> > else if (get_sha1(colon + 1, entry->expect))
> > return error("cannot parse expected object name '%s'", colon + 
> > 1);
> > return 0;
> > diff --git a/t/t5533-push-cas.sh b/t/t5533-push-cas.sh
> > index c732012..5e7f6e9 100755
> > --- a/t/t5533-push-cas.sh
> > +++ b/t/t5533-push-cas.sh
> > @@ -191,4 +191,16 @@ test_expect_success 'cover everything with default 
> > force-with-lease (allowed)' '
> > test_cmp expect actual
> >  '
> >  
> > +test_expect_success 'new branch covered by force-with-lease (explicit)' '
> > +   setup_srcdst_basic &&
> > +   (
> > +   cd dst &&
> > +   git branch branch master &&
> > +   git push --force-with-lease=branch: origin branch
> > +   ) &&
> > +   git ls-remote dst refs/heads/branch >expect &&
> > +   git ls-remote src refs/heads/branch >actual &&
> > +   test_cmp expect actual
> > +'
> > +
> >  test_done
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] push: add shorthand for --force-with-lease branch creation

2016-07-25 Thread Junio C Hamano
John Keeping  writes:

> Allow the empty string to stand in for the null SHA-1 when pushing a new
> branch, like we do when deleting branches.
>
> This means that the following command ensures that `new-branch` is
> created on the remote (that is, is must not already exist):
>
>   git push --force-with-lease=new-branch: origin new-branch
>
> Signed-off-by: John Keeping 
> ---
> New in v2.
>
>  Documentation/git-push.txt |  3 ++-
>  remote.c   |  2 ++
>  t/t5533-push-cas.sh| 12 
>  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-push.txt b/Documentation/git-push.txt
> index bf7c9a2..927a034 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-push.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-push.txt
> @@ -201,7 +201,8 @@ if it is going to be updated, by requiring its current 
> value to be
>  the same as the specified value `` (which is allowed to be
>  different from the remote-tracking branch we have for the refname,
>  or we do not even have to have such a remote-tracking branch when
> -this form is used).
> +this form is used).  If `` is the empty string, then the named ref
> +must not already exist.
>  +
>  Note that all forms other than `--force-with-lease=:`
>  that specifies the expected current value of the ref explicitly are
> diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
> index a326e4e..af94892 100644
> --- a/remote.c
> +++ b/remote.c
> @@ -2294,6 +2294,8 @@ int parse_push_cas_option(struct push_cas_option *cas, 
> const char *arg, int unse
>   entry = add_cas_entry(cas, arg, colon - arg);
>   if (!*colon)
>   entry->use_tracking = 1;
> + else if (!colon[1])
> + memset(entry->expect, 0, sizeof(entry->expect));

hashclr()?

>   else if (get_sha1(colon + 1, entry->expect))
>   return error("cannot parse expected object name '%s'", colon + 
> 1);
>   return 0;
> diff --git a/t/t5533-push-cas.sh b/t/t5533-push-cas.sh
> index c732012..5e7f6e9 100755
> --- a/t/t5533-push-cas.sh
> +++ b/t/t5533-push-cas.sh
> @@ -191,4 +191,16 @@ test_expect_success 'cover everything with default 
> force-with-lease (allowed)' '
>   test_cmp expect actual
>  '
>  
> +test_expect_success 'new branch covered by force-with-lease (explicit)' '
> + setup_srcdst_basic &&
> + (
> + cd dst &&
> + git branch branch master &&
> + git push --force-with-lease=branch: origin branch
> + ) &&
> + git ls-remote dst refs/heads/branch >expect &&
> + git ls-remote src refs/heads/branch >actual &&
> + test_cmp expect actual
> +'
> +
>  test_done
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH v2 2/3] push: add shorthand for --force-with-lease branch creation

2016-07-25 Thread John Keeping
Allow the empty string to stand in for the null SHA-1 when pushing a new
branch, like we do when deleting branches.

This means that the following command ensures that `new-branch` is
created on the remote (that is, is must not already exist):

git push --force-with-lease=new-branch: origin new-branch

Signed-off-by: John Keeping 
---
New in v2.

 Documentation/git-push.txt |  3 ++-
 remote.c   |  2 ++
 t/t5533-push-cas.sh| 12 
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/git-push.txt b/Documentation/git-push.txt
index bf7c9a2..927a034 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-push.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-push.txt
@@ -201,7 +201,8 @@ if it is going to be updated, by requiring its current 
value to be
 the same as the specified value `` (which is allowed to be
 different from the remote-tracking branch we have for the refname,
 or we do not even have to have such a remote-tracking branch when
-this form is used).
+this form is used).  If `` is the empty string, then the named ref
+must not already exist.
 +
 Note that all forms other than `--force-with-lease=:`
 that specifies the expected current value of the ref explicitly are
diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
index a326e4e..af94892 100644
--- a/remote.c
+++ b/remote.c
@@ -2294,6 +2294,8 @@ int parse_push_cas_option(struct push_cas_option *cas, 
const char *arg, int unse
entry = add_cas_entry(cas, arg, colon - arg);
if (!*colon)
entry->use_tracking = 1;
+   else if (!colon[1])
+   memset(entry->expect, 0, sizeof(entry->expect));
else if (get_sha1(colon + 1, entry->expect))
return error("cannot parse expected object name '%s'", colon + 
1);
return 0;
diff --git a/t/t5533-push-cas.sh b/t/t5533-push-cas.sh
index c732012..5e7f6e9 100755
--- a/t/t5533-push-cas.sh
+++ b/t/t5533-push-cas.sh
@@ -191,4 +191,16 @@ test_expect_success 'cover everything with default 
force-with-lease (allowed)' '
test_cmp expect actual
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'new branch covered by force-with-lease (explicit)' '
+   setup_srcdst_basic &&
+   (
+   cd dst &&
+   git branch branch master &&
+   git push --force-with-lease=branch: origin branch
+   ) &&
+   git ls-remote dst refs/heads/branch >expect &&
+   git ls-remote src refs/heads/branch >actual &&
+   test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
 test_done
-- 
2.9.2.639.g855ae9f

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html