Re: [PATCH] i18n: fix mistakes in translated strings
Jiang Xin writes: > Jean-Noël Avila 于2018年8月24日周五 上午5:02写道: >> diff --git a/builtin/submodule--helper.c b/builtin/submodule--helper.c >> index 2bcc70fdfe..b56028ba9d 100644 >> --- a/builtin/submodule--helper.c >> +++ b/builtin/submodule--helper.c >> @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ static void runcommand_in_submodule_cb(const struct >> cache_entry *list_item, >> argv_array_pushv(&cpr.args, info->argv); >> >> if (run_command(&cpr)) >> - die(_("run_command returned non-zero status while" >> + die(_("run_command returned non-zero status while " >> "recursing in the nested submodules of >> %s\n."), > > Any specific reason to put a period after newline? > And there is another mistake just above this one: > > "run_command returned non-zero status for %s\n." Embarrassing X-< These are not something the "fix" introduces (rather it is what it still misses), though.
Re: [PATCH] i18n: fix mistakes in translated strings
Jean-Noël Avila 于2018年8月24日周五 上午5:02写道: > diff --git a/builtin/submodule--helper.c b/builtin/submodule--helper.c > index 2bcc70fdfe..b56028ba9d 100644 > --- a/builtin/submodule--helper.c > +++ b/builtin/submodule--helper.c > @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ static void runcommand_in_submodule_cb(const struct > cache_entry *list_item, > argv_array_pushv(&cpr.args, info->argv); > > if (run_command(&cpr)) > - die(_("run_command returned non-zero status while" > + die(_("run_command returned non-zero status while " > "recursing in the nested submodules of > %s\n."), Any specific reason to put a period after newline? And there is another mistake just above this one: "run_command returned non-zero status for %s\n." -- Jiang Xin
Re: [PATCH] i18n: fix mistakes in translated strings
Le jeudi 23 août 2018, 23:28:55 CEST Junio C Hamano a écrit : > Jean-Noël Avila writes: > > > - die(_("run_command returned non-zero status while" > > + die(_("run_command returned non-zero status while " > > "recursing in the nested submodules of %s\n."), > > Obviously good. > > > diff --git a/config.c b/config.c > > index 9a0b10d4bc..3461993f0a 100644 > > --- a/config.c > > +++ b/config.c > > @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static const char include_depth_advice[] = N_( > > " %s\n" > > "from\n" > > " %s\n" > > -"Do you have circular includes?"); > > +"This might be due to circular includes."); > > OK. Hello, Has this patch been integrated in a -rc? In which case, would a new round of translation need to be triggered? Thanks JN
Re: [PATCH] i18n: fix mistakes in translated strings
Jean-Noël Avila writes: > - die(_("run_command returned non-zero status while" > + die(_("run_command returned non-zero status while " > "recursing in the nested submodules of %s\n."), Obviously good. > diff --git a/config.c b/config.c > index 9a0b10d4bc..3461993f0a 100644 > --- a/config.c > +++ b/config.c > @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static const char include_depth_advice[] = N_( > "%s\n" > "from\n" > "%s\n" > -"Do you have circular includes?"); > +"This might be due to circular includes."); OK. > diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c > index 65d371c746..84bf598c3e 100644 > --- a/sequencer.c > +++ b/sequencer.c > @@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ static const char *read_author_ident(struct strbuf *buf) > /* dequote values and construct ident line in-place */ > for (in = buf->buf; i < 3 && in - buf->buf < buf->len; i++) { > if (!skip_prefix(in, keys[i], (const char **)&in)) { > - warning(_("could not parse '%s' (looking for '%s'"), > + warning(_("could not parse '%s' (looking for '%s')"), Good. Thanks.