Re: [PATCH 0/7] improve range-diffs coloring and [RFC] move detection
Stefan Beller writes: > On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 9:57 AM Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> Stefan Beller writes: >> >> > This builds on top of sb/range-diff-colors, which builds on js/range-diff. >> >> As another round of js/range-diff is expected, according to >> >> > > Oh right. I forgot to mention that in this cover letter, but Johannes > has had work issues last week and people threw lots of stuff at him, > so I concluded the resend might take a while. Hence I just put it out there > in case we're happy with the status quo of that series. > ... > > Thanks! I'll resend when appropriate. Thanks; that way I have one less thing I have to remember ;-)
Re: [PATCH 0/7] improve range-diffs coloring and [RFC] move detection
On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 9:57 AM Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Stefan Beller writes: > > > This builds on top of sb/range-diff-colors, which builds on js/range-diff. > > As another round of js/range-diff is expected, according to > > Oh right. I forgot to mention that in this cover letter, but Johannes has had work issues last week and people threw lots of stuff at him, so I concluded the resend might take a while. Hence I just put it out there in case we're happy with the status quo of that series. > I will refrain from queuing this right now. Possible conflict > resolution that won't be reusable when the base one is rerolled and > this and another topic that depend on the current round of > js/range-diff are rebased on top is not something I can spend my > time on this week. Thanks! I'll resend when appropriate. Stefan
Re: [PATCH 0/7] improve range-diffs coloring and [RFC] move detection
Stefan Beller writes: > This builds on top of sb/range-diff-colors, which builds on js/range-diff. As another round of js/range-diff is expected, according to I will refrain from queuing this right now. Possible conflict resolution that won't be reusable when the base one is rerolled and this and another topic that depend on the current round of js/range-diff are rebased on top is not something I can spend my time on this week.
