Re: Submodule relative URL problems
Hi, Lianheng Tong wrote: git clone W1:path to A on W1/.git path to A on W2 Interesting. Thoughts: * More typical usage is to clone from a bare repository (A.git), which wouldn't have this problem. But I think your case is worth supporting, too. * What would you think of putting symlinks in A's .git directory? cd A/.git ln -s ../B ../C ../D . * Perhaps as a special case when the superproject is foo/.git, git should treat relative submodule paths as relative to foo/ instead of relative to foo/.git/. I think that would take care of your case without breaking existing normal practices, though after the patch is made it still wouldn't take care of people using old versions of git without that patch. What do you think? Thanks, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: Re: Submodule relative URL problems
Hi, On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:55:18AM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Lianheng Tong wrote: git clone W1:path to A on W1/.git path to A on W2 Interesting. Thoughts: * More typical usage is to clone from a bare repository (A.git), which wouldn't have this problem. But I think your case is worth supporting, too. * What would you think of putting symlinks in A's .git directory? cd A/.git ln -s ../B ../C ../D . * Perhaps as a special case when the superproject is foo/.git, git should treat relative submodule paths as relative to foo/ instead of relative to foo/.git/. I think that would take care of your case without breaking existing normal practices, though after the patch is made it still wouldn't take care of people using old versions of git without that patch. What do you think? I do not fully get the repository layout, since some commands simply do not work. Nevertheless I think what Lianheng Tong is running into is the following: * If a superproject has *no remote* a relative submodule url is relative to the *superproject itself* * If a superproject has *a remote* a relative submodule url is relative to the *superprojects remote* The simplest solution is: Have central bare repositories for everything so that every workstation has the same remote. The second solution: Make sure both repositories have each other as a remote. But then you run into a chicken/egg problem when setting the two up. The interpretation of relative urls was a design decision back when the relative urls were introduced. I am quite sure it would produce a lot of fallout if we change that. If I get your usecase wrong it would be very helpful if you could provide us with a working script that creates the repository setup your are using. Cheers Heiko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: Submodule relative URL problems
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes: * More typical usage is to clone from a bare repository (A.git), which wouldn't have this problem. But I think your case is worth supporting, too. I think the relative URL among nested submodules was specifically designed for hosting environments that have forest of bare repositories to serve as publishing or meeting points. I personally do not know where that worth supporting comes from, but if the change can be done without confusing the codepaths involved, I wouldn't object too much ;-) * Perhaps as a special case when the superproject is foo/.git, git should treat relative submodule paths as relative to foo/ instead of relative to foo/.git/. I think that would take care of your case without breaking existing normal practices, though after the patch is made it still wouldn't take care of people using old versions of git without that patch. What do you think? If we were to start adding special cases, it may also be sensible to clean up the more normal case of using subdirectories of bare repositories to represent nestedness (i.e. you can have a submodule logs.git, but not logs). We could reuse the $GIT_DIR/modules/$sm_name convention somehow perhaps? Any change to implement the special case you suggest likely has to touch the same place as such a change does, as both require some reorganization of the code that traverses the pathnames to find related repositories. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
