Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Update link to GTK+3 bundle for test builds to self-hosted version (#1931)
I restarted PR builds that were failing, they should be back we relevant results soon. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1931#issuecomment-423471721
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Update link to GTK+3 bundle for test builds to self-hosted version (#1931)
Merged #1931 into master. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1931#event-1859686116
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Update link to GTK+3 bundle for test builds to self-hosted version (#1931)
Ok. As said, the extra downloads are completely fine. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1931#issuecomment-422175908
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Update link to GTK+3 bundle for test builds to self-hosted version (#1931)
@eht16 I just meant the extra download on each Travis CI run. I wasn't suggesting we do the CI ourselves, which would probably be theoretically cool, but I don't think we have the manpower to maintain that, otherwise we'd already be running GitLab and all ourselves :) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1931#issuecomment-422163944
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Update link to GTK+3 bundle for test builds to self-hosted version (#1931)
This PR was rather meant to get Travis CI working again quickly instead of revamping the way we build for CI. @kugel- : Do you have already any idea how to get the necessary MSYS2 packages on a Linux host? We would find a way to "port" the `gtk-bundle-from-msys2.sh` to Linux I guess and the hard part is probably substituting `pacman`. @b4n do mean handling with "extra workload" serving the bundle downloads to Travis? Or rather replacing Travis and perform the CI builds on our servers? If the former, that's easy. If the latter, I'd rather use a separate VM for that but it won't be a problem. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1931#issuecomment-422160368
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Update link to GTK+3 bundle for test builds to self-hosted version (#1931)
> Currently the Windows build mostly tests the Win32 parts, and the parts that > could be unportable. "Tests" is a bit generous, tests it builds is really all, but yeah, some is better than none, or disable win so all Travis results don't show as failed. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1931#issuecomment-422154200
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Update link to GTK+3 bundle for test builds to self-hosted version (#1931)
@eht16 will our servers manage the extra workload from auto-building PRs, assuming we/I get back to regular development workload? I was working on something similar but wanted to try and cache the bundle on Travis so we don't put that burden on us, but if it's irrelevant we should just download it at least for now. @kugel- Yes, we should use the same setup ideally, I just am no knowledgeable on how to do that. And in the meantime, it's better to have *some* Windows build than none, even if it's not perfect. Currently the Windows build mostly tests the Win32 parts, and the parts that could be unportable. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1931#issuecomment-422153116
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Update link to GTK+3 bundle for test builds to self-hosted version (#1931)
I mean msys2 package. And to elaborate: the gtk 3.8 zip has no relevance since the releases are msys2 based. Travis CI should follow what we actually use to release as close as possible. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1931#issuecomment-422042521
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Update link to GTK+3 bundle for test builds to self-hosted version (#1931)
Err, I would rather grab the latested mingw package and use that. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1931#issuecomment-422041968
