Re: [GKD] Article on How to Bridge the Digital Divide

2001-05-11 Thread James Muir

Dear GKD Members,

Ekoue's note, as with certain others, offers an important element of
realism. I wonder, if no-one has raised this before, whether equipment
supply companies can be encouraged, as part of a life-cycle management
policy (see e.g., German industrial manufacture, where producers
increasingly have to account (and pay) for good environmental practice
not just in production and use, but also in disposal). A 'next
generation use' fund could be an interesting proposition, provided iof
course that the ultimate disposal, in the recipient countries concerned
(or shipped back to the West?), could also be accountably managed.

An initiative for UNIDO? Some green consumer lobbying? Would Dell, HP,
IBM etc recognise this as a positive marketing strategy amongst wealthy
and at least slightly guilt-ridden Western consumers?

James Muir




***GKD is an initiative of the Global Knowledge Partnership***
To post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. In the 1st line of the message type:
subscribe gkd OR type: unsubscribe gkd
Archives of previous GKD messages can be found at:
http://www.globalknowledge.org



Re: [GKD] Article on How to Bridge the Digital Divide

2001-05-11 Thread Daniel Taghioff

Tom Poe wrote:

 Large Donor agencies - - - Who would they be?  How to get their
 attention? Here's a more direct, simplified [too simplified] approach
 that could be used  to demonstrate that outfitting an entire nation
 with community kiosks is the most efficient means to bring money to
 the developing nations, rather than drain it away from developing
 nations: http://www.worldccr.org/kiosks.htm

In response to Tom's response,

The Grameen Bank already runs a commercial operation called the
village pay phone project, which siphons off money whilst providing
important communication infrastructure.  Perhaps this might give pause
for thought , when you invoke the business = bad, charity = good
dichotomy. Don't forget that development in itself has its roots as a
power political business.

Secondly, to advocate a one solution fits all strategy underestimates
the intelligence of those at the recieving end.  The Grameen Bank is in
fact a business started by phlianthropically minded entrepreneurs IN
BANGLADESH. But even their specific solutions are not a replacement for
people within the countries to be helped being engaged in the creative
process of finding their own communication products and solutions. 
Hence the idea, in line with Grameen Bank's Philosophy, of involving
local entrepreneurial talent.

Who are big donor agencies?  Government agencies such as UKs DFID,
canada's CIDA and Sweden's SIDA all have a healthy interest in ICTs in
development. Unfortunately they often fall for one size fits all
approaches too, but admittedly the Grammen Bank solution is much more
realistic cost wise.  To get their attention requires good old advocacy,
just like the process that the Grameen Bank went through in order to
catch your attention, and that has made it a model of best practise for
such State donors.

Finally, private business might be seen as donors in such a project,
since they would gain market research information.  Don't forget that
Sub Saharan Africa is partly under developed not because of
Multinational Companies being over-represented there, but due to a lack
of foreign interest in investing in anything but natural resource
extraction:  These countries are crying out for investment in
manufacturing.

Simplistic black and white judgements do not help in this area, if the
good guys and bad guys were easy to identify then development would
not be the largest social crisis of our age.

Daniel Taghioff
   


***GKD is an initiative of the Global Knowledge Partnership***
To post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. In the 1st line of the message type:
subscribe gkd OR type: unsubscribe gkd
Archives of previous GKD messages can be found at:
http://www.globalknowledge.org



[GKD] Managing Knowledge Economies Workshop

2001-05-11 Thread Edward Swanstrom

I am pleased to announce a one day workshop on Managing Knowledge
Economies sponsored by the Global Knowledge Economics Council.

This workshop will be held in major capital cities throughout the world
including South Africa, China, India, and Brazil. Fees will vary based
on GNP of each country and the number of participants ($50 USD - $250
USD).

Topics:

-Knowledge Management Econometrics
-Compressing the Knowledge Diffusion Curve
-Measuring the effectiveness of KM strategies methods and tools
-Knowledge Economics
-eGovernment's role in the Knowledge Economy
-Improving National Innovation and Knowledge Systems
-ICT and Knowledge Management Education for Teachers and Children
-Closing the Digital Divide with using Knowledge Management

If you are interested in hosting or attending a session, please send a
note to Joseph Scarpignato at [EMAIL PROTECTED].

Also, please check www.gkec.org to find out more about the council and
www.gksociety.org to find out more about the newly formed Global
Knowledge Society.

Edward Swanstrom
Secretary-General
Global Knowledge Economics Council (GKEC)
http://www.gkec.org
520-731-3130



***GKD is an initiative of the Global Knowledge Partnership***
To post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. In the 1st line of the message type:
subscribe gkd OR type: unsubscribe gkd
Archives of previous GKD messages can be found at:
http://www.globalknowledge.org