Re: stg_ap_v_ret porting crash: solved?
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 02:06:57AM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > Bootstrapping IA64 from x86 (with numerous patches from CVS) looks like > it is working fine, although I am getting > > ghc-6.0.1(9371): unaligned access to 0x41e6177a, ip=0x40dd46c1 > > when compiling even hello world with optimisation. The result seems to > work fine though. Is this expected? Or maybe I missed a patch? Hmm, no, I don't get any unaligned accesses. My tree is a few months old though, I will update and check. Matt ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: stg_ap_v_ret porting crash: solved?
igloo: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 08:31:40AM +1000, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote: > > > > Following the new guide, and the new distrib/hc-build, with the > > fix to .hc file generation on the host that Simon sorted out yesterday. > > > > This generated a working sparc binary. That compiler in turn is > > recompiling the libraries and generating new .hi files. > > Looks like it's working here too :-) The sparc isn't entirely well-behaved. The unregisterised compiler seems fine, but the first go at building a registerised GHC built a stage1 compiler that "couldn't allocate memory". However, I was being ambitious and had turned on everything: nativeGen, ghci, regs, tail calls etc. I'm being more cautious second time around. I'm having a go at alpha (osf3) too, I'll let you know. As an aside: I'll post bin-dists when registersied builds work. -- Don ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: stg_ap_v_ret porting crash: solved?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 08:31:40AM +1000, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote: > > Following the new guide, and the new distrib/hc-build, with the > fix to .hc file generation on the host that Simon sorted out yesterday. > > This generated a working sparc binary. That compiler in turn is > recompiling the libraries and generating new .hi files. Looks like it's working here too :-) Bootstrapping IA64 from x86 (with numerous patches from CVS) looks like it is working fine, although I am getting ghc-6.0.1(9371): unaligned access to 0x41e6177a, ip=0x40dd46c1 when compiling even hello world with optimisation. The result seems to work fine though. Is this expected? Or maybe I missed a patch? [Added Matt Chapman to the CC list] Things aren't so easy with alpha as gcc rejects the -mieee flag when GHC calls gcc for -cpp'ing. I fear a nasty hacky wrapper may be in order. Ian ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
RE: Syntax extensions (was: RE: The Future of Haskell discussion at the Haskell Workshop)
[ moved to ghc-users ] > On Wednesday 10 September 2003 07:22 am, Hal Daume III wrote: > > I agree with Malcolm, with the possible addition of: > > > > keep -fglasgow-exts as it is (or, even, perhaps continue > making it the > > "add all extensions keyword). also have -fffi, -farrows, -fth, etc. > > but also have, -fnoth and -fnoffi. that way, if a lot of > us have code > > that uses all the extensions other than TH and have lots of > code that > > looks like (foo$bar), we can just to -fglasgow-exts -fnoth. > > > > seems to be a win-win. > > I agree; I want a catch-all flag, but I also want to > flexibility to be able > to pick and choose. Both -f and -fno is > the way to go IMHO. Ok, I've added -fth and -fimplicit-params (and the appropriate -fno- forms). The -fglasgow-exts flag will continue to imply these for the time being, so nothing should break. Cheers, Simon ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
RE: stg_ap_v_ret porting crash: solved?
> $ uname -msr > OpenBSD 3.3 sparc > > $ cat > test.hs > import System.Info > main = print System.Info.arch >> print System.Info.os > > $ > /usr/obj/ports/ghc-6.0.1/ghc-6.0.1/ghc/compiler/ghc-inplace test.hs > > $ ./a.out > "sparc" > "openbsd" Congrats :-) Would you like to add this port to the relevant section of the Building Guide? Cheers, Simon ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
