Hi Ian,
I have made some progress. Today I got 6.4.2 to build unregisterized on
my FreeBSD/amd64 box. I went back to 6.4.2 because the only actual
report
of success I could find record of was Wilhelm Kloke's. He used 6.4.1.
I made certain I had exactly the same versions of readline and gmp on
both
machines. This might not be necessary, but it's one less thing that
might
go wrong. I also downgraded my ghc to 6.4.2 on the host i386
system. Building
6.4.2 using 6.6 runs into trouble with the change in the mutable
array API.
The 6.4.2 build now runs successfully to the end of the hc-build script.
I haven't installed it, but tried to build an out of the box 6.6 with
the 6.4.2
ghc-inplace. (I applied my patch to Linker.c so that the build
wouldn't fail
merely because of undefined symbols.) I also patched the mangler by
adding
|freebsd to rules for /^x86_64-.*-(linux|openbsd)$/.
The interesting thing is that out of the box using the 6.4.2
bootstrap compiler,
6.6 still crashes when compiling Linker.c. Not just a little crash;
it hung the
whole system. At that point it is using the ghc-inplace of 6.6.
On Mar 13, 2007, at 3:05 PM, Ian Lynagh wrote:
This sounds like you are using the original 6.6? You're probably
better
off trying to start from the 6.6 darcs branch instead (make a
tarball of
a checkout (might as well run autoreconf first) so you can be sure you
have the same source on both machines).
As I said, I'm using out of the box 6.6. Should I try a 6.6 from darcs?
../compiler/ghc-inplace -optc-O -optc-Wall -optc-W -optc-Wstrict-
prototypes -optc-Wmissing-prototypes -optc-Wmissing-declarations -
optc-Winline -optc-Waggregate-return -optc-Wbad-function-cast -optc-
I../includes -optc-I. -optc-Iparallel -optc-DCOMPILING_RTS -optc-
fomit-frame-pointer -optc-fno-strict-aliasing -H16m -O -optc-O2 -
static -I. -#include HCIncludes.h -fvia-C -dcmm-lint -c
Linker.c -
o Linker.o
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
gmake: *** [Linker.o] Error 139
gmake: Leaving directory `/tmp/ghc-6.6/rts'
../compiler/ghc-inplace has successfully compiled other files by this
point, right?
Yes. I've built the 6.6 compiler with the 6.4.2 bootstrap, and the
inplace
6.6 has built everything up until Linker.c. Then crash, burn,
smoking ruin.
It probably won't help, but what does it say if you add -v?
I suspect the next step is to try gdb and see what it says, though. It
might be necessary to repeat the build with -g -O0 in GhcHcOpts or
other
variables (be wary of hc-build trampling changes you make to
mk/build.mk).
It might even be useful to tweak the process so that you end up with a
-debug ghc (in fact, this should probably be the default). I don't
have
instructions for how to do this, but I've done it in the past and
don't
remember any major difficulties. Basically stick SRC_HC_OPTS += -
debug
in compiler/Makefile and fix any problems that come up (you might need
to do things like make WAY=debug in rts/, and modify the list of
files
that get put in the tarball).
I can add -v. Should I try to build a vanilla 6.6 with debugging or
one out
of darcs? Which would be more useful?
Thanks for your help.
Thanks
Ian
Best Wishes,
Greg
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
