Re: Associativity of ViewPatterns

2010-01-07 Thread Bas van Dijk
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones
simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
 Good point. I'll fix that, in HEAD at least.

Thanks,

BTW did you fix the infix instance headers problem in HEAD I
previously mailed about?

regards,

Bas
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


RE: Associativity of ViewPatterns

2010-01-07 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
Yes I did.  That too was an oversight. Thanks for pointing both out.

S

| -Original Message-
| From: Bas van Dijk [mailto:v.dijk@gmail.com]
| Sent: 07 January 2010 08:44
| To: Simon Peyton-Jones
| Cc: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Associativity of ViewPatterns
| 
| On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones
| simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
|  Good point. I'll fix that, in HEAD at least.
| 
| Thanks,
| 
| BTW did you fix the infix instance headers problem in HEAD I
| previously mailed about?
| 
| regards,
| 
| Bas

___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Associativity of ViewPatterns

2010-01-07 Thread Bas van Dijk
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones
simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
 Yes I did.  That too was an oversight. Thanks for pointing both out.

Ok thanks (I asked just to make sure I don't have to create a ticket.)

Bas
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


RE: Associativity of ViewPatterns

2010-01-06 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
Good point. I'll fix that, in HEAD at least.

Simon

| -Original Message-
| From: glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-
| boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Bas van Dijk
| Sent: 06 January 2010 12:44
| To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
| Subject: Associativity of ViewPatterns
| 
| Hello,
| 
| Why is the following a syntax error:
| 
| f (view1 - view2 - pattern) = ...
| 
| and the following isn't:
| 
| f (view1 - (view2 - pattern)) = ...
| 
| I would prefer the first version.
| 
| regards,
| 
| Bas
| ___
| Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
| Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
| http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users