Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] GlusterFest Test Week
On 21/09/2014, at 7:47 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On 09/18/2014 05:42 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal wrote: Greetings, As decided in our last GlusterFS meeting and the 3.6 planning schedule, we shall conduct GlusterFS 3.6 test days starting from next week. This time we intend testing one component and functionality per day. GlusterFS 3.6.0beta1 is now available to kick start the test week [1]. As we find issues and more patches do get merged in over the test week, I will be triggering further beta releases. We're going to need RPMs... and probably .deb's too. + Justin -- GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org An open source, distributed file system scaling to several petabytes, and handling thousands of clients. My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] GlusterFest Test Week
Hi Justin, We are working on releasing RPMs for 3.6.0beta1 release, but it will take some time. We will notify the list once the rpms are available. --Humble On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Justin Clift jus...@gluster.org wrote: On 21/09/2014, at 7:47 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On 09/18/2014 05:42 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal wrote: Greetings, As decided in our last GlusterFS meeting and the 3.6 planning schedule, we shall conduct GlusterFS 3.6 test days starting from next week. This time we intend testing one component and functionality per day. GlusterFS 3.6.0beta1 is now available to kick start the test week [1]. As we find issues and more patches do get merged in over the test week, I will be triggering further beta releases. We're going to need RPMs... and probably .deb's too. + Justin -- GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org An open source, distributed file system scaling to several petabytes, and handling thousands of clients. My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] GlusterFest Test Week
On 09/22/2014 03:27 PM, Justin Clift wrote: On 21/09/2014, at 7:47 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On 09/18/2014 05:42 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal wrote: Greetings, As decided in our last GlusterFS meeting and the 3.6 planning schedule, we shall conduct GlusterFS 3.6 test days starting from next week. This time we intend testing one component and functionality per day. GlusterFS 3.6.0beta1 is now available to kick start the test week [1]. As we find issues and more patches do get merged in over the test week, I will be triggering further beta releases. We're going to need RPMs... and probably .deb's too. RPMs are in progress and will be notified once they are available. Louis - would it be possible for you to provide .debs for 3.6 beta releases? Thanks, Vijay ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
[Gluster-devel] Regarding the coding guidelines script
Hi, I just ran ./rfc.sh to push my patch our for review and it failed the checkpatch.pl test. One of the warnings says the following: WARNING: quoted string split across lines #93: FILE: xlators/cluster/afr/src/afr-self-heal-entry.c:237: + gf_log (this-name, GF_LOG_DEBUG, Gfid mismatch + detected for %s/%s, %s on %s and %s on %s. I am not sure how we can get around this. Most of our gf_log() message strings (especially the ones inside nested blocks) will easily exceed 80 columns if this rule is going to be enforced. Do we really need this check? -Krutika ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] Regarding the coding guidelines script
Ah! Warnings are not the same as errors. :) Got it. -Krutika - Original Message - From: Krutika Dhananjay kdhan...@redhat.com To: FNU Harshavardhana fhars...@redhat.com Cc: Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 4:56:43 PM Subject: [Gluster-devel] Regarding the coding guidelines script Hi, I just ran ./rfc.sh to push my patch our for review and it failed the checkpatch.pl test. One of the warnings says the following: WARNING: quoted string split across lines #93: FILE: xlators/cluster/afr/src/afr-self-heal-entry.c:237: + gf_log (this-name, GF_LOG_DEBUG, Gfid mismatch + detected for %s/%s, %s on %s and %s on %s. I am not sure how we can get around this. Most of our gf_log() message strings (especially the ones inside nested blocks) will easily exceed 80 columns if this rule is going to be enforced. Do we really need this check? -Krutika ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
[Gluster-devel] glusterfs-api 3.4 dependency on python 2.6 causing problems
We have an interesting problem. In order to have a supported version of the linux kernel for our CPU (Intel's Avoton), we need a kernel version 3.15. To get this kernel version, we need to be on centos 7(Same with the later versions of Ubuntu). Centos 7 installs and requires python 2.7. and if we go with this, then we cannot install gluster 3.4.x because of the python dependency for the older python version in the glusterfs-api package. Is there a possibility of bumping up the python requirement in that package to python 2.7 anytime soon? Thanks, -Ram ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] Regarding the coding guidelines script
I keep getting this warning(or maybe not) for checkpatch.pl itself
when I run rfc.sh.
`Useless use of greediness modifier '+' in regex; marked by -- HERE
in m/(^\+.*) {8,8}+ -- HERE \t/ at ./extras/checkpatch.pl line 2131.`
Anyone else seeing this?
~kaushal
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Jeff Darcy jda...@redhat.com wrote:
Ah! Warnings are not the same as errors. :)
Got it.
We should probably disable those warnings anyway, as excessive
warnings can hide new/real problems. Since this is an
innocuous pattern that occurs frequently in our code, we don't
need the check for it.
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] glusterfs replica volume self heal lots of small file very very slow?how to improve? why slow?
Hi Just Gluster, Sorry for the bad formatting of the reply, I just copy/pasted the values from the daily digest As for using GlusterFS with small files, it is also the use case in which we're trying to use it. Unfortunately, we weren't successful yet in having a smooth ride with a Gluster cluster with a lot of small files. Our use case is storing several million files, averaging under 1mb in size (most of them around 10kb). We still have some files at about 1gb, but very few. When a self-heal hits in our use-case, it is a direct impact in performance for the users. The CPU of the Gluster nodes hits 100%, and maintains this for usually 1 hour, but sometimes goes up to 4-5 hours. This usually renders the Gluster cluster unusable, with a high impact for us. We're hoping the refactoring of the AFR in version 3.6 will help. We're also looking in testing some values in here: http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Documenting_the_undocumented But as of yet, we haven't found anything that makes our use case work. If you do find something though, please share it with the community, I would be thrilled to make it work :) Jocelyn ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] Regarding the coding guidelines script
I'm using Perl 5.20.1. I was wondering how no one caught a mistake in
the checker.
~kaushal
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Harshavardhana
har...@harshavardhana.net wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Kaushal M kshlms...@gmail.com wrote:
I keep getting this warning(or maybe not) for checkpatch.pl itself
when I run rfc.sh.
`Useless use of greediness modifier '+' in regex; marked by -- HERE
in m/(^\+.*) {8,8}+ -- HERE \t/ at ./extras/checkpatch.pl line 2131.`
Anyone else seeing this?
Nope never seen it, what version of perl are you using?
There's a useless + use that needs to be removed as perl 5.20
emits a Useless use of greediness modifier '+' message each
time it's hit.
Let me remove it
-- Harsha
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] Regarding the coding guidelines script
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Kaushal M kshlms...@gmail.com wrote: I'm using Perl 5.20.1. I was wondering how no one caught a mistake in the checker. ~kaushal http://review.gluster.com/#/c/8811/ - here you go, please verify. -- Religious confuse piety with mere ritual, the virtuous confuse regulation with outcomes ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
