Re: [Gluster-devel] spurious regression failures again!
Hi, Created a bug against the same. Please use it to submit if required. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121014 Thanks Varun Shastry On Tuesday 15 July 2014 09:34 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On 07/15/2014 09:24 PM, Joseph Fernandes wrote: Hi Pranith, Could you please share the link of the console output of the failures. Added them inline. Thanks for reminding :-) Pranith Regards, Joe - Original Message - From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" To: "Gluster Devel" , "Varun Shastry" Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 8:52:44 PM Subject: [Gluster-devel] spurious regression failures again! hi, We have 4 tests failing once in a while causing problems: 1) tests/bugs/bug-1087198.t - Author: Varun http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/379/consoleFull 2) tests/basic/mgmt_v3-locks.t - Author: Avra http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/375/consoleFull 3) tests/basic/fops-sanity.t - Author: Pranith http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/383/consoleFull Please take a look at them and post updates. Pranith ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Glusterfs Help needed
On Tuesday 24 June 2014 04:45 PM, Chandrahasa S wrote: Dear All, I am building Glusterfs on shared storage. I got Disk array with 2 SAS controller, one controller connected to node A and other Node B. Can I create Glusterfs between these two node ( A & B) without replication, but data should be read / write on both node ( for better performance). In case of node A fail data should be accessed from node B. Hi Chandrahasa, I think only Erasure Coding feature (which is not *yet* merged but under review) can provide Failure Tolerance without using Replication. - Varun Shastry Please suggest. Regards, Chandrahasa S Tata Consultancy Services Data Center- ( Non STPI) 2nd Pokharan Road, Subash Nagar , Mumbai - 400601,Maharashtra India Ph:- +91 22 677-81825 Buzz:- 4221825 Mailto: chandrahas...@tcs.com Website: http://www.tcs.com <http://www.tcs.com/> Experience certainty.IT Services Business Solutions Consulting From: jenk...@build.gluster.org (Gluster Build System) To: gluster-us...@gluster.org, gluster-devel@gluster.org Date: 06/24/2014 03:46 PM Subject: [Gluster-users] glusterfs-3.5.1 released Sent by: gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org SRC: http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.5.1.tar.gz This release is made off jenkins-release-73 -- Gluster Build System ___ Gluster-users mailing list gluster-us...@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users =-=-= Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. Thank you ___ Gluster-users mailing list gluster-us...@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] Awareness of the disk space available on nodes
On Friday 27 June 2014 05:37 PM, Nux! wrote: Thanks, this is great news! It was quite bad to hit disk limits and gluster to be oblivious to it and rebalancing is slow and taxing. Any estimate in which version this feature will land? If everything goes by plan, I think the 3.6 release should be built with this patch. - Varun Shastry Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: "Varun Shastry" To: "Nux!" , gluster-devel@gluster.org Sent: Friday, 27 June, 2014 12:41:46 PM Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Awareness of the disk space available on nodes On Friday 27 June 2014 04:02 PM, Nux! wrote: Hi, In 3.3/3.4 we had a problem with distributed volumes having problems when a brick/node would fill up and GlusterFS just failing to write down any more files on it, not trying to write them down on another node. I was told this is not a bug and it happens because of the hashing used to distribute the files (and no checks being done on disk space). My question is, has any of the above changed in 3.5? The patch addressing this is up for review at http://review.gluster.org/#/c/8093/. I don't think any other patch (at least partially) addressing this issue is merged in 3.5. - Varun Shastry Thanks Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] Awareness of the disk space available on nodes
On Friday 27 June 2014 04:02 PM, Nux! wrote: Hi, In 3.3/3.4 we had a problem with distributed volumes having problems when a brick/node would fill up and GlusterFS just failing to write down any more files on it, not trying to write them down on another node. I was told this is not a bug and it happens because of the hashing used to distribute the files (and no checks being done on disk space). My question is, has any of the above changed in 3.5? The patch addressing this is up for review at http://review.gluster.org/#/c/8093/. I don't think any other patch (at least partially) addressing this issue is merged in 3.5. - Varun Shastry Thanks Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] quota tests and usage of sleep
> - Original Message - >> hi, >> Could you guys remove 'sleep' for quota tests authored by you guys >> if it can be done. They are leading to spurious failures. I don't get how sleep can cause the failures. But for script bug-1087198.t in my name, it is part of the testing. I can reduce it to a smaller value but we need to have the test which waits for a small amount of time. - Varun Shastry >> I will be sending out a patch removing 'sleep' in other tests. >> >> Pranith >> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] User-serviceable snapshots design
Hi, On Wednesday 07 May 2014 10:52 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: Attached is a basic write-up of the user-serviceable snapshot feature design (Avati's). Please take a look and let us know if you have questions of any sort... A few. The design creates a new type of daemon: snapview-server. * Where is it started? One server (selected how) or all? All the servers in the cluster. * How do clients find it? Are we dynamically changing the client side graph to add new protocol/client instances pointing to new snapview-servers, or is snapview-client using RPC directly? Are the snapview-server ports managed through the glusterd portmapper interface, or patched in some other way? Adding a protocol/client instance to connect to protocol/server at the daemon. so, the call flow would look like, (if the call is to .snaps) snapview-client -> protocol/client -> protocol/server ->snapview-server. Yes, it is handled through glusterd portmapper. * Since a snap volume will refer to multiple bricks, we'll need more brick daemons as well. How are *those* managed? Brick processes associated with the snapshot will be started. - Varun Shastry * How does snapview-server manage user credentials for connecting to snap bricks? What if multiple users try to use the same snapshot at the same time? How does any of this interact with on-wire or on-disk encryption? I'm sure I'll come up with more later. Also, next time it might be nice to use the upstream feature proposal template *as it was designed* to make sure that questions like these get addressed where the whole community can participate in a timely fashion. ___ Gluster-users mailing list gluster-us...@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] User-serviceable snapshots design
Hi Sobhan, On Wednesday 07 May 2014 09:12 PM, Sobhan Samantaray wrote: I think its a good idea to include the auto-remove of the snapshots based on the time or space as threshold as mentioned in below link. http://www.howtogeek.com/110138/how-to-back-up-your-linux-system-with-back-in-time/ I think this feature is already implemented (partially?) as part of the snapshot feature. The feature proposed here only concentrates on the user serviceability of the snapshots taken. - Varun Shastry - Original Message - From: "Anand Subramanian" To: "Paul Cuzner" Cc: gluster-devel@gluster.org, "gluster-users" , "Anand Avati" Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2014 7:50:30 PM Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] User-serviceable snapshots design Hi Paul, that is definitely doable and a very nice suggestion. It is just that we probably won't be able to get to that in the immediate code drop (what we like to call phase-1 of the feature). But yes, let us try to implement what you suggest for phase-2. Soon :-) Regards, Anand On 05/06/2014 07:27 AM, Paul Cuzner wrote: Just one question relating to thoughts around how you apply a filter to the snapshot view from a user's perspective. In the "considerations" section, it states - "We plan to introduce a configurable option to limit the number of snapshots visible under the USS feature." Would it not be possible to take the meta data from the snapshots to form a tree hierarchy when the number of snapshots present exceeds a given threshold, effectively organising the snaps by time. I think this would work better from an end-user workflow perspective. i.e. .snaps \/ Today +-- snap01_20140503_0800 +-- snap02_ 20140503_ 1400 Last 7 days 7-21 days 21-60 days 60-180days 180days From: "Anand Subramanian" To: gluster-de...@nongnu.org , "gluster-users" Cc: "Anand Avati" Sent: Saturday, 3 May, 2014 2:35:26 AM Subject: [Gluster-users] User-serviceable snapshots design Attached is a basic write-up of the user-serviceable snapshot feature design (Avati's). Please take a look and let us know if you have questions of any sort... We have a basic implementation up now; reviews and upstream commit should follow very soon over the next week. Cheers, Anand ___ Gluster-users mailing list gluster-us...@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users ___ Gluster-users mailing list gluster-us...@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users ___ Gluster-users mailing list gluster-us...@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
