[Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression recovered (with patches)
Hi We now have the patches to recover NetBSD regression. This needs to be reviewed and merged (it would be nice if it could be before release-3.7 branching): http://review.gluster.org/10030 http://review.gluster.org/10032 http://review.gluster.org/10033 http://review.gluster.org/10034 http://review.gluster.org/9831 http://review.gluster.org/9944 I also have the following pending change that may deserve a look before branching: http://review.gluster.org/10017 Once all that will be merged, we will still have a few failing cases for which I need some help (see details below): tests/basic/afr/split-brain-resolution.t tests/basic/ec/ tests/basic/tier/tier.t tests/encryption/crypt.t tests/features/trash.t I will disable them so that NetBSD regression vote can be useful. But it would be nice if people coule help fixing them. Here are the details: 1) tests/basic/afr/split-brain-resolution.t 100% reliable failure, I posted an analysis of it in <1m21hnh.yiu9vbyqrhg9m%m...@netbsd.org> 2) tests/basic/ec tests have rare sprious failures, Xavier Hernandez said he will look at it when time will allow it. 3) tests/basic/tier/tier.t has 100% reliable failure on nbslave70 [19:19:07] ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t .. 20/32 md5: /d/backends/patchy1/d1/data2.txt: No such file or directory [19:19:07] ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t .. 23/32 not ok 23 Got "1" instead of "0" md5: /d/backends/patchy1/d1/data3.txt: No such file or directory [19:19:07] ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t .. 24/32 not ok 24 Got "1" instead of "0" umount: /mnt/glusterfs/0: Device busy [19:19:07] ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t .. Failed 2/32 subtests ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 32 Failed: 2) Failed tests: 23-24 Note that tier.t needs a portability patch not yet submitted: diff --git a/tests/basic/tier/tier.t b/tests/basic/tier/tier.t index 383d470..9cc754a 100755 --- a/tests/basic/tier/tier.t +++ b/tests/basic/tier/tier.t @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ sleep 12 uuidgen >> d1/data2.txt # Check promotion on read to slow tier -echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches +( cd $M0 && umount $M0 ) cat d1/data3.txt sleep 5 EXPECT_WITHIN $PROMOTE_TIMEOUT "0" file_on_fast_tier d1/data2.txt 4) tests/encryption/crypt.t has 100% reliable error on nbslave70. This is annoying because that one passed before: [19:21:21] ./tests/encryption/crypt.t .. 19/39 ln: /mnt/glusterfs/0/testfile: Protocol error not ok 20 mv: rename /mnt/glusterfs/0/testfile to /mnt/glusterfs/0/testfile-renamed: Protocol error not ok 21 diff: /mnt/glusterfs/0/testfile-symlink: No such file or directory not ok 26 [19:21:21] ./tests/encryption/crypt.t .. Failed 3/39 subtests ./tests/encryption/crypt.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 39 Failed: 3) Failed tests: 20-21, 26 5) tests/features/trash.t is completely broken. Note that http://review.gluster.org/10033 patches trash.t for NetBSD compatibility [19:24:33] ./tests/features/trash.t .. 1/65 No volumes present [19:24:33] ./tests/features/trash.t .. 15/65 not ok 15 [19:24:33] ./tests/features/trash.t .. 18/65 not ok 18 [19:24:33] ./tests/features/trash.t .. 30/65 not ok 30 (...) ./tests/features/trash.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 65 Failed: 16) Failed tests: 15, 18, 30, 33-34, 38-39, 57-65 -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz m...@netbsd.org ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression recovered (with patches)
On 29 Mar 2015, at 21:31, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > Hi > > We now have the patches to recover NetBSD regression. This needs to be > reviewed and merged (it would be nice if it could be before release-3.7 > branching): > > http://review.gluster.org/10030 > http://review.gluster.org/10032 > http://review.gluster.org/10033 > http://review.gluster.org/10034 > http://review.gluster.org/9831 > http://review.gluster.org/9944 > > I also have the following pending change that may deserve a look before > branching: > http://review.gluster.org/10017 > > Once all that will be merged, we will still have a few failing cases for > which I need some help (see details below): > tests/basic/afr/split-brain-resolution.t > tests/basic/ec/ > tests/basic/tier/tier.t > tests/encryption/crypt.t > tests/features/trash.t > > I will disable them so that NetBSD regression vote can be useful. But it > would be nice if people coule help fixing them. Here are the details: > > 1) tests/basic/afr/split-brain-resolution.t > 100% reliable failure, I posted an analysis of it in > <1m21hnh.yiu9vbyqrhg9m%m...@netbsd.org> > > > 2) tests/basic/ec tests have rare sprious failures, Xavier Hernandez > said he will look at it when time will allow it. > > > 3) tests/basic/tier/tier.t has 100% reliable failure on nbslave70 > > [19:19:07] ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t .. 20/32 > md5: /d/backends/patchy1/d1/data2.txt: No such file or directory > [19:19:07] ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t .. 23/32 > not ok 23 Got "1" instead of "0" > md5: /d/backends/patchy1/d1/data3.txt: No such file or directory > [19:19:07] ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t .. 24/32 > not ok 24 Got "1" instead of "0" > umount: /mnt/glusterfs/0: Device busy > [19:19:07] ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t .. Failed 2/32 subtests > > ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 32 Failed: 2) > Failed tests: 23-24 > > > Note that tier.t needs a portability patch not yet submitted: > diff --git a/tests/basic/tier/tier.t b/tests/basic/tier/tier.t > index 383d470..9cc754a 100755 > --- a/tests/basic/tier/tier.t > +++ b/tests/basic/tier/tier.t > @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ sleep 12 > uuidgen >> d1/data2.txt > > # Check promotion on read to slow tier > -echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches > +( cd $M0 && umount $M0 ) > cat d1/data3.txt > sleep 5 > EXPECT_WITHIN $PROMOTE_TIMEOUT "0" file_on_fast_tier d1/data2.txt > > > > 4) tests/encryption/crypt.t has 100% reliable error on nbslave70. This > is annoying because that one passed before: > > [19:21:21] ./tests/encryption/crypt.t .. 19/39 > ln: /mnt/glusterfs/0/testfile: Protocol error > not ok 20 > mv: rename /mnt/glusterfs/0/testfile to > /mnt/glusterfs/0/testfile-renamed: Protocol error > not ok 21 > diff: /mnt/glusterfs/0/testfile-symlink: No such file or directory > not ok 26 > [19:21:21] ./tests/encryption/crypt.t .. Failed 3/39 subtests > > ./tests/encryption/crypt.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 39 Failed: 3) > Failed tests: 20-21, 26 > > > 5) tests/features/trash.t is completely broken. Note that > http://review.gluster.org/10033 patches trash.t for NetBSD compatibility > > [19:24:33] ./tests/features/trash.t .. 1/65 No volumes present > [19:24:33] ./tests/features/trash.t .. 15/65 > not ok 15 > [19:24:33] ./tests/features/trash.t .. 18/65 > not ok 18 > [19:24:33] ./tests/features/trash.t .. 30/65 > not ok 30 > (...) > ./tests/features/trash.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 65 Failed: 16) > Failed tests: 15, 18, 30, 33-34, 38-39, 57-65 Awesome. :) + Justin -- GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org An open source, distributed file system scaling to several petabytes, and handling thousands of clients. My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression recovered (with patches)
Thanks Emmanuel for posting fixes for all these issues! > > http://review.gluster.org/10030 Review done, awaiting clarification on a minor question from Venky (changelog maintainer). > > http://review.gluster.org/10032 Patch has been merged. > > http://review.gluster.org/10033 Review done. Changes look good to me. > > http://review.gluster.org/10034 Patch has been merged. ~kp ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression recovered (with patches)
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Krishnan Parthasarathi wrote: > Thanks Emmanuel for posting fixes for all these issues! > >> > http://review.gluster.org/10030 > Review done, awaiting clarification on a minor question from Venky (changelog > maintainer). Have a minor comment. Rest is all good. > >> > http://review.gluster.org/10032 > Patch has been merged. > >> > http://review.gluster.org/10033 > Review done. Changes look good to me. > >> > http://review.gluster.org/10034 > Patch has been merged. > > ~kp > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression recovered (with patches)
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:10:20AM +0530, Venky Shankar wrote: > > Review done, awaiting clarification on a minor question from Venky > > (changelog maintainer). > > Have a minor comment. Rest is all good. I addressed the minor comment. Please bring the +1 review)! There is no need for release-3.6 backport, right? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression recovered (with patches)
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:10:20AM +0530, Venky Shankar wrote: >> > Review done, awaiting clarification on a minor question from Venky >> > (changelog maintainer). >> >> Have a minor comment. Rest is all good. > > I addressed the minor comment. Please bring the +1 review)! > > There is no need for release-3.6 backport, right? Correct. > > -- > Emmanuel Dreyfus > m...@netbsd.org ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
