Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] RPM's for latest glusterfs does not install on Fedora-20
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 11:40:35AM +0100, Justin Clift wrote: On 08/07/2014, at 9:53 AM, Anders Blomdell wrote: snip 2. What are the rules for marking a bug as blocking the trackers (can't find one for 3.6.0 yet, so currently a moot point). We should probably create an alias thing for 3.6.0, like we have for 3.5.2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.5.2 Not sure who does that, maybe Vijay (CC'd)? Anyone can do that, I've now created one for 3.6.0: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.6.0 When there are urgent bugs that need to get fixed in 3.6.0, open the bug (not the tracker) and add 'glusterfs-3.6.0' (or 1117822) in the 'blocks' field. If that is not working due to some permission issues, send an email to this list or ask on Freenode/IRC in #gluster-dev if someone can take care of adding it to the tracker. Niels + Justin -- GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org An open source, distributed file system scaling to several petabytes, and handling thousands of clients. My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] RPM's for latest glusterfs does not install on Fedora-20
On 2014-07-09 15:02, Niels de Vos wrote: On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 11:40:35AM +0100, Justin Clift wrote: On 08/07/2014, at 9:53 AM, Anders Blomdell wrote: snip 2. What are the rules for marking a bug as blocking the trackers (can't find one for 3.6.0 yet, so currently a moot point). We should probably create an alias thing for 3.6.0, like we have for 3.5.2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.5.2 Not sure who does that, maybe Vijay (CC'd)? Anyone can do that, I've now created one for 3.6.0: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.6.0 Thanks :-) When there are urgent bugs that need to get fixed in 3.6.0, open the bug (not the tracker) and add 'glusterfs-3.6.0' (or 1117822) in the 'blocks' field. If that is not working due to some permission issues, send an email to this list or ask on Freenode/IRC in #gluster-dev if someone can take care of adding it to the tracker. Have added my own favorite itches to it. I still don't feel confident enough with git to add my patches to gerrit and get jenkins to do the right thing is probably even worse, so where I have code that works for me™, bug reports contains patches, please bear with me. Removal of erroneous blockers should preferably be done without flame-throwers :-) BTW: doc/hacker-guide/en-US/markdown/unittest.md seems to lack info on how to write tests/bugs/bug-*.t files. /Anders -- Anders Blomdell Email: anders.blomd...@control.lth.se Department of Automatic Control Lund University Phone:+46 46 222 4625 P.O. Box 118 Fax: +46 46 138118 SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] RPM's for latest glusterfs does not install on Fedora-20
On 07/09/2014 09:56 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote: BTW: doc/hacker-guide/en-US/markdown/unittest.md seems to lack info on how to write tests/bugs/bug-*.t files. unittest.md is for writing code unit tests using cmockery. some details about writing tests/bugs/bug-*.t files is available at [1]. Cheers, Vijay [1] http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Using_the_Gluster_Test_Framework ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] RPM's for latest glusterfs does not install on Fedora-20
On 2014-07-07 21:13, Niels de Vos wrote: On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 07:29:15PM +0200, Anders Blomdell wrote: On 2014-07-07 18:17, Niels de Vos wrote: On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 04:48:18PM +0200, Anders Blomdell wrote: On 2014-07-07 15:08, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: # rpm -U ./glusterfs-server-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm ./glusterfs-fuse-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm ./glusterfs-cli-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm ./glusterfs-libs-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm ./glusterfs-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm ./glusterfs-api-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed) qemu-common-2:1.6.2-6.fc20.x86_64 libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed) qemu-system-x86-2:1.6.2-6.fc20.x86_64 libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed) qemu-img-2:1.6.2-6.fc20.x86_64 Feature or bug? /Anders Hey Anders, You should not see this issue as glusterfs-api provides /usr/lib64/libgfapi.so.0 . $rpm -ql glusterfs-api /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/__init__.py /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/__init__.pyc /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/__init__.pyo /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/gfapi.py /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/gfapi.pyc /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/gfapi.pyo /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/glusterfs_api-3.5.0-py2.7.egg-info /usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.5.0/xlator/mount/api.so /usr/lib64/libgfapi.so.0 /usr/lib64/libgfapi.so.0.0.0 True for branch release-3.5 from git://git.gluster.org/glusterfs.git, but not for master. Indeed, the master branch uses SONAME-versioning. Any applications (like qemu) using libgfapi.so need to get re-compiled to use the update. Can do without these for my current testing :-) Of course, removing packages you don't need is a nice workaround :) Is there any specific reason you want to use glusterfs-server-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm? because 3.5.1 is available in fedora 20 in update repo . So if you do yum update it i.e. yum update glusterfs-server you should get glusterfs 3.5.1 GA version which like to be stable than glusterfs-server-3.5qa2-0.722. I would like to track progress of the fixing of my bugs and at the same time experiment with reverting 3dc56cbd16b1074d7ca1a4fe4c5bf44400eb63ff to re-add IPv6 support, and I figured that the master is what will eventually become 3.6.0 Yes, you are correct. The master branch will become glusterfs-3.6. You should be able to recompile qemu (and other?) packages on a system that has glusterfs-devel-3.6 installed. I can also recommend the use of 'mockchain' (from the 'mock' package) for rebuilding glusterfs and other dependent packages. I'll keep tracking master (exposing as many bugs as I can), I'll redirect followups to gluster-devel@gluster.org and drop gluster-us...@gluster.org after this message. Great, thanks for the testing! Will hopefully get me a better product in the end :-) A few questions: 1. Should bugs/patches be posted on the list or should I file a BugZilla for each? 2. What are the rules for marking a bug as blocking the trackers (can't find one for 3.6.0 yet, so currently a moot point). 3. Given that my understanding of gluster innards is very limited, my guess is that the 'GlusterFS Development Workflow' is a overkill, but please correct me if I'm wrong. /Anders -- Anders Blomdell Email: anders.blomd...@control.lth.se Department of Automatic Control Lund University Phone:+46 46 222 4625 P.O. Box 118 Fax: +46 46 138118 SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] RPM's for latest glusterfs does not install on Fedora-20
On 08/07/2014, at 9:53 AM, Anders Blomdell wrote: snip 2. What are the rules for marking a bug as blocking the trackers (can't find one for 3.6.0 yet, so currently a moot point). We should probably create an alias thing for 3.6.0, like we have for 3.5.2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.5.2 Not sure who does that, maybe Vijay (CC'd)? + Justin -- GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org An open source, distributed file system scaling to several petabytes, and handling thousands of clients. My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] RPM's for latest glusterfs does not install on Fedora-20
On 2014-07-07 18:17, Niels de Vos wrote: On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 04:48:18PM +0200, Anders Blomdell wrote: On 2014-07-07 15:08, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: # rpm -U ./glusterfs-server-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm ./glusterfs-fuse-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm ./glusterfs-cli-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm ./glusterfs-libs-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm ./glusterfs-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm ./glusterfs-api-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed) qemu-common-2:1.6.2-6.fc20.x86_64 libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed) qemu-system-x86-2:1.6.2-6.fc20.x86_64 libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed) qemu-img-2:1.6.2-6.fc20.x86_64 Feature or bug? /Anders Hey Anders, You should not see this issue as glusterfs-api provides /usr/lib64/libgfapi.so.0 . $rpm -ql glusterfs-api /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/__init__.py /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/__init__.pyc /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/__init__.pyo /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/gfapi.py /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/gfapi.pyc /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/gfapi.pyo /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/glusterfs_api-3.5.0-py2.7.egg-info /usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.5.0/xlator/mount/api.so /usr/lib64/libgfapi.so.0 /usr/lib64/libgfapi.so.0.0.0 True for branch release-3.5 from git://git.gluster.org/glusterfs.git, but not for master. Indeed, the master branch uses SONAME-versioning. Any applications (like qemu) using libgfapi.so need to get re-compiled to use the update. Can do without these for my current testing :-) Is there any specific reason you want to use glusterfs-server-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm? because 3.5.1 is available in fedora 20 in update repo . So if you do yum update it i.e. yum update glusterfs-server you should get glusterfs 3.5.1 GA version which like to be stable than glusterfs-server-3.5qa2-0.722. I would like to track progress of the fixing of my bugs and at the same time experiment with reverting 3dc56cbd16b1074d7ca1a4fe4c5bf44400eb63ff to re-add IPv6 support, and I figured that the master is what will eventually become 3.6.0 Yes, you are correct. The master branch will become glusterfs-3.6. You should be able to recompile qemu (and other?) packages on a system that has glusterfs-devel-3.6 installed. I can also recommend the use of 'mockchain' (from the 'mock' package) for rebuilding glusterfs and other dependent packages. I'll keep tracking master (exposing as many bugs as I can), I'll redirect followups to gluster-devel@gluster.org and drop gluster-us...@gluster.org after this message. Thanks! /Anders -- Anders Blomdell Email: anders.blomd...@control.lth.se Department of Automatic Control Lund University Phone:+46 46 222 4625 P.O. Box 118 Fax: +46 46 138118 SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] RPM's for latest glusterfs does not install on Fedora-20
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 07:29:15PM +0200, Anders Blomdell wrote: On 2014-07-07 18:17, Niels de Vos wrote: On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 04:48:18PM +0200, Anders Blomdell wrote: On 2014-07-07 15:08, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: # rpm -U ./glusterfs-server-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm ./glusterfs-fuse-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm ./glusterfs-cli-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm ./glusterfs-libs-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm ./glusterfs-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm ./glusterfs-api-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed) qemu-common-2:1.6.2-6.fc20.x86_64 libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed) qemu-system-x86-2:1.6.2-6.fc20.x86_64 libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed) qemu-img-2:1.6.2-6.fc20.x86_64 Feature or bug? /Anders Hey Anders, You should not see this issue as glusterfs-api provides /usr/lib64/libgfapi.so.0 . $rpm -ql glusterfs-api /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/__init__.py /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/__init__.pyc /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/__init__.pyo /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/gfapi.py /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/gfapi.pyc /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/gfapi.pyo /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/glusterfs_api-3.5.0-py2.7.egg-info /usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.5.0/xlator/mount/api.so /usr/lib64/libgfapi.so.0 /usr/lib64/libgfapi.so.0.0.0 True for branch release-3.5 from git://git.gluster.org/glusterfs.git, but not for master. Indeed, the master branch uses SONAME-versioning. Any applications (like qemu) using libgfapi.so need to get re-compiled to use the update. Can do without these for my current testing :-) Of course, removing packages you don't need is a nice workaround :) Is there any specific reason you want to use glusterfs-server-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm? because 3.5.1 is available in fedora 20 in update repo . So if you do yum update it i.e. yum update glusterfs-server you should get glusterfs 3.5.1 GA version which like to be stable than glusterfs-server-3.5qa2-0.722. I would like to track progress of the fixing of my bugs and at the same time experiment with reverting 3dc56cbd16b1074d7ca1a4fe4c5bf44400eb63ff to re-add IPv6 support, and I figured that the master is what will eventually become 3.6.0 Yes, you are correct. The master branch will become glusterfs-3.6. You should be able to recompile qemu (and other?) packages on a system that has glusterfs-devel-3.6 installed. I can also recommend the use of 'mockchain' (from the 'mock' package) for rebuilding glusterfs and other dependent packages. I'll keep tracking master (exposing as many bugs as I can), I'll redirect followups to gluster-devel@gluster.org and drop gluster-us...@gluster.org after this message. Great, thanks for the testing! Niels ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
