Re: [Gluster-devel] RPC, DHT and AFR logging errors that are expected, reduce log level?
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > Hello, > > When NFS-Ganesha does an UNLINK of a filename on an inode, it does a > follow-up check to see if the inode has been deleted or if there are > still other filenames linked (like hardlinks) to it. > > Users are getting confused about the errors that are logged by RPC, DHT > and AFR. The file is missing (which is often perfectly expected from a > NFS-Ganesha point of view) and this causes a flood of messages. > > From https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328581#c5 : > > > If we reduce the log level for > > client-rpc-fops.c:2974:client3_3_lookup_cbk there would be the > > following entries left: > > > > 2x dht-helper.c:1179:dht_migration_complete_check_task > > 2x afr-read-txn.c:250:afr_read_txn > > > > it would reduce the logging for this non-error with 10 out of 14 > > messages. We need to know from the AFR and DHT team if these messages > > are sufficient for them to identify potential issues. > Updated the bug from the perspective of AFR as well: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328581#c12 "I am not sure how an inode which is not in split-brain is linked as 'no read-subvolumes' case. That is something to debug." > > Thanks, > Niels > -- Pranith ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] RPC, DHT and AFR logging errors that are expected, reduce log level?
- Original Message - > From: "Niels de Vos" > To: gluster-devel@gluster.org > Cc: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" , "Nithya Balachandran" > , "Pranith Kumar > Karampuri" > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 7:51:05 PM > Subject: RPC, DHT and AFR logging errors that are expected, reduce log level? > > Hello, > > When NFS-Ganesha does an UNLINK of a filename on an inode, it does a > follow-up check to see if the inode has been deleted or if there are > still other filenames linked (like hardlinks) to it. > > Users are getting confused about the errors that are logged by RPC, DHT > and AFR. The file is missing (which is often perfectly expected from a > NFS-Ganesha point of view) and this causes a flood of messages. > > From https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328581#c5 : > > > If we reduce the log level for > > client-rpc-fops.c:2974:client3_3_lookup_cbk there would be the > > following entries left: > > > > 2x dht-helper.c:1179:dht_migration_complete_check_task > > 2x afr-read-txn.c:250:afr_read_txn > > > > it would reduce the logging for this non-error with 10 out of 14 > > messages. We need to know from the AFR and DHT team if these messages > > are sufficient for them to identify potential issues. Please find my responses at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328581#c11 > > Thanks, > Niels > ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
