Re: [Gluster-infra] Switching from salt to ansible ?

[Michael Scherer]

Le mardi 05 janvier 2016 à 14:59 +0100, Michael Scherer a écrit :

> 
> Another solution is to use ansible over salt
> ( https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/12836 ), which mean we get the
> benefit of both world. If we decide to switch, I would maybe start by
> that until we can get a more secured network setup (ie, reuse the
> existing salt setup, and migrate slowly).
> 

So it turn out that I am not able to properly take time off, and on
Sunday one week ago, I did enough commits on my ansible role[1] to
support the group based model I wanted to use. It also turn out that I
was able to make ansible run on salt for the transition today without
much fuzz[2].

So since I didn't see much opposition, I went ahead and did started the
migration from salt to ansible. 

I will give more details once I make sure I fixed freeipa deployment (so
we can use it for LDAP and access control for the git repo, as it is
planned ), and then we will see the way forward from there.

[1] https://github.com/OSAS/ansible-role-ansible_bastion/commits/master 
[2] https://github.com/OSAS/ansible-role-salt_transport

-- 
Michael Scherer
Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra

Re: [Gluster-infra] review.gluster.org not working

[Michael Scherer]

Le samedi 27 février 2016 à 21:17 +0530, Raghavendra Talur a écrit :
> On Feb 27, 2016 9:04 PM, "Amye Scavarda"  wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Raghavendra Talur 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Feb 26, 2016 11:23 PM, "Raghavendra Talur"  wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Kaleb Keithley 
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> - Original Message -
> > >>> > From: "Raghavendra Talur" 
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Most likely it looks like disk is full. Someone please have a look
> at
> > >>> > it.
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>> Someone who? Misc is on holiday IIRC. Who else has access?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I think it is only Vijay and Kaushal other than misc who have access.
> > >
> > > I spoke to Kaushal over phone. He does not have access either. Adding
> misc
> > > hoping to catch his attention.
> > >
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Why do we think running our own gerrit and jenkins is a good thing?
> (When
> > >>> we could be using the CentOS gerrit and jenkins?)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> That discussion did happen in Devconf and will be discussed in
> > >> gluster-devel is what I understand. We should wait for people to put
> across
> > >> pros and cons for that.
> > >> Personally,
> > >> 1. I would want infra which has a large enough team to have a 24/7
> > >> monitoring.(As ndevos suggested, if we form a bigger group we can do
> so with
> > >> our current setup.)
> > >> 2. Have control over gerrit settings so that we can decide what do we
> mean
> > >> by trivial patches, and what patches carry over review comments etc.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> (Yes, I am feeling snarky.)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Understandable, given how easily our infra breaks. We who are in
> > >> gluster-infra group have to come up with a solution too.
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>>
> > >>> Kaleb
> > >>> ___
> > >>> Gluster-infra mailing list
> > >>> Gluster-infra@gluster.org
> > >>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Gluster-infra mailing list
> > > Gluster-infra@gluster.org
> > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
> >
> > Misc is indeed out of the office, but he will return on Monday.
> >
> > In the meantime, can we put this on the list of documented
> > infrastructure pieces that more than one person needs access to - so
> > that we can start forming that effective infra team? Part of the
> > challenge is that the responsibilities haven't been clear, so getting
> > people to volunteer to assist is not helpful.
> >
> > The conversation about CentOS's CI/CD is still ongoing, and in no way
> > do I want to dissuade Kaleb's snarky yet helpful suggestions. Keep 'em
> > coming.
> 
> +1 to everything.
> 
> Update : the site is working now. Not sure about who fixed it or what fixed
> it.

I did, once someone mentioned this was not working on a place where I
was looking (ie, the irc channel #gluster). It seems that indeed, after
last power cut, I didn't rejoin #gluster-dev from my 2nd irc client.
 
-- 
Michael Scherer
Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra

Re: [Gluster-infra] Request for SSH access to review.gluster.org

[Michael Scherer]

Le mercredi 17 février 2016 à 13:01 +0530, Kaushal M a écrit :
> Since the migration to RH data center, SSH access to
> review.gluster.org has been revoked for everyone, including me.
> 
> Michael, can you please restore access for me? So that I can help with
> any problems, when you're not online. My ssh keys are attached.

So for some reason, freeipa admin password is not working (I suspect the
hack i had to do with keytab disabled it...), so I have added your key
in the root keyring for the time being.

TO access review.gluster.org :
# ssh r...@formicary.gluster.org
# virsh console dev.gluster.org

then login on the console.


-- 
Michael Scherer
Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra