[Gluster-users] Weekly Community Meeting - 20170104

[Kaushal M]

Happy New Year everyone!

This is a reminder for the resumption of the weekly community meeting
after nearly a month of not being held. I hope everyone enjoyed their
holidays, and are now ready to get this restarted.

The meeting agenda and updates document is at [1] as always. I expect
there are a lot of updates to add after this long break, so make sure
to add your updates and topics to this before the meeting starts.

The meeting will start, as always, at 1200UTC in #gluster-meeting on Freenode.

See you all tomorrow!

~kaushal

[1] https://bit.ly/gluster-community-meetings
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster volume permissions denied

[vincent gromakowski]

Did someone already get this issue ? Can it be kernel related ? I am using
a Centos 7.2 image from my cloud provider, could it be a low level
configuration that is missing ?

2016-12-29 18:19 GMT+01:00 vincent gromakowski <
vincent.gromakow...@gmail.com>:

> Hi all,
> Any idea regarding the log outputs ?
> What are the ACL to set on bricks directory or gluster brick root ?
>
> 2016-12-28 11:25 GMT+01:00 vincent gromakowski <
> vincent.gromakow...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi,
>> Please find below the outputs. I previse that I can read and write to the
>> volume but only with "sudo" or root account whatever the ACL or the
>> ownership I set on fuse directories (even 777)
>>
>> *>sudo gluster peer status*
>> *Number of Peers: 3*
>>
>> *Hostname: bd-reactive-worker-4*
>> *Uuid: 434a7ee0-9c83-47ce-9a02-7c89e2e94ce0*
>> *State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)*
>>
>> *Hostname: bd-reactive-worker-2*
>> *Uuid: 7f76389c-3f78-4cac-8fd8-56f0a9bff47a*
>> *State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)*
>>
>> *Hostname: bd-reactive-worker-3*
>> *Uuid: e412cae9-6ecd-49cf-be63-c46d3e537c83*
>> *State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)*
>>
>>
>> *>sudo gluster volume status*
>>
>>
>> *Status of volume: reactive_smallGluster process
>> TCP Port  RDMA Port  Online
>>  
>> Pid--Brick
>> bd-reactive-worker-1:/srv/gluster/data/small/brick1
>>  49155 0  Y   31517Brick
>> bd-reactive-worker-2:/srv/gluster/data/small/brick1
>>  49155 0  Y   1147Brick
>> bd-reactive-worker-3:/srv/gluster/data/small/brick1
>>  49155 0  Y   32455Brick
>> bd-reactive-worker-4:/srv/gluster/data/small/brick1
>>  49155 0  Y   675Brick
>> bd-reactive-worker-1:/srv/gluster/data/small/brick2
>>  49156 0  Y   31536Brick
>> bd-reactive-worker-2:/srv/gluster/data/small/brick2
>>  49156 0  Y   1167Brick
>> bd-reactive-worker-3:/srv/gluster/data/small/brick2
>>  49156 0  Y   32474Brick
>> bd-reactive-worker-4:/srv/gluster/data/small/brick2
>>  49156 0  Y   696Brick
>> bd-reactive-worker-1:/srv/gluster/data/small/brick3
>>  49157 0  Y   31555Brick
>> bd-reactive-worker-2:/srv/gluster/data/small/brick3
>>  49157 0  Y   1190Brick
>> bd-reactive-worker-3:/srv/gluster/data/small/brick3
>>  49157 0  Y   32493Brick
>> bd-reactive-worker-4:/srv/gluster/data/small/brick3
>>  49157 0  Y   715Self-heal Daemon on localhost
>>   N/A   N/AY   31575Self-heal Daemon on
>> bd-reactive-worker-4N/A   N/AY   736Self-heal Daemon on
>> bd-reactive-worker-3N/A   N/AY   32518Self-heal Daemon
>> on bd-reactive-worker-2N/A   N/AY   1227Task Status of
>> Volume
>> reactive_small--There
>> are no active volume tasks*
>>
>>
>> 2016-12-28 11:11 GMT+01:00 knarra :
>>
>>> On 12/28/2016 02:42 PM, vincent gromakowski wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Can someone help me solve this issue ? I am really stuck on it and I
>>> don't find any workaround...
>>> Thanks a lot.
>>>
>>> V
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> What does gluster volume status show? I think it is because of
>>> quorum you are not able to read / write to and from the volume. Can you
>>> check if all your bricks are online and can you paste the output of your
>>> gluster peer status? In the glusterd.log i see that "*Peer
>>>  (<59500674-750f-4e16-aeea-4a99fd67218a>), in state
>>> , has disconnected from glusterd." *
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> kasturi.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2016-12-26 15:02 GMT+01:00 vincent gromakowski <
>>> vincent.gromakow...@gmail.com>:
>>>
 Hi all,
 I am currently setting a gluster volume on 4 Centos 7.2 nodes.
 Everything seems to be OK from the volume creation to the fuse mounting but
 after that I can't access data (read or write) without a sudo even if I set
 777 permissions.
 I have checked that permissions on underlying FS (an XFS volume) are OK
 so I assume the problem is in Gluster but I can't find where.
 I am using ansible to deploy gluster, create volumes and mount fuse
 endpoint.
 Please find below some information:

 The line in /etc/fstab for mounting the raw device

 *LABEL=/gluster /srv/gluster/data xfs defaults 0 0 *

 The line in /etc/fstab for mounting the fuse endpoint
 *bd-reactive-worker-2:/reactive_small /srv/data/small glusterfs
 defaults,_netdev 0 0*

 *>sudo gluster volume info*






 * Volume Name: reactive_small Type: Distributed-Replicate Volume ID:
 f0abede2-eab3-4a0b-8271-ffd6f3c83eb6 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0
 Number of Bricks: 4 x 3 = 12 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1:
 bd-reactive-worker-1:/srv/gluster/data/small/brick1 Brick2:

Re: [Gluster-users] install Gluster 3.9 on CentOS

[Kaleb Keithley]

- Original Message -
> From: "Ramesh Nachimuthu" 
>  
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Niels de Vos" 
> > 
> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 06:40:35AM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Just send Niels (nde...@redhat.com) an email telling him you've tested
> > > it.
> > 
> > Yes, that's correct. There is no web interface for giving karma to
> > packages like there is for Fedora. It is best to inform the 3.9 release
> > maintainers on one of the lists and put me in CC. Once someone other
> > than me checked the packages and is happy with them, I can mark them for
> > signing and releasing by the CentOS release engineering team.
> > 
> 
> Thanks Niels. I'm not sure about who is the 3.9 maintainer but I have
> personally verified the basic things like volume creation in 3.9 and it
> works. May me I will I include Kasturi, Sas to give their feedback on
> gluster 3.9.
> 
> Kasturi, Sas: Are you using gluster 3.9 in your testing?. If not, can you
> include it in some tests and share your feedback with Niels?.
> 

I'm not sure we have settled on who is _maintaining_ 3.9. Pranith and Aravinda 
made the initial release, but that might be the end of their involvement. Or 
not. Either way you can just send an email to gluster-users or gluster-dev 
saying 3.9 looks good and whoever it is will get the message.

GlusterFS 3.9 is a Short Term Maintenance release. I wouldn't expect Red Hat QE 
to be using it in their "day job" testing. STM releases are meant to get new 
features into the hands of community users early.

The packages in the CentOS Storage SIG are _upstream_ packages provided by and 
for the GlusterFS community, just like the packages that are provided by the 
community in Fedora, Ubuntu Launchpad, the SuSE Build System, and on 
download.gluster.org.

FWIW, CentOS, Debian, Ubuntu, and SuSE have their own processes for managing 
the packages they provide – the GlusterFS community packages are independent of 
those processes. Independent of all that, Niels does ask for a thumbs up from 
someone in the community before he promotes packages in the CentOS Storage SIG. 
(Although I personally think Niels could promote them after a couple weeks even 
if nobody gives a thumbs up; as can be done with packages in Fedora.)

The GlusterFS community should not expect Red Hat QE to give the thumbs up that 
Niels is looking for; it's really intended, and expected, to come from one or 
more community users.

HTH.

--

Kaleb


___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] install Gluster 3.9 on CentOS

[Ramesh Nachimuthu]

- Original Message -
> From: "Niels de Vos" 
> To: "Kaleb Keithley" 
> Cc: "Ramesh Nachimuthu" , "Grant Ridder" 
> , gluster-users@gluster.org
> Sent: Monday, January 2, 2017 5:28:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] install Gluster 3.9 on CentOS
> 
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 06:40:35AM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Just send Niels (nde...@redhat.com) an email telling him you've tested it.
> 
> Yes, thats correct. There is no web interface for giving karma to
> packages like there is for Fedora. It is best to inform the 3.9 release
> maintainers on one of the lists and put me in CC. Once someone other
> than me checked the packages and is happy with them, I can mark them for
> signing and releasing by the CentOS release engineering team.
> 

Thanks Niels. I'm not sure about who is the 3.9 maintainer but I have 
personally verified the basic things like volume creation in 3.9 and it works. 
May me I will I include Kasturi, Sas to give their feedback on gluster 3.9.

Kasturi, Sas: Are you using gluster 3.9 in your testing?. If not, can you 
include it in some tests and share your feedback with Niels?.

Regards,
Ramesh

> Thanks,
> Niels
> 
> 
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > 
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Ramesh Nachimuthu" 
> > > To: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" 
> > > Cc: "Grant Ridder" , gluster-users@gluster.org
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2016 12:26:03 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] install Gluster 3.9 on CentOS
> > > 
> > > Hi Kaleb,
> > > 
> > > I can give the karma. Do you know where these builds are listed in Centos
> > > Update system?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Ramesh
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" 
> > > > To: "Grant Ridder" , gluster-users@gluster.org
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 12:06:33 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] install Gluster 3.9 on CentOS
> > > > 
> > > > On 12/20/2016 12:19 PM, Grant Ridder wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am not seeing 3.9 in the Storage SIG for CentOS 6 or 7
> > > > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7.2.1511/storage/x86_64/
> > > > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6.8/storage/x86_64/
> > > > >
> > > > > However, i do see it
> > > > > here: http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/
> > > > >
> > > > > Is that expected?
> > > > 
> > > > Yes.
> > > > 
> > > > > did the Storage SIG repo change locations?
> > > > 
> > > > No.
> > > > 
> > > > Until someone tests and gives positive feedback they remain in
> > > > buildlogs.
> > > > 
> > > > Much the same way Fedora RPMs remain in Updates-Testing until they
> > > > receive +3 karma (or wait for 14 days).
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > 
> > > > Kaleb
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ___
> > > > Gluster-users mailing list
> > > > Gluster-users@gluster.org
> > > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> > > > 
> > > 
> 
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] install Gluster 3.9 on CentOS

[Niels de Vos]

On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 06:40:35AM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Just send Niels (nde...@redhat.com) an email telling him you've tested it.

Yes, thats correct. There is no web interface for giving karma to
packages like there is for Fedora. It is best to inform the 3.9 release
maintainers on one of the lists and put me in CC. Once someone other
than me checked the packages and is happy with them, I can mark them for
signing and releasing by the CentOS release engineering team.

Thanks,
Niels


> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Ramesh Nachimuthu" 
> > To: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" 
> > Cc: "Grant Ridder" , gluster-users@gluster.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2016 12:26:03 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] install Gluster 3.9 on CentOS
> > 
> > Hi Kaleb,
> > 
> > I can give the karma. Do you know where these builds are listed in Centos
> > Update system?
> > 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Ramesh
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" 
> > > To: "Grant Ridder" , gluster-users@gluster.org
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 12:06:33 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] install Gluster 3.9 on CentOS
> > > 
> > > On 12/20/2016 12:19 PM, Grant Ridder wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I am not seeing 3.9 in the Storage SIG for CentOS 6 or 7
> > > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7.2.1511/storage/x86_64/
> > > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6.8/storage/x86_64/
> > > >
> > > > However, i do see it
> > > > here: http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/
> > > >
> > > > Is that expected?
> > > 
> > > Yes.
> > > 
> > > > did the Storage SIG repo change locations?
> > > 
> > > No.
> > > 
> > > Until someone tests and gives positive feedback they remain in buildlogs.
> > > 
> > > Much the same way Fedora RPMs remain in Updates-Testing until they
> > > receive +3 karma (or wait for 14 days).
> > > 
> > > --
> > > 
> > > Kaleb
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ___
> > > Gluster-users mailing list
> > > Gluster-users@gluster.org
> > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> > > 
> > 


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users