Re: [Gluster-users] ESXi Gluster setup options

2011-08-27 Thread Matt Temple
Chris Haumesser ch@... writes:

 
 
 The native FUSE client has built-in failover if you mount using the server 
and volume name (e.g. `mount -t glusterfs server1:/foo /mnt/foo`). When
mounting this way, the gluster client downloads a list of all the bricks, and if
one goes down, automatically fails over to another available brick server.Note,
however,
that at mount-time, the client needs to be able to reach the brick server
specified in the mount command. You could use simple roundrobin DNS to 
make sure your clients always reach an available brick.As others stated
previously, NFS failover requires ucarp or an alternative ha 
framework.Cheers,-C-

 On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:37 PM, paul simpson paul at realisestudio.com
wrote:i'm also interested in this.  is there any pro/con to using native 
gluster FUSE client for xen images?  i would have thought that would mitigate
the use of ucarp (apart from initial connect).
 
 
 -p
 
 
 
 
 
 
 On 26 May 2011 21:39, Whit Blauvelt
whit.glus...@transpect.com wrote:
 
 On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 08:28:29PM +, Matt Temple wrote:
  We've been looking for a way to have HA for our VMWare datastore, too. (Our
  single server had a kernel panic last night and took down the VMs.)
  We're very much interested in a similar setup, using Gluster, but I have a
  question ... with Gluster NFS, don't you have to choose a specific 
 address of a
  server to connect to?   And if yes, if that node goes down, how does VMWare
  respond?
 Pretty much the standard thing to do is use a virtual IP address with ucarp
 handling reassignment if the primary node goes down. I've yet to run that
 through thorough tests to see if how transparent it is in a case of failure.
 It's simple to set up though.
 There are, of course, plenty of more complicated alternatives to ucarp in
 the HA world - heartbeat, pacemaker, corosync
 Whit
 
 ___
 Gluster-users mailing listGluster-users at
gluster.orghttp://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Gluster-users mailing
listGluster-users@gluster.orghttp://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Gluster-users mailing list
 Gluster-users@...
 http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
 
All,

   We just set up UCARP on our simple replicating 3.2 server, but when we 
tried to connect to the virtual address as an NFS store from VCenter, the
connection was rejected.  When we used the real ip address of the server, it
connected.
Is anyone successfully using UCARP/Gluster with VMWare for storage using
NFSconnections.   Or are we just doing something wrong?   HA on the VMWare
storagefor the VMDKs is pretty important and automatic NFS failover would really
be terrific.   Doesn't NFS have to much context to simply failover?

(If this were KVM, I'm sure we'd be able to use a native gluster client, but
that's another story.)

Any help would be appreciated.   We could document all the steps to a working
example.

Matt 



___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users


Re: [Gluster-users] ESXi Gluster setup options

2011-05-26 Thread Matt Temple

Krishna Srinivas krishna@... writes:

 
 Troy,
 
 Yes it would work, you can setup 4 servers in a distributed replicated
 setup acting as NFS data store for VMWare. If any one of the storage
 node goes down it will not be seen by the ESX hosts. Many users use
 this type of config for storage HA for NFS datastores.
 
 You can use SATA or SAS.
 
 Since you are using 10gb performance should not be a problem. Backend
 disks would be the bottleneck and hence you should experiment with a
 good raid setup to get maximum backend disk throughput.
 
 On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Troy Swaine troy.swaine@... wrote:
  All,
 
 
 
     We are in the process of determining a virtualized infrastructure and
  wanted to hear from
 
  current users of Gluster and VMWare. What we were looking to setup was an HA
  ESXi cluster
 
  (2 heads) with gluster backend (4 bricks to start, replicated/distributed),
  all backend connectivity
  would be 10Gbe. Mainly the storage would be for VM images but may include
  NAS files later.
 
  Thanks,
 
  Troy


Hello,  

We've been looking for a way to have HA for our VMWare datastore, too. (Our
single server had a kernel panic last night and took down the VMs.)
We're very much interested in a similar setup, using Gluster, but I have a
question ... with Gluster NFS, don't you have to choose a specific address of a
server to connect to?   And if yes, if that node goes down, how does VMWare 
respond?


Matt Temple


___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users