Looking at the answers of the post:
(...)
Gluster 3.2 is known to use only since HCA for the transport right now over
RDMA.
RDMA codebase AFAIK doesn't use two HCA communication points to do RDMA for
the time being.
(...)
It seems as a "limitation" in gluster implementation. I guess using IP as
transport will enable bonding...would it be a workaround?
Thank you for the provided answers,
Samuel.
On 21 September 2012 12:41, Fernando Frediani (Qube) <
fernando.fredi...@qubenet.net> wrote:
> Well, it actually says it is a limitation of the Infiniband driver so
> nothing with Gluster I guess. If the driver allow then in theory should not
> be a problem for Gluster.
>
>
> Fernando
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org [mailto:
> gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org] *On Behalf Of *samuel
> *Sent:* 21 September 2012 10:56
> *To:* gluster-users@gluster.org
> *Subject:* [Gluster-users] infiniband bonding
>
> ** **
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Reading this post:
> http://community.gluster.org/q/port-bonding-link-aggregation-transport-rdma-ib-verbs/
>
> It says that gluster 3.2 does not support bonding of infiniband ports.
>
> Does anyone knows whether 3.3 has changed this limitation? Is there any
> other place where to find information about this subject?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Samuel.
>
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
