Re: [Gluster-users] other cluster fs-- was - No space left on device (when there is actually lots of free space)
On 09/04/2010, at 9:49 AM, Ian Rogers wrote: > It would be interesting to compare against - > http://www.gluster.com/community/documentation/index.php/GlusterFS_1.3.pre2-VERGACION_vs_Lustre-1.4.9.1_Various_Benchmarks > > Ian I'm not so sure - I may have missed something, but that comparison gives no information on the configuration of storage under GlusterFS or Lustre and no further information on the testing methods used... Tom ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] other cluster fs-- was - No space left on device (when there is actually lots of free space)
It would be interesting to compare against - http://www.gluster.com/community/documentation/index.php/GlusterFS_1.3.pre2-VERGACION_vs_Lustre-1.4.9.1_Various_Benchmarks Ian On 08/04/2010 15:30, Burnash, James wrote: I'm actually working on this as we speak. Stay tuned. James -Original Message- From: gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org] On Behalf Of Kali Hernandez Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 3:52 AM To: gluster-users@gluster.org Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] other cluster fs-- was - No space left on device (when there is actually lots of free space) Hi Ron, Thanks for your suggestion, I might take a look on Ceph. However, while looking for a good alternative on Glusterfs, I found that the most mature, widely used and well documented alternative is Lustre. It seems pretty cool and the only drawback is having to compile kernel modules (which some times is just not an option). Did anyone made a good benchmark between Lustre and Gluster? -kali- El 08/04/2010 10:14, Ronald Pottol escribió: Ceph just got in to the Linux kernel. It claims not to be prod ready either, but not sure how true that is. It does look like it will handle things better than gluster. home page: http://ceph.newdream.net/ wiki: http://ceph.newdream.net/wiki/Main_Page Mailing list: http://marc.info/?l=ceph-devel&r=1&b=201004&w=2 I'm slowly heading towards having to install and test the two of them. keep us informed, Ron ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users DISCLAIMER: This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please immediately notify me and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail and any printout thereof. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. NOTICE REGARDING PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY Knight Capital Group may, at its discretion, monitor and review the content of all e-mail communications. http://www.knight.com ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] other cluster fs-- was - No space left on device (when there is actually lots of free space)
I'm actually working on this as we speak. Stay tuned. James -Original Message- From: gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org] On Behalf Of Kali Hernandez Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 3:52 AM To: gluster-users@gluster.org Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] other cluster fs-- was - No space left on device (when there is actually lots of free space) Hi Ron, Thanks for your suggestion, I might take a look on Ceph. However, while looking for a good alternative on Glusterfs, I found that the most mature, widely used and well documented alternative is Lustre. It seems pretty cool and the only drawback is having to compile kernel modules (which some times is just not an option). Did anyone made a good benchmark between Lustre and Gluster? -kali- El 08/04/2010 10:14, Ronald Pottol escribió: > Ceph just got in to the Linux kernel. It claims not to be prod ready > either, but not sure how true that is. It does look like it will > handle things better than gluster. > > home page: http://ceph.newdream.net/ > > wiki: http://ceph.newdream.net/wiki/Main_Page > > Mailing list: http://marc.info/?l=ceph-devel&r=1&b=201004&w=2 > > I'm slowly heading towards having to install and test the two of them. > > keep us informed, > Ron > > ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users DISCLAIMER: This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please immediately notify me and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail and any printout thereof. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. NOTICE REGARDING PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY Knight Capital Group may, at its discretion, monitor and review the content of all e-mail communications. http://www.knight.com ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] other cluster fs-- was - No space left on device (when there is actually lots of free space)
Hi Ron, Thanks for your suggestion, I might take a look on Ceph. However, while looking for a good alternative on Glusterfs, I found that the most mature, widely used and well documented alternative is Lustre. It seems pretty cool and the only drawback is having to compile kernel modules (which some times is just not an option). Did anyone made a good benchmark between Lustre and Gluster? -kali- El 08/04/2010 10:14, Ronald Pottol escribió: Ceph just got in to the Linux kernel. It claims not to be prod ready either, but not sure how true that is. It does look like it will handle things better than gluster. home page: http://ceph.newdream.net/ wiki: http://ceph.newdream.net/wiki/Main_Page Mailing list: http://marc.info/?l=ceph-devel&r=1&b=201004&w=2 I'm slowly heading towards having to install and test the two of them. keep us informed, Ron ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
