Re: [Gmsh] Single element normal

2020-06-24 Thread Christophe Geuzaine


> On 23 Jun 2020, at 19:44, Sabrina Zacarias  
> wrote:
> 
> Dear all, 
> 
> I am working on a 2D model in which I would like all the mesh normals to be 
> pointing in the same direction. As I visualize them, I noticed that there is 
> a single element from a single surface pointing in opposite direction to the 
> rest. Does anyone know what it means and if there is a way to fix it? 
> 

Difficult to say without a test case...

> 
> An additional point, if I may, is that after setting the boundary conditions 
> and physical surfaces of my model and solving the electrostatic field with 
> Elmerfem, the result I get is either right or wrong (in terms that not even 
> the boundary conditions have the values that they should) depending on the 
> type of mesh that I use (either 2nd order triangles, which gives me the right 
> solution, or 8-node quadrangles, which doesn't and unfortunately this one is 
> the one that I must use). 
> 

Idem.

Christophe

> I would appreciate any help or suggestion that you may have. 
> 
> Best regards, 
> 
> Sabrina
> 
> --  
> Sabrina Zacarias
> Institut für Kernphysik
> Technische Universität Darmstadt
> S2|14 / office 319 
> Schlossgartenstr. 9
> 64289 Darmstadt
> Office: +49 6151 16 23589
> ___
> gmsh mailing list
> gmsh@onelab.info
> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh

— 
Prof. Christophe Geuzaine
University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 
http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine




___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh


[Gmsh] Single element normal

2020-06-23 Thread Sabrina Zacarias
Dear all, I am working on a 2D model in which I would like all the mesh normals to be pointing in the same direction. As I visualize them, I noticed that there is a single element from a single surface pointing in opposite direction to the rest. Does anyone know what it means and if there is a way to fix it? An additional point, if I may, is that after setting the boundary conditions and physical surfaces of my model and solving the electrostatic field with Elmerfem, the result I get is either right or wrong (in terms that not even the boundary conditions have the values that they should) depending on the type of mesh that I use (either 2nd order triangles, which gives me the right solution, or 8-node quadrangles, which doesn't and unfortunately this one is the one that I must use). I would appreciate any help or suggestion that you may have. Best regards, Sabrina--  Sabrina ZacariasInstitut für KernphysikTechnische Universität DarmstadtS2|14 / office 319 Schlossgartenstr. 964289 DarmstadtOffice: +49 6151 16 23589___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh