Re: FudgeLJ in ffamber - Was: [gmx-users] Re: fudgeQQ (again ...)

2007-02-12 Thread Erik Lindahl

Hi,

On Feb 13, 2007, at 6:52 AM, Jones de Andrade wrote:


Hi guys.

Well, I'm not "exactly" trying t reopen an old discussion. I'm  
trying to see a different aspect from it, as the subject indicates.


Since the message reproduced below is the last of the "fudges"  
questions, I'm worried about the fact of the fudgeLJ meaning  
nothing for the simulation.


First, is it true, and there is no way around to get a working  
fudge LJ of 0.5 AND a fudgeQQ of 0.8333 in gromacs simulations?



No, you can certainly use fudge factors with Gromacs.

Essentially:

1. If you do not generate 1,4 ("pair") interactions they will be zero  
unless you specify them explicitly.
2. If you do generate them, standard combination rules of the force  
field will be applied, combined with the fudge factor.
3. If you generate pairs and still specify some interactions, those  
will override the generated values.


Cheers,

Erik


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


FudgeLJ in ffamber - Was: [gmx-users] Re: fudgeQQ (again ...)

2007-02-12 Thread Jones de Andrade

Hi guys.

Well, I'm not "exactly" trying t reopen an old discussion. I'm trying to see
a different aspect from it, as the subject indicates.

Since the message reproduced below is the last of the "fudges" questions,
I'm worried about the fact of the fudgeLJ meaning nothing for the
simulation.

First, is it true, and there is no way around to get a working fudge LJ of
0.5 AND a fudgeQQ of 0.8333 in gromacs simulations?

Having this in mind, shouldn't it mean that the ffamber, the amber port to
gromacs, have a "problem" in that point? Specially because it uses, up to
the point I could see, the same "configurations" in the "default" section?

I have deep concerns on this because I would like to move on to gromacs to
make the next simulations I'm interested in. My interests in gromacs range
from its speed to simplicity and range of analysis programs it already have
(and, of course, the cost of the program). But this specific point is a big
reason of concern to me, and I would like to see it clarified.

Thanks a lot for any help in advance.

Sincerally yours,

Jones

On 12/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> I am puzzled about this. In your opinion, when I  use  genpairs=no,
fudgeLJ=
> 0.5 and fudgeQQ=0.8333, are these scaling factors, 0.5 and 0.8333,
useful?
> On the other hand, when using genpairs=yes, how to set the scaling
factor of
> fudgeLJ and fudgeQQ?$

fudgeQQ is always used no matter what the value of genparis is.

(exerpt from
http://www.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2006-September/023743.html)
Each force-field has its own rules (e.g. gen-pairs and FudgeLJ/QQ), but
these
apply to the information outlined above. For example, gen-pairs does NOT
mean
"generate a [ pairs ] section for the molecule." Instead, it means "If
LJ-14
epsilon and sigma are not present in a [ pairs ] section entry, and
that type of
interaction is not explicitly formulated in [ pairtypes ], then it is
permissible to use the regular non-bonded parameters, and in that case
scale
them by FudgeLJ."

Therefore your settings indicate that coulombic 1-4 interactions will
be scaled by 0.8333 and the pairs must be taken directly from the [
pairs ] or [ pairtypes ] section (and they will NOT be scaled by
fudgeLJ). In your case fudgeLJ does not matter (you could change the
value and it would not affect your simulation). However, I have always
hoped that it is set to 0.5 to indicate that this is what the
forcefield developers have done for you and included it in [ pairtypes
] so that it's kind of a reference value for your piece of mind.

I was assuming that the previous messages were from an Amber
forcefield. Since Amber uses (to my knowledge) [ pairtypes ] instead
of genpairs=yes, I was confused by the combination of genpairs=yes and
fudgeQQ=0.8333.


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

RE: [gmx-users] problem still lies regarding dssp

2007-02-12 Thread sangeeta kundu


"Naser, Md Abu " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  Yes Abu, 
  I have seen it, while executing do_dssp with the .xtc file I have 
seen those commands.
   
  regards
  SANGEETA

  Hi Sangeeta,


Your out dose not say that the programme is really running.
Can you try with .trr and .tpr file and see you get something at
the bottom of the output like:

Reading frame   0 time0.000
Back Off! I just backed up ddQmCBhK to ./#ddQmCBhK.1#
Reading frame  20 time   40.000



Abu Naser

School Of Life Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh EH14 4AS
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +44(0)1314518265
Fax : +44(0) 131 451 3009






-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of sangeeta kundu
Sent: Mon 12/02/2007 9:55 AM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: RE: [gmx-users] problem still lies regarding dssp

Dear Abu and Mark,
  
 You asked me, whether my computer is shared by many, it is not, I think 
the program was not hanged because while executing do_dssp -v as usual Gromacs 
output was given,
  
  ":-)  G  R  O  M  A  C  S  (-:

  GROningen Mixture of Alchemy and Childrens' Stories

:-)  VERSION 3.3.1  (-:


  Written by David van der Spoel, Erik Lindahl, Berk Hess, and others.
   Copyright (c) 1991-2000, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
 Copyright (c) 2001-2006, The GROMACS development team,
check out http://www.gromacs.org for more information.

 This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
  modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
 as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.

   :-)  do_dssp  (-:

Option Filename  Type Description

  -f   traj.xtc  InputGeneric trajectory: xtc trr trj gro g96 pdb
  -s  topol.tpr  InputStructure+mass(db): tpr tpb tpa gro g96 pdb
   xml
  -n  index.ndx  Input, Opt.  Index file
-ssdump  ssdump.dat  Output, Opt. Generic data file
-map ss.map  Input, Lib.  File that maps matrix data to colors
  -o ss.xpm  Output   X PixMap compatible matrix file
 -sc scount.xvg  Output   xvgr/xmgr file
  -a   area.xpm  Output, Opt. X PixMap compatible matrix file
 -tatotarea.xvg  Output, Opt. xvgr/xmgr file
 -aa   averarea.xvg  Output, Opt. xvgr/xmgr file

  Option   Type  Value  Description
--
  -[no]h   bool no  Print help info and quit
  -[no]X   bool no  Use dialog box GUI to edit command line options
   -niceint 19  Set the nicelevel
  -b   time  0  First frame (ps) to read from trajectory
  -e   time  0  Last frame (ps) to read from trajectory
 -dt   time  0  Only use frame when t MOD dt = first time (ps)
 -tu   enum ps  Time unit: ps, fs, ns, us, ms or s
  -[no]w   bool no  View output xvg, xpm, eps and pdb files
   -[no]xvgr   boolyes  Add specific codes (legends etc.) in the output
xvg files for the xmgrace program
-sss string   HEBT  Secondary structures for structure count

"
  
  I changed the permission of   dsspcmbi and dsspcmbi.exe  files , what else  I 
should do? I mean execpt these two files what are the other files that need 
change of permission now these two files has read, write, and executable 
permission, Mark suggested  me to call dssp "by hand", will you please explain 
in more detail?? In order to get taht particular coloured map what procedure 
should I  adopt??
  
  regards
  SANGEETA  
"Naser, Md Abu " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  Hi Sangeeta,

Let me ask you few questions in order to solve the problem.

Are you sure your do_dssp prog were running or it was hanged?
To make sure please try using verbose output using -v option.

Is your computer shared among too many people?

What is the file permission status of dssp?

To find out use: ls -l /directory/where/you/put/dssp

If you see any restricton to file permission change it to

chmod a+rx dssp

Hope this will help.


Abu Naser

School Of Life Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh EH14 4AS
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +44(0)1314518265
Fax : +44(0) 131 451 3009






-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of sangeeta kundu
Sent: Fri 09/02/2007 10:13 AM
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: [gmx-users] problem still lies regarding dssp

Dear All,
 
I do not know whether I am interrupting you again and again by 
asking the same question, but I am helpless , I can not detect my fault, When I 
run the program DSSP it works fine, but while executing do_dssp or my_dssp (as 
suggested by Yang) the program seems to be never ending, intermedi

Re: [gmx-users] loss of information trr xtc

2007-02-12 Thread Mark Abraham

Qiao Baofu wrote:
If I understand correctly, only the coordinate information can be saved 
in .xtc. That means, all other informations, velocity, force, etc,  
can't be reconverted into .trr again.


Yes. Loosely speaking, the xtc format stores only the changes in 
position, which requires only low precision since the positions don't 
change much from step to step and so conserving space. Since the 
velocities and forces can change radically, there's no advantage to be 
gained here.


Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] restarting a sorted shuffled trajectory

2007-02-12 Thread chris . neale
Your specific problem is probably because you sent unsorted  
(=desorted) .trr file to grompp -sort. Due to the order that grompp  
does things, the .trr must already be appropriately sorted at the time  
that it is read in. This is the reason for the complicated procedure  
that I outlined in the description section of g_desort.


Also, and I can't stress this enough: If you want to use grompp -sort  
to start and then continue by anything other than tpbconv, you need to  
use g_desort and NOT trjconv -n deshuffle.ndx. For the procedure that  
I outline you may as well delete deshuffle.ndx as soon as it is created.


I sent more complete information previously but it bounced back. Here  
it is again. Hopefully it is not a double post.


#

The instructions are in g_desort.
http://www.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2007-January/025584.html

I think you misunderstand one key thing: use g_desort to go from a  
totally mangled
trajectory to a totally unmangled trajectory. If you use g_desort then  
you shouldn't need
the deshuffle.ndx file that was output from trjconv and definately do  
not first deshuffle
and then use g_desort. The program really should be called  
g_deshuffledesort but that

seemed like a too long name.

I have by now fully tested this and I use it for all of my large runs.  
The key test that
convinced me is that after I put tens of 200ps pieces back together  
(trjcat the
desorteddeshuffled .xtc files) I use g_msd to calculate the MSD vs.  
time for water and I
get a straight line without any inconsistencies at the shuffle/sort  
junctures. Also I
have used VMD to view independent water molecules and things are all  
looking good.


The benefit of sort tends to deteriorate over time so I find it best  
to do cycles of
about 200ps. This said, shuffling and sorting my runs gives me 100%  
efficiency to 4cpus =
they run 4x as fast as they do on a single node. I can't come anywhere  
near that with

plain runs.

Here is a sample script that I use to run a cycle. After running this  
once through I
simply increment the $in and $out values and run again. Actually I  
have template
submission scripts and then a daemon that uses sed to put the correct  
numbers in the

correct places to make a new input script for submission each round.

I took a look at your specific information and there is not enough  
there. Please specify
how you are doing your desorting. Also, please take a look at the  
source code where it
contains a description of how to use the program. Note that you need  
to deshuffle/desort
to get something that you can look at but then you need to re-sort  
your trr according to
the new sorting scheem that will be different than the last one and is  
currently unknown.
To do this you do a trial grompp that allows you to generate a ndx  
that can take your

normal .trr to a properly sorted/shuffled trr for input.

Sorry that it's so confusing but it's the only way that I could think  
of. So here is the
sample script first and then after that I have attached the notes that  
are included in

g_desort.c.

I am happy that this has found someone else that is interested in  
using it. Please feel

free to direct and more questions to this list.

#!/bin/sh
#$ -v
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/tls:/hpf/tools/n1ge/lib/lx24-amd64:/tools/lam/lam-7.1.2/lib
#$ -v
PATH=/hpf/tools/n1ge/bin/lx24-amd64:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/bin:/usr/games:/opt/gnome/bin:/tools/local/bin:/home/cneale/exe:/projects/pomes/cneale/exe/gromacs-3.3.1/exec/fftw-3.1.2/bin:.:/tools/lam/lam-7.1.2/bin

MYMOL=sys1800
ED=/projects/pomes/cneale/exe/gromacs-3.3.1/exec/fftw-3.1.2/bin
DD=/projects/pomes/cneale/exe/gromacs-3.3.1/exec/fftw-3.1.2/share/gromacs/template

MD=/projects/pomes/cneale/micelle/2huge
cd ${MD}

in="_md25"
out="_md26"
mynp=8

echo "Starting grompp..."

#Shuffle the .trr input file correctly. Assume that it is not  
currently shuffled

${ED}/grompp -np ${mynp} -shuffle -sort -f ${MYMOL}${out}.mdp -c
${MYMOL}${in}_deshuffleddesorted.gro -p ${MYMOL}.top -n ${MYMOL}.ndx -o
${MYMOL}${out}_a.tpr -deshuf deshuffle${out}_a.ndx>  
output.${MYMOL}_grompp${out}_a 2>

output.${MYMOL}_grompp${out}_e_a
rm -f deshuffle${out}_a.ndx mdout.mdp
echo System | ${ED}/editconf -f ${MYMOL}${out}_a.tpr -o
${MYMOL}${out}_shuffledsortedInit_a.gro

#g_desort -f original shuffled will unshuffle
#Assuming that g_desort -f shuffled original will REshuffle
${DD}/g_desort -f ${MYMOL}${out}_shuffledsortedInit_a.gro
${MYMOL}${in}_deshuffleddesorted.gro -o reshuffleresort${MYMOL}${out}_a.ndx
${ED}/trjconv -f ${MYMOL}${in}_deshuffleddesorted.trr -o
${MYMOL}${in}_reshuffleresort.trr -n ./reshuffleresort${MYMOL}${out}_a.ndx

#Create the run input file
${ED}/grompp -np ${mynp} -shuffle -sort -f ${MYMOL}${out}.mdp -c
${MYMOL}${in}_deshuffleddesorted.gro -t  
${MYMOL}${in}_reshuffleresort.trr -p ${MYMOL}.top
-n ${MYMOL}.ndx -deshuf deshuffle${out}.ndx -e ${MYMOL}${in}.edr -o  
${MYMOL}${out}.tpr  >

output.${M

Re: [gmx-users] restarting a sorted shuffled trajectory

2007-02-12 Thread Yang Ye

No. You don't need to "desort" it.
But from your error message, it seems not related to "shuffling and 
sorting" but between your .top and .gro.
Did you "deshuffle" toto_min_formd.gro? Can you check your .top and .gro 
more carefully?


Regards,
Yang Ye

On 2/13/2007 2:05 AM, Alan Dodd wrote:

>From memory, deshuffling, followed by using editconf to change confout.gro to 
a pdb and back again, results in the molecule types all being in the same order 
again (in my case, protein, lipid, solvent, ions instead of protein, lipid, ions, 
water, lipid, ions, water, lipid, ions, water, protein etc).  Actually... I think 
ions might move about, but this process at leasts put them all in the same place, 
even if you then have to check which order the groups are in.  I couldn't say for 
certain if the molecules within a set group stay in the same order, but this can 
at least let you use the same .top with minimal or no alterations.

- Original Message 
From: Stéphane Téletchéa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 5:00:24 PM
Subject: [gmx-users] restarting a sorted shuffled trajectory


Dear all,

I'm willing to do a fine-tuning start for my simulation using multiples 
prX.mdp input.


I'm launching the first run using -shuffle -sort from grompp (with 
pr1.mdp), but i'd like to know how to reuse the resulting .trr file for 
the second pr (pr2.mdp).
I've tried deshuffling first the trr file but do i also need to desort 
it ? (as Chris Neale posted on 24.01.2007 on this list)



So far, i'm getting:

Warning: atom names in ../test_min_deflated26_sol_ions.top and 
../toto_min_formd.gro don't match (HW2 - HW1)

(more than 20 non-matching atom names)
WARNING 1 [file "../test_min_deflated26_sol_ions.top", line 38]:
   23642 non-matching atom names
   atom names from ../test_min_deflated26_sol_ions.top will be used
   atom names from ../OR1G1_min_formd.gro will be ignored

The mdrun was launched after this grompp input :

grompp_lam \
 -f mdp/md_Na.mdp \
 -p test_min_deflated26_sol_ions.top \
 -pp test_min_deflated26_sol_ions_out.top \
 -c toto_min_formd.gro \
 -o fullmd_ions.tpr \
 -po md_Na_out.mdp \
 -deshuf fullmd_ions.ndx \
 -shuffle \
 -sort \
 -np 4

I'd like to pursue the dynamics, so far i'm doing:

cd test
grompp_lam \
 -f ../mdp/pr1.mdp \
 -p ../test_min_deflated26_sol_ions.top \
 -pp test_out.top \
 -c ../toto_min_formd.gro \
 -t ../fullmd_ions_deshuf.trr \
 -e ../fullmd_ions.edr \
 -n  toto_min_formd.ndx \
 -o test.tpr \
 -po test_out.mdp \
 -np 4

Thanks a lot for your comments/advices.

Cheers,

Stéphane

  



___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] restarting a sorted shuffled trajectory

2007-02-12 Thread Alan Dodd
>From memory, deshuffling, followed by using editconf to change confout.gro to 
>a pdb and back again, results in the molecule types all being in the same 
>order again (in my case, protein, lipid, solvent, ions instead of protein, 
>lipid, ions, water, lipid, ions, water, lipid, ions, water, protein etc).  
>Actually... I think ions might move about, but this process at leasts put them 
>all in the same place, even if you then have to check which order the groups 
>are in.  I couldn't say for certain if the molecules within a set group stay 
>in the same order, but this can at least let you use the same .top with 
>minimal or no alterations.

- Original Message 
From: Stéphane Téletchéa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 5:00:24 PM
Subject: [gmx-users] restarting a sorted shuffled trajectory


Dear all,

I'm willing to do a fine-tuning start for my simulation using multiples 
prX.mdp input.

I'm launching the first run using -shuffle -sort from grompp (with 
pr1.mdp), but i'd like to know how to reuse the resulting .trr file for 
the second pr (pr2.mdp).
I've tried deshuffling first the trr file but do i also need to desort 
it ? (as Chris Neale posted on 24.01.2007 on this list)


So far, i'm getting:

Warning: atom names in ../test_min_deflated26_sol_ions.top and 
../toto_min_formd.gro don't match (HW2 - HW1)
(more than 20 non-matching atom names)
WARNING 1 [file "../test_min_deflated26_sol_ions.top", line 38]:
   23642 non-matching atom names
   atom names from ../test_min_deflated26_sol_ions.top will be used
   atom names from ../OR1G1_min_formd.gro will be ignored

The mdrun was launched after this grompp input :

grompp_lam \
 -f mdp/md_Na.mdp \
 -p test_min_deflated26_sol_ions.top \
 -pp test_min_deflated26_sol_ions_out.top \
 -c toto_min_formd.gro \
 -o fullmd_ions.tpr \
 -po md_Na_out.mdp \
 -deshuf fullmd_ions.ndx \
 -shuffle \
 -sort \
 -np 4

I'd like to pursue the dynamics, so far i'm doing:

cd test
grompp_lam \
 -f ../mdp/pr1.mdp \
 -p ../test_min_deflated26_sol_ions.top \
 -pp test_out.top \
 -c ../toto_min_formd.gro \
 -t ../fullmd_ions_deshuf.trr \
 -e ../fullmd_ions.edr \
 -n  toto_min_formd.ndx \
 -o test.tpr \
 -po test_out.mdp \
 -np 4

Thanks a lot for your comments/advices.

Cheers,

Stéphane

-- 
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD.  http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert  Tél : (33) 134 652 891
78352 Jouy-en-Josas cedex, France Fax : (33) 134 652 901
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


 

Bored stiff? Loosen up... 
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
http://games.yahoo.com/games/front
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Nucleic Acids -- Protonate ?

2007-02-12 Thread Viswanadham Sridhara

Thanks Mark, David, Yang, Joern and Maik for your suggestions. Now the
only way I see is to use amber forcefield for nucleic acid
simulations.

Regards,
Vissu.

P.S. : **keywords : Nucleic Acids, DNA, RNA, Gromacs, AMBER FF, MD simulations


On 2/12/07, Maik Goette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 > I don't know how to solve your problem, but merely adding counter-ions
 > because you don't know where or how many hydrogens there might be is
 > almost guaranteed to lead to a simulation that has no correlation with
 > reality.

The answer to the problem has been presented (amber FF port), but I
thought exactly the same...and btw...Mark, the one with the car mechanic
was great...;)

Best regards

Maik Goette, Dipl. Biol.
Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
Theoretical & computational biophysics department
Am Fassberg 11
37077 Goettingen
Germany
Tel.  : ++49 551 201 2310
Fax   : ++49 551 201 2302
Email : mgoette[at]mpi-bpc.mpg.de
mgoette2[at]gwdg.de
WWW   : http://www.mpibpc.gwdg.de/groups/grubmueller/


Mark Abraham wrote:
> Viswanadham Sridhara wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I wanted to perform MD simulation on a DNA structure I found from
>> RCSB.org. After changing C, G, A, T to DCYT, DGUA, DADE and DTHY
>> respectively, I used pdb2gmx to create topology file. It says missing
>> hydrogens, which is obvious and I realized I could not use protonate
>> command as ffgmx2.hdb does not have these residues to be protonated.
>> Is there any other file to add missing hydrogens or Is there any other
>> program which you can use to add missing hydrogens to nucleic acids.
>> The total charge now is -43e, which is quite huge, and I am looking to
>> see electric field effects on the DNA. This will be a lot of charge to
>> neutralize by adding counter-ions, if I ignore hydrogens.
>
> I don't know how to solve your problem, but merely adding counter-ions
> because you don't know where or how many hydrogens there might be is
> almost guaranteed to lead to a simulation that has no correlation with
> reality.
>
> Mark
> ___
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
> interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>
> .
>
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php




--
Viswanadham Sridhara,
Research Assistant,
Old Dominion University,
Norfolk, Va-23529.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Nucleic Acids -- Protonate ?

2007-02-12 Thread Maik Goette

> I don't know how to solve your problem, but merely adding counter-ions
> because you don't know where or how many hydrogens there might be is
> almost guaranteed to lead to a simulation that has no correlation with
> reality.

The answer to the problem has been presented (amber FF port), but I 
thought exactly the same...and btw...Mark, the one with the car mechanic 
was great...;)


Best regards

Maik Goette, Dipl. Biol.
Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
Theoretical & computational biophysics department
Am Fassberg 11
37077 Goettingen
Germany
Tel.  : ++49 551 201 2310
Fax   : ++49 551 201 2302
Email : mgoette[at]mpi-bpc.mpg.de
mgoette2[at]gwdg.de
WWW   : http://www.mpibpc.gwdg.de/groups/grubmueller/


Mark Abraham wrote:

Viswanadham Sridhara wrote:

Hello,

I wanted to perform MD simulation on a DNA structure I found from
RCSB.org. After changing C, G, A, T to DCYT, DGUA, DADE and DTHY
respectively, I used pdb2gmx to create topology file. It says missing
hydrogens, which is obvious and I realized I could not use protonate
command as ffgmx2.hdb does not have these residues to be protonated.
Is there any other file to add missing hydrogens or Is there any other
program which you can use to add missing hydrogens to nucleic acids.
The total charge now is -43e, which is quite huge, and I am looking to
see electric field effects on the DNA. This will be a lot of charge to
neutralize by adding counter-ions, if I ignore hydrogens.


I don't know how to solve your problem, but merely adding counter-ions 
because you don't know where or how many hydrogens there might be is 
almost guaranteed to lead to a simulation that has no correlation with 
reality.


Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www 
interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

.


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] restarting a sorted shuffled trajectory

2007-02-12 Thread Stéphane Téletchéa

Dear all,

I'm willing to do a fine-tuning start for my simulation using multiples 
prX.mdp input.


I'm launching the first run using -shuffle -sort from grompp (with 
pr1.mdp), but i'd like to know how to reuse the resulting .trr file for 
the second pr (pr2.mdp).
I've tried deshuffling first the trr file but do i also need to desort 
it ? (as Chris Neale posted on 24.01.2007 on this list)



So far, i'm getting:

Warning: atom names in ../test_min_deflated26_sol_ions.top and 
../toto_min_formd.gro don't match (HW2 - HW1)

(more than 20 non-matching atom names)
WARNING 1 [file "../test_min_deflated26_sol_ions.top", line 38]:
  23642 non-matching atom names
  atom names from ../test_min_deflated26_sol_ions.top will be used
  atom names from ../OR1G1_min_formd.gro will be ignored

The mdrun was launched after this grompp input :

grompp_lam \
-f mdp/md_Na.mdp \
-p test_min_deflated26_sol_ions.top \
-pp test_min_deflated26_sol_ions_out.top \
-c toto_min_formd.gro \
-o fullmd_ions.tpr \
-po md_Na_out.mdp \
-deshuf fullmd_ions.ndx \
-shuffle \
-sort \
-np 4

I'd like to pursue the dynamics, so far i'm doing:

cd test
grompp_lam \
-f ../mdp/pr1.mdp \
-p ../test_min_deflated26_sol_ions.top \
-pp test_out.top \
-c ../toto_min_formd.gro \
-t ../fullmd_ions_deshuf.trr \
-e ../fullmd_ions.edr \
-n  toto_min_formd.ndx \
-o test.tpr \
-po test_out.mdp \
-np 4

Thanks a lot for your comments/advices.

Cheers,

Stéphane

--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD.  http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert  Tél : (33) 134 652 891
78352 Jouy-en-Josas cedex, France Fax : (33) 134 652 901
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


RE: [gmx-users] problem still lies regarding dssp

2007-02-12 Thread Naser, Md Abu

Hi Sangeeta,


Your out dose not say that the programme is really running.
Can you try with .trr and .tpr file and see you get something at 
the bottom of the output like:

Reading frame   0 time0.000
Back Off! I just backed up ddQmCBhK to ./#ddQmCBhK.1#
Reading frame  20 time   40.000



Abu Naser 

School Of Life Sciences 
Heriot-Watt University 
Edinburgh EH14 4AS 
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +44(0)1314518265 
Fax : +44(0) 131 451 3009 


 



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of sangeeta kundu
Sent: Mon 12/02/2007 9:55 AM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: RE: [gmx-users] problem still lies regarding dssp
 
Dear Abu and Mark, 
   
 You asked me, whether my computer is shared by many, it is not, I think 
the program was not hanged because while executing do_dssp -v as usual Gromacs 
output was given, 
   
  ":-)  G  R  O  M  A  C  S  (-:
 
  GROningen Mixture of Alchemy and Childrens' Stories
 
:-)  VERSION 3.3.1  (-:
 
 
  Written by David van der Spoel, Erik Lindahl, Berk Hess, and others.
   Copyright (c) 1991-2000, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
 Copyright (c) 2001-2006, The GROMACS development team,
check out http://www.gromacs.org for more information.
 
 This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
  modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
 as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
 
   :-)  do_dssp  (-:
 
Option Filename  Type Description

  -f   traj.xtc  InputGeneric trajectory: xtc trr trj gro g96 pdb
  -s  topol.tpr  InputStructure+mass(db): tpr tpb tpa gro g96 pdb
   xml
  -n  index.ndx  Input, Opt.  Index file
-ssdump  ssdump.dat  Output, Opt. Generic data file
-map ss.map  Input, Lib.  File that maps matrix data to colors
  -o ss.xpm  Output   X PixMap compatible matrix file
 -sc scount.xvg  Output   xvgr/xmgr file
  -a   area.xpm  Output, Opt. X PixMap compatible matrix file
 -tatotarea.xvg  Output, Opt. xvgr/xmgr file
 -aa   averarea.xvg  Output, Opt. xvgr/xmgr file
 
  Option   Type  Value  Description
--
  -[no]h   bool no  Print help info and quit
  -[no]X   bool no  Use dialog box GUI to edit command line options
   -niceint 19  Set the nicelevel
  -b   time  0  First frame (ps) to read from trajectory
  -e   time  0  Last frame (ps) to read from trajectory
 -dt   time  0  Only use frame when t MOD dt = first time (ps)
 -tu   enum ps  Time unit: ps, fs, ns, us, ms or s
  -[no]w   bool no  View output xvg, xpm, eps and pdb files
   -[no]xvgr   boolyes  Add specific codes (legends etc.) in the output
xvg files for the xmgrace program
-sss string   HEBT  Secondary structures for structure count
 
"
   
  I changed the permission of   dsspcmbi and dsspcmbi.exe  files , what else  I 
should do? I mean execpt these two files what are the other files that need 
change of permission now these two files has read, write, and executable 
permission, Mark suggested  me to call dssp "by hand", will you please explain 
in more detail?? In order to get taht particular coloured map what procedure 
should I  adopt??
   
  regards
  SANGEETA   
"Naser, Md Abu " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  Hi Sangeeta,

Let me ask you few questions in order to solve the problem.

Are you sure your do_dssp prog were running or it was hanged?
To make sure please try using verbose output using -v option.

Is your computer shared among too many people?

What is the file permission status of dssp?

To find out use: ls -l /directory/where/you/put/dssp

If you see any restricton to file permission change it to

chmod a+rx dssp

Hope this will help.


Abu Naser

School Of Life Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh EH14 4AS
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +44(0)1314518265
Fax : +44(0) 131 451 3009






-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of sangeeta kundu
Sent: Fri 09/02/2007 10:13 AM
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: [gmx-users] problem still lies regarding dssp

Dear All,
  
I do not know whether I am interrupting you again and again by 
asking the same question, but I am helpless , I can not detect my fault, When I 
run the program DSSP it works fine, but while executing do_dssp or my_dssp (as 
suggested by Yang) the program seems to be never ending, intermediate files are 
prepared for some time, but I never got any .xpm files, I can not understand 
whether my system is not working, or I am making any mistake, but all t

[gmx-users] question about genbox -vdwd

2007-02-12 Thread Qiao Baofu

Hi all,

I have one question: when I use the "genbox -nmol 300 -ci a.gro -cp b.gro"
to insert a.gro into b.gro, for some system it gives good results,
while not for others.
On the other hand, the -vdwd opinion seems not work. I looked at the
code of gmx_genbox.c, but didn't find the reason.


From the google, I found the following. The problem is the same as

mine. Who has good suggestions?

Thanks in advance!

===
http://www.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2004-August/011926.html

*The resulting output contains atoms which are too close. The distance

*>*between the atoms is sometimes
*>*as small as 0.01 nm which is smaller than the vanderwaals radii from the
*>*database vdwradii.dat . Not
*>*surprisingly, therefore I get errors when I run energy minimization or mdrun.
*>*  The output keeps repeating the message "tested 0 pairs,  removed 0 atoms
*>* " as I quote below.  I would
*>*greatly appreciate if somebody could guide me how to use genbox properly.
*
genbox isn't that good at randomly placing molecules within a box in cases
like this (are some emails in the archive on this).  It needs a bit of
work.  I use an in house program to do it, works out much better.  Although
I don't have it to give out to anyone, since it is part of a much larger
package that does a lot of other things and isn't mine to make available.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] eigenrmsf in COMBINED ESSENTIAL DYNAMICS

2007-02-12 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar

Hi Sridhar

On 2/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Dear Dr. Tsjerk,

Thankyou for the suggession. I am however not clear with the explanation.
Did you mention the calculation of variance using the mean projection for
the eigenrmsf calculations?



Yes.


The projections of the two trajectories on the combined eigenvectors are
different. But, the eigen rmsf plots with give a residue wise rmsf
fluctuations along individual eigenvectors are also same for both the
trajectories.



This is due to the way the principal components are defined. I suggest
you read a statistics textbook on principal component analysis.


Definetly the fluctuations along the combined eigen vectors should be
different for separate trajectories.



By no means.


Can you explain in a bit detail?



It will help you more to read a text on PCA first. I did give it my
best shot before. The main thing that seems to be bothering you is
what PCA is doing exactly, with which you do have to note that you're
dealing with PCA on a combined data set. To understand that may not be
trivial, certainly not without understanding the basic theory from
PCA.

Cheers,

Tsjerk

--
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
Junior UD (post-doc)
Biomolecular NMR, Bijvoet Center
Utrecht University
Padualaan 8
3584 CH Utrecht
The Netherlands
P: +31-30-2539931
F: +31-30-2537623
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


RE: [gmx-users] problem still lies regarding dssp

2007-02-12 Thread sangeeta kundu
Dear Abu and Mark, 
   
 You asked me, whether my computer is shared by many, it is not, I think 
the program was not hanged because while executing do_dssp -v as usual Gromacs 
output was given, 
   
  ":-)  G  R  O  M  A  C  S  (-:
 
  GROningen Mixture of Alchemy and Childrens' Stories
 
:-)  VERSION 3.3.1  (-:
 
 
  Written by David van der Spoel, Erik Lindahl, Berk Hess, and others.
   Copyright (c) 1991-2000, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
 Copyright (c) 2001-2006, The GROMACS development team,
check out http://www.gromacs.org for more information.
 
 This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
  modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
 as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
 
   :-)  do_dssp  (-:
 
Option Filename  Type Description

  -f   traj.xtc  InputGeneric trajectory: xtc trr trj gro g96 pdb
  -s  topol.tpr  InputStructure+mass(db): tpr tpb tpa gro g96 pdb
   xml
  -n  index.ndx  Input, Opt.  Index file
-ssdump  ssdump.dat  Output, Opt. Generic data file
-map ss.map  Input, Lib.  File that maps matrix data to colors
  -o ss.xpm  Output   X PixMap compatible matrix file
 -sc scount.xvg  Output   xvgr/xmgr file
  -a   area.xpm  Output, Opt. X PixMap compatible matrix file
 -tatotarea.xvg  Output, Opt. xvgr/xmgr file
 -aa   averarea.xvg  Output, Opt. xvgr/xmgr file
 
  Option   Type  Value  Description
--
  -[no]h   bool no  Print help info and quit
  -[no]X   bool no  Use dialog box GUI to edit command line options
   -niceint 19  Set the nicelevel
  -b   time  0  First frame (ps) to read from trajectory
  -e   time  0  Last frame (ps) to read from trajectory
 -dt   time  0  Only use frame when t MOD dt = first time (ps)
 -tu   enum ps  Time unit: ps, fs, ns, us, ms or s
  -[no]w   bool no  View output xvg, xpm, eps and pdb files
   -[no]xvgr   boolyes  Add specific codes (legends etc.) in the output
xvg files for the xmgrace program
-sss string   HEBT  Secondary structures for structure count
 
"
   
  I changed the permission of   dsspcmbi and dsspcmbi.exe  files , what else  I 
should do? I mean execpt these two files what are the other files that need 
change of permission now these two files has read, write, and executable 
permission, Mark suggested  me to call dssp "by hand", will you please explain 
in more detail?? In order to get taht particular coloured map what procedure 
should I  adopt??
   
  regards
  SANGEETA   
"Naser, Md Abu " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  Hi Sangeeta,

Let me ask you few questions in order to solve the problem.

Are you sure your do_dssp prog were running or it was hanged?
To make sure please try using verbose output using -v option.

Is your computer shared among too many people?

What is the file permission status of dssp?

To find out use: ls -l /directory/where/you/put/dssp

If you see any restricton to file permission change it to

chmod a+rx dssp

Hope this will help.


Abu Naser

School Of Life Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh EH14 4AS
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +44(0)1314518265
Fax : +44(0) 131 451 3009






-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of sangeeta kundu
Sent: Fri 09/02/2007 10:13 AM
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: [gmx-users] problem still lies regarding dssp

Dear All,
  
I do not know whether I am interrupting you again and again by 
asking the same question, but I am helpless , I can not detect my fault, When I 
run the program DSSP it works fine, but while executing do_dssp or my_dssp (as 
suggested by Yang) the program seems to be never ending, intermediate files are 
prepared for some time, but I never got any .xpm files, I can not understand 
whether my system is not working, or I am making any mistake, but all the other 
programs of Gromacs like pdb2gmx, editconf , genbox, grompp, mdrun etc are 
going on successfully, problem lies only in case of dssp, I was suggested by 
Mark to try dssp independently on a single snapshot extracted from the 
trajectory,  I took the snapshot of the protein after 500ps  with the command 
trjconv -f md.xtc -s md.tpr -o time_500ps.pdb -dump 500
  (I think the command is correct, if not I earnestly request you to rectify my 
mistake), When I ran do_dssp on this single structure I waited for 3 days, but 
it did not finish and seems to be neverending, then I killed the program, In 
order to get that particular coloured plot of secondary structure

Re: [gmx-users] Nucleic Acids -- Protonate ?

2007-02-12 Thread Yang Ye

Instead of using GROMACS forcefield, use the AMBER port from stanford.
http://folding.stanford.edu/ffamber/



On 2/12/2007 7:36 AM, Viswanadham Sridhara wrote:

Hello,

I wanted to perform MD simulation on a DNA structure I found from
RCSB.org. After changing C, G, A, T to DCYT, DGUA, DADE and DTHY
respectively, I used pdb2gmx to create topology file. It says missing
hydrogens, which is obvious and I realized I could not use protonate
command as ffgmx2.hdb does not have these residues to be protonated.
Is there any other file to add missing hydrogens or Is there any other
program which you can use to add missing hydrogens to nucleic acids.
The total charge now is -43e, which is quite huge, and I am looking to
see electric field effects on the DNA. This will be a lot of charge to
neutralize by adding counter-ions, if I ignore hydrogens.

Looking foward to your response.

Best Regards,
Vissu




___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] loss of information trr xtc

2007-02-12 Thread Qiao Baofu

If I understand correctly, only the coordinate information can be saved in
.xtc. That means, all other informations, velocity, force, etc,  can't be
reconverted into .trr again.


2007/2/9, Joern Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


hi guys.
can anyone tell me if there is a loss of information when i convert a trr
file
into a less-storage-consuming xtc file ?
can i reconevrt the xtc file into trr again and then have no loss of
information ?
thanks for a very short answer
Greetings
Joern
___


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php