[gmx-users] Re: topolbuild1_2_1.tgz decompressing problem

2009-08-02 Thread Vitaly V. Chaban

 Hello,

 I downloaded topolbuild1_2_1.tgz from the URL:
 http://www.gromacs.org/@api/deki/files/40/=topolbuild1_2_1.tgz


It seems you are right. I tried the same and also found the archive broken.



Vitaly V. Chaban, Ph.D. (ABD)
School of Chemistry
V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University
Svoboda sq.,4, Kharkiv 61077, Ukraine
email: cha...@univer.kharkov.ua,vvcha...@gmail.com
skype: vvchaban, cell.: +38-097-8259698
http://www-rmn.univer.kharkov.ua/chaban.html
===
!!! Looking for a postdoctoral position !!!
===
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] reg mopac gromacs installation

2009-08-02 Thread Mark Abraham

vidhya sankar wrote:
dear gmx user , 
i am doing QM/MM using MOPAC/GROMACS when i configure mopac7-1.10 the software using for the interface with gromacs by 
../configure command i got error as follows 
configure error: f2c or g2c library cannot be found . 
solution for the above error would be  appericiated 
reply please thanks in advance 


Solution: install f2c or g2c. Google is your friend. Probably the 
installation documentation for this port of GROMACS should talk about 
this issue.


Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] very strange domain composition statistics

2009-08-02 Thread Mark Abraham

Jennifer Williams wrote:

Quoting Jennifer Williams jennifer.willi...@ed.ac.uk:



Hi,

Thanks for your input. Sorry I should have mentioned that I am using
the latest version of gromacs (4.0.5).

This morning I noticed that the strange domain decomp statistics are
only produced when my simulations run on certain nodes. Below I have
pasted the domain decomp statistics for the SAME .tpr file run on 2
different nodes (each time using 6 nodes)- the first looks ok to me
while the second produces crazy numbers.


Indeed, one looks quite normal.


I have opened a call to computer support at my Uni to ask if there is
some difference between the nodes and for now I specify that my
simulations should run on certain nodes which I have checked are ok.

I don't know if this is something to do with the way I compiled
gromacs or the architecture. I did a standard installation and it
seemed to run smoothly-no error messages. I have attached my config.log.


Seems like some nodes might have a suitable source of timing routines, 
and some might not. It ought to have nothing to do with how GROMACS was 
compiled if the cluster is homogeneous. If the cluster's nodes are not 
homogeneous then the admins should know about it, and have documented 
how to deal with some issues.


Mark


If you have any ideas please let me know,

Thanks



D O M A I N   D E C O M P O S I T I O N   S T A T I S T I C S

 av. #atoms communicated per step for force:  2 x 1967.2
 av. #atoms communicated per step for LINCS:  2 x 20.4

 Average load imbalance: 30.3 %
 Part of the total run time spent waiting due to load imbalance: 5.8 %
 Steps where the load balancing was limited by -rdd, -rcon and/or 
-dds: X 9 %


NOTE: 5.8 % performance was lost due to load imbalance
  in the domain decomposition.

 R E A L   C Y C L E   A N D   T I M E   A C C O U N T I N G

 Computing: Nodes Number G-CyclesSeconds %
---
 Domain decomp. 6 11  852.216  341.9 3.0
 Comm. coord.   6101  594.411  238.5 2.1
 Neighbor search6 11 2271.294  911.2 7.9
 Force  6101 5560.129 2230.519.3
 Wait + Comm. F 6101 1216.171  487.9 4.2
 PME mesh   610115071.432 6046.152.2
 Write traj.6   10012.5771.0 0.0
 Update 6101  264.545  106.1 0.9
 Constraints6101  923.418  370.4 3.2
 Comm. energies 6101  942.036  377.9 3.3
 Rest   61167.866  468.5 4.0
---
 Total  6   28866.09611580.0   100.0
---

Parallel run - timing based on wallclock.

   NODE (s)   Real (s)  (%)
   Time:   1930.000   1930.000100.0
   32:10
   (Mnbf/s)   (GFlops)   (ns/day)  (hour/ns)
Performance: 51.737  6.922 44.767  0.536
Finished mdrun on node 0 Fri Jul 31 13:05:01 2009


D O M A I N   D E C O M P O S I T I O N   S T A T I S T I C S

 av. #atoms communicated per step for force:  2 x 1969.0
 av. #atoms communicated per step for LINCS:  2 x 15.7

 Average load imbalance: 500.0 %
 Part of the total run time spent waiting due to load imbalance:
5822746112.0 %
 Steps where the load balancing was limited by -rdd, -rcon and/or 
-dds: X 9 %


NOTE: 5822746112.0 % performance was lost due to load imbalance
  in the domain decomposition.

 R E A L   C Y C L E   A N D   T I M E   A C C O U N T I N G

 Computing: Nodes Number G-CyclesSeconds %
---
 Write traj.6   1001 18443320128.89043061.8   100.0
 Update 6101  314.1750.0 0.0
 Rest   69223372036.85521534.950.0
---
 Total  618443397799.33643062.0   100.0
---

NOTE: 306 % of the run time was spent communicating energies,
  you might want to use the -nosum option of mdrun

Parallel run - timing based on wallclock.

   NODE (s)   Real (s)  (%)
   Time:   7177.000   7177.000100.0
   1h59:37
   (Mnbf/s)   (GFlops)   (ns/day)  (hour/ns)
Performance: 13.907  1.861 12.038  1.994
Finished mdrun on node 0 Thu Jul 30 01:47:05 2009










Quoting Berk Hess g...@hotmail.com:






Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:49:49 +0200
From: sp...@xray.bmc.uu.se
To: 

[gmx-users] g_wham problem

2009-08-02 Thread accomp lin
 
Dear all
 
Gromacs 3.3.3 seems to have a problem with g_wham and there is a fixed version 
from David Bostick of Scripps. So, does anybody has this fixed version of 
g_wham or is there anybody know that where I can find it?
 
My email address is  accomp...@student.dlut.edu.cn 
 
Thanks a lot

Jiaqi



  ___ 
  好玩贺卡等你发,邮箱贺卡全新上线! 
http://card.mail.cn.yahoo.com/___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] g_wham problem

2009-08-02 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



accomp lin wrote:
 
Dear all
 
Gromacs 3.3.3 seems to have a problem with g_wham and there is a fixed 
version from David Bostick of Scripps. So, does anybody has this fixed 
version of g_wham or is there anybody know that where I can find it?
 
My email address is  accomp...@student.dlut.edu.cn 
mailto:accomp...@student.dlut.edu.cn 
 


The Gromacs 4.0.x series contains a fixed g_wham that can handle the .pdo output 
of Gromacs 3.3.x.  Using this official version might make it easier to get 
technical support, should you need it.


-Justin


Thanks a lot
Jiaqi



好玩贺卡等你发,邮箱贺卡全新上线! 
http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tagline/card/*http://card.mail.cn.yahoo.com/ 






___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


--


Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] desciption of ffG43a1bon.itp

2009-08-02 Thread subarna thakur
Hello
In the file ffG43a1bon.itp, the bond parameters are given like this-
--
ICB(H)[N] CB[N] B0[N]
;
#define gb_1 0. 1000 1.5700e+07
; H - OA    750 
;
#define gb_2 0. 1000 1.8700e+07
; H - N (all) 895 
;
#define gb_3 0.    1090  1.2300e+07
; HC - C    700 

Can anybody please tell me, which one is is the force constant and which one is 
ideal bond length. For describing a new bond parameters , what the values 
I have to provide in the file ffG43a1bon.itp.
The ffG43a1bon.itp is not clearly described in the chapter5 of the manual of 
gromacs version4.
 
Subarna


  Yahoo! recommends that you upgrade to the new and safer Internet Explorer 
8. http://downloads.yahoo.com/in/internetexplorer/___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php