[gmx-users] simulation settings

2010-02-28 Thread politr

Dear Gromacs users and developers,
I want to perform simulation of peptide dissolved in water using NPT.  
For constant temperature I use Berendsen temperature coupling. Do I  
have to define tc-grps for 2 groups (protein and solvent) or I may use  
tc-grps =System.

What is the difference? The person who introduced gromacs to me uses
tc-grps =  Protein  Sol_Ions
but he is not sure why it should be in this way if at all
Can you, please elucidate this issue to me.
Thank you a lot.
Regina


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] simulation settings

2010-02-28 Thread Mark Abraham

On 1/03/2010 12:00 AM, pol...@fh.huji.ac.il wrote:

Dear Gromacs users and developers,
I want to perform simulation of peptide dissolved in water using NPT.
For constant temperature I use Berendsen temperature coupling. Do I have
to define tc-grps for 2 groups (protein and solvent) or I may use
tc-grps =System.
What is the difference? The person who introduced gromacs to me uses
tc-grps = Protein Sol_Ions
but he is not sure why it should be in this way if at all
Can you, please elucidate this issue to me.


There's some quick advice here 
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Thermostats, otherwise 
consult some textbook material.


Mark
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Question about distance restraints, energy minimization and time averaging.

2010-02-28 Thread Arthur Roberts

Hi, all,

This is probably a very simple question.  Does time averaging apply,
when distance restraints are used during energy minimization (steepest
descent or conjugate gradient)?  Your input would be greatly
appreciated.

Art Roberts

Dr. Arthur Roberts, Ph.D.
University of California, San Diego
Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
9500 Gilman Drive #0703
La Jolla, CA 92093-0703

email: aroberts99...@yahoo.com
cell: 206-850-7468
skype=aroberts92122



--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Question about distance restraints, energy minimization and time averaging.

2010-02-28 Thread Erik Marklund

Hi,

I'm not sure if I understand exactly what you meen, but since there's no 
time propagation during energy minimization, time-averages don't make 
much sense.


Erik

Arthur Roberts skrev:

Hi, all,

This is probably a very simple question.  Does time averaging apply,
when distance restraints are used during energy minimization (steepest
descent or conjugate gradient)?  Your input would be greatly
appreciated.

Art Roberts

Dr. Arthur Roberts, Ph.D.
University of California, San Diego
Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
9500 Gilman Drive #0703
La Jolla, CA 92093-0703

email: aroberts99...@yahoo.com
cell: 206-850-7468
skype=aroberts92122






--
---
Erik Marklund, PhD student
Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics,
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596,75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone:+46 18 471 4537fax: +46 18 511 755
er...@xray.bmc.uu.sehttp://xray.bmc.uu.se/molbiophys

--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] NVE of water

2010-02-28 Thread Andrea
Dear users,

for test purposes in order to set up a bigger system, I try to run NVE
simulations of SPC water, but the energy increases very rapidely. My guess
is that the cutoffs I use are not good for water. I that the case ( I would
be grateful for a good reference for suitable SPC water parameters) or do I
miss something else?
My parameter file for the NVE is:

title= NVE
cpp  = /lib/cpp
integrator   = md
dt   = 0.002   ; ps ! = 2 fs
nsteps   = 5   ; total 100 ps
nstxout  = 5000
nstvout  = 5000
nstxtcout= 0
nstlog   = 5000
nstenergy= 5000
nstlist  = 10
ns_type  = grid
rlist= 1.1

unconstrained-start  = yes
constraints  = all-bonds
constraint_algorithm = shake
shake_tol= 0.0001
;VdW
vdwtype  = Switch
rvdw = 1.0  ; rvdw+ (0.1:0.3)=  rlist
rvdw_switch  = 0.9
gen_vel  = no   ; yes
gen_temp = 300
gen_seed = -1
;Temperature coupling
tc_grps  = system
tcoupl   = no   ;nose-hoover
tau_t= 0.1
ref_t= 300
;Pressure coupling
pcoupl   = no
optimize_fft = yes

Any suggesions are really welcome.

Thank you.

Regards,
Andrea Muntean
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

RE: [gmx-users] Anisotropic pressure control

2010-02-28 Thread Dallas B. Warren
Why is it that what you have run with xy rigid and z couple not correct?  
Fluctuating box volume is exactly what you would expect to get, and do get, 
with pressure coupling.

 

Catch ya,

Dr. Dallas Warren
Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics
Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University
381 Royal Parade, Parkville VIC 3010
dallas.war...@pharm.monash.edu.au
+61 3 9903 9167
-
When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a 
nail. 

 

From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [mailto:gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On 
Behalf Of Matteus Lindgren
Sent: Friday, 26 February 2010 8:24 PM
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: [gmx-users] Anisotropic pressure control

 

Dear experts,

 

I am trying to run MD on a protein in water above a flat surface of TiO2 in a 
cubic box with pressure control. All the atoms of TiO2 are frozen and I 
therefore think that anisotropic pressure control must be used. I tried 
allowing box fluctuations in the direction of the normal vector (the z-axis) of 
the TiO2 surface but the box volume then oscillates during the whole 
simulation. The same parameters worked for a simulation of protein+water 
without the frozen TiO2 surface. 

 

How can I use pressure control for a system with a frozen surface that extends 
through the whole box? Ive read the posts about membrane simulations but 
membranes are flexible so I think those suggestions might not apply. 

 

The important part of the input file was as follows:

 

nstlist  = 10

ns_type  = grid

pbc  = xyz

periodic_molecules   = no

rlist= 1.2

 

coulombtype  = PME

rcoulomb-switch  = 0

rcoulomb = 1.2

epsilon-r= 1

epsilon_rf   = 1

vdw-type = Cut-off

rvdw-switch  = 0

rvdw = 1.4

DispCorr = EnerPres

table-extension  = 1.5

energygrp_table  = 

fourierspacing   = 0.12

pme_order= 4

ewald_rtol   = 1e-05

ewald_geometry   = 3d

optimize_fft = yes

 

Tcoupl   = Nose-hoover

tc-grps  = protres RUT solcl

tau_t= 0.1 0.1 0.1 

ref_t= 310 310 310 

Pcoupl   = Parrinello-Rahman

Pcoupltype   = anisotropic

tau_p= 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

compressibility  = 0.0 0.0 5e-5 0.0 0.0 0.0

ref_p= 0 0 1.01325 0 0 0

 

gen_vel  = yes

gen_temp = 310

gen_seed = 1993

 

constraints  = hbonds

constraint-algorithm = lincs

continuation = yes

lincs-order  = 4

lincs-iter   = 4

 

freezegrps   = frozen

freezedim= Y Y Y



 

Thanks

Matteus

- 

Matteus Lindgren, graduate student
Department of Chemistry, Umeå University 
SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden
Phone:  +46 (0)90-7865368  

 

 

-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] Position restrained dynamics crash

2010-02-28 Thread sukesh chandra gain

Dear All,
I am trying to do position restrained dynamics of a protein with 
co-factor in Gromacs Version 4. But after running for a while (1390 
steps), the run is simply stopping.  I am not getting any message  on 
log file or terminal. Please help to identify the problem.

This is my pr.mdp file parameters:
;   User spoel (236)
;   Wed Nov  3 17:12:44 1993
;   Input file
;
title   =  Yo
cpp =  /usr/bin/cpp
define  =  -DPOSRES
constraints =  all-bonds
integrator  =  md
dt  =  0.002; ps !
nsteps  =  15000; total 30 ps.
nstcomm =  1
nstxout =  250
nstvout =  1000
nstfout =  0
nstlog  =  10
nstenergy   =  10
nstlist =  10
ns_type =  grid
rlist   =  1.0
coulombtype =  PME
rcoulomb=  1.0
vdwtype = cut-off
rvdw=  1.4
fourierspacing  =  0.12
fourier_nx =  0
fourier_ny =  0
fourier_nz =  0
pme_order  =  6
ewald_rtol =  1e-5
optimize_fft= yes
; temperature coupling is on in two groups
Tcoupl  =  V-rescale
tc-grps =  Protein  Non-Protein
tau_t   =  0.1  0.1
ref_t   =  300  300
; Pressure coupling is on
Pcoupl  =  Parrinello-Rahman
Pcoupltype  =  isotropic
tau_p   =  0.5
compressibility =  4.5e-5
ref_p   =  1.0
; Generate velocites is on at 300 K.
gen_vel =  yes
gen_temp=  300.0
gen_seed=  173529

Thank You,
Regards,
Sukesh.

--
Sukesh Chandra Gain
TCS Innovation Labs
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd.
'Deccan Park', Madhapur
Hyderabad 500081
Phone:  +91 40 6667 3572

--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Please help me with ACPYPI

2010-02-28 Thread TRANG NGUYEN
Dear All,

I would like to ask for your help to my problem dealing with making topology
file for ligand with OPLS-AA forcefield by following
TutorialAcpypi4GromacsOPLS.

Now, let me show you my steps:
- Getting my ligand.pdb file from PDB
- Adding all hydrogen by PRODRG2.5 Server with GROMOS 87 forcefield, full
charges, no EM, full chirality
- Using antechamber to convert ligand.pdb to ligand_bcc.pdb
(antechamber -i ligand.pdb -fi pdb -o ligand_bcc.pdb -fo pdb -c bcc)
- Running ACPYPI (acpypi -i ligand_bcc.pdb), then obtaining folder
ligand_bcc.acpypi, including my wanted file: ligand_bcc_GMX_OPLS.itp.

However, some problems occured:
17 opls_x 1   MOL   O24   17-0.447600  0.0 ; qtot
-0.186  x
22 opls_x 1   MOLC4   22-0.147400  0.0 ; qtot
-0.168  x
It seems that OPLS-AA forcefield does not recognize what Amber forcefield
have assigned for this atomtype/bondtype. Then, it stopped me there from
running the next steps in order to perform modeling dynamics simulation of
protein-ligand complex in Gromacs with OPLS-AA forcefield.

Could you please help me to solve this problem?

I really hope to hear from you soon!

Thanks in advances!
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] g_sas

2010-02-28 Thread pawan raghav
*I executed the following command.
**
**g_sas -s mdrun.tpr -f mdrun.trr -or mdrun.xvg
***
**
*xmgrace -nxy mdrun.xvg*

*I get two sets of values: one is bigger (black) than the other (red).
***
*I have checked the manual and other sources, but I could not find an
**answer about the black and red line.  If it was written in fine print and
I missed it, I am sorry
**about that. So I want to know is the red lower value, the standard error
or standard deviation or
something else? What does red and black line shows also link the reference.*
-- 
Pawan
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] Constraining periodic cell

2010-02-28 Thread David Chalmers
Dear All,

We are running some simulations using an anisotropic periodic cell.  We are
getting 'cell runaway' with the cell becoming very long and thin.  This
appears to being driven by the electrostatics of the system.  The simulation
then dies because the smallest cell dimension is less than 2*cutoff.

Is there a way that we can apply some constraints to the periodic cell?

Regards

David


  David Chalmers   Lab: 9903 9110
  Senior Lecturer  Fax: 9903 9582
  Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
  Monash  University
  381 Royal Pde, Parkville, Vic 3053. Australia




-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Constraining periodic cell

2010-02-28 Thread David van der Spoel

On 2010-03-01 07.27, David Chalmers wrote:

Dear All,

We are running some simulations using an anisotropic periodic cell.  We are
getting 'cell runaway' with the cell becoming very long and thin.  This
appears to being driven by the electrostatics of the system.  The simulation
then dies because the smallest cell dimension is less than 2*cutoff.

Is there a way that we can apply some constraints to the periodic cell?

Why not use isotropic pressure coupling?



Regards

David


   David Chalmers   Lab: 9903 9110
   Senior Lecturer  Fax: 9903 9582
   Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
   Monash  University
   381 Royal Pde, Parkville, Vic 3053. Australia







--
David van der Spoel, Ph.D., Professor of Biology
Dept. of Cell  Molec. Biol., Uppsala University.
Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone:  +46184714205.
sp...@xray.bmc.uu.sehttp://folding.bmc.uu.se
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] g_sas

2010-02-28 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi Pawan,

The legends are contained in the .xvg file. Try viewing the file.

Cheers,

Tsjerk

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:29 AM, pawan raghav pwnr...@gmail.com wrote:
 I executed the following command.

 g_sas -s mdrun.tpr -f mdrun.trr -or mdrun.xvg

 xmgrace -nxy mdrun.xvg

 I get two sets of values: one is bigger (black) than the other (red).
 I have checked the manual and other sources, but I could not find an
 answer about the black and red line.  If it was written in fine print and I
 missed it, I am sorry
 about that. So I want to know is the red lower value, the standard error or
 standard deviation or
 something else? What does red and black line shows also link the reference.
 --
 Pawan
 --
 gmx-users mailing list    gmx-us...@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php




-- 
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.

Computational Chemist
Medicinal Chemist
Neuropharmacologist
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] g_sas

2010-02-28 Thread Mark Abraham

On 1/03/2010 6:29 PM, pawan raghav wrote:

/I executed the following command.
//
//g_sas -s mdrun.tpr -f mdrun.trr -or mdrun.xvg
///
//
/xmgrace -nxy mdrun.xvg/
/I get two sets of values: one is bigger (black) than the other (red).
///
/I have checked the manual and other sources, but I could not find an
//answer about the black and red line.  If it was written in fine print
and I missed it, I am sorry
//about that. So I want to know is the red lower value, the standard
error or standard deviation or
/something else? What does red and black line shows also link the
reference.//


Look in the .xvg file for the headings for the data sets s0, s1, etc.

Mark
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php