[gmx-users] On the choosing of GPU for MD runs

2013-01-14 Thread James Starlight
Dear Gromacs Users!


I wounder to know some detailes about choosing of the gpu for md with
gromacs. In particular on what properties of the videoadapter should I
pay most attention ? What modern gpu nvidia-series might give best
performance (gtx 6xx, tesla or quadro series) ? Could you provide me
with some bechmarks besides the information present on the Gromacs web
?

For instance with the gpu Geforce GTX 670 + core i5 (4 cores) I have
performance 10ns\day for explicit system with 67000 atoms ( protein in
tip3p water). Have someone better results with common home-like
desktop? :)


James
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] activation energy

2013-01-14 Thread Ahmet yıldırım
Dear users,

Is it possible to calculate the activation energy of a structure using
Gromacs? if OK, how?

Thanks in advance
-- 
Ahmet Yıldırım
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] activation energy

2013-01-14 Thread Felipe Pineda, PhD
I would first explain what do you mean with activation energy. What 
definition do you use?


On 01/14/2013 01:15 PM, Ahmet yıldırım wrote:

Dear users,

Is it possible to calculate the activation energy of a structure using
Gromacs? if OK, how?

Thanks in advance

--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] activation energy

2013-01-14 Thread Ahmet yıldırım
It is the minimum energy required to start a chemical reaction. I have a
structure complexed A and B ligands. I want to calculate how these
ligands changed
the activation energy.


2013/1/14 Felipe Pineda, PhD luis.pinedadecas...@lnu.se

 I would first explain what do you mean with activation energy. What
 definition do you use?


 On 01/14/2013 01:15 PM, Ahmet yıldırım wrote:

 Dear users,

 Is it possible to calculate the activation energy of a structure using
 Gromacs? if OK, how?

 Thanks in advance

 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/**
 Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore
  posting!
 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
 interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 * Can't post? Read 
 http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists




-- 
Ahmet Yıldırım
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] activation energy

2013-01-14 Thread Felipe Pineda, PhD

On 01/14/2013 01:29 PM, Ahmet yıldırım wrote:

It is the minimum energy required to start a chemical reaction.


OK. In a chemical reaction bonds are built or broken. None of this 
happens during a MD simulation.

I have a
structure complexed A and B ligands. I want to calculate how these
ligands changed
the activation energy.
You would probably need some kind of (ab-initio) QM calculation to study 
this. It would be a better idea to ask, e.g., the Gaussian community (in 
CCL) for advice.

2013/1/14 Felipe Pineda, PhD luis.pinedadecas...@lnu.se


I would first explain what do you mean with activation energy. What
definition do you use?


On 01/14/2013 01:15 PM, Ahmet yıldırım wrote:


Dear users,

Is it possible to calculate the activation energy of a structure using
Gromacs? if OK, how?

Thanks in advance


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] DD cells - regd

2013-01-14 Thread Bogdan Costescu
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 10:04 AM, ramesh cheerla
rameshgrom...@gmail.com wrote:
 This probably means your
 constraint lengths are too long compared to the domain decomposition cell
 size. Decrease the number of domain decomposition grid cells

This gives another possible solution. You decrease the number of DD
grid cells by reducing the numbers of cores on which mdrun runs. Or,
for the same number of cores, you can control better the decomposition
using the '-dd' option in case the constraints are aligned to one of
the 3 main directions.

Cheers,
Bogdan
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] PBC for evaporation of droplets?

2013-01-14 Thread Rasoul Nasiri
Dear all,

I would like to ask you that using PBC for evaporation of droplets is necessary?

Please note that the MD simulations are to be performed in vacuum.

I checked the relevant references but in some of them PBC has been
taken into account but in others not [for instance please see J.chem.
phys. 125, 154508 (2006) and J. chem. phys. 134, 164309 (2011)].

I would be grateful if you can tell me advantages and disadvantages of
PBC in evaporation of droplets in the vacuum.

Best  regards
Rasoul
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Covariance analysis of X-ray ensemble

2013-01-14 Thread Lucio Ricardo Montero Valenzuela
Hello. Check your topology file. You should have had a mistake in
matching the atoms.
Best regards.
Lucio.
El vie, 11-01-2013 a las 21:46 +0300, James Starlight escribió:
 Tsjerk, thanks for suggestion!
 
 By the way I've found in the pca.log ( that time pca was done on
 trajectory as well as TRP ( not pdb) files as the inputs ):
 
 Read 30 frames from cam_xray_coors_bb.pdb (time 1 to 30 ps)
 Read reference structure for fit from x_ray.tpr
 
 Analysis group is 'System' (575 atoms)
 Fit group is 'System' (575 atoms)
 Analysis is non-mass weighted
 Fit is non-mass weighted
 Diagonalized the 1725x1725 covariance matrix
 Trace of the covariance matrix before diagonalizing: 350.847
 Trace of the covariance matrix after diagonalizing: 350.847
 
 Wrote 1725 eigenvalues to PCA_eigenval.xvg
 Wrote reference structure to PCA_eigenvec.trr
 Wrote average structure to PCA_average.pdb and PCA_eigenvec.trr
 Wrote eigenvectors 1 to 29 to PCA_eigenvec.trr
 
 It seems that cov.analysis was done also as  non-mass weighted.
 Actualy I extract eigenvectors for further essential dynamics sampling
 runs. In the literature I've found that for EDA eigenvectors from only
 non-mass weighted PCA are suitable. So if its true in what cases mass
 weighted eigenvectors might be used?
 
 James
 
 2013/1/11 Tsjerk Wassenaar tsje...@gmail.com:
  Hi James,
 
  You don't need a .tpr file. A .gro or .pdb file will do as well. Unless you
  insist on doing mass-weighted PCA.
 
  Cheers,
 
  Tsjerk
 
  On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:04 PM, James Starlight 
  jmsstarli...@gmail.comwrote:
 
  Dear Gromacs users!
 
 
  I want to perform Covariance analysis of my x-ray data sets via
 
  g_covar -f trr.pdb -s x_ray.tpr -n index -o PCA_eigenval.xvg -v
  PCA_eigenvec.trr
 
  where trr.pdb is the trajectory made from the 30 x-ray structures
  (only c-alpha atoms were selected. How I could obtain x_ray.tpr file
  for such analysis?
 
  I've tried to use tpr from full atomic model of the same protein which
  I';ve simulated recently. For that p[rotein tpr file have been already
  created.  From that model via make_ndx I've defined only backbone
  atoms corresponded to the atoms in my pdb ensemble. On the next step
  I've used tpbconv on protein.tpr with index file to make reduced tpr
  file with atoms corresponded to the backbone of the pdb-ensemble. Now
  when I run g_covar with my ensemble and reduced tpr file I obtain
  error
  *** glibc detected *** g_covar: malloc(): memory corruption:
  0x7f27df53e018 ***
 
 
  On other hand if I specify for g_covar full-atomic tpr file with the
  index ( where atoms corresponded to the trr.pdb are mentioned)
 
  g_covar -f trr.pdb -s protein.tpr -n index -o PCA_eigenval.xvg -v
  PCA_eigenvec.trr
 
  I obtain another error
 
  Calculating the average structure ...
  Reading frame   0 time1.000
  WARNING: number of atoms in tpx (575) and trajectory (575) do not match
 
  ---
  Program g_covar, VERSION 4.5.5
  Source code file: /tmp/build/gromacs-4.5.5/src/gmxlib/mshift.c, line: 102
 
  Fatal error:
  Molecule in topology has atom numbers below and above natoms (575).
  You are probably trying to use a trajectory which does not match the
  first 575 atoms of the run input file.
 
 
 
  What I've done wrong and how I can define tpr file for trajectory made
  from several pdb files ?
 
 
  Thanks for help
 
  James
  --
  gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
  http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
  * Please search the archive at
  http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
  * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
  www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
  * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
 
 
 
  --
  Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
 
  post-doctoral researcher
  Biocomputing Group
  Department of Biological Sciences
  2500 University Drive NW
  Calgary, AB T2N 1N4
  Canada
  --
  gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
  http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
  * Please search the archive at 
  http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
  * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
  www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
  * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] Re: On the choosing of GPU for MD runs

2013-01-14 Thread James Starlight
1)As I understood from nvidia site at present time GPU's from the
tesla serie are the best for the calculations like md. For instasnce
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 have performance ~ 1 TFLOPS in the
single-precission calculations. I wounder to know how many 8-core CPU
must have typical cluster to obtain such performance ? Have someone
tried to use tesla GPU with gromacs ? What real performance in ns\day
have been obtained with the explicit solvent systems?


2) Today I performed test gpu-based calculation with 2 different gpu's
( GTX 670 vs GT 640). Both of that gpu's have the same GPU frequency
but GTX 670 has 256 bit memory interface width with ddr5 ram worked on
higher frequency. As the result I've obtained 50% more perfomance with
the GTX 670. Does the memory interface width as well as ram frequency
affect on total GPU performance in addition to GPU frequency?

James



2013/1/14 James Starlight jmsstarli...@gmail.com:
 Dear Gromacs Users!


 I wounder to know some detailes about choosing of the gpu for md with
 gromacs. In particular on what properties of the videoadapter should I
 pay most attention ? What modern gpu nvidia-series might give best
 performance (gtx 6xx, tesla or quadro series) ? Could you provide me
 with some bechmarks besides the information present on the Gromacs web
 ?

 For instance with the gpu Geforce GTX 670 + core i5 (4 cores) I have
 performance 10ns\day for explicit system with 67000 atoms ( protein in
 tip3p water). Have someone better results with common home-like
 desktop? :)


 James
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] Turn on pdb output after every step

2013-01-14 Thread santhosh
Hello 

For some reasons, I want to output pdb file output after every step of the
MD run. After searching the forum, I found that Gromacs does that only in
some circumstances(like when the system is about to crash or already
crashed). 
http://gromacs.5086.n6.nabble.com/turn-off-pdb-output-td4417229.html#a4417301

Is there a way I could have a control on that by changing a flag and can I
write only the protein part ignoring the solvent? 
Thanks
Santhosh





--
View this message in context: 
http://gromacs.5086.n6.nabble.com/Turn-on-pdb-output-after-every-step-tp5004542.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Turn on pdb output after every step

2013-01-14 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 1/14/13 3:02 PM, santhosh wrote:

Hello

For some reasons, I want to output pdb file output after every step of the
MD run. After searching the forum, I found that Gromacs does that only in
some circumstances(like when the system is about to crash or already
crashed).
http://gromacs.5086.n6.nabble.com/turn-off-pdb-output-td4417229.html#a4417301

Is there a way I could have a control on that by changing a flag and can I
write only the protein part ignoring the solvent?


Why not just set nstxtcout = 1 with xtc-grps = Protein?  trjconv -sep will then 
write separate coordinate files in whatever format you choose after the run. 
Anything else would require modification of the code.


-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] Re: Turn on pdb output after every step

2013-01-14 Thread santhosh
@Justin : Thanks for your time but I think I was a little unclear. 

I want to output pdb during the run. Before every integration step, I want
to output the current configuration of the system. 

(This would make the system slow but right now thats not my concern). 



--
View this message in context: 
http://gromacs.5086.n6.nabble.com/Turn-on-pdb-output-after-every-step-tp5004542p5004544.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Re: Turn on pdb output after every step

2013-01-14 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 1/14/13 3:23 PM, santhosh wrote:

@Justin : Thanks for your time but I think I was a little unclear.

I want to output pdb during the run. Before every integration step, I want
to output the current configuration of the system.

(This would make the system slow but right now thats not my concern).




Then, as I said, you will likely have to modify the code.  The emergency dump of 
.pdb files is probably not going to be useful in any way, and the environment 
variable that controls its behavior only turns it off, not on.


-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Re: Adding a new water model to gromacs

2013-01-14 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 1/14/13 9:04 PM, learnmd wrote:

Justin,
Thanks for the direction.

So, I have now edited spc template to create a new model called spchw.

The spchw.itp for amber99 forcefield now looks like this:

[ moleculetype ]
; molname nrexcl
SOL 2

[ atoms ]
; id  at type res nr  res name  at name  cg nr  chargemass
   1   OW_spch  1   SOL   OW   1  -0.870   15.99940
   2   HW_spch  1   SOL   HW1  1   0.4352.00800
   3   HW_spch  1   SOL   HW2  1   0.4352.00800

#ifndef FLEXIBLE

[ settles ]
; OW funct doh dhh
1   1   0.1 0.16330

[ exclusions ]
1 2 3
2 1 3
3 1 2

#else

[ bonds ]
; i j   funct   length  force.c.
1   2   1   0.1 345000  0.1 345000
1   3   1   0.1 345000  0.1 345000

[ angles ]
; i j   k   funct   angle   force.c.
2   1   3   1   109.43  383 109.47  383

#endif

I have also edited the ffnonbonded.itp file for amber99 to include this
model

  atomtypes ]
; name  at.num  mass charge ptype  sigma  epsilon
Br  35  79.900.  A   0.0e+00  0.0e+00
; spch water - use only with spch.itp  settles
OW_spch   8  15.9994  0.  A   3.16557e-01  6.50629e-01
HW_spch   1   2.0080  0.  A   0.0e+00  0.0e+00

Please advise if this is sufficient.



In principle.  Try it and see.

-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] make a movie from vmd

2013-01-14 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 1/14/13 9:22 PM, Nur Syafiqah Abdul Ghani wrote:

Hi guys,

Can you suggest me how to make a movie from the vmd to the slide presentation?
Well, when I opened the trajectories of the protien with xtc file it
show the movement.But how i can save it as a movie to present with
other peoples?



VMD has several tutorials for making movies - apply Google here.  There's a VMD 
mailing list that is more appropriate for these questions.


-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists