Re: [gmx-users] Re: The molecule size (jiqing)

2006-09-19 Thread :)




》Has this force field been demonstrated to be effective for this sort 
ofsimulation? If not, maybe you've begun to demonstrate that it 
isn't?Mark

Yes , you are quite right. In GMX manual 3.2, 
at the end of chapter 4, it was said thatgromos96 is not, however, 
recommended for use with long alkanes and lipids.
So user has to validate force parameters. Now 
the problem is for a periodic boundary system, the density is ok but the Rg is 
too small. I feel the parameters for proper dihedrals need to be improved. Is it 
right?

*Ji 
QingInstitute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of SciencesTel: 
0086-10-62562894 
,82618423*
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] The molecule size

2006-09-18 Thread :)



 Hi: 
 Two melt models were built for polyethylene (PE) and  
polyvinylmethylether (PVME) melt with PBC condition .  The 
density of both melt model agree with experimenal value well.But  when 
one check the radius of gyration (Rg) of them, both of them were  too 
small to accept as follows.  The Rg for PE (C1000) is just 
28 angstrom. It means the infinite  charaterastic ratio (Cinf) for the 
polymer is just about 2 which is much  smaller than scatter experimental 
value about 7.  The Rg for PVME (C44) melt is about 6.6 
angstrom. It means the Cinf for  the polymer is just 2.5 which is much 
smaller than scatter experimental  value 8-10.  
Can these results be accepted?  Is there any fault in 
force field? gromos96aUsually a garbage result as output means that you 
had either garbage asinput, or garbage for the algorithm. Find a published 
article thatdescribes a similar simulation and adapt their method 
suitably.Otherwise describe your method more thoroughly (e.g. how large was 
thebox, what ensemble did you use, equilibration regime, etc.) and 
maybesomeone has some judgement they can share with 
you.Mark

Hi Mark:
Thanks for your advise. Because 
the PE model is built by one of my officemate, i did not konw its 
details.

The cell length about my PVME 
model is 4.5 nm which is big enough for a PVME chain possesses all trans 
conformation. The ensemble is NVT with the control file Pcoupl= no after 
10ns NPT simulation to reach the experimental density. The runtime for NVT is 
5ns from which the relax time for end to end vector is anaylzed. The relax 
time is about 1ns. So i think the system has been relaxed 
enough.

Is there any error in my 
process?

Maybe the residue parameter for 
PVME is also needed for discuss. They are:

[ VME ] [ atoms 
] 
; atom type 
charge cgnr CN Gasteiger 
 CAB CH1 
0.142 1 ; 
CN CAA CH2 
0.035 1 ; 
CN OAD OE 
-0.352 1 ; 
CN CAC CH3 
0.174 1 ; 
CN [ bonds 
] 
; ai aj 
fu 
 CAA CAB 
gb_27  
CAB OAD 
gb_53  
CAC OAD gb_53  
CAB +CAA gb_27 
 [ angles 
] 
; ai aj ak fu c0, c1, 
... 
 CAA CAB OAD ga_30 
 CAB OAD CAC ga_10 
 OAD CAB +CAA 
ga_30 CAA CAB +CAA 
ga_15 CAB +CAA +CAB ga_15 


 [ 
dihedrals ]; ai aj ak al fu c0, 
c1, m, ... CAA CAB OAD CAC 
gd_13 CAA CAB +CAA +CAB gd_34+CAA 
CAB OAD CAC gd_13CAB +CAA +CAB 
+OAD gd_1

*Ji 
QingInstitute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of SciencesTel: 
0086-10-62562894 
,82618423*
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] Re: The molecule size (jiqing)

2006-09-18 Thread :)



Hi:Two melt models were built for 
polyethylene (PE) and  polyvinylmethylether (PVME) melt with 
PBC condition .The density of both melt 
model agree with experimenal value well.But  when one check 
the radius of gyration (Rg) of them, both of them were  too 
small to accept as follows.The Rg for PE 
(C1000) is just 28 angstrom. It means the infinite  
charaterastic ratio (Cinf) for the polymer is just about 2 which is 
much  smaller than scatter experimental value about 
7.The Rg for PVME (C44) melt is about 
6.6 angstrom. It means the Cinf for  the polymer is just 2.5 
which is much smaller than scatter experimental  value 
8-10.Can these results be 
accepted?Is there any fault in force 
field? gromos96aTwo things,- maybe you need a larger 
systems- maybe g_gyrate does not take periodicity into account correctly. 
extract some single molecules and look at them in a viewer, or write 
your own script to compute Rg.- have you used pbc = full for the 
simulations?

1.The cell length about my 
PVME model is 4.5 nm which is big enough for a PVME chain possesses all trans 
conformation.

2. The Rg is anaylzed by my own 
program, which has been validated.

3.PBC=XYZ
  Usually a garbage result as output means that you 
had either garbage as input, or garbage for the algorithm. Find a 
published article that describes a similar simulation and adapt their 
method suitably. Otherwise describe your method more thoroughly (e.g. 
how large was the box, what ensemble did you use, equilibration regime, 
etc.) and maybe someone has some judgement they can share with 
you.  Mark  *Hi Mark:* *Thanks for 
your advise. Because the PE model is built by one of my  officemate, i 
did not konw its details.* **  *The cell length about my PVME 
model is 4.5 nm which is big enough for a  PVME chain possesses all 
trans conformation. The ensemble is NVT with  the control file Pcoupl = 
no after 10ns NPT simulation to reach the  experimental density. The 
runtime for NVT is 5ns from which the relax  time for end to end vector 
is anaylzed. The relax time is about 1ns. So  i think the system 
has been relaxed enough.* **  *Is there any error in my 
process?* **  *Maybe the residue parameter for PVME is also 
needed for discuss. They are:* 
[ VME ] [ atoms 
] 
; atom type 
charge cgnr CN Gasteiger 
 CAB CH1 
0.142 1 ; 
CN CAA CH2 
0.035 1 ; 
CN OAD OE 
-0.352 1 ; 
CN CAC CH3 
0.174 1 ; 
CN [ bonds 
] 
; ai aj 
fu 
 CAA CAB 
gb_27  
CAB OAD 
gb_53  
CAC OAD gb_53  
CAB +CAA gb_27 
 [ angles 
] 
; ai aj ak fu c0, c1, 
... 
 CAA CAB OAD ga_30 
 CAB OAD CAC ga_10 
 OAD CAB +CAA 
ga_30 CAA CAB +CAA 
ga_15 CAB +CAA +CAB ga_15 


 [ 
dihedrals ]; ai aj ak al fu c0, 
c1, m, ... CAA CAB OAD CAC 
gd_13 CAA CAB +CAA +CAB gd_34+CAA 
CAB OAD CAC gd_13CAB +CAA +CAB 
+OAD gd_1

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] The molecule size

2006-09-17 Thread :)



Hi:

Two meltmodels were built for 
polyethylene (PE) and polyvinylmethylether (PVME) melt with PBC 
condition.

The density of both melt model agree with 
experimenal value well.But when one check the radius of gyration (Rg) of them, 
both of them were too small to accept as follows.

The Rg for PE (C1000) is just 28 angstrom. It 
means the infinite charaterastic ratio (Cinf) for the polymer is just about 2 
which is much smaller than scatter experimental value about 7.

The Rg for PVME (C44) melt is about 6.6 
angstrom. It means the Cinf for the polymer is just 2.5 which is much smaller 
than scatter experimental value 8-10.

Can these results be accepted?

Is there any fault in force field? 
gromos96a

Thanks in advance.

*Ji 
QingInstitute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of SciencesTel: 
0086-10-62562894 
,82618423*
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] Tip5p with gromos 96, error atom has mass 0

2006-09-04 Thread :)



Hi all:
I built a topol file for tip5p water accordint 
to tip5p.itp which is designed for OPLS.But when i used grompp to built a tpr 
file,three errors came even the system just have one tip5p 
water.

The error is :

ERROR 1 [file "topol.top", line 
10]:
 atom OW Res SOL-1 has mass 
0

ERROR2 [file "topol.top", line 
10]:
 atomHW1 Res SOL-1 has mass 
0

ERROR3 [file "topol.top", line 
10]:
 atomHW2 Res SOL-1 has mass 
0

In fact, the mass for all above atoms were all 
defined in atp file. How can i fix it? Thanks a lot.

The build steps are follows:
1.Named the atom type in new tip5p.itp. 
Add them to ffG53a6.atp and ffG53a6nb.itp.
In tip5p.itp:
[ atoms ]; id at type res 
nr residu name at 
name cg nr 
charge1 5p_O 
1 
SOL 
OW 
1 02 
5p_H 1 
SOL 
HW1 
1 
0.2413 5p_H 
1 
SOL 
HW2 
1 
0.2414 5p_L 
1 
SOL 
OL1 
1 -0.2415 
5p_L 1 
SOL 
OL2 
1 -0.241
In ffG53a6.atp 
5p_O 15.99940 
; O TIP5P Water5p_H 1.00800 
; H TIP5P Water5p_L 0.0 
; L TIP5P Water
In ffG53a6nb.itp
5p_O 
80.000 0.000 A 
2.470013e-03 2.278383e-065p_H 
10.000 0.000 
A 
0 
05p_L 00.000 
0.000 
D 
0 0 

2. Write top file.
#include "ffG53a6.itp"#include 
"tip5p_.itp" 

[ system ]; NameProtein

[ molecules ]; 
Compound 
#molsSOL 
1

3. Built gro

5 
1SOL OW 1 
0.321 1.614 0.603  
1SOL HW1 2 0.377 
1.643 0.675  1SOL 
HW2 3 0.258 1.555 0.645 
 1SOL OL1 
4 0.358 1.581 0.554  
1SOL OL2 5 0.288 
1.669 0.574  0.5 0.5 0.54. grompp -f 
em.mdp

Then the errors came.


*Ji 
QingInstitute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of SciencesTel: 
0086-10-62562894 
,82618423*
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] tip4p or 5p

2006-08-28 Thread :)




I want to build a water cell with 4p or 5p.How 
can i realized it?
May be after include *.itp in current top, 
something need to be modified? It was said that 4p or 5p need OPLS 
together.

How can i used it in GROMOS 96

*Ji 
QingInstitute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of SciencesTel: 
0086-10-62562894 
,82618423*
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] The water model with tip5p in gromos96

2006-08-27 Thread :)



Hi everyone:
I found that in tip5p.itp, there is a note tell 
user to use tip5p model with opls force field.

Butwhat i really want to use is the 
gromos96. How can i include tip5p model?

Thanks a lot
*Ji 
QingInstitute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of SciencesTel: 
0086-10-62562894 
,82618423*
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] Re: MD run end abnormally

2006-07-03 Thread :)



Problem has been fixed!

Just add the 'nohup' in front of 
'mdrun'



*Ji 
Qing(吉青)Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of 
Sciences(中科院化学所)Tel: 0086-10-62562894 
,82618423*


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] MD run end abnormally more detailed info

2006-07-02 Thread :)



Hi :
Mark, thanks for your advice.

But i only use the single-processor.And the 
enviourment is RedHat 9.0 with gromacs 3.3.1.

what is other problem of this 
error

Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 15:17:53 +1000 (EST)From: "Mark Abraham" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: 
Re: [gmx-users] MD run end abnormallyTo: "Discussion list for GROMACS users" 
gmx-users@gromacs.orgMessage-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Content-Type: 
text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Hi: I install GMX FFTW 
MPI in my own folders. And then i used a begin structure which performed 
well at other computers to test the GMX programme. What 
is strange to me is that the job can run well at begginning time but 
after a while the CPU was not still busy, and the output file was not 
change. I chencked the log file. There is no reason. And i used g_energy 
to check the condition of MD.But the "Potential"Kinetic En." 
"Temperature" were all in equilibrium. Every time the error came 
with different step. Some time is 5 step. Some time is 2445001 
. What is the error? How can i fix it.It sounds like you 
are using a Windows MPI environment that isn't workingproperly. Test 
single-processor calculations to see they work OK. If so,try to eliminate 
other processes running on the machines, and turn off anyauto-hibernation 
stuff.Mark


祝 

好

*Ji 
Qing(吉青)Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of 
Sciences(中科院化学所)Tel: 0086-10-62562894 
,82618423*


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] MD run end abnormally

2006-07-01 Thread :)



Hi:

I install GMX FFTW MPIin my own folders. 
And then i used a begin structure which performedwell at other computers 
to test the GMX programme.

What is strange to me is that the job can run 
well atbegginning time but after a while theCPU was not still busy, 
and the output filewas not change.I chencked thelog 
file.There is no reason. And i usedg_energy to check the condition 
of MD.But the "Potential"Kinetic En." "Temperature" were all in 
equilibrium.

Every time the error came with different step. 
Sometime is 5 step. Some time is 2445001 .

What is the error? How can i fix 
it.

Thanks in advance.


祝 

好

*Ji 
Qing(吉青)Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of 
Sciences(中科院化学所)Tel: 0086-10-62562894 
,82618423*


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] compile GMX source code by VC 6.0

2006-06-09 Thread :)





Hi:
I tried to compile GMX source code by VC 
6.0.

I found the main function of MD simulation is 
in mdrun.c. And then i compiled it as main file.

But some varier type my compiler can not find . 
Such as :
LONG;TCHAR;BSTR;
BOOL;DATE;
How can i fix it !

thanks a lot

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php