[gmx-users] Can gromacs automatically divided trajectory file into several parts during the simulation process?

2010-08-05 Thread
Dear all,

I am now try to do a long-time all atom simulation. The trajectory file is
expected to be larger than 20G bytes. However, my simulation is run on a
cluster which only allows me to store 5G bytes file. Therefore, I attempt to
divided the trajectory file into several parts but not interrupt the
simulation. Does anyone know how to do?

Many thanks!

Justin Zhang
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] P4_error for extending coarse grained MD simulations

2010-07-09 Thread
Hi Carsten,

The error message I post is got on a single core with MPI.

p0_6991:  p4_error: interrupt SIGSEGV: 11

So it states p0_.

I dont think the error is due to the MPI progrom.
Am I right?

Justin Zhang

在 2010年7月9日 下午4:00,Carsten Kutzner 写道:

> Hi Justin,
>
> what kind of error message do you get if you run this system
> on a single core without MPI?
>
> Carsten
>
>
> On Jul 8, 2010, at 9:36 PM, 张春雷 wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have post this question about a two weeks ago. During these days, I
> followed suggestions from Mark and weixin, but did not fix it. Here, I
> repeat it again to seek more help.
>
> I attempt to extend MD simulation for a coarse-grained system. CG models
> are in MARTINI form. Simulation was carried out on Gromacs 4.02, 4.03 or
> 4.07.
>
> I tried to use check point file state.cpt to extend my simulation. The
> mdrun program can read to the check file. But it reported error like this:
>
> Reading checkpoint file state.cpt generated: Mon Jun 14 09:48:10 2010
>
> Loaded with Money
>
> starting mdrun 'Protein in POPE bilayer'
> 2400 steps, 72.0 ps (continuing from step 1200, 36.0 ps).
> step 1200, remaining runtime: 0 s
> p0_6991:  p4_error: interrupt SIGSEGV: 11
>
> I check the *state.cpt* file using *gmxdump* and compare it with other
> checkpoint files that can be used for extending All-atom simulations. I
> found that in the CG check point file, some sections are missing: *box-v
> (3x3)* and *thermostat-integral*.
> I am not sure whether this missing sections cause my run crash. If it is,
> could any one tell me possible reasons that result in the loss of box-v and
> thermostat-integral and how to fix the problem?
>
> Your suggestions are greatly helpful and appreciated.
>
> Justin Zhang
>
>
>
> 在 2010年6月25日 下午4:45,张春雷 写道:
>
>> Information shown by gmxcheck:
>>
>> *Checking file state.cpt*
>>
>> # Atoms  9817
>> Last frame -1 time 36.000
>>
>>
>> Item#frames Timestep (ps)
>> Step 1
>> Time 1
>> Lambda   1
>> Coords   1
>> Velocities   1
>> Forces   0
>> Box  1
>>
>> *Checking file state_prev.cpt*
>>
>> # Atoms  9817
>> Last frame -1 time 359010.000
>>
>>
>> Item#frames Timestep (ps)
>> Step 1
>> Time 1
>> Lambda   1
>> Coords   1
>> Velocities   1
>> Forces   0
>> Box  1
>>
>> *Checking file md_360ns.trr*
>> trn version: GMX_trn_file (double precision)
>> Reading frame   0 time0.000
>> # Atoms  9817
>> Reading frame    2000 time 30.000
>>
>>
>> Item#frames Timestep (ps)
>> Step  2401150
>> Time  2401150
>> Lambda2401150
>> Coords2401150
>> Velocities2401150
>> Forces   0
>> Box   2401150
>>
>> Is anything wrong?
>>
>>
>> 2010/6/25 Mark Abraham 
>>
>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: 张春雷 
>>> Date: Friday, June 25, 2010 16:46
>>> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] P4_error for extending coarse grained MD
>>> simulations
>>> To: Discussion list for GROMACS users 
>>>
>>> > The last .gro file only provides coordinates of the system. No
>>> velocity is recorded. Actually, what I attempt to achieve is a binary
>>> identical trajectory. So I think the velocity from the last step is
>>> critical.
>>> >
>>> > I have tried another approach in which the checkpoint file is
>>> neglected.
>>> >
>>> > $mdrun_mpi_d -s md_720ns.tpr  -e md_720ns.edr -o md_720ns.trr -g
>>> md_720ns.log
>>> >
>>> > It works. So the checkpoint file appears to contain some error. But it
>>> is generated by a normally finished production simulation.
>>>
>>> What does gmxcheck say about all the files involved?
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>> > Have  you encountered similar things?
>>> >
>>> > Thank you for your suggestions!
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 在 2010年6月25日 上午9:16,weixin 写道:
>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > How about using the last .gro file to continue your simulation?
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > 2010/6/24 张春雷 
>>>>
>>

Re: [gmx-users] P4_error for extending coarse grained MD simulations

2010-07-08 Thread
Dear all,

I have post this question about a two weeks ago. During these days, I
followed suggestions from Mark and weixin, but did not fix it. Here, I
repeat it again to seek more help.

I attempt to extend MD simulation for a coarse-grained system. CG models are
in MARTINI form. Simulation was carried out on Gromacs 4.02, 4.03 or 4.07.

I tried to use check point file state.cpt to extend my simulation. The mdrun
program can read to the check file. But it reported error like this:

Reading checkpoint file state.cpt generated: Mon Jun 14 09:48:10 2010

Loaded with Money

starting mdrun 'Protein in POPE bilayer'
2400 steps, 72.0 ps (continuing from step 1200, 36.0 ps).
step 1200, remaining runtime: 0 s
p0_6991:  p4_error: interrupt SIGSEGV: 11

I check the *state.cpt* file using *gmxdump* and compare it with other
checkpoint files that can be used for extending All-atom simulations. I
found that in the CG check point file, some sections are missing: *box-v
(3x3)* and *thermostat-integral*.
I am not sure whether this missing sections cause my run crash. If it is,
could any one tell me possible reasons that result in the loss of box-v and
thermostat-integral and how to fix the problem?

Your suggestions are greatly helpful and appreciated.

Justin Zhang



在 2010年6月25日 下午4:45,张春雷 写道:

> Information shown by gmxcheck:
>
> *Checking file state.cpt*
>
> # Atoms  9817
> Last frame -1 time 36.000
>
>
> Item#frames Timestep (ps)
> Step 1
> Time 1
> Lambda   1
> Coords   1
> Velocities   1
> Forces   0
> Box  1
>
> *Checking file state_prev.cpt*
>
> # Atoms  9817
> Last frame -1 time 359010.000
>
>
> Item#frames Timestep (ps)
> Step 1
> Time 1
> Lambda   1
> Coords   1
> Velocities   1
> Forces   0
> Box  1
>
> *Checking file md_360ns.trr*
> trn version: GMX_trn_file (double precision)
> Reading frame   0 time0.000
> # Atoms  9817
> Reading frame2000 time 30.000
>
>
> Item#frames Timestep (ps)
> Step  2401150
> Time  2401150
> Lambda2401150
> Coords2401150
> Velocities2401150
> Forces   0
> Box   2401150
>
> Is anything wrong?
>
>
> 2010/6/25 Mark Abraham 
>
>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: 张春雷 
>> Date: Friday, June 25, 2010 16:46
>> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] P4_error for extending coarse grained MD
>> simulations
>> To: Discussion list for GROMACS users 
>>
>> > The last .gro file only provides coordinates of the system. No velocity
>> is recorded. Actually, what I attempt to achieve is a binary identical
>> trajectory. So I think the velocity from the last step is critical.
>> >
>> > I have tried another approach in which the checkpoint file is
>> neglected.
>> >
>> > $mdrun_mpi_d -s md_720ns.tpr  -e md_720ns.edr -o md_720ns.trr -g
>> md_720ns.log
>> >
>> > It works. So the checkpoint file appears to contain some error. But it
>> is generated by a normally finished production simulation.
>>
>> What does gmxcheck say about all the files involved?
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>> > Have  you encountered similar things?
>> >
>> > Thank you for your suggestions!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 在 2010年6月25日 上午9:16,weixin 写道:
>>
>>> >
>>> > How about using the last .gro file to continue your simulation?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2010/6/24 张春雷 
>>>
>>>> > Dear GMX-users,
>>>> >
>>>> > This is Justin.
>>>> > I am performing coarse-grained simulation on a protein-lipid bilayer
>>>> system. This is a MARTINI CG model.
>>>> > I have successfully completed a 360ns simulation, during which the
>>>> time step is 30 fs.
>>>> >
>>>> > I would like to extend the simulation to 1micro-second. The commands
>>>> I used are:
>>>> >
>>>> > $tpbconv_mpi_d -s md_360ns.tpr -extend 36 -o md_720ns.tpr
>>>> >
>>>> > $mdrun_mpi_d -s md_720ns.tpr  -append -e md_360ns.edr -o md_360ns.trr
>>>> -g md_360ns.log -cpi state.cpt
>>>> >
>>>> > However, I received the following message:
>>>> >
>>>> > Checkpoint file is from part 1, new output files will be suffixed
>>>> part0002.
>>>> > Getting

[gmx-users] Re: P4_error for extending coarse grained MD simulations

2010-06-27 Thread
Could anyone give me more suggestions?

Many thanks!
2010/6/24 张春雷 

> Dear GMX-users,
>
> This is Justin.
> I am performing coarse-grained simulation on a protein-lipid bilayer
> system. This is a MARTINI CG model.
> I have successfully completed a 360ns simulation, during which the time
> step is 30 fs.
>
> I would like to extend the simulation to 1micro-second. The commands I used
> are:
>
> $tpbconv_mpi_d -s md_360ns.tpr -extend 36 -o md_720ns.tpr
>
> $mdrun_mpi_d -s md_720ns.tpr  -append -e md_360ns.edr -o md_360ns.trr -g
> md_360ns.log -cpi state.cpt
>
> However, I received the following message:
>
> Checkpoint file is from part 1, new output files will be suffixed part0002.
> Getting Loaded...
> Reading file md_720ns.tpr, VERSION 4.0.3 (double precision)
>
> Reading checkpoint file state.cpt generated: Mon Jun 14 09:48:10 2010
>
> Loaded with Money
>
> starting mdrun 'Protein in POPE bilayer'
> 2400 steps, 72.0 ps (continuing from step 1200, 36.0 ps).
> step 1200, remaining runtime: 0 s
> p0_6991:  p4_error: interrupt SIGSEGV: 11
>
> I have searched the mail-list, but found no similar report. I also search
> through google, but no answer seems satisfactory.
>
> I once performed extending simulation for all atom simulation, and the
> method mentioned above worked.
>
> Is anyone familiar with MARTINI CG simulation?
> Could you give me some suggestions?
>
> Many thanks!
>
> Justin
>
>
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] P4_error for extending coarse grained MD simulations

2010-06-25 Thread
Information shown by gmxcheck:

*Checking file state.cpt*

# Atoms  9817
Last frame -1 time 36.000


Item#frames Timestep (ps)
Step 1
Time 1
Lambda   1
Coords   1
Velocities   1
Forces   0
Box  1

*Checking file state_prev.cpt*

# Atoms  9817
Last frame -1 time 359010.000


Item#frames Timestep (ps)
Step 1
Time 1
Lambda   1
Coords   1
Velocities   1
Forces   0
Box  1

*Checking file md_360ns.trr*
trn version: GMX_trn_file (double precision)
Reading frame   0 time0.000
# Atoms  9817
Reading frame2000 time 30.000


Item#frames Timestep (ps)
Step  2401150
Time  2401150
Lambda2401150
Coords2401150
Velocities2401150
Forces   0
Box   2401150

Is anything wrong?


2010/6/25 Mark Abraham 

>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: 张春雷 
> Date: Friday, June 25, 2010 16:46
> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] P4_error for extending coarse grained MD
> simulations
> To: Discussion list for GROMACS users 
>
> > The last .gro file only provides coordinates of the system. No velocity
> is recorded. Actually, what I attempt to achieve is a binary identical
> trajectory. So I think the velocity from the last step is critical.
> >
> > I have tried another approach in which the checkpoint file is neglected.
> >
> > $mdrun_mpi_d -s md_720ns.tpr  -e md_720ns.edr -o md_720ns.trr -g
> md_720ns.log
> >
> > It works. So the checkpoint file appears to contain some error. But it
> is generated by a normally finished production simulation.
>
> What does gmxcheck say about all the files involved?
>
> Mark
>
>
> > Have  you encountered similar things?
> >
> > Thank you for your suggestions!
> >
> >
> >
> > 在 2010年6月25日 上午9:16,weixin 写道:
>
>> >
>> > How about using the last .gro file to continue your simulation?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2010/6/24 张春雷 
>>
>>> > Dear GMX-users,
>>> >
>>> > This is Justin.
>>> > I am performing coarse-grained simulation on a protein-lipid bilayer
>>> system. This is a MARTINI CG model.
>>> > I have successfully completed a 360ns simulation, during which the
>>> time step is 30 fs.
>>> >
>>> > I would like to extend the simulation to 1micro-second. The commands I
>>> used are:
>>> >
>>> > $tpbconv_mpi_d -s md_360ns.tpr -extend 36 -o md_720ns.tpr
>>> >
>>> > $mdrun_mpi_d -s md_720ns.tpr  -append -e md_360ns.edr -o md_360ns.trr
>>> -g md_360ns.log -cpi state.cpt
>>> >
>>> > However, I received the following message:
>>> >
>>> > Checkpoint file is from part 1, new output files will be suffixed
>>> part0002.
>>> > Getting Loaded...
>>> > Reading file md_720ns.tpr, VERSION 4.0.3 (double precision)
>>> >
>>> > Reading checkpoint file state.cpt generated: Mon Jun 14 09:48:10 2010
>>> >
>>> > Loaded with Money
>>> >
>>> > starting mdrun 'Protein in POPE bilayer'
>>> > 2400 steps, 72.0 ps (continuing from step 1200, 36.0
>>> ps).
>>> > step 1200, remaining runtime: 0 s
>>> > p0_6991:  p4_error: interrupt SIGSEGV: 11
>>> >
>>> > I have searched the mail-list, but found no similar report. I also
>>> search through google, but no answer seems satisfactory.
>>> >
>>> > I once performed extending simulation for all atom simulation, and the
>>> method mentioned above worked.
>>> >
>>> > Is anyone familiar with MARTINI CG simulation?
>>> > Could you give me some suggestions?
>>> >
>>> > Many thanks!
>>> >
>>> > Justin
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
>>> > http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users<http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users>
>>> > Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
>>> posting!
>>> > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>>> > www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
>>> > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>>>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
>> > http

Re: [gmx-users] Optimizing system size by moving from rectangular to hexagonal cells

2010-06-25 Thread
I think you may try "trjconv -ur".

2010/6/25 Marc Baaden 

>
> Dear All,
>
> Trying to optimize some simulation systems, I noticed that I could
> actually gain quite some degrees of freedom by changing the xy
> dimension of my simulation system from square/rectangular to hexagonal.
> I wonder how one would do that in order to preserve at best the
> properties of an already equilibrated system with a rectangular
> xy-plane. Can Gromacs simply "cut" a hexagonal patch out of a periodic
> simulation box with rectangular geometry?
> Which tool would one use for this task? Editconf, with options eg
> -c -box a b c -angles 120 120 90 ?
>
> Thank you very much in advance,
>  Marc Baaden
>
> --
>  Dr. Marc Baaden  - Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, Paris
>  mailto:baa...@smplinux.de  -  http://www.baaden.ibpc.fr
>  FAX: +33 15841 5026  -  Tel: +33 15841 5176  ou  +33 609 843217
>
>
> --
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] P4_error for extending coarse grained MD simulations

2010-06-24 Thread
The last .gro file only provides coordinates of the system. No velocity is
recorded. Actually, what I attempt to achieve is a binary identical
trajectory. So I think the velocity from the last step is critical.

I have tried another approach in which the checkpoint file is neglected.

$mdrun_mpi_d -s md_720ns.tpr  -e md_720ns.edr -o md_720ns.trr -g
md_720ns.log

It works. So the checkpoint file appears to contain some error. But it is
generated by a normally finished production simulation.
Have  you encountered similar things?

Thank you for your suggestions!



在 2010年6月25日 上午9:16,weixin 写道:

>
> How about using the last .gro file to continue your simulation?
>
>
>
> 2010/6/24 张春雷 
>
>> Dear GMX-users,
>>
>> This is Justin.
>> I am performing coarse-grained simulation on a protein-lipid bilayer
>> system. This is a MARTINI CG model.
>> I have successfully completed a 360ns simulation, during which the time
>> step is 30 fs.
>>
>> I would like to extend the simulation to 1micro-second. The commands I
>> used are:
>>
>> $tpbconv_mpi_d -s md_360ns.tpr -extend 36 -o md_720ns.tpr
>>
>> $mdrun_mpi_d -s md_720ns.tpr  -append -e md_360ns.edr -o md_360ns.trr -g
>> md_360ns.log -cpi state.cpt
>>
>> However, I received the following message:
>>
>> Checkpoint file is from part 1, new output files will be suffixed
>> part0002.
>> Getting Loaded...
>> Reading file md_720ns.tpr, VERSION 4.0.3 (double precision)
>>
>> Reading checkpoint file state.cpt generated: Mon Jun 14 09:48:10 2010
>>
>> Loaded with Money
>>
>> starting mdrun 'Protein in POPE bilayer'
>> 2400 steps, 72.0 ps (continuing from step 1200, 36.0 ps).
>> step 1200, remaining runtime: 0 s
>> p0_6991:  p4_error: interrupt SIGSEGV: 11
>>
>> I have searched the mail-list, but found no similar report. I also search
>> through google, but no answer seems satisfactory.
>>
>> I once performed extending simulation for all atom simulation, and the
>> method mentioned above worked.
>>
>> Is anyone familiar with MARTINI CG simulation?
>> Could you give me some suggestions?
>>
>> Many thanks!
>>
>> Justin
>>
>> --
>> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
>> posting!
>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
>> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>>
>
>
> --
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] P4_error for extending coarse grained MD simulations

2010-06-24 Thread
Dear GMX-users,

This is Justin.
I am performing coarse-grained simulation on a protein-lipid bilayer system.
This is a MARTINI CG model.
I have successfully completed a 360ns simulation, during which the time step
is 30 fs.

I would like to extend the simulation to 1micro-second. The commands I used
are:

$tpbconv_mpi_d -s md_360ns.tpr -extend 36 -o md_720ns.tpr

$mdrun_mpi_d -s md_720ns.tpr  -append -e md_360ns.edr -o md_360ns.trr -g
md_360ns.log -cpi state.cpt

However, I received the following message:

Checkpoint file is from part 1, new output files will be suffixed part0002.
Getting Loaded...
Reading file md_720ns.tpr, VERSION 4.0.3 (double precision)

Reading checkpoint file state.cpt generated: Mon Jun 14 09:48:10 2010

Loaded with Money

starting mdrun 'Protein in POPE bilayer'
2400 steps, 72.0 ps (continuing from step 1200, 36.0 ps).
step 1200, remaining runtime: 0 s
p0_6991:  p4_error: interrupt SIGSEGV: 11

I have searched the mail-list, but found no similar report. I also search
through google, but no answer seems satisfactory.

I once performed extending simulation for all atom simulation, and the
method mentioned above worked.

Is anyone familiar with MARTINI CG simulation?
Could you give me some suggestions?

Many thanks!

Justin
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php