[gmx-users] Color in wheel

2008-02-21 Thread Hwankyu Lee

Dear GMX-users,

In wheel (helical projection tool), can I make colors for some 
residues?  Besides gray for hydrophobic residues, I also want to make 
positive charged residues in blue, and negative charged residues in red.

Thank you for your help in advance.

best,
Hwankyu.

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] time constants for the Parrinello-Rahman/nose-hoover coupling

2007-10-21 Thread Hwankyu Lee

Dear GMX-users,

I'm simulating lipid bilayer, and since fluctuation is important for 
the study of undulation and area compressibility (Ka), I'm also 
applying the Parrinello-Rahman and nose-hoover for the pressure and 
temperature couplings. When I use the Berendsen, time constants are 
like below.  When I use the PR, do I need to change time constants?  
Thank you for your time and help in advance.



tcoupl   = Berendsen
; Groups to couple separately = tc-grps  = DPP W ; Time 
constant (ps) and reference temperature (K) = tau_t
= 0.5 0.5

ref_t= 323  323
; Pressure coupling  = Pcoupl   = Berendsen 
Pcoupltype   = Semiisotropic
; Time constant (ps), compressibility (1/bar) and reference P (bar) = 
tau_p= 1.2   1.2 compressibility  = 5e-5  
5e-5   ref_p= 1.0 1.0 --


best,
Hwankyu.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Measure contour area of bilayer undulation

2007-08-31 Thread Hwankyu Lee

Dear gmx-users,

This is not a question about Gromacs, but I wonder if I can hear 
suggestions from here. I would like to measure contour area of bilayer 
undulation.  If there is no undulation, area (area per lipid) can be 
easily calculated by dividing XY area by number of lipid.  But, in the 
lipid bilayer with undulation, how can contour area (ultimately, area 
per lipid) be calculated ?  If there are some suggestions about 
possibilities in Gromacs or other tools, it'd be really appreciated.

Thanks,

best,
Hwankyu.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] How to make grids in lipid bilayer (to measure contour length)

2007-08-21 Thread Hwankyu Lee

Dear gmx-users,

I'm trying to calculate contour length of huge lipid bilayer with 
undulation (non-projected area per lipid). In order to calculate that 
accurately, I would like to measure contour length in local areas of 
bilayer by making lots of grids in lipid bilayer.  I'm wondering if 
there is a tool or way to make grids in lipid bilayer in the .xtc 
trajectories.


Thank you for your help in advance.

best,
Hwankyu.

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Question about trjorder

2007-08-03 Thread Hwankyu Lee

Dear GMX-users,

I'm using Gromacs 3.3.1, and trying to collect solvents within specific 
distance from a part of peptide.
I typed trjorder -f *.xtc -n *.ndx -s *.tpr -o -nshell -da 8 -na 12 -r 
2.5.  I correctly typed reference molecule, and the result of -nshell 
looks OK, but couldn't get the result of -o (.xtc).

I wonder if I missed something or there is a bug in trjorder.
Thanks for your help.

best,
Hwankyu.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Calculation of the bending modulus (Kc) of bilayer using spectral intensity.

2007-07-31 Thread Hwankyu Lee

Dear gmx-users,

I'm trying to measure the bending modulus (Kc) of lipid bilayer with 
different sizes.  I've found some papers, showing that spectral 
intensity needs to be calculated using the wave vector q, but couldn't 
understand details.  I wonder if I can hear more details and how to do 
that using GROMACS.

Any advice or suggestion will be very appreciated.
Thanks,

best,
Hwankyu.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Re: Re: Calculations of area per lipid using g_sas

2007-07-10 Thread Hwankyu Lee

Dear Mark and David,

Thanks for your reply. Dimension of 128-lipid bilayer system is 
6.32x6.43x8.57nm, which leads to the projected area/lipid of ~63.5 A^2, 
and the box size is consistent during whole simulation time. In order 
to measure total SASA, I typed g_sas -f **.xtc -s **.tpr -o **.xvg 
-solsize ** with different values of -solsize. Outputs are shown 
below.  Here, my questions is 1) With bigger solvent probes, why does 
the total SASA decrease ?  I thought that SASA should increase because 
bigger solvents will not insert into the lipid headgroups.


2) with -solsize 1.9, area/lipid can be obtained from 43.0275/2/64=33.6 
A^2. How can this be smaller than the projected area/lipid, ~63.5 ?


For -solsize 1.5,   -
# This file was created Tue Jul 10 10:25:24 2007
# by the following command:
# g_sas -f test.xtc -s md.tpr -o area0.xvg -solsize 1.5 -b 10 -e 20
#
# g_sas is part of G R O M A C S:
#
# Gnomes, ROck Monsters And Chili Sauce
#
@title Solvent Accessible Surface
@xaxis  label Time (ps)
@yaxis  label Area (nm\S2\N)
@TYPE xy
@ view 0.15, 0.15, 0.75, 0.85
@ legend on
@ legend box on
@ legend loctype view
@ legend 0.78, 0.8
@ legend length 2
@ s0 legend Hydrophobic
@ s1 legend Hydrophilic
@ s2 legend Total
@ s3 legend D Gsolv
   10   0 85.8878 85.8878   0
   100050   0 88.9415 88.9415   0
   100100   0 88.0002 88.0002   0
---

For, -solsize 1.7,
---
# This file was created Tue Jul 10 10:27:27 2007
# by the following command:
# g_sas -f test.xtc -s md.tpr -o area1.xvg -solsize 1.7 -b 10 -e 20
#
# g_sas is part of G R O M A C S:
#
# GRowing Old MAkes el Chrono Sweat
#
@title Solvent Accessible Surface
@xaxis  label Time (ps)
@yaxis  label Area (nm\S2\N)
@TYPE xy
@ view 0.15, 0.15, 0.75, 0.85
@ legend on
@ legend box on
@ legend loctype view
@ legend 0.78, 0.8
@ legend length 2
@ s0 legend Hydrophobic
@ s1 legend Hydrophilic
@ s2 legend Total
@ s3 legend D Gsolv
   10   0 82.7674 82.7674   0
   100050   0 84.0109 84.0109   0
   100100   0 85.2114 85.2114   0
-

For -solsize 1.9
-
This file was created Tue Jul 10 10:28:40 2007
# by the following command:
# g_sas -f test.xtc -s md.tpr -o area2.xvg -solsize 1.9 -b 10 -e 20
#
# g_sas is part of G R O M A C S:
#
# Good gRace! Old Maple Actually Chews Slate
#
@title Solvent Accessible Surface
@xaxis  label Time (ps)
@yaxis  label Area (nm\S2\N)
@TYPE xy
@ view 0.15, 0.15, 0.75, 0.85
@ legend on
@ legend box on
@ legend loctype view
@ legend 0.78, 0.8
@ legend length 2
@ s0 legend Hydrophobic
@ s1 legend Hydrophilic
@ s2 legend Total
@ s3 legend D Gsolv
   10   0 43.0275 43.0275   0
   100050   0  47.978  47.978   0
   100100   0 38.3633 38.3633   0
--


Thanks,

best,
Hwankyu.

Message: 5
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:55:29 +1000
From: Mark Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Re: Calculations of area per lipid using
   g_sas
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Hwankyu Lee wrote:
[Hide Quoted Text]

Dear Mark,

I just measured the projected XY-area (simply XY-size of box), and used
typical periodic boundary condition (In g_sas, default considers PBC).
In the small system (128 lipid bilayer), there is no undulation, so
projected area per lipid may be almost the same as non-projected area
per lipid.  So, total solvent accessible surface area (the third column)
should be always larger than the projected XY-area, but I observed that
total SASA become smaller than the projected XY-area at some point.
Could you give me some suggestions?


Show us your box dimensions at a point when you observe this to occur -
or preferably a relevant chunk of both g_sas and g_energy output.

Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Re: Calculations of area per lipid using g_sas

2007-07-09 Thread Hwankyu Lee

Dear Mark,

I just measured the projected XY-area (simply XY-size of box), and used 
typical periodic boundary condition (In g_sas, default considers PBC). 
In the small system (128 lipid bilayer), there is no undulation, so 
projected area per lipid may be almost the same as non-projected area 
per lipid.  So, total solvent accessible surface area (the third 
column) should be always larger than the projected XY-area, but I 
observed that total SASA become smaller than the projected XY-area at 
some point. Could you give me some suggestions?


best,
Hwankyu.


Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 10:23:46 +1000 (EST)
From: Mark Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Calculations of area per lipid using g_sas
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Message-ID:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1

[Hide Quoted Text]

Dear GMX users,

I'm interested in calculating non-projected area/lipid of huge bilayer
with undulations. I think that if the bigger solvent probes were used,
the non-projected area per lipid may be reasonably calculated from the
solvent accessible surface area because solvent probes cannot be
inserted between lipid headgroups, which will avoid overestimation of
area per lipid.  So, I'm testing this with small bilayer (128 lipids)
using g_sas, and have some questions.

1) If the bigger solvent probes (such as -solsize 1.7 or so) are used,
SASA of lipid will become smaller, but should be always bigger than the
XY-area of this small bilayer system.  But, when I increased the value
of -solsize, SASA becomes even smaller than the XY-area at some point.
In this case, how can SASA be smaller than XY-area of the bilayer?


How are you measuring XY-area? What periodicity are you using?

2) The manual says that -ndots is related to accuracy, but when I tried
different values, I don't see trends of increase or decrease.  Could
you tell me what it is and what the reasonable value will be?

3) I saw SASA fluctuate quite a lot. Is there any way to decrease
fluctuation?


Fluctuating with what?

Mark

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Calculations of area per lipid using g_sas

2007-07-08 Thread Hwankyu Lee

Dear GMX users,

I'm interested in calculating non-projected area/lipid of huge bilayer 
with undulations. I think that if the bigger solvent probes were used, 
the non-projected area per lipid may be reasonably calculated from the 
solvent accessible surface area because solvent probes cannot be 
inserted between lipid headgroups, which will avoid overestimation of 
area per lipid.  So, I'm testing this with small bilayer (128 lipids) 
using g_sas, and have some questions.


1) If the bigger solvent probes (such as -solsize 1.7 or so) are used, 
SASA of lipid will become smaller, but should be always bigger than the 
XY-area of this small bilayer system.  But, when I increased the value 
of -solsize, SASA becomes even smaller than the XY-area at some point. 
In this case, how can SASA be smaller than XY-area of the bilayer?


2) The manual says that -ndots is related to accuracy, but when I tried 
different values, I don't see trends of increase or decrease.  Could 
you tell me what it is and what the reasonable value will be?


3) I saw SASA fluctuate quite a lot. Is there any way to decrease fluctuation?

Thanks for your help in advance.

best,
Hwankyu.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Converting CHARMM trajectories (.trj) to GROMACS trajectories (.xtc)

2007-03-27 Thread Hwankyu Lee

Dear gmx-users,

I would like to analyze CHARMM trajectories in GROMACS, and wonder if 
there are available scripts or tools to convert CHARMM traj to GROMACS 
traj (.xtc).  I've searched the contributed software and forum 
sections, and it looks like there is a script for that, but couldn't 
find it.  If you can provide me scripts for that, it'll be appreciated.

Thanks,

best,
Hwankyu.

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] g_sdf

2006-07-31 Thread Hwankyu Lee

Dear Gromacs-users,

I would like to use the analysis tool g_sdf, but couldn't find in the 
download section.   If someone has the file, would you like to send me 
that ?  Does it work with gromacs-3.3.1?

Thank you very much for your help in advance.

best,
Hwankyu.

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php