On 11/07/2012 11:19 AM, David van der Spoel wrote:
On 2012-11-07 10:21, Volker Lesch wrote:
Dear all,
I am a new Gromacs user. In the past I used AMBER, but because of
performance and technical reason I want to switch to Gromacs. Actually,
I have one big problem namely polarisation. In AMBER I used the atomic
point dipole model but this one is not implemented in Gromacs (please
correct me if I am wrong). Are there any experienced data which compare
the two models, atomic point dipole and shell??
Kind regards,
Volker
This is not implemented. The shell model works but with limited
functionality, such that the Charmm model does not work completely. It
would be interesting to have such a comparison although I expect few
significant differences.
Hallo,
thanks for this reply. So the shell model only works for simple systems
like water. Is this correct? What are the exact limitations?
Kind regards,
Volker
--
Volker Lesch
Institut für physikalische Chemie
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster
Corrensstrasse 28/30
48149 Münster
Phone: +49-(0)-251-83-29180
Email: volkerle...@uni-muenster.de
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
