[gmx-users] protonated histidine with Martini

2011-06-29 Thread politr

Dear gromacs users,
I want to use Martini force field for my simulation. The simulation is  
supposed to be performed at acidic environment (pH2.6). In this  
environment His is protonated. I want to add protonate Hisidine in itp  
file. Where exactly should I put the charge on S2c or on S3c? Maybe I  
should put 0.5 on each CG bead?

Thank you in advance.
Regina


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] minimization problem (Martini simulation)

2011-06-29 Thread politr

Thank you very much. It worked.
Regina
Quoting "Justin A. Lemkul" :




pol...@fh.huji.ac.il wrote:

Dear Justin,
Thank you very much for your answer.
Can you please explain me what do you mean by saying "EM wasn't  
sufficient". What information do you need in order be able to help?

I run EM with emtol=60 and I got the following energies:
Steepest Descents converged to Fmax < 60 in 2256 steps
Potential Energy = -1.2244622e+07
Maximum force = 4.7755444e+01 on atom 1659
Norm of force = 6.3245118e-01


This was the information I wanted to see.  Without it, no one had  
any idea if your EM converged reasonably.



Everything seems ok.


Indeed it does.


After that I run MD using mdp file attached and I got the following error:
Started mdrun on node 0 Tue Jun 28 00:10:12 2011

Step Time Lambda
0 0.0 0.0

Energies (kJ/mol)
Bond G96Angle Improper Dih. LJ (SR) Coulomb (SR)
6.39093e+03 9.79589e+03 3.77765e+02 -1.22386e+07 -1.82773e+03
Potential Kinetic En. Total Energy Temperature Pressure (bar)
-1.22239e+07 1.25745e+00 -1.22239e+07 2.55766e-04 -1.14611e+03


Here's your problem.  The initial temperature is ridiculously small,  
indicating something has gone wrong.



Cons. rmsd ()
4.25390e-06

DD step 9 load imb.: force 3.0%

---
Program mdrun_mpi, VERSION 4.0.3


Any reason you're using a really old version of Gromacs?



Here's your problem.  The combination of:


tcoupl   = Berendsen


and


gen_vel  = no


is generally not stable.  You should set "gen_vel = yes" to start a  
reasonable equilibration period.


-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at  
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www  
interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists






This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] minimization problem (Martini simulation)

2011-06-27 Thread politr

Dear Justin,
Thank you very much for your answer.
Can you please explain me what do you mean by saying "EM wasn't  
sufficient". What information do you need in order be able to help?

I run EM with emtol=60 and I got the following energies:
Steepest Descents converged to Fmax < 60 in 2256 steps
Potential Energy = -1.2244622e+07
Maximum force = 4.7755444e+01 on atom 1659
Norm of force = 6.3245118e-01
Everything seems ok.
After that I run MD using mdp file attached and I got the following error:
Started mdrun on node 0 Tue Jun 28 00:10:12 2011

Step Time Lambda
0 0.0 0.0

Energies (kJ/mol)
Bond G96Angle Improper Dih. LJ (SR) Coulomb (SR)
6.39093e+03 9.79589e+03 3.77765e+02 -1.22386e+07 -1.82773e+03
Potential Kinetic En. Total Energy Temperature Pressure (bar)
-1.22239e+07 1.25745e+00 -1.22239e+07 2.55766e-04 -1.14611e+03
Cons. rmsd ()
4.25390e-06

DD step 9 load imb.: force 3.0%

---
Program mdrun_mpi, VERSION 4.0.3
Source code file: nsgrid.c, line: 348

Fatal error:
Number of grid cells is zero. Probably the system and box collapsed.

---

"Step Aside, Butch" (Pulp Fiction)

I found that this error is connected to problems with minimization but  
unfortunately I don't know how to fix it.

I will appreciate very much any help.
Thank you.
Regina
mdp file used:
; VARIOUS PREPROCESSING OPTIONS =
title= Martini
cpp  = /usr/bin/cpp

; RUN CONTROL PARAMETERS =
integrator   = md
; start time and timestep in ps =
tinit= 0.0
dt   = 0.030
nsteps   = 4000
; number of steps for center of mass motion removal =
nstcomm  = 1
; Groups for center of mass motion removal
comm-grps= System

; OUTPUT CONTROL OPTIONS =
; Output frequency for coords (x), velocities (v) and forces (f) =
nstxout  = 5000
nstvout  = 5000
nstfout  = 0
; Output frequency for energies to log file and energy file =
nstlog   = 1000
nstenergy= 100
; Output frequency and precision for xtc file =
nstxtcout= 0
xtc_precision= 100
; This selects the subset of atoms for the xtc file. You can =
; select multiple groups. By default all atoms will be written. =
xtc-grps =
; Selection of energy groups =
energygrps   =  Protein_PSE W_ION

; NEIGHBORSEARCHING PARAMETERS =
; nblist update frequency =
nstlist  = 10
; ns algorithm (simple or grid) =
ns_type  = grid
; Periodic boundary conditions: xyz or none =
pbc  = xyz
; nblist cut-off =
rlist= 1.2

; OPTIONS FOR ELECTROSTATICS AND VDW =
; Method for doing electrostatics =
coulombtype  = Shift
rcoulomb_switch  = 0.0
rcoulomb = 1.2
; Dielectric constant (DC) for cut-off or DC of reaction field =
epsilon_r= 15
; Method for doing Van der Waals =
vdw_type = Shift
; cut-off lengths=
rvdw_switch  = 0.9
rvdw = 1.2
; Apply long range dispersion corrections for Energy and Pressure =
DispCorr = No

; OPTIONS FOR WEAK COUPLING ALGORITHMS =
; Temperature coupling   =
tcoupl   = Berendsen
; Groups to couple separately =
tc-grps  = Protein_PSE W_ION
; Time constant (ps) and reference temperature (K) =
tau_t= 1.0  1.0
ref_t= 300  300
; Pressure coupling  =
Pcoupl   = berendsen
Pcoupltype   = isotropic
; Time constant (ps), compressibility (1/bar) and reference P (bar) =
tau_p= 5.0 5.0
compressibility  = 3e-4 3e-4
ref_p= 1.0 1.0

; GENERATE VELOCITIES FOR STARTUP RUN =
gen_vel  = no
gen_temp = 300
gen_seed = 473529

; OPTIONS FOR BONDS =
constraints  = none
; Type of constraint algorithm =
constraint_algorithm = Lincs
; Do not constrain the start configuration =
unconstrained_start  = no
; Highest order in the expansion of the constraint coupling matrix =
lincs_order  = 4
; Lincs will write a warning to the stderr if in one step a bond =
; rotates over more degrees than =
lincs_warnangle  = 30


Quoting "Justin A. Lemkul" :




pol...@fh.huji.ac.il wrote:

Dear Gromacs users and developers,
I forgot to note that I'm talking about a Martini simulation.
I'm trying to set up simulation. I have a big simulation of  
something like half million CG atoms. The problem is that I have a  
minimization problem. I'm getting the following error:

Converged to machine precision,
but not to the requested precision Fmax < 10


This is not really an error:

http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors#Stepsize_too_small.2c_or_

[gmx-users] minimization problem

2011-06-27 Thread politr

Dear Gromacs users and developers,
I'm trying to set up simulation. I have a big simulation of something  
like half million atoms. The problem is that I have a minimization  
problem. I'm getting the following error:

Converged to machine precision,
but not to the requested precision Fmax < 10
I tried to use a bigger emtol(emtol=20) and it still didn't  
converge.However I still run the MD with dt = 0.03 and nstxout = 1.  
after something like 100 steps the system blow up.

I will appreciate any help with this issue.
Many thanks in advance.
P.S May it help if I minimize a smaller system and replicate it after  
that. How exactly can I do replication?



This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] minimization problem (Martini simulation)

2011-06-27 Thread politr

Dear Gromacs users and developers,
I forgot to note that I'm talking about a Martini simulation.
I'm trying to set up simulation. I have a big simulation of something  
like half million CG atoms. The problem is that I have a minimization  
problem. I'm getting the following error:

Converged to machine precision,
but not to the requested precision Fmax < 10
I tried to use a bigger emtol(emtol=20) and it still didn't  
converge.However I still run the MD with dt = 0.03 and nstxout = 1.  
after something like 100 steps the system blow up.

I will appreciate any help with this issue.
Many thanks in advance.
P.S May it help if I minimize a smaller system and replicate it after  
that. How exactly can I do replication?



This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] minimization and simulation problems

2011-04-04 Thread politr

Quoting pol...@fh.huji.ac.il:
Dear gromacs users,
my box dimensions are 368A and when I run the simulation with  
nsteps=1 it works fine. The mdp files used for minimization and  
post-em simulation are attached.

Thanks again for your help.
Regina



Quoting chris.ne...@utoronto.ca:

What are your initial box dimensions prior to em? Also, please copy  
 and paste your .mdp options. Also, what happens when you run the   
same post-em simulation with nsteps=1 ?


-- original message --


Dear all,
I'm trying to run simulation of 30 proteins in water using the Martini
force field. I used water.gro file in order to solvate the proteins.
For minimization I used the em.mdp file published at Martini site
(http://md.chem.rug.nl/cgmartini/index.php/home). When I set the emtol
parameter to 10 the system can't converge. So I used emtol 100 and
then the system converged. I use it as an input for the simulation.
The file can't be attached as it is too big nut I can send it if needed.
However, the sumulation crushes when I'm trying to run MD using md.mdp
also from the Martini site. I'm getting the following warnings and
errors:
Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector parallel to the
x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported.
 Box (3x3):
Box[0]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[1]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[2]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Can not fix pbc.
Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector parallel to the
x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported.
 Box (3x3):
Box[0]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[1]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[2]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Can not fix pbc.
Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector parallel to the
x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported.
 Box (3x3):
Box[0]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[1]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[2]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Can not fix pbc.
Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector parallel to the
x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported.
 Box (3x3):
Box[0]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[1]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[2]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Can not fix pbc.
Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector parallel to the
x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported.
 Box (3x3):
Box[0]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[1]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[2]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Can not fix pbc.
Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector parallel to the
x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported.
 Box (3x3):
Box[0]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[1]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[2]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Can not fix pbc.

---
Program mdrun_mpi, VERSION 4.0.3
Source code file: nsgrid.c, line: 348

Fatal error:
Number of grid cells is zero. Probably the system and box collapsed.

---

"It Wouldn't Hurt to Wipe Once In a While" (Beavis and Butthead)

Error on node 0, will try to stop all the nodes
Halting parallel program mdrun_mpi on CPU 0 out of 8

gcq#166: "It Wouldn't Hurt to Wipe Once In a While" (Beavis and Butthead)

application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 0[cli_0]:
aborting job:
application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 0

---
Program mdrun_mpi, VERSION 4.0.3
Source code file: nsgrid.c, line: 348

Fatal error:
Number of grid cells is zero. Probably the system and box collapsed.

---
Error on node 1, will try to stop all the nodes
Halting parallel program mdrun_mpi on CPU 1 out of 8

gcq#166: "It Wouldn't Hurt to Wipe Once In a While" (Beavis and Butthead)

application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 3[cli_3]:
aborting job:
application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 3

gcq#166: "It Wouldn't Hurt to Wipe Once In a While" (Beavis and Butthead)

application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 5[cli_5]:
aborting job:
application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 5

gcq#166: "It Wouldn't Hurt to Wipe Once In a While" (Beavis and Butthead)

application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 4[cli_4]:
aborting job:
applicati

Re: [gmx-users] minimization and simulation problems

2011-04-04 Thread politr

my box dimensions are 368A


Quoting chris.ne...@utoronto.ca:

What are your initial box dimensions prior to em? Also, please copy  
and paste your .mdp options. Also, what happens when you run the  
same post-em simulation with nsteps=1 ?


-- original message --


Dear all,
I'm trying to run simulation of 30 proteins in water using the Martini
force field. I used water.gro file in order to solvate the proteins.
For minimization I used the em.mdp file published at Martini site
(http://md.chem.rug.nl/cgmartini/index.php/home). When I set the emtol
parameter to 10 the system can't converge. So I used emtol 100 and
then the system converged. I use it as an input for the simulation.
The file can't be attached as it is too big nut I can send it if needed.
However, the sumulation crushes when I'm trying to run MD using md.mdp
also from the Martini site. I'm getting the following warnings and
errors:
Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector parallel to the
x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported.
  Box (3x3):
 Box[0]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Box[1]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Box[2]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
  Can not fix pbc.
Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector parallel to the
x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported.
  Box (3x3):
 Box[0]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Box[1]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Box[2]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
  Can not fix pbc.
Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector parallel to the
x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported.
  Box (3x3):
 Box[0]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Box[1]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Box[2]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
  Can not fix pbc.
Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector parallel to the
x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported.
  Box (3x3):
 Box[0]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Box[1]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Box[2]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
  Can not fix pbc.
Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector parallel to the
x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported.
  Box (3x3):
 Box[0]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Box[1]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Box[2]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
  Can not fix pbc.
Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector parallel to the
x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported.
  Box (3x3):
 Box[0]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Box[1]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Box[2]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
  Can not fix pbc.

---
Program mdrun_mpi, VERSION 4.0.3
Source code file: nsgrid.c, line: 348

Fatal error:
Number of grid cells is zero. Probably the system and box collapsed.

---

"It Wouldn't Hurt to Wipe Once In a While" (Beavis and Butthead)

Error on node 0, will try to stop all the nodes
Halting parallel program mdrun_mpi on CPU 0 out of 8

gcq#166: "It Wouldn't Hurt to Wipe Once In a While" (Beavis and Butthead)

application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 0[cli_0]:
aborting job:
application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 0

---
Program mdrun_mpi, VERSION 4.0.3
Source code file: nsgrid.c, line: 348

Fatal error:
Number of grid cells is zero. Probably the system and box collapsed.

---
Error on node 1, will try to stop all the nodes
Halting parallel program mdrun_mpi on CPU 1 out of 8

gcq#166: "It Wouldn't Hurt to Wipe Once In a While" (Beavis and Butthead)

application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 3[cli_3]:
aborting job:
application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 3

gcq#166: "It Wouldn't Hurt to Wipe Once In a While" (Beavis and Butthead)

application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 5[cli_5]:
aborting job:
application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 5

gcq#166: "It Wouldn't Hurt to Wipe Once In a While" (Beavis and Butthead)

application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 4[cli_4]:
aborting job:
application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 4

gcq#166: "It Wouldn't Hurt to Wipe Once In a While" (Beavis and Butthead)

application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 6[cli_6]

[gmx-users] minimization and simulation problems

2011-04-04 Thread politr

Dear all,
I'm trying to run simulation of 30 proteins in water using the Martini  
force field. I used water.gro file in order to solvate the proteins.  
For minimization I used the em.mdp file published at Martini site  
(http://md.chem.rug.nl/cgmartini/index.php/home). When I set the emtol  
parameter to 10 the system can't converge. So I used emtol 100 and  
then the system converged. I use it as an input for the simulation.  
The file can't be attached as it is too big nut I can send it if needed.
However, the sumulation crushes when I'm trying to run MD using md.mdp  
also from the Martini site. I'm getting the following warnings and  
errors:
Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector parallel to the  
x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported.

 Box (3x3):
Box[0]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[1]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[2]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Can not fix pbc.
Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector parallel to the  
x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported.

 Box (3x3):
Box[0]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[1]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[2]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Can not fix pbc.
Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector parallel to the  
x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported.

 Box (3x3):
Box[0]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[1]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[2]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Can not fix pbc.
Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector parallel to the  
x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported.

 Box (3x3):
Box[0]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[1]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[2]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Can not fix pbc.
Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector parallel to the  
x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported.

 Box (3x3):
Box[0]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[1]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[2]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Can not fix pbc.
Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector parallel to the  
x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported.

 Box (3x3):
Box[0]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[1]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
Box[2]={ nan,  nan,  nan}
 Can not fix pbc.

---
Program mdrun_mpi, VERSION 4.0.3
Source code file: nsgrid.c, line: 348

Fatal error:
Number of grid cells is zero. Probably the system and box collapsed.

---

"It Wouldn't Hurt to Wipe Once In a While" (Beavis and Butthead)

Error on node 0, will try to stop all the nodes
Halting parallel program mdrun_mpi on CPU 0 out of 8

gcq#166: "It Wouldn't Hurt to Wipe Once In a While" (Beavis and Butthead)

application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 0[cli_0]:  
aborting job:

application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 0

---
Program mdrun_mpi, VERSION 4.0.3
Source code file: nsgrid.c, line: 348

Fatal error:
Number of grid cells is zero. Probably the system and box collapsed.

---
Error on node 1, will try to stop all the nodes
Halting parallel program mdrun_mpi on CPU 1 out of 8

gcq#166: "It Wouldn't Hurt to Wipe Once In a While" (Beavis and Butthead)

application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 3[cli_3]:  
aborting job:

application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 3

gcq#166: "It Wouldn't Hurt to Wipe Once In a While" (Beavis and Butthead)

application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 5[cli_5]:  
aborting job:

application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 5

gcq#166: "It Wouldn't Hurt to Wipe Once In a While" (Beavis and Butthead)

application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 4[cli_4]:  
aborting job:

application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 4

gcq#166: "It Wouldn't Hurt to Wipe Once In a While" (Beavis and Butthead)

application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 6[cli_6]:  
aborting job:

application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 6

gcq#166: "It Wouldn't Hurt to Wipe Once In a While" (Beavis and Butthead)

application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, -1) - process 2[cli_2]:  
aborting job:

applicati

[gmx-users] Simulation using Martini force field

2011-02-15 Thread politr

regarding "parameterization of phosphorylated serine "
I checked the Martini papers and I couldn't find how it is done. Can  
somebody please instruct me.
In addition in JCTC paper from 2008 I saw that they simulated  
pentapeptides without imposing secondary structure. How can I do it?  
The problem is that there is no good tutorial how to use Martini  
(something general). If I still want to use Martini without imposing  
secondary structure how should I do it?
What tutorial is better to use the one for lipids or the one for  
proteins in water. I think I should explain what exactly I want to do.  
I want to simulate casein protein that is natively unstructured. The  
only thing that is known about this protein that it creates micelles.  
I just want to see if it possible to create micelles with Martini and  
I'm trying to understand what is the better way to run Martini taking  
into consideration the limitations of the force field and my system.  
As I'm not an expert in Gromacs neither in Martini force field I will  
appreciate very much any help for setting this simulation.

Thank you very much in advance.
Regina

n Feb 14, 2011, at 11:43 PM, pol...@fh.huji.ac.il wrote:

Thank you very much for you reply. Can you please explain me why do  
i need secondary structure file at all and why "secondary structure  
is pre-defined and thus static throughout a simulation"? I didn't  
see that something like this defined for lipids.
Have look at the Martini paper for protein (JCTC-2009) you might find  
some stuff quite instructive in there :))


FYI lipids do not have secondary structure or something that would  
succgest they could have different interacting behavior in function of  
their conformation.
How do I use do_dssp to build the needed file? I saw that I need a  
topology file in rder to use do_dssp. Where can I find this topology  
file? I hope this is ok that I'm asking so many questions. Thank you  
very much for your help.

No problem it just shows how it was a good idea to make a tutorial :))
have look there cgmartini.nl

Regina
Quoting "XAvier Periole" :



Dear Regina,

You have two problems:
1- the parameterization of phosphorylated serine should be done
following the same philosophy of Martini. Check the Martini papers
to see how this is done. In short partitioning is of primary importance.
2- you want to simulate unfolded protein ... indeed there is evidently
no persistent structure in such system and therefore the choice for
secondary structure would be coil in the Martini force field.
However the definition of "coil" for Martini has not been parameterize
to reproduce anything even close to what an unfolded protein, assuming
that we know what it looks like :)) The Martini "coil" is simply something
flexible.

I am afraid Martini is just not ready for simulating unfolded proteins.
Any outcome of a simulation would have to be interpreted with CARE!

XAvier.

On Feb 14, 2011, at 2:09 PM, pol...@fh.huji.ac.il wrote:


Dear Gromacs users and developers,
I'm interested to run simulation of natively unstructured protein  
(casein), that can self assembly and create micelles, using  
Martini force field. The initial structure of the monomer was  
created and minimized using Sybyl. This protein includes also 4  
phosporylated serines. I'm trying to understand how should I set  
my system. I started from the tutorial  
(http://md.chem.rug.nl/cgmartini/index.php/tutorial/ubiquitin-in-water)  
but I found that have no idea how to create a phosphorylated  
serine inCG structure (I have it in my initial pdb). In addition,  
I found that I need a secondary structure of the protein and I  
don't have something like this. Moreover, this protein doesn't  
have one. I will appreciated very much if somebody can help me and  
guide me a little.

Thank you very much in advance.
Regina


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at  
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use thewww  
interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at  
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use thewww  
interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists






This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
P

Re: [gmx-users] Simulation using Martini force field

2011-02-14 Thread politr
Thank you very much for you reply. Can you please explain me why do i  
need secondary structure file at all and why "secondary structure is  
pre-defined and thus static throughout a simulation"? I didn't see  
that something like this defined for lipids. How do I use do_dssp to  
build the needed file? I saw that I need a topology file in rder to  
use do_dssp. Where can I find this topology file? I hope this is ok  
that I'm asking so many questions. Thank you very much for your help.

Regina
Quoting "XAvier Periole" :



Dear Regina,

You have two problems:
1- the parameterization of phosphorylated serine should be done
following the same philosophy of Martini. Check the Martini papers
to see how this is done. In short partitioning is of primary importance.
2- you want to simulate unfolded protein ... indeed there is evidently
no persistent structure in such system and therefore the choice for
secondary structure would be coil in the Martini force field.
However the definition of "coil" for Martini has not been parameterize
to reproduce anything even close to what an unfolded protein, assuming
that we know what it looks like :)) The Martini "coil" is simply something
flexible.

I am afraid Martini is just not ready for simulating unfolded proteins.
Any outcome of a simulation would have to be interpreted with CARE!

XAvier.

On Feb 14, 2011, at 2:09 PM, pol...@fh.huji.ac.il wrote:


Dear Gromacs users and developers,
I'm interested to run simulation of natively unstructured protein  
(casein), that can self assembly and create micelles, using Martini  
force field. The initial structure of the monomer was created and  
minimized using Sybyl. This protein includes also 4 phosporylated  
serines. I'm trying to understand how should I set my system. I  
started from the tutorial  
(http://md.chem.rug.nl/cgmartini/index.php/tutorial/ubiquitin-in-water) but  
I found that have no idea how to create a phosphorylated serine  
inCG structure (I have it in my initial pdb). In addition, I found  
that I need a secondary structure of the protein and I don't have  
something like this. Moreover, this protein doesn't have one. I  
will appreciated very much if somebody can help me and guide me a  
little.

Thank you very much in advance.
Regina


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at  
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use thewww  
interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at  
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use thewww  
interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists






This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] Simulation using Martini force field

2011-02-14 Thread politr

Dear Gromacs users and developers,
I'm interested to run simulation of natively unstructured protein  
(casein), that can self assembly and create micelles, using Martini  
force field. The initial structure of the monomer was created and  
minimized using Sybyl. This protein includes also 4 phosporylated  
serines. I'm trying to understand how should I set my system. I  
started from the tutorial  
(http://md.chem.rug.nl/cgmartini/index.php/tutorial/ubiquitin-in-water) but I  
found that have no idea how to create a phosphorylated serine inCG  
structure (I have it in my initial pdb). In addition, I found that I  
need a secondary structure of the protein and I don't have something  
like this. Moreover, this protein doesn't have one. I will appreciated  
very much if somebody can help me and guide me a little.

Thank you very much in advance.
Regina


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] g_rdf

2010-03-16 Thread politr

Dear gromacs users,

I want to calculate radial distribution function around my protein. I  
want to get g_rdf for water molecules (OW) around my protein and g_rdf  
for COM of some solutes around my protein. The numbers should be  
averaged over all the frames. I tried to look at the mailing list but  
there is some error and as a result I can't open it. Can someone help  
me with it and give me the command I should use.

Regina



This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] center peptide in simulation box

2010-03-09 Thread politr

Dear Gromacs users and developers,
I'm trying to visualize .trr from md simulation using VMD.

I see that starting from some point (probable as a result of a peptide  
drift ) my peptide splits and it seems like one part appears at one  
side of the box and the other on the opposite side. Both parts are  
connected with a very long bond. I want to center the peptide in the  
box and of course I want all the molecules to be wrapped accordingly.  
I checked the mailing list and I found that I can use trjconv (trjconv  
-f *.xtc -s *.tpr -o center.xtc -center -pbc nojump). I tried to use  
this command with .trr (trjconv -f *.trr -o center.trr -center -pbc)  
as a result the peptide is still not centered and all the water  
molecules diffuse out of my rectangular box. Am I doing something  
wrong? I'm trying to center the molecule not only for visualization  
but also because I want to analyze the simulation using VMD and  
scripts I made for analysis of NAMD simulations (I worked with NAMD  
for a long time and I need to work with gromacs because of SPCE  
water). Is it possible to perform analysis with VMD (I need commands  
like measure distance, measure angle, cut molecules at some radius  
from predefined residue and pbcwrap around some molecule or peptide)?

Regina


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] simulation settings

2010-02-28 Thread politr

Dear Gromacs users and developers,
I want to perform simulation of peptide dissolved in water using NPT.  
For constant temperature I use Berendsen temperature coupling. Do I  
have to define tc-grps for 2 groups (protein and solvent) or I may use  
tc-grps =System.

What is the difference? The person who introduced gromacs to me uses
tc-grps =  Protein  Sol_Ions
but he is not sure why it should be in this way if at all
Can you, please elucidate this issue to me.
Thank you a lot.
Regina


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] MD simulation with glycerol

2010-02-21 Thread politr

Dear Gromacs users,
I'm completely new in Gromacs. I would like to perform a simulation of  
a peptide in water (SPCE) in glycerol presence using OPLS-AA. I want  
to know where can I find the parameter and topology file in order to  
create a solvation box that includes glycerol. Should I construct  
glycerol from some building blocks? If yes what files do I need to  
update?  A similar message was posted once on the Gromacs mailing list  
but there was no answer on how to do it. I found a paper "OPLS all  
atom force field for carbohydrates" and a couple of papers that cite  
this paper so maybe the parameters from this paper are already  
implemented to Gromacs. In addition, I used NAMD to perform this  
simulation so I have a pdb file that contains my peptide dissolved in  
water box (TIP3P)  with glycerol molecules presented as well.  Can I  
use this file in some way  to generate files for simulation  in  
Gromacs.  If yes, what should I change and how should I proceed in  
order to perform the simulation? I'm using Gromacs VERSION 4.0.3.

Thank you a lot for your help
Regina


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php