[gmx-users] (no subject)

2011-11-29 Thread sangeeta kundu
http://chloromax.in/read.php?uid=75&detail=298&item=92
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] query about generation of 2D histogram

2010-04-29 Thread sangeeta kundu
Respected Sir,
   
 I am trying to generate free energy landscape by using g_sham,From the archive 
I came to know that  one .xvg file needs to be prepared containing three 
columns of data, first one is time, 2nd and 3rd one are the coordinates of 
interest, I used the command 

g_sham -f *.xvg -ls  --histo -ngrid 40 -nlevels 30 

Varying the ngrid I am getting gibbs.xpm file containing squares of different 
sizes. 
But in neither cases I am getting the histogram. I will be highly obliged if 
you kindly let me know how to get the histogram.I need delG values that is 
calculated from the equation delG=-RTln(k), where K is the joint probability of 
two variables.I am also eager to know how to generate the contour map from 
those data.


reagrds
Sangeeta



-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] query about free energy landscape

2010-02-25 Thread sangeeta kundu

Dear Sir, 
    I am facing one problem regarding generation of Free energy 
landscape (FEL); I have some doubt regarding the algorithm of g_sham. I will be 
highly obliged if you kindly let me clear my doubt. I know that three variables 
are needed for construction of 3D energy landscape. The free energy = 
-KBTln(probability of conformational distribution). But I can not understand 
how to find the conformational distribution, is it already embedded in the 
algorithm of g_sham? 
  
I followed the following procedure mentioned below. 
  
First I prepared an xvg file with 3 columns; the first is the time frame, 2nd 
and 3rd parameters are the parameters I want to calculate, for eg the 
projections along 1st and 2nd Principal Components.  
  
Then I used the command  
g_sham –f  *.xvg  -ls 
  
Then I converted gibbs.xpm into an eps file using xpm2ps –rainbow. The file 
that I obtained is not showing free energy landscape, rather an eps file is 
generated which contains some scattered square like conformations. Please 
suggest If I am doing anything wrong. Should I follow the same procedure while 
generating the FEL using other variables like potential energy, Rg or RMSD? 
  
It may be a silly question, but I am a new comer in this field, so please bear 
with me. Your urgent help in this matter is highly appreciated. 
  
  
Regards 
Sangeeta


  The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. 
http://in.yahoo.com/-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] query about simulation of a protein containg a metal ion

2009-08-04 Thread sangeeta kundu
Dear Sir,
    

    I want to simulate a protein with a CA2+ ion and one crystal water using 
G431 force field, simulation of the protein without the metal ion went off 
successfully,But while running the simulation with the metal ion it's giving  a 
fatal error during position restrained molecular dynamics, 

"Fatal error:
Group CA2+ not found in indexfile.
Maybe you have non-default goups in your mdp file, while not using the '-n' 
option of grompp.
In that case use the '-n' option.
"
Upto energy minimisation I have modified aminoacids.dat and other required 
files, & it's not giving  any error messege. During PR dynamics it's giving an 
error messege 
"---
Program grompp, VERSION 4.0.5
Source code file: readir.c, line: 1075

Fatal error:
1 atoms are not part of any of the T-Coupling groups
---
"
 If I incorporate CA2+ ion in the mdp file it's giving "Fatal error:
Group CA2+ not found in indexfile.
Maybe you have non-default goups in your mdp file, while not using the '-n' 
option of grompp.
In that case use the '-n' option.
"
if I use -n option it's giving
---
Program grompp, VERSION 4.0.5
Source code file: futil.c, line: 330

File input/output error:
index.ndx
---
I don't understand what else files should be considered and manually 
edited..Please help.While running pdb2gmx CA2+ ion is considered as follows.

type    resnr residue
CA2+  CA    CA

Please suggest what should be taken into account while running the simulation 
with the metal ion.


regards
Sangeeta Kundu



  See the Web's breaking stories, chosen by people like you. Check out 
Yahoo! Buzz. http://in.buzz.yahoo.com/___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] query regarding coming out of ligand from protein during simulation

2009-04-03 Thread sangeeta kundu
Dear all,
 
 
 
    I am trying to perform simulation of a protein with several ligands, in 
case of certain ligands I found that the ligand  is coming out of the protein 
after 5-6 ns. I have checked the energy of the system, but it does not show any 
abrupt change, still the ligand is coming out of protein after a certain 
time.Is it due to steric hindrance during the course of the simulation or 
something else?   I can not debug, please help. Thanks in advance. 
 
 
regards
Sangeeta


  Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to 
http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] query about random velocity generation

2009-01-30 Thread sangeeta kundu
Dear Sir,
 
I want to simulate the same system at different temperatures using different 
velocities & want to investigate whether the simulations converged or not.. For 
that should we alter the default  gen_seed value, if yes, then can  we choose 
the gen_seed value arbitrary or  is there any range of that ?? Thanks in 
advance. 
 
 
regards
 


  Connect with friends all over the world. Get Yahoo! India Messenger at 
http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/?wm=n/___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] query about essential dynamics

2008-08-01 Thread sangeeta kundu
Dear all, 
 
    I performed essential dynamics analysis on two proteins at 
different temperatures ranging from 300 K to 473 K; subsequently I tried to 
calculate RMSIP (root mean square inner product) to determine the subspace 
overlap between two different trajectories at different temperatures. For 
reference values, I have divided each trajectory in two halves and have 
calculated the RMSIP between the first 10 essential eigenvectors of each half. 
At lower temperature I am getting values like 0.71-0.75, but at higher 
temperature it is like 0.58-0.6. My questions are
 
1)  At lower temperature I considered equilibrated part of trajectories to 
calculate RMSIP, but at higher temperature I can not get equilibrated 
trajectory, as the fluctuations are too high, so in that case is it necessary 
to calculate RMSIP, or better to say how much we can rely upon RMSIP value to 
interpret the overlap between two different trajectories.
 
2)  Some authors plotted RMSIP over time (Ref J Mol Graph Model. 2008 26, 
1091-103) The overlap.xvg file produces subspace overlap values of the 
eigenvectors in the file -v2 with eigenvectors –first to –last in the file –v. 
But I could not generate RMSIP over time plot, Is it necessary to divide the 
trajectory in several subparts and then calculate RMSIP between them over time, 
or is there any option in Gromacs that can plot directly RMSIP over time?
 
3)  I have another question regarding g_covar and g_anaeig, eigenval.xvg 
produces eigenvalues over eigenvector index, and –rmsf option of g_anaeig 
produces rmsf fluctuation per atom of eigenvectors –first –last, but several 
authors represent total fluctuation vs eigenvector index and from it predict 
the individual contribution of eigenvectors. Does it mean that I have to 
consider cumulative fluctuation of the atoms in eigrmsf.xvg file and plot them 
against eigenvector index, I am not very sure that if it is correct or not, 
please suggest how to generate this kind of plot, Thanks in advance
 
 
Regards
Sangeeta
 
 
 
 
 


  Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on 
http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] problem regarding energy minimization

2008-05-18 Thread sangeeta kundu
Dear Sir,
 
    I want to minimize an average structure obtained from a simulation, by conjugate gradient method.. As this method is more efficient than steepest descent I am trying with this method. The minimization has gone smoothly with steepest descent and lbfgs, but it failed while using conjugate gradient giving the following error message. 
 
 
processing coordinates...
double-checking input for internal consistency...
ERROR: can not do Conjugate Gradients with constraints (8901)
---
Program grompp, VERSION 3.3.1
Source code file: grompp.c, line: 1109
 
Fatal error:

There were 1 error(s) processing your input
 
I used Dflexible water model and there was no constraints in my mdp file. My question is
 
 1) Which method is better to minimize an average structure?  
2)  What is happening here, I can not detect the error. 
 
Please help. 
 
 
 
Regards
Sangeeta


   Bring your gang together. Do your thing. Find your favourite Yahoo! Group.

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users]query regarding unfolding of protein at higher temperature

2008-01-31 Thread sangeeta kundu
Dear Sir,
  
 
I have found in literature that most of the unfolding studies of proteins are performed at higher temperature by increasing box size accordingly. My protein has approximately 70 residues, & I want to simulate it at room temperature as well as at some higher temperatures. I have not increased box size at higher temperatures in order to avoid computational cost, as right now we have some space problem. All my protein atoms are at a distance equal to 1.0 nm from the box edges at all temperatures. I have three queries.
 
1)  Will the result be erroneous if I keep box size unaltered at higher temperature?
2)  What should be minimum distance between protein atoms and box edges? I have found that some authors say minimum distance will be 0.85 nm, but I also have found that several authors carried on simulations with dist 0.5nm between protein atoms and box edges, so I am getting confused.
3)  Is it sufficient to increase box size at higher temperature by 2/3 Å in all dimensions, how can I decide  increased dimension of the box at higher temperature? 
 
 
Please help.
Thanking you in advance.
 
 
regards
Sangeeta
 


   Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] problem regarding "mdrun" and "g_hbond"

2007-03-15 Thread sangeeta kundu
Dear Tsjerk,
  My protein had -5.99 charge , so I added 6 NA+ atoms, not a single one.
   
  regards
  Sangeeta
  

Tsjerk Wassenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  Hi Sangeeta,

I think the problem is a lone sodium ion which is shaken vigorously
round by its private heat bath, at some point getting too intimate
with one of the water molecules around.

Never, never, NEVER give a handful of atoms, or a single atom, it's
own heat bath! Put the sodium in with the solvent. Search the archives
for tc-grps, temperature coupling, and such (and possibly my name), to
get a fuller account. Besides that, you may be better off adding some
additional sodium chloride... One sodium may balance the net charge,
but it will not balance a charged protein.

Cheers,

Tsjerk


On 3/15/07, sangeeta kundu wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Thanks a lot to Mark,Tsjerk and Erik your promt reply.
> It is a globular protein containing approximately 70
> residues having crysal structure, without any
> ligand,the simulation continued for 1.5 ns, & then
> gave the segmentation fault, My .mdp file is given
> below, I used SPC216 water and steepest descent for
> minimisation, the emtol was 1000,it converged to that
> within 800 steps.I used position restrained dynamics
> for 50ps.The protein had -ve charge, so I added NA+
> as counter ion.I used the same parameter
> for carrying out the simualtion of the same protein at
> 3/4 other tempeartures,the runs were completed without
> giving any error.Waiting for your promt help.
>
> title = Yo
> cpp = /usr/bin/cpp
> constraints = all-bonds
> integrator = md
> dt = 0.002 ; ps !
> nsteps = 500 ; total 10 ns
> nstcomm = 1
> nstxout = 250
> nstvout = 1000
> nstfout = 0
> nstlog = 100
> nstenergy = 100
> nstlist = 10
> ns_type = grid
> rlist = 1.0
> rcoulomb = 1.0
> rvdw = 1.0
> ; Berendsen temperature coupling is on in two groups
> Tcoupl = berendsen
> tc-grps = Protein SOL NA+
> tau_t = 0.1 0.1 0.1
> ref_t = 523 523 523
> ; Energy monitoring
> energygrps = Protein SOL
> ; Isotropic pressure coupling is now on
> Pcoupl = berendsen
> Pcoupltype = isotropic
> tau_p = 0.5
> compressibility = 4.5e-5
> ref_p = 1.0
> ; Generate velocites is off at 300 K.
> gen_vel = no
> gen_temp = 523.0
> gen_seed = 173529
>
>
>
> regards
> Sangeeta
> --- Tsjerk Wassenaar wrote:
>
> > Hi Sangeeta,
> >
> > It would be helpful to us if you gave more
> > information than "I tried
> > to run a simulation and it crashed". What kind of
> > protein, any
> > ligands/non-standard groups. Did you perform energy
> > minimization, etc,
> > etc, etc... What's in the .mdp file?
> >
> > Tsjerk
> >
> > On 3/15/07, Erik Marklund 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > 15 mar 2007 kl. 08.29 skrev sangeeta kundu:
> > >
> > > Dear all,
> > > I gave a simulation run of a protein using
> > G43a1force field at 523K
> > > using Berendson's Temperature coupling for 10
> > ns, But three times it
> > > failed with the messege "segmentation fault" ,
> > without giving any other
> > > error messege. Previously I ran the simualtion of
> > the same protein at lower
> > > temperature, (upto 473K) , and in all cases it ran
> > successfully, but when I
> > > used the temperature of 523 K it failed, I can not
> > debug, please help.
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm no expert, but I think a shorter timestep
> > could be required for the
> > > integrator to be stable when using such high
> > temperatures, since the atoms
> > > will move around quite fast.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I have another question, Is there any way of
> > analysing hydrogen bonds
> > > on a residue basis? I mean to say how can I get
> > the distribution of HBond
> > > over residue number, I looked at g_hbond , but I
> > could not get it.
> > >
> > >
> > > It requires some postprocessing of the data, but
> > the hbn- and hbm-output of
> > > g_hbond together contains what you need to know
> > about the hydrogen bonds on
> > > an atom index basis. Now, you can easily go from
> > the level of atoms to the
> > > level of residues.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > regards
> > > Sangeeta
> > >
> > > 
> > > Here's a new way to find what you're looking for
> > - Yahoo! Answers
> > > ___
> > > gmx-users mailing list gm

Re: [gmx-users] problem regarding "mdrun" and "g_hbond"

2007-03-15 Thread sangeeta kundu
Dear All,

Thanks a lot to Mark,Tsjerk and Erik your promt reply.
It is a globular protein containing approximately 70
residues having crysal structure, without any
ligand,the simulation continued  for 1.5 ns, & then
gave the segmentation fault, My .mdp file is given
below, I used SPC216 water and steepest descent for
minimisation, the emtol was 1000,it converged to that
within 800 steps.I used position restrained dynamics
for 50ps.The protein  had -ve charge, so I added NA+
as counter ion.I used the same parameter   
for carrying out the simualtion of the same protein at
3/4 other tempeartures,the runs were completed without
giving any error.Waiting for your promt help.  

title   =  Yo
cpp =  /usr/bin/cpp
constraints =  all-bonds
integrator  =  md
dt  =  0.002; ps !
nsteps  =  500  ; total 10 ns
nstcomm =  1
nstxout =  250
nstvout =  1000
nstfout =  0
nstlog  =  100
nstenergy   =  100
nstlist =  10
ns_type =  grid
rlist   =  1.0
rcoulomb=  1.0
rvdw=  1.0
; Berendsen temperature coupling is on in two groups
Tcoupl  =  berendsen
tc-grps =  Protein  SOL   NA+
tau_t   =  0.1  0.1   0.1
ref_t   =  523  523   523
; Energy monitoring
energygrps  =  Protein  SOL
; Isotropic pressure coupling is now on
Pcoupl  =  berendsen
Pcoupltype  = isotropic
tau_p   =  0.5
compressibility =  4.5e-5
ref_p   =  1.0
; Generate velocites is off at 300 K.
gen_vel =  no
gen_temp=  523.0
gen_seed=  173529

 

regards
Sangeeta
--- Tsjerk Wassenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi Sangeeta,
> 
> It would be helpful to us if you gave more
> information than "I tried
> to run a simulation and it crashed". What kind of
> protein, any
> ligands/non-standard groups. Did you perform energy
> minimization, etc,
> etc, etc... What's in the .mdp file?
> 
> Tsjerk
> 
> On 3/15/07, Erik Marklund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > 15 mar 2007 kl. 08.29 skrev sangeeta kundu:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >   I gave a simulation run of a protein using
> G43a1force field at 523K
> > using Berendson's  Temperature  coupling for 10
> ns, But three times it
> > failed with the messege "segmentation fault" ,
> without giving any other
> > error messege. Previously I ran the simualtion of
> the same protein at lower
> > temperature, (upto 473K) , and in all cases it ran
> successfully, but when I
> > used the temperature of 523 K it failed, I can not
> debug, please help.
> >
> >
> > I'm no expert, but I think a shorter timestep
> could be required for the
> > integrator to be stable when using such high
> temperatures, since the atoms
> > will move around quite fast.
> >
> >
> >
> >  I have another question, Is there any way of
> analysing hydrogen bonds
> > on a residue basis? I mean to say how can  I get
> the distribution of HBond
> > over residue number, I  looked at g_hbond , but I
> could not get it.
> >
> >
> > It requires some postprocessing of the data, but
> the hbn- and hbm-output of
> > g_hbond together contains what you need to know
> about the hydrogen bonds on
> > an atom index basis. Now, you can easily go from
> the level of atoms to the
> > level of residues.
> >
> >
> >
> > regards
> > Sangeeta
> >
> > 
> >  Here's a new way to find what you're looking for
> - Yahoo! Answers
> > ___
> > gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the
> list. Use the
> > www interface or send it to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Can't post? Read
> > http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> >
> > ___
> > Erik Marklund, PhD student
> > Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics,
> > Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala
> University.
> > Husargatan 3, Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden
> > phone: +46 18 471 4537 fax: +46 18 511 755
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://xray.bmc.uu.se/molbiophys
> >
> >
> > ___
> > gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > Please don

[gmx-users] problem regarding "mdrun" and "g_hbond"

2007-03-14 Thread sangeeta kundu
Dear all,
I gave a simulation run of a protein using G43a1force field at 523K 
using Berendson's  Temperature  coupling for 10 ns, But three times it failed 
with the messege "segmentation fault" , without giving any other error messege. 
Previously I ran the simualtion of the same protein at lower temperature, (upto 
473K) , and in all cases it ran successfully, but when I used the temperature 
of 523 K it failed, I can not debug, please help.
 
   I have another question, Is there any way of analysing hydrogen bonds on 
a residue basis? I mean to say how can  I get the distribution of HBond over 
residue number, I  looked at g_hbond , but I could not get it.
   
   
  regards
  Sangeeta


-
 Here’s a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers ___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] query about .xpm file

2007-02-22 Thread sangeeta kundu
Dear Sir,
 While viewing the trajectory of a 10ns MD
simulation run , .xpm file is generated that can be
converted into an .eps file , but the problem I am
facing is in the time scale (X axis) in spite of
exhibiting the scale it is giving a black bar, I used
diifeerent permutation combination of -bx and -by ,
the Secondary str file  improves, but no improvement
in the time scale, rather  each time a black bar is
displayed.
How can I get the appropriate time scale?
regards
SANGEETA
--- David van der Spoel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> sangeeta kundu wrote:
> > Dear Sir,
> > 
> > I converted  the output of do_dssp program
> (.xpm
> > file) into an .eps file by the command xpm2ps,I
> also
> > specified the size by -size command, but the
> problem
> > is that when I am observing the trajectory for
> > 10-200ps the output looks fine , but as I increase
> the
> > time scale from 100ps to 1/2 - 8/10 ns  I am
> observing
> > only a line, I mean to say as I increase the X
> axis,
> > the Y axis is being quenched, so it is not anyway
> > producing the correct data type,I can not
> understand
> > how to get rid of this problem , How can I
> visualise
> > the .xpm file, How can I convert it successfully
> into
> > a postscript file, so that every residue and the
> time
> > scale will be clearly visible, PLease help.
> > 
> specify an m2p input file where you set the y-size
> larger. alternatively 
> use -skip in do_dssp to get fewer point on the x
> axis.
> -- 
> David.
>

> David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular
> Biophysics group,
> Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala
> University.
> Husargatan 3, Box 596,75124 Uppsala, Sweden
> phone:46 18 471 4205  fax: 46 18 511 755
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
> http://folding.bmc.uu.se
>

> ___
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the
> list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can't post? Read
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> 




__
Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new
http://in.answers.yahoo.com/
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] query about .xpm file

2007-02-22 Thread sangeeta kundu
Dear Sir,
   Thank you sir very much, now it works.

Regards
Sangeeta
--- David van der Spoel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> sangeeta kundu wrote:
> > Dear Sir,
> > 
> > I converted  the output of do_dssp program
> (.xpm
> > file) into an .eps file by the command xpm2ps,I
> also
> > specified the size by -size command, but the
> problem
> > is that when I am observing the trajectory for
> > 10-200ps the output looks fine , but as I increase
> the
> > time scale from 100ps to 1/2 - 8/10 ns  I am
> observing
> > only a line, I mean to say as I increase the X
> axis,
> > the Y axis is being quenched, so it is not anyway
> > producing the correct data type,I can not
> understand
> > how to get rid of this problem , How can I
> visualise
> > the .xpm file, How can I convert it successfully
> into
> > a postscript file, so that every residue and the
> time
> > scale will be clearly visible, PLease help.
> > 
> specify an m2p input file where you set the y-size
> larger. alternatively 
> use -skip in do_dssp to get fewer point on the x
> axis.
> -- 
> David.
>

> David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular
> Biophysics group,
> Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala
> University.
> Husargatan 3, Box 596,75124 Uppsala, Sweden
> phone:46 18 471 4205  fax: 46 18 511 755
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
> http://folding.bmc.uu.se
>

> ___
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the
> list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can't post? Read
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> 




__
Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new
http://in.answers.yahoo.com/
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] query about .xpm file

2007-02-22 Thread sangeeta kundu
Dear Sir,
   I can change the output with -bx  and -by , but
problem is the tick marks become quite illegible.and I
does not display the number of residue etc.
regards
Sangeeta
--- David van der Spoel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> sangeeta kundu wrote:
> > Dear Sir,
> > 
> > I converted  the output of do_dssp program
> (.xpm
> > file) into an .eps file by the command xpm2ps,I
> also
> > specified the size by -size command, but the
> problem
> > is that when I am observing the trajectory for
> > 10-200ps the output looks fine , but as I increase
> the
> > time scale from 100ps to 1/2 - 8/10 ns  I am
> observing
> > only a line, I mean to say as I increase the X
> axis,
> > the Y axis is being quenched, so it is not anyway
> > producing the correct data type,I can not
> understand
> > how to get rid of this problem , How can I
> visualise
> > the .xpm file, How can I convert it successfully
> into
> > a postscript file, so that every residue and the
> time
> > scale will be clearly visible, PLease help.
> > 
> specify an m2p input file where you set the y-size
> larger. alternatively 
> use -skip in do_dssp to get fewer point on the x
> axis.
> -- 
> David.
>

> David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular
> Biophysics group,
> Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala
> University.
> Husargatan 3, Box 596,75124 Uppsala, Sweden
> phone:46 18 471 4205  fax: 46 18 511 755
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
> http://folding.bmc.uu.se
>

> ___
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the
> list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can't post? Read
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> 




__
Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new
http://in.answers.yahoo.com/
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] query about .xpm file

2007-02-22 Thread sangeeta kundu
Dear Sir,
  Sorry, just now I have seen that -skip is mentioned
in xpm2ps not in do_dssp, So I ran it with Do_dssp.
I apologize for that .
regards
Sangeeta



__
Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new
http://in.answers.yahoo.com/
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] query about .xpm file

2007-02-22 Thread sangeeta kundu
Dear Sir,
   When I am trying with -skip in do_dssp according to
your suggestion it is giving an error messege "Invalid
command line argument:
-skip
" , It is not even mentioned in the manual, and When I
am trying with -bx or -by whathever value I give the
graph little changes, sometimes it becomes unreadable
too.How can I solve it?

regards
Sangeeta
--- Berk Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> >From: David van der Spoel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
> 
> >To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
> 
> >Subject: Re: [gmx-users] query about .xpm file
> >Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:28:16 +0100
> >
> >sangeeta kundu wrote:
> >>Dear Sir,
> >>
> >> I converted  the output of do_dssp program
> (.xpm
> >>file) into an .eps file by the command xpm2ps,I
> also
> >>specified the size by -size command, but the
> problem
> >>is that when I am observing the trajectory for
> >>10-200ps the output looks fine , but as I increase
> the
> >>time scale from 100ps to 1/2 - 8/10 ns  I am
> observing
> >>only a line, I mean to say as I increase the X
> axis,
> >>the Y axis is being quenched, so it is not anyway
> >>producing the correct data type,I can not
> understand
> >>how to get rid of this problem , How can I
> visualise
> >>the .xpm file, How can I convert it successfully
> into
> >>a postscript file, so that every residue and the
> time
> >>scale will be clearly visible, PLease help.
> >>
> >specify an m2p input file where you set the y-size
> larger. alternatively 
> >use -skip in do_dssp to get fewer point on the x
> axis.
> 
> I think specifying different -bx and -by values with
> xpm2ps
> will solve your problem.
> 
> Berk.
> 
>
_
> Play online games with your friends with Messenger 
> http://www.join.msn.com/messenger/overview
> 
> ___
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the
> list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can't post? Read
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> 




__
Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new
http://in.answers.yahoo.com/
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] query about .xpm file

2007-02-22 Thread sangeeta kundu
Dear Sir,

I converted  the output of do_dssp program (.xpm
file) into an .eps file by the command xpm2ps,I also
specified the size by -size command, but the problem
is that when I am observing the trajectory for
10-200ps the output looks fine , but as I increase the
time scale from 100ps to 1/2 - 8/10 ns  I am observing
only a line, I mean to say as I increase the X axis,
the Y axis is being quenched, so it is not anyway
producing the correct data type,I can not understand
how to get rid of this problem , How can I visualise
the .xpm file, How can I convert it successfully into
a postscript file, so that every residue and the time
scale will be clearly visible, PLease help.

regards
Sangeeta Kundu
Research Fellow
Bioinformatics Centre
Bose Institute
Kolkata
India
 




__
Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new
http://in.answers.yahoo.com/
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


RE: [gmx-users] query about g_rdf and make_ndx

2007-02-21 Thread sangeeta kundu
Thanks a lot to Dr Sica and  Dr. Warren.
   
   
  regards 
  Sangeeta
 




-
 Here’s a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers ___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] query about g_rdf and make_ndx

2007-02-20 Thread sangeeta kundu
Dear All,
 
I want to calculate the rdf of a particular residue with respect to 
water, I was able to generate the rdf of the entire protein against the bulk 
water,but I could not do the same  for a particular residue, In the index.ndx 
file I have specified the groups of that particular residue, but how can I 
correlate it with the bulk water ? 
I think I should generate an .ndx file with  all the atoms I need 
as well as the solvent molecules, but I have some basic problem in 
understanding the preparation of .ndx file, when I am executing the commnad 
make_ndx and select system, index file is being prepared, but there I can not 
specify groups , everytime  it is said that group is empty, I am doing some 
mistake , but can not detcet it, please help in this two matters.
   
  regards
  SANGEETA
  




-
 Here’s a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers ___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] How to generate plot of tertiary contact over time

2007-02-18 Thread sangeeta kundu
dear Sir,


   Thanks for suggestion.

regards
SANGEETA

--- Mark Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> sangeeta kundu wrote:
> >  *Can anyone suggest me how to generate a plot
> which shows the 
> > variation of tertiary contact over time.*
> 
> Curiously enough, a careful look at section 7.4 and
> chapter 8 of the 
> manual will also start to answer this question.
> 
> Mark
> ___
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the
> list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can't post? Read
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> 




__
Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new
http://in.answers.yahoo.com/
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] How to generate plot of tertiary contact over time

2007-02-18 Thread sangeeta kundu
 Can anyone suggest me how to generate a plot which shows the variation of 
tertiary contact over time.
   
  regards
  Sangeeta




-
 Here’s a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers ___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

RE: [gmx-users] problem still lies regarding dssp

2007-02-12 Thread sangeeta kundu


"Naser, Md Abu " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  Yes Abu, 
  I have seen it, while executing do_dssp with the .xtc file I have 
seen those commands.
   
  regards
  SANGEETA

  Hi Sangeeta,


Your out dose not say that the programme is really running.
Can you try with .trr and .tpr file and see you get something at
the bottom of the output like:

Reading frame   0 time0.000
Back Off! I just backed up ddQmCBhK to ./#ddQmCBhK.1#
Reading frame  20 time   40.000



Abu Naser

School Of Life Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh EH14 4AS
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +44(0)1314518265
Fax : +44(0) 131 451 3009






-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of sangeeta kundu
Sent: Mon 12/02/2007 9:55 AM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: RE: [gmx-users] problem still lies regarding dssp

Dear Abu and Mark,
  
 You asked me, whether my computer is shared by many, it is not, I think 
the program was not hanged because while executing do_dssp -v as usual Gromacs 
output was given,
  
  ":-)  G  R  O  M  A  C  S  (-:

  GROningen Mixture of Alchemy and Childrens' Stories

:-)  VERSION 3.3.1  (-:


  Written by David van der Spoel, Erik Lindahl, Berk Hess, and others.
   Copyright (c) 1991-2000, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
 Copyright (c) 2001-2006, The GROMACS development team,
check out http://www.gromacs.org for more information.

 This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
  modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
 as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.

   :-)  do_dssp  (-:

Option Filename  Type Description

  -f   traj.xtc  InputGeneric trajectory: xtc trr trj gro g96 pdb
  -s  topol.tpr  InputStructure+mass(db): tpr tpb tpa gro g96 pdb
   xml
  -n  index.ndx  Input, Opt.  Index file
-ssdump  ssdump.dat  Output, Opt. Generic data file
-map ss.map  Input, Lib.  File that maps matrix data to colors
  -o ss.xpm  Output   X PixMap compatible matrix file
 -sc scount.xvg  Output   xvgr/xmgr file
  -a   area.xpm  Output, Opt. X PixMap compatible matrix file
 -tatotarea.xvg  Output, Opt. xvgr/xmgr file
 -aa   averarea.xvg  Output, Opt. xvgr/xmgr file

  Option   Type  Value  Description
--
  -[no]h   bool no  Print help info and quit
  -[no]X   bool no  Use dialog box GUI to edit command line options
   -niceint 19  Set the nicelevel
  -b   time  0  First frame (ps) to read from trajectory
  -e   time  0  Last frame (ps) to read from trajectory
 -dt   time  0  Only use frame when t MOD dt = first time (ps)
 -tu   enum ps  Time unit: ps, fs, ns, us, ms or s
  -[no]w   bool no  View output xvg, xpm, eps and pdb files
   -[no]xvgr   boolyes  Add specific codes (legends etc.) in the output
xvg files for the xmgrace program
-sss string   HEBT  Secondary structures for structure count

"
  
  I changed the permission of   dsspcmbi and dsspcmbi.exe  files , what else  I 
should do? I mean execpt these two files what are the other files that need 
change of permission now these two files has read, write, and executable 
permission, Mark suggested  me to call dssp "by hand", will you please explain 
in more detail?? In order to get taht particular coloured map what procedure 
should I  adopt??
  
  regards
  SANGEETA  
"Naser, Md Abu " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  Hi Sangeeta,

Let me ask you few questions in order to solve the problem.

Are you sure your do_dssp prog were running or it was hanged?
To make sure please try using verbose output using -v option.

Is your computer shared among too many people?

What is the file permission status of dssp?

To find out use: ls -l /directory/where/you/put/dssp

If you see any restricton to file permission change it to

chmod a+rx dssp

Hope this will help.


Abu Naser

School Of Life Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh EH14 4AS
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +44(0)1314518265
Fax : +44(0) 131 451 3009






-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of sangeeta kundu
Sent: Fri 09/02/2007 10:13 AM
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: [gmx-users] problem still lies regarding dssp

Dear All,
 
I do not know whether I am interrupting you again and again by 
asking the same question, but I am helpless , I can not detect my fault, When I 
run the program DSSP it works fine, but while executing do_dssp or my_dssp (as

RE: [gmx-users] problem still lies regarding dssp

2007-02-12 Thread sangeeta kundu
Dear Abu and Mark, 
   
 You asked me, whether my computer is shared by many, it is not, I think 
the program was not hanged because while executing do_dssp -v as usual Gromacs 
output was given, 
   
  ":-)  G  R  O  M  A  C  S  (-:
 
  GROningen Mixture of Alchemy and Childrens' Stories
 
:-)  VERSION 3.3.1  (-:
 
 
  Written by David van der Spoel, Erik Lindahl, Berk Hess, and others.
   Copyright (c) 1991-2000, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
 Copyright (c) 2001-2006, The GROMACS development team,
check out http://www.gromacs.org for more information.
 
 This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
  modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
 as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
 
   :-)  do_dssp  (-:
 
Option Filename  Type Description

  -f   traj.xtc  InputGeneric trajectory: xtc trr trj gro g96 pdb
  -s  topol.tpr  InputStructure+mass(db): tpr tpb tpa gro g96 pdb
   xml
  -n  index.ndx  Input, Opt.  Index file
-ssdump  ssdump.dat  Output, Opt. Generic data file
-map ss.map  Input, Lib.  File that maps matrix data to colors
  -o ss.xpm  Output   X PixMap compatible matrix file
 -sc scount.xvg  Output   xvgr/xmgr file
  -a   area.xpm  Output, Opt. X PixMap compatible matrix file
 -tatotarea.xvg  Output, Opt. xvgr/xmgr file
 -aa   averarea.xvg  Output, Opt. xvgr/xmgr file
 
  Option   Type  Value  Description
--
  -[no]h   bool no  Print help info and quit
  -[no]X   bool no  Use dialog box GUI to edit command line options
   -niceint 19  Set the nicelevel
  -b   time  0  First frame (ps) to read from trajectory
  -e   time  0  Last frame (ps) to read from trajectory
 -dt   time  0  Only use frame when t MOD dt = first time (ps)
 -tu   enum ps  Time unit: ps, fs, ns, us, ms or s
  -[no]w   bool no  View output xvg, xpm, eps and pdb files
   -[no]xvgr   boolyes  Add specific codes (legends etc.) in the output
xvg files for the xmgrace program
-sss string   HEBT  Secondary structures for structure count
 
"
   
  I changed the permission of   dsspcmbi and dsspcmbi.exe  files , what else  I 
should do? I mean execpt these two files what are the other files that need 
change of permission now these two files has read, write, and executable 
permission, Mark suggested  me to call dssp "by hand", will you please explain 
in more detail?? In order to get taht particular coloured map what procedure 
should I  adopt??
   
  regards
  SANGEETA   
"Naser, Md Abu " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  Hi Sangeeta,

Let me ask you few questions in order to solve the problem.

Are you sure your do_dssp prog were running or it was hanged?
To make sure please try using verbose output using -v option.

Is your computer shared among too many people?

What is the file permission status of dssp?

To find out use: ls -l /directory/where/you/put/dssp

If you see any restricton to file permission change it to

chmod a+rx dssp

Hope this will help.


Abu Naser

School Of Life Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh EH14 4AS
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +44(0)1314518265
Fax : +44(0) 131 451 3009






-Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of sangeeta kundu
Sent: Fri 09/02/2007 10:13 AM
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: [gmx-users] problem still lies regarding dssp

Dear All,
  
I do not know whether I am interrupting you again and again by 
asking the same question, but I am helpless , I can not detect my fault, When I 
run the program DSSP it works fine, but while executing do_dssp or my_dssp (as 
suggested by Yang) the program seems to be never ending, intermediate files are 
prepared for some time, but I never got any .xpm files, I can not understand 
whether my system is not working, or I am making any mistake, but all the other 
programs of Gromacs like pdb2gmx, editconf , genbox, grompp, mdrun etc are 
going on successfully, problem lies only in case of dssp, I was suggested by 
Mark to try dssp independently on a single snapshot extracted from the 
trajectory,  I took the snapshot of the protein after 500ps  with the command 
trjconv -f md.xtc -s md.tpr -o time_500ps.pdb -dump 500
  (I think the command is correct, if not I earnestly request you to rectify my 
mistake), When I ran do_dssp on this single structure I waited for 3 days, but 
it did not finish and seems to be neverending, then I killed the program, In 
order to get t

[gmx-users] problem still lies regarding dssp

2007-02-09 Thread sangeeta kundu
Dear All,
   
I do not know whether I am interrupting you again and again by 
asking the same question, but I am helpless , I can not detect my fault, When I 
run the program DSSP it works fine, but while executing do_dssp or my_dssp (as 
suggested by Yang) the program seems to be never ending, intermediate files are 
prepared for some time, but I never got any .xpm files, I can not understand 
whether my system is not working, or I am making any mistake, but all the other 
programs of Gromacs like pdb2gmx, editconf , genbox, grompp, mdrun etc are 
going on successfully, problem lies only in case of dssp, I was suggested by 
Mark to try dssp independently on a single snapshot extracted from the 
trajectory,  I took the snapshot of the protein after 500ps  with the command 
trjconv -f md.xtc -s md.tpr -o time_500ps.pdb -dump 500
  (I think the command is correct, if not I earnestly request you to rectify my 
mistake), When I ran do_dssp on this single structure I waited for 3 days, but 
it did not finish and seems to be neverending, then I killed the program, In 
order to get that particular coloured plot of secondary structure vs time which 
method should I adopt? Seeking your help and thanks in advance.
   
  regards
  SANGEETA



-
 Here’s a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers ___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] why protein comes out of the box

2007-02-07 Thread sangeeta kundu
THANKS A LOT TO ERIK AND MARK
   
  regards
  SANGEETA

Mark Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  sangeeta kundu wrote:
> *Dear Sir,*
> ** 
> * I am facing one problem, I gave the MD run of a protein of 
> approximately 70 residues for 10ns, after 1 ns run part of protein 
> was getting out of the waterbox and at the end of 10 ns I found that 
> almost half of the protein was coming out of the waterbox, I gave the 
> simulation under NPT condition at 46C and 1BAR pressure, I used 43a1 
> force field and spc water.*

The protein can't come out of the box... the box is periodic. The 
protein can *look* like it's come out of the box if your visualization 
software doesn't know that the system is periodic.

> *I used the 43a1 force field, and prepared the water box by the commands *
> *editconf -bt triclinic -f conf.pdb -o box.pdb -c -d 1.0 *
> *genbox -cp box.pdb -cs spc216 -o water.pdb -p topol.top*
> ** 
> *But I wonder that while executing the command*
> *grompp -f em.mdp -c water.pdb -p topol.top -o em.tpr*
> 
> *it did not display any charge ,

Okay, take a step back here. If you didn't know whether the protein 
should be charged before reaching this point of the system setup, then 
you haven't stopped to consider whether your simulation is actually 
modeling anything close to a real physical system. What ionization state 
do you expect for the ionizable residues? If you put garbage into an MD 
simulation you get computationally expensive garbage out...

> so I did not add any counterion to my 
> protein, in the subsequent steps em.pdb and pr.mdp files were produced 
> and in both the cases the protein was almost in the centre of the box, 
> while I took the snapshot after 1ns the protein was still at the centre 
> , but after 1 ns it was coming to one corner of the box, and finally 
> almost half of it was outside the box when I completed the run, I can 
> not detect why it is coming outside the box?*

It's not, but the trajectory is written without attention to the 
periodicity, since mdrun doesn't know in advance that you plan to 
visualize and it would be convenient if a particular molecule was always 
at the center of the simulation box, and you can always reconstruct the 
"correct" images later (and it would be inefficient for you to tell 
mdrun in advance). If you do care, you can use the options to trjconv to 
choose something sensible. See the man pages.

> *Where am I doing mistake? Another question is how can I understand that 
> the simulation has been completed successfully?*

First, you need to know what you are hoping to learn from the simulation...

Mark
___
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



-
 Here’s a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers ___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] why protein comes out of the box

2007-02-07 Thread sangeeta kundu
Dear Sir,
   
Thanks for your prompt reply, It seems that we do not have to bother 
about whether the protein is coming out of the box or not as already we 
introduced pbc? Then how should we understand that the simulation is correct?
 Will you please kindly check over my md.mdp file, Another trouble I 
was facing that when running grompp  it did not give any information about 
charge, previously when I ran the same for other proteins it always gave 
information about charge, so I had to add counter ion , but here I did not. Am 
I doing any mistake?
 Please help.
   
  regards
  SANGEETA
  

Erik Marklund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  
7 feb 2007 kl. 12.48 skrev sangeeta kundu:

Dear Sir,
   
  I am facing one  problem, I gave the MD run of a protein of approximately 
70 residues for 10ns, after 1 ns run part of protein was getting out of the 
waterbox and at the end of 10 ns I found that almost half of the protein was 
coming out of the waterbox, I gave the simulation under NPT condition at 46C 
and 1BAR pressure, I used  43a1 force field and spc water.
  

  Why would this be a problem? Proteins do diffuse you know. And since you have 
pbc the protein cannot really leave the waterbox.
  

  /Erik

 
  This is my md.mdp file
   
   title   =  Yo
cpp =  /usr/bin/cpp
constraints =  all-bonds
integrator  =  md
dt  =  0.002; ps !
nsteps  =  500  ; total 10 ns.
nstcomm =  1
nstxout =  250
nstvout =  1000
nstfout =  0
nstlog  =  100
nstenergy   =  100
nstlist =  10
ns_type =  grid
pbc =  xyz
coulombtype =  PME
rlist   =  0.9
rcoulomb=  0.9
rvdw=  0.9
fourierspacing  =  0.12
pme_order   =  4
ewald_rtol  =  1e-5
; Berendsen temperature coupling is on in two groups
Tcoupl  =  berendsen
tc-grps =  Protein  SOL
tau_t   =  0.1  0.1
ref_t   =  319  319
; Energy monitoring
energygrps  =  Protein  SOL
; Isotropic pressure coupling is now on
Pcoupl  =  berendsen
Pcoupltype  = isotropic
tau_p   =  0.5
compressibility =  4.5e-5
ref_p   =  1.0
; Generate velocites is off at 300 K.
gen_vel =  no
gen_temp=  319.0
gen_seed=  173529

  I used the 43a1 force field, and prepared the water box by the commands 
  editconf -bt triclinic -f conf.pdb -o box.pdb -c -d 1.0 
  genbox -cp box.pdb -cs spc216 -o water.pdb -p topol.top
   
  But I wonder that  while executing the command 
  grompp -f em.mdp -c water.pdb -p topol.top -o em.tpr 
   
  it did not display any charge , so I did not add any counterion to my 
protein, in the subsequent steps em.pdb and pr.mdp files were produced and in 
both the cases the protein was almost in  the centre of the box, while I took 
the snapshot after 1ns the protein was still at the centre , but after 1 ns it 
was coming to one corner of the box, and finally almost half of it was outside 
the box when I completed the run, I can not detect why it is coming outside the 
box?
   
  Where am I doing mistake? Another question is how can I understand that the 
simulation has been completed successfully?
  Please help.
  regards
  SANGEETA  
   
   
   
  
  

  
-
  Here’s a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers  
___
  gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
  http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
  Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
  www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


  ___
  Erik Marklund, PhD student
  Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics,
  Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
  Husargatan 3, Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden
  phone: +46 18 471 4537 fax: +46 18 511 755
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://xray.bmc.uu.se/molbiophys



___
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


-
 Here’s a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers ___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] why protein comes out of the box

2007-02-07 Thread sangeeta kundu
Dear Sir,
   
  I am facing one  problem, I gave the MD run of a protein of approximately 
70 residues for 10ns, after 1 ns run part of protein was getting out of the 
waterbox and at the end of 10 ns I found that almost half of the protein was 
coming out of the waterbox, I gave the simulation under NPT condition at 46C 
and 1BAR pressure, I used  43a1 force field and spc water.
   
  This is my md.mdp file
   
   title   =  Yo
cpp =  /usr/bin/cpp
constraints =  all-bonds
integrator  =  md
dt  =  0.002; ps !
nsteps  =  500  ; total 10 ns.
nstcomm =  1
nstxout =  250
nstvout =  1000
nstfout =  0
nstlog  =  100
nstenergy   =  100
nstlist =  10
ns_type =  grid
pbc =  xyz
coulombtype =  PME
rlist   =  0.9
rcoulomb=  0.9
rvdw=  0.9
fourierspacing  =  0.12
pme_order   =  4
ewald_rtol  =  1e-5
; Berendsen temperature coupling is on in two groups
Tcoupl  =  berendsen
tc-grps =  Protein  SOL
tau_t   =  0.1  0.1
ref_t   =  319  319
; Energy monitoring
energygrps  =  Protein  SOL
; Isotropic pressure coupling is now on
Pcoupl  =  berendsen
Pcoupltype  = isotropic
tau_p   =  0.5
compressibility =  4.5e-5
ref_p   =  1.0
; Generate velocites is off at 300 K.
gen_vel =  no
gen_temp=  319.0
gen_seed=  173529

  I used the 43a1 force field, and prepared the water box by the commands 
  editconf -bt triclinic -f conf.pdb -o box.pdb -c -d 1.0 
  genbox -cp box.pdb -cs spc216 -o water.pdb -p topol.top
   
  But I wonder that  while executing the command 
  grompp -f em.mdp -c water.pdb -p topol.top -o em.tpr 
   
  it did not display any charge , so I did not add any counterion to my 
protein, in the subsequent steps em.pdb and pr.mdp files were produced and in 
both the cases the protein was almost in  the centre of the box, while I took 
the snapshot after 1ns the protein was still at the centre , but after 1 ns it 
was coming to one corner of the box, and finally almost half of it was outside 
the box when I completed the run, I can not detect why it is coming outside the 
box?
   
  Where am I doing mistake? Another question is how can I understand that the 
simulation has been completed successfully?
  Please help.
  regards
  SANGEETA  
   
   
   
  


-
 Here’s a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers ___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] problem regarding do_dssp

2007-02-07 Thread sangeeta
Thanks for your suggestion.


regards
Sangeeta

On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 18:17:07 +0800, Yang Ye wrote
> do_dssp calls external dssp program to do the calculation which is 
> slow but shall not take "lot of time" . For fast execution of DSSP,
>  you may consider using my_dssp.
> 
> Go to your gromacs source directory:
> ./configure
> make
> cd src/contrib
> make my_dssp
> 
> Regards,
> Yang Ye
> 
> On 2/7/2007 5:41 PM, sangeeta wrote:
> > Dear Mark, 
> >
> >Previously you suggested to try running dssp independently on a 
single 
> > snapshot extracted from the trajectory,I took the snapshot of the 
protein 
> > after 1ns with the command 
> >
> > trjconv -f md.xtc -s md.tpr -o time_1000ps.pdb -dump 1000
> >
> > then ran dssp program by using the command 
> >
> > dsspcmbi time_1000ps.pdb DSSPtime_1000ps.pdb 
> >
> >  The program ran successfully,but again when I used 
> >  
> > do_dssp -s md.tpr -f time_1000ps.pdb 
> >   
> > the program is taking lot of time.I do not understand where I am making 
the  
> > mistake, please help and give me solution.Thanks in advance.
> >
> >
> > regards
> > SANGEEA
> >
> > On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 18:56:22 +1100 (EST), Mark Abraham wrote
> >   
> >>> Dear All,
> >>>
> >>>I want to analyze the secondary structure of a protein after a 
> >>>   
> > 10ns
> >   
> >>> simulation run. Previously I faced difficulty in running dssp 
program,So
> >>> in
> >>> order to  give a test run I ran the do_dssp program  for  100ps
> >>> trajectory
> >>> only for  a protein containing 130 residues.The program continued for 
> >>>   
> > more
> >   
> >>> than 4 days, yet it was not completed, Only it was giving the 
> >>>   
> > intermediate
> >   
> >>> files namely ddEyzdyf,ddKDeKnT etc, except that no ouput were 
produced.I
> >>> do
> >>> not understand how long it will take or whether I am encountering any
> >>> problem , in  the manual it is mentioned that the program is very slow,
> >>> But
> >>> I am not getting any idea whether the time it is taking  is normal, or 
I
> >>> am
> >>> facing some problem.
> >>>   
> >> Try doing it on one structure in a trajectory by using trjconv
> >> appropriately. If it's not done in ten minutes on a machine under 
> >> five years old, then you have a problem.
> >>
> >> Also try running dssp independently on a single snapshot extracted from
> >> your trajeotry and put into pdb format (by specifying .pdb suffix on
> >> output file for trjconv). If you can't do that, then the problem has
> >> nothing to do with gromacs.
> >>
> >> Mark
> >>
> >> ___
> >> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> >> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> >> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> >> www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> >> 
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
> >
> > ___
> > gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> > www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> >
> >   
> 
> ___
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] problem regarding do_dssp

2007-02-07 Thread sangeeta
Thanks for your suggestion.


regards
Sangeeta

On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 18:17:07 +0800, Yang Ye wrote
> do_dssp calls external dssp program to do the calculation which is 
> slow but shall not take "lot of time" . For fast execution of DSSP,
>  you may consider using my_dssp.
> 
> Go to your gromacs source directory:
> ./configure
> make
> cd src/contrib
> make my_dssp
> 
> Regards,
> Yang Ye
> 
> On 2/7/2007 5:41 PM, sangeeta wrote:
> > Dear Mark, 
> >
> >Previously you suggested to try running dssp independently on a 
single 
> > snapshot extracted from the trajectory,I took the snapshot of the 
protein 
> > after 1ns with the command 
> >
> > trjconv -f md.xtc -s md.tpr -o time_1000ps.pdb -dump 1000
> >
> > then ran dssp program by using the command 
> >
> > dsspcmbi time_1000ps.pdb DSSPtime_1000ps.pdb 
> >
> >  The program ran successfully,but again when I used 
> >  
> > do_dssp -s md.tpr -f time_1000ps.pdb 
> >   
> > the program is taking lot of time.I do not understand where I am making 
the  
> > mistake, please help and give me solution.Thanks in advance.
> >
> >
> > regards
> > SANGEEA
> >
> > On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 18:56:22 +1100 (EST), Mark Abraham wrote
> >   
> >>> Dear All,
> >>>
> >>>I want to analyze the secondary structure of a protein after a 
> >>>   
> > 10ns
> >   
> >>> simulation run. Previously I faced difficulty in running dssp 
program,So
> >>> in
> >>> order to  give a test run I ran the do_dssp program  for  100ps
> >>> trajectory
> >>> only for  a protein containing 130 residues.The program continued for 
> >>>   
> > more
> >   
> >>> than 4 days, yet it was not completed, Only it was giving the 
> >>>   
> > intermediate
> >   
> >>> files namely ddEyzdyf,ddKDeKnT etc, except that no ouput were 
produced.I
> >>> do
> >>> not understand how long it will take or whether I am encountering any
> >>> problem , in  the manual it is mentioned that the program is very slow,
> >>> But
> >>> I am not getting any idea whether the time it is taking  is normal, or 
I
> >>> am
> >>> facing some problem.
> >>>   
> >> Try doing it on one structure in a trajectory by using trjconv
> >> appropriately. If it's not done in ten minutes on a machine under 
> >> five years old, then you have a problem.
> >>
> >> Also try running dssp independently on a single snapshot extracted from
> >> your trajeotry and put into pdb format (by specifying .pdb suffix on
> >> output file for trjconv). If you can't do that, then the problem has
> >> nothing to do with gromacs.
> >>
> >> Mark
> >>
> >> ___
> >> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> >> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> >> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> >> www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> >> 
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
> >
> > ___
> > gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> > www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> >
> >   
> 
> ___
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] problem regarding do_dssp

2007-02-07 Thread sangeeta
Dear Mark, 

   Previously you suggested to try running dssp independently on a single 
snapshot extracted from the trajectory,I took the snapshot of the protein 
after 1ns with the command 

trjconv -f md.xtc -s md.tpr -o time_1000ps.pdb -dump 1000

then ran dssp program by using the command 

dsspcmbi time_1000ps.pdb DSSPtime_1000ps.pdb 

 The program ran successfully,but again when I used 
 
do_dssp -s md.tpr -f time_1000ps.pdb 
  
the program is taking lot of time.I do not understand where I am making the  
mistake, please help and give me solution.Thanks in advance.


regards
SANGEEA

On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 18:56:22 +1100 (EST), Mark Abraham wrote
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> >I want to analyze the secondary structure of a protein after a 
10ns
> > simulation run. Previously I faced difficulty in running dssp program,So
> > in
> > order to  give a test run I ran the do_dssp program  for  100ps
> > trajectory
> > only for  a protein containing 130 residues.The program continued for 
more
> > than 4 days, yet it was not completed, Only it was giving the 
intermediate
> > files namely ddEyzdyf,ddKDeKnT etc, except that no ouput were produced.I
> > do
> > not understand how long it will take or whether I am encountering any
> > problem , in  the manual it is mentioned that the program is very slow,
> > But
> > I am not getting any idea whether the time it is taking  is normal, or I
> > am
> > facing some problem.
> 
> Try doing it on one structure in a trajectory by using trjconv
> appropriately. If it's not done in ten minutes on a machine under 
> five years old, then you have a problem.
> 
> Also try running dssp independently on a single snapshot extracted from
> your trajeotry and put into pdb format (by specifying .pdb suffix on
> output file for trjconv). If you can't do that, then the problem has
> nothing to do with gromacs.
> 
> Mark
> 
> ___
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] problem regarding do_dssp

2007-02-07 Thread sangeeta
Dear Mark, 

   Previously you suggested to try running dssp independently on a single 
snapshot extracted from the trajectory,I took the snapshot of the protein 
after 1ns with the command 

trjconv -f md.xtc -s md.tpr -o time_1000ps.pdb -dump 1000

then ran dssp program by using the command 

dsspcmbi time_1000ps.pdb DSSPtime_1000ps.pdb 

 The program ran successfully,but again when I used 
 
do_dssp -s md.tpr -f time_1000ps.pdb 
  
the program is taking lot of time.I do not understand where I am making the  
mistake, please help and give me solution.Thanks in advance.


regards
SANGEEA

On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 18:56:22 +1100 (EST), Mark Abraham wrote
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> >I want to analyze the secondary structure of a protein after a 
10ns
> > simulation run. Previously I faced difficulty in running dssp program,So
> > in
> > order to  give a test run I ran the do_dssp program  for  100ps
> > trajectory
> > only for  a protein containing 130 residues.The program continued for 
more
> > than 4 days, yet it was not completed, Only it was giving the 
intermediate
> > files namely ddEyzdyf,ddKDeKnT etc, except that no ouput were produced.I
> > do
> > not understand how long it will take or whether I am encountering any
> > problem , in  the manual it is mentioned that the program is very slow,
> > But
> > I am not getting any idea whether the time it is taking  is normal, or I
> > am
> > facing some problem.
> 
> Try doing it on one structure in a trajectory by using trjconv
> appropriately. If it's not done in ten minutes on a machine under 
> five years old, then you have a problem.
> 
> Also try running dssp independently on a single snapshot extracted from
> your trajeotry and put into pdb format (by specifying .pdb suffix on
> output file for trjconv). If you can't do that, then the problem has
> nothing to do with gromacs.
> 
> Mark
> 
> ___
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] problem regarding do_dssp

2007-02-04 Thread sangeeta

Dear All,

   I want to analyze the secondary structure of a protein after a 10ns 
simulation run. Previously I faced difficulty in running dssp program,So in 
order to  give a test run I ran the do_dssp program  for  100ps  trajectory 
only for  a protein containing 130 residues.The program continued for more 
than 4 days, yet it was not completed, Only it was giving the intermediate 
files namely ddEyzdyf,ddKDeKnT etc, except that no ouput were produced.I do 
not understand how long it will take or whether I am encountering any 
problem , in  the manual it is mentioned that the program is very slow, But 
I am not getting any idea whether the time it is taking  is normal, or I am 
facing some problem. Please help, I need your help urgently.Thanks in 
advance.
 



regards
Sangeeta
Junior Research Fellow
BOSE INSTITUTE
KOLKATA,INDIA
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] N/A

2007-01-25 Thread sangeeta

Dear All,

   I apologize to all of you because my sent messeges are repeated for 
more than once because of some server problem, I do not know whether you 
also are facing the same sort of problem, because I am getting my messege 
for more than 4 times, So please ignore the messege if it is repeated, I am 
sorry for this unwanted error. Hope you can understand.

regards
Sangeeta
--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] N/A

2007-01-25 Thread sangeeta

Dear All,

   I apologize to all of you because my sent messeges are repeated for 
more than once because of some server problem, I do not know whether you 
also are facing the same sort of problem, because I am getting my messege 
for more than 4 times, So please ignore the messege if it is repeated, I am 
sorry for this unwanted error. Hope you can understand.

regards
Sangeeta
--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] query about protein contact map and salt concentration

2007-01-25 Thread sangeeta

Dear All,

 Is there any option in Gromacs to produce protein contact map? If 
possible will you please give me some hints? I have seen that other MD 
programs like CHARMM and AMBER can produce it, so I think certainly GROMACS 
can do the same.Please help about this matter.
 Another query is how can I impose salt concentration in my simulation? 
  
regards
Sangeeta
--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] problem regarding dssp

2007-01-25 Thread sangeeta
Dear Tsjerk,

 I am sorry I cannot give you the output produced right at the moment 
when the command "do_dssp -s md.tpr -f traj.xtc." was issued, as far as I 
remember for that particular program Gromacs was not producing any 
informative text, as it does in case of other programs, At this moment I do 
not have the  opportunity to access that program due to some internal 
error,so at this very moment I can not reproduce the result.I can assure you 
that  next time I will definitely report you about the output if it produces 
any, and I hope you will help.



regards
SANGEETA
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:32:26 +0100, Tsjerk Wassenaar wrote
> Hi Sangeeta,
> 
> My request was actually for the text which do_dssp output to the
> screen. At this point I do not intend to try to reproduce your error,
> and the intermediate files will not prove useful anyway. Running any
> of the gromacs programs gives plenty of informative text thrown out 
> to the screen, in particular when things go wrong. I'm sorry if I haven't
> been clear enough there.
> 
> Tsjerk
> 
> On 1/25/07, sangeeta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Tsjerk,
> >
> >   Previously I send you the intermediate files which are the output 
of
> > DSSP,as per your request, I think I should submit the input files also, 
so
> > here I am attaching the .mdp and .xtc files, the command I used was
> > do_dssp -s md.tpr -f traj.xtc.I want to get the particular type of plot 
of
> > secondary structural elements over time as stated in the manual.I
> > downloaded  DSSP from the link
> >
> > http://swift.cmbi.ru.nl/gv/dssp/
> > and according to the instruction unpacked by using the command  "unzip
> > dsspcmbi.zip  ", the dssp program by itself ran successfully with the 
typed
> > command
> >
> > "dsspcmbi PDBSourcefile DSSPDestinationfile  ", and I could view the
> > destination file with all the structural informations. But when I tried 
to
> > correlate with Gromacs by using  "do_dssp -s md.tpr -f traj.xtc" the
> > intermediate files are only produced.I understand that something is going
> > wrong but can not detect it, please help.Thanks in advence.
> >
> > regards
> > Sangeeta Kundu
> > Junior Research Fellow
> > Bose Institute, Kolkata
> > India
> >
> > --
> > Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
> >
> > ___
> > gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> > www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> >
> 
> -- 
> Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
> Junior UD (post-doc)
> Biomolecular NMR, Bijvoet Center
> Utrecht University
> Padualaan 8
> 3584 CH Utrecht
> The Netherlands
> P: +31-30-2539931
> F: +31-30-2537623
> ___
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] problem regarding dssp

2007-01-25 Thread sangeeta

Dear Tsjerk,
   
I am sorry I cannot give you the output produced right at the moment 
when the command  "do_dssp -s md.tpr -f traj.xtc." was issued, as far as I 
remember for that particular program Gromacs was not producing any 
informative text, as it does in case of other programs, At this moment I do 
not have the  opportunity to access that program due to some internal 
error,so at this very moment I can not reproduce the result.I can assure you 
that  next time I will definitely report you about the output if it produces 
any, and I hope you will help.

regards
SANGEETA

--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] problem regarding dssp

2007-01-25 Thread sangeeta
Dear Tsjerk,

 I am sorry I cannot give you the output produced right at the moment 
when the command "do_dssp -s md.tpr -f traj.xtc." was issued, as far as I 
remember for that particular program Gromacs was not producing any 
informative text, as it does in case of other programs, At this moment I do 
not have the  opportunity to access that program due to some internal 
error,so at this very moment I can not reproduce the result.I can assure you 
that  next time I will definitely report you about the output if it produces 
any, and I hope you will help.



regards
SANGEETA
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:32:26 +0100, Tsjerk Wassenaar wrote
> Hi Sangeeta,
> 
> My request was actually for the text which do_dssp output to the
> screen. At this point I do not intend to try to reproduce your error,
> and the intermediate files will not prove useful anyway. Running any
> of the gromacs programs gives plenty of informative text thrown out 
> to the screen, in particular when things go wrong. I'm sorry if I haven't
> been clear enough there.
> 
> Tsjerk
> 
> On 1/25/07, sangeeta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Tsjerk,
> >
> >   Previously I send you the intermediate files which are the output 
of
> > DSSP,as per your request, I think I should submit the input files also, 
so
> > here I am attaching the .mdp and .xtc files, the command I used was
> > do_dssp -s md.tpr -f traj.xtc.I want to get the particular type of plot 
of
> > secondary structural elements over time as stated in the manual.I
> > downloaded  DSSP from the link
> >
> > http://swift.cmbi.ru.nl/gv/dssp/
> > and according to the instruction unpacked by using the command  "unzip
> > dsspcmbi.zip  ", the dssp program by itself ran successfully with the 
typed
> > command
> >
> > "dsspcmbi PDBSourcefile DSSPDestinationfile  ", and I could view the
> > destination file with all the structural informations. But when I tried 
to
> > correlate with Gromacs by using  "do_dssp -s md.tpr -f traj.xtc" the
> > intermediate files are only produced.I understand that something is going
> > wrong but can not detect it, please help.Thanks in advence.
> >
> > regards
> > Sangeeta Kundu
> > Junior Research Fellow
> > Bose Institute, Kolkata
> > India
> >
> > --
> > Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
> >
> > ___
> > gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> > www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> >
> 
> -- 
> Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
> Junior UD (post-doc)
> Biomolecular NMR, Bijvoet Center
> Utrecht University
> Padualaan 8
> 3584 CH Utrecht
> The Netherlands
> P: +31-30-2539931
> F: +31-30-2537623
> ___
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] problem regarding dssp

2007-01-25 Thread sangeeta

Dear Tsjerk,
   
I am sorry I cannot give you the output produced right at the moment 
when the command  "do_dssp -s md.tpr -f traj.xtc." was issued, as far as I 
remember for that particular program Gromacs was not producing any 
informative text, as it does in case of other programs, At this moment I do 
not have the  opportunity to access that program due to some internal 
error,so at this very moment I can not reproduce the result.I can assure you 
that  next time I will definitely report you about the output if it produces 
any, and I hope you will help.

regards
SANGEETA

--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] problem regarding dssp

2007-01-25 Thread sangeeta
Dear Tsjerk,

 I am sorry I cannot give you the output produced right at the moment 
when the command "do_dssp -s md.tpr -f traj.xtc." was issued, as far as I 
remember for that particular program Gromacs was not producing any 
informative text, as it does in case of other programs, At this moment I do 
not have the  opportunity to access that program due to some internal 
error,so at this very moment I can not reproduce the result.I can assure you 
that  next time I will definitely report you about the output if it produces 
any, and I hope you will help.



regards
SANGEETA
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:32:26 +0100, Tsjerk Wassenaar wrote
> Hi Sangeeta,
> 
> My request was actually for the text which do_dssp output to the
> screen. At this point I do not intend to try to reproduce your error,
> and the intermediate files will not prove useful anyway. Running any
> of the gromacs programs gives plenty of informative text thrown out 
> to the screen, in particular when things go wrong. I'm sorry if I haven't
> been clear enough there.
> 
> Tsjerk
> 
> On 1/25/07, sangeeta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Tsjerk,
> >
> >   Previously I send you the intermediate files which are the output 
of
> > DSSP,as per your request, I think I should submit the input files also, 
so
> > here I am attaching the .mdp and .xtc files, the command I used was
> > do_dssp -s md.tpr -f traj.xtc.I want to get the particular type of plot 
of
> > secondary structural elements over time as stated in the manual.I
> > downloaded  DSSP from the link
> >
> > http://swift.cmbi.ru.nl/gv/dssp/
> > and according to the instruction unpacked by using the command  "unzip
> > dsspcmbi.zip  ", the dssp program by itself ran successfully with the 
typed
> > command
> >
> > "dsspcmbi PDBSourcefile DSSPDestinationfile  ", and I could view the
> > destination file with all the structural informations. But when I tried 
to
> > correlate with Gromacs by using  "do_dssp -s md.tpr -f traj.xtc" the
> > intermediate files are only produced.I understand that something is going
> > wrong but can not detect it, please help.Thanks in advence.
> >
> > regards
> > Sangeeta Kundu
> > Junior Research Fellow
> > Bose Institute, Kolkata
> > India
> >
> > --
> > Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
> >
> > ___
> > gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> > www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> >
> 
> -- 
> Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
> Junior UD (post-doc)
> Biomolecular NMR, Bijvoet Center
> Utrecht University
> Padualaan 8
> 3584 CH Utrecht
> The Netherlands
> P: +31-30-2539931
> F: +31-30-2537623
> ___
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] problem regarding dssp

2007-01-25 Thread sangeeta

Dear Tsjerk,

  Previously I send you the intermediate files which are the output of 
DSSP,as per your request, I think I should submit the input files also, so 
here I am attaching the .mdp and .xtc files, the command I used was 
do_dssp -s md.tpr -f traj.xtc.I want to get the particular type of plot of 
secondary structural elements over time as stated in the manual.I 
downloaded  DSSP from the link

http://swift.cmbi.ru.nl/gv/dssp/
and according to the instruction unpacked by using the command  "unzip 
dsspcmbi.zip  ", the dssp program by itself ran successfully with the typed 
command

"dsspcmbi PDBSourcefile DSSPDestinationfile  ", and I could view the 
destination file with all the structural informations. But when I tried to 
correlate with Gromacs by using  "do_dssp -s md.tpr -f traj.xtc" the 
intermediate files are only produced.I understand that something is going 
wrong but can not detect it, please help.Thanks in advence.

regards
Sangeeta Kundu
Junior Research Fellow
Bose Institute, Kolkata
India

--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] problem regarding dssp

2007-01-24 Thread sangeeta

dear Sir,

  Thanks a lot for your reply.I am sorry for the fact that my subject name 
does not tally with the problem I faced.I really apologize for that.
  So I do not need to include explicitely  "pbc=xyz" in my .mdp file as it 
is already being used by default.

  Regarding dssp I used the following commands
  
  export DSSP=/home/debjani/dssp
  setenv DSSP /home/debjani/dssp
  do_dssp -s md.tpr -f traj.xtc 
 
 At the end of the program only the files namely ddEZ117f ddOWnvlx etc were 
present, but no .xpm files were there.I want to get the plot of changing of 
secondary structural elements during the run.PLease help.

regards
Sangeeta

--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] problem regarding dssp

2007-01-24 Thread sangeeta

dear Sir,

  Thanks a lot for your reply.I am sorry for the fact that my subject name 
does not tally with the problem I faced.I really apologize for that.
  So I do not need to include explicitely  "pbc=xyz" in my .mdp file as it 
is already being used by default.

  Regarding dssp I used the following commands
  
  export DSSP=/home/debjani/dssp
  setenv DSSP /home/debjani/dssp
  do_dssp -s md.tpr -f traj.xtc 
 
 At the end of the program only the files namely ddEZ117f ddOWnvlx etc were 
present, but no .xpm files were there.I want to get the plot of changing of 
secondary structural elements during the run.PLease help.

regards
Sangeeta

--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] problem regarding dssp

2007-01-24 Thread sangeeta
dear Sir,

   Thanks a lot for your reply.I am sorry for the fact that my subject name 
does not tally with the problem I faced.I really apologize for that.
   So I do not need to include explicitely "pbc=xyz" in my .mdp file as it 
is already being used by default.
 
   Regarding dssp I used the following commands
   
   export DSSP=/home/debjani/dssp
   setenv DSSP /home/debjani/dssp
   do_dssp -s md.tpr -f traj.xtc 
  
  At the end of the program only the files namely ddEZ117f ddOWnvlx etc were 
present, but no .xpm files were there.I want to get the plot of changing of 
secondary structural elements during the run.PLease help.

regards
 Sangeeta
 

On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:45:02 +0100, Tsjerk Wassenaar wrote
> Hi Sangeeta,
> 
> To start with, you don't really describe a problem regarding pbc, as
> you've stated in the subject. Please make the subject reflect your
> problem or question directly. This will make it easier on the 
> repliers on this list to check whether they can be of any help. Most 
> of us read/discard messages based on the subject.
> 
> Now, you have three questions, which you've stated before, but
> apparently the answers were not informative enough. To start with the
> pbc, gromacs uses pbc unless explicitly stated otherwise, by adding
> pbc=no in the .mdp file.
> 
> Regarding the chlorides, I think you caught that you have to have an
> #include statement in the .top file, reading #include "ions.itp". The
> next thing to make sure is that the name you've used for your 
> chloride ions in the .top file matches those in the file ions.itp 
> listed for the force field you are using. It may be CL, Cl, Cl-. You 
> can try either or you can check the file ions.itp in your 
> $GMXDIR/share/gromacs/top directory.
> 
> Finally, regarding dssp, please explain what you tried to do, i.e.
> which command you've issued. Note that the file you mentioned is
> merely a temporary file.
> 
> Hope it helps,
> 
> Tsjerk
> 
> On 1/24/07, sangeeta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Dear GROMACS list members,
> >
> >
> >I have three questions,
> >
> >My protein has +2 charge, so I added two Cl atoms through the program
> > genion and subsequently edited the  topol.top file, in spite of that 
while
> > running mdrun it gave an error that  "FATAL error, CL atom type can not 
be
> > found",I can not understand the problem.
> >I wanted to include PBC in my simulation, I want to know that does
> > Gromacs by default use the option by minimum image convention or we have 
to
> > edit pr.mdp & md.mdp by writing PBC=xyz ,How can I know that PBC is
> > being included in my simulation?
> > In spite of having dssp and running it I can not get the .xpm files.
> > Instead while dssp is going on some kind of files namely ddEZ117f 
ddOWnvlx
> > are being produced.How can I generate those xpm files?
> > Waiting for your reply.
> >
> > regards
> > SANGEETA
> >
> > --
> > Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
> >
> > ___
> > gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> > www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> >
> 
> -- 
> Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
> Junior UD (post-doc)
> Biomolecular NMR, Bijvoet Center
> Utrecht University
> Padualaan 8
> 3584 CH Utrecht
> The Netherlands
> P: +31-30-2539931
> F: +31-30-2537623
> ___
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] problem regarding pbc

2007-01-24 Thread sangeeta

Dear GROMACS list members,


   I have three questions,

   My protein has +2 charge, so I added two Cl atoms through the program 
genion and subsequently edited the  topol.top file, in spite of that while 
running mdrun it gave an error that  "FATAL error, CL atom type can not be 
found",I can not understand the problem.
   I wanted to include PBC in my simulation, I want to know that does 
Gromacs by default use the option by minimum image convention or we have to 
edit pr.mdp & md.mdp by writing PBC=xyz ,How can I know that PBC is 
being included in my simulation?
In spite of having dssp and running it I can not get the .xpm files. 
Instead while dssp is going on some kind of files namely ddEZ117f ddOWnvlx
are being produced.How can I generate those xpm files?  
Waiting for your reply.

regards
SANGEETA 

--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] problem regarding pbc

2007-01-24 Thread sangeeta

Dear GROMACS list members,


   I have three questions,

   My protein has +2 charge, so I added two Cl atoms through the program 
genion and subsequently edited the  topol.top file, in spite of that while 
running mdrun it gave an error that  "FATAL error, CL atom type can not be 
found",I can not understand the problem.
   I wanted to include PBC in my simulation, I want to know that does 
Gromacs by default use the option by minimum image convention or we have to 
edit pr.mdp & md.mdp by writing PBC=xyz ,How can I know that PBC is 
being included in my simulation?
In spite of having dssp and running it I can not get the .xpm files. 
Instead while dssp is going on some kind of files namely ddEZ117f ddOWnvlx
are being produced.How can I generate those xpm files?  
Waiting for your reply.

regards
SANGEETA 

--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] N/A

2007-01-23 Thread sangeeta

Dear Sir,

I have three questions,

My protein has +2 charge, so I added two Cl atoms through the program 
genion and subsequently edited the  topol.top file, in spite of that while 
running mdrun it gave an error that  "FATAL error, CL atom type can not be 
found",I can not understand the problem.
I wanted to include PBC in my simulation so in the pr.mdp file as well 
in md.mdp file I wrote PBC=xyz , am I correct? How can I know that PBC is 
being included in my simulation?
 In spite of having dssp and running it I can not get the .xpm files. 
Instead while dssp is going on some kind of files namely ddEZ117f ddOWnvlx
are being produced.How can I generate those files?  
 Waiting for your reply.

regards
SANGEETA 

--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] problem regarding dssp

2007-01-22 Thread sangeeta

Dear Sir,

 After carrying out one MD simulation of  a protein when I went for 
analysis of secondary structure through dssp the program ran successfully, 
but no .xpm files were generated.I can not understand the problem , please 
help.
--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] N/A

2007-01-22 Thread sangeeta
Dear Sir,

 I have three questions,

 My protein has +2 charge, so I added two Cl atoms through the program 
genion and subsequently edited the  topol.top file, in spite of that while 
running mdrun it gave an error that  "FATAL error, CL atom type can not be 
found",I can not understand the problem.
 I wanted to include PBC in my simulation so in the pr.mdp file as well 
in md.mdp file I wrote PBC=xyz , am I correct? How can I know that PBC is 
being included in my simulation?
  In spite of having dssp and running it I can not get the .xpm files. 
How can I generate those files?  
  Waiting for your reply.


regards
SANGEETA 

--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] problem regarding xmgr

2007-01-05 Thread sangeeta
Dear GROMACS list members,

It may be a very trivial question,But I can not solve it, please help,The 
commands like xmgrace,xpsview,xmgr, my-dssp are not working. How could I get 
out of that problem?

regards
Sangeeta 

--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] query about protein-ligand complex

2006-07-02 Thread sangeeta

I could not mail you as our net was down, 
you asked me "Is your system
 properly minimized? "
My question is how can I understand whether my system is properly minimised?
  the run is still going on, I can realize that something is going wrong. 
But I can not detect it.The log file is giving the error that the system is 
not properly minimised.I am giving you the messege,
"2127   2131  176.6  223178260480. 3921810030592.  0.1330
   2128   2129  176.6  69075034112. 1233987043328.  0.1000
   2128   2130  176.6  69075394560. 1233986912256.  0.1000
   2131   2132  176.5  69056528384. 1233902108672.  0.1000
   2131   2133  176.5  69054996480. 1233896734720.  0.1000
Constraint error in algorithm Lincs at step 9
 
t = 0.018 ps: Water molecule starting at atom 13339 can not be settled.
Check for bad contacts and/or reduce the timestep.Wrote pdb files with 
previous and current coordinates
Large VCM(group rest): -168597.92188, 112023.07031, -175543.56250, ekin-cm:  
3.95206e+15
"
 will you please give  me some suggestion , so that 
I can run the system from the beginning?
regards
Sangeeta


On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:50:44 +0200, Erik Marklund wrote
> On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 17:52 +0530, sangeeta wrote:
> > 
> > Dear all,
> > 
> > I am trying to run the dynamics of protein-ligand complex following the 
> > tutorial "GROMACS Tutorial for Drug_Enzyme Complex version 3.3.1"
> > . I am running position restricted dynamics of the 91az8.pdb protein as 
> > mentioned in the tutorial trp.pdb & drg.pdb)in a Linux server machine, I 
can 
> > not understand why it is taking such a long time, the machine is not 
busy 
> > with any other jobs.I ran it before & I stopped  the run at 1200 min, 
now it 
> > is going for about 215 min, &  step6.pdb, step7.pdb etc files are being 
> > formed, I can not undersyand whether I am doing any wrong step, why it 
is 
> > taking such a long time , I don't know , please help.
> 
> stepX.pdb files are generated when things go wrong, for example when
> forces or other quantities becomes NaN or Inf. The log files should give
> some clues about what is happening to your system.Is your system
> properly minimized?  Please provide some more information, otherwise it's
> difficult to help you.
> 
> /Erik Marklund
> 
> > 
> > regards
> > sangeeta 
> > Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
> > 
> > ___
> > gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> > www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> -- 
> Erik Marklund, PhD Student, Molecular Biopcysics group,
> Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
> Husargatan 3, Box 596,  75124 Uppsala, Sweden
> phone:  46 18 471 4537  fax: 46 18 511 755
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ___
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] query about protein-ligand complex

2006-06-30 Thread sangeeta


Dear all,

I am trying to run the dynamics of protein-ligand complex following the 
tutorial "GROMACS Tutorial for Drug_Enzyme Complex version 3.3.1"
. I am running position restricted dynamics of the 91az8.pdb protein as 
mentioned in the tutorial trp.pdb & drg.pdb)in a Linux server machine, I can 
not understand why it is taking such a long time, the machine is not busy 
with any other jobs.I ran it before & I stopped  the run at 1200 min, now it 
is going for about 215 min, &  step6.pdb, step7.pdb etc files are being 
formed, I can not undersyand whether I am doing any wrong step, why it is 
taking such a long time , I don't know , please help.

regards
sangeeta 
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] N/A

2006-06-07 Thread sangeeta

Hi,
Can anyone suggest me is it possible to carry a minimisation followed by MD 
simulation in Groamcs in a water box keeping both the ligand and the 
substrate fixed?The backbone of the protein will also be fixed.

regards
SANGEETA KUNDU
JUNIOR RESEARCH FELLOW
BOSE INSTITUTE
KOLKATA
--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php