Re: Re: [gmx-users] Atomic distances problems using gmxcheck

2007-09-19 Thread yudaqi
Hello David:
Yes, you are right. the value equals to the square of the distance,
approximately. In fact, the force field I used was GROMOS96 43a1 force
field. I have also tried the other kind of force fields, such as
OPLS-AA/L all-atom force field, the same warning was reported, but the
should be value seemed much more reasonable.
Thank you very much for your help!
在 2007-09-19三的 08:24 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Message: 5
 Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:24:25 +0200
 From: David van der Spoel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Atomic distances problems using gmxcheck
 To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
 
 yudaqi wrote:
  Hello gmx-users:
  When using gmxcheck to compare the bond length in .tpr files and .trr
  files, I get the following long list error:
  Distance between atoms 1 and 2 is 0.100, should be 0.010
  Distance between atoms 1 and 3 is 0.101, should be 0.010
  Distance between atoms 1 and 4 is 0.100, should be 0.010
  Distance between atoms 1 and 5 is 0.146, should be 0.022
 
 If you look close the expected distance seems to be the square of the 
 distance. Could it be you are using a GROMOS force field?
 
  ..
  I have searched the maillists in the web site of gromacs, and found the
  same problems has been issued by other users. However, I can not find
  detailed explanations about this. 
  So I wonder why the bond length should be of the order of 0.01 nm? 
  Thank you very much.
  YuDaqi
  
  ___
  gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
  http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
  Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
  Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
  www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
 
 

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Re: Atomic distances problems using gmxcheck (David van der Spoel)

2007-09-19 Thread yudaqi
Hello, David
I have download the CVS version 3.3.2. it works well. 
Thank you very much for your hard work in gromacs.
YuDaqi
在 2007-09-19三的 11:45 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Re: Atomic distances problems using gmxcheck (David van der Spoel)

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php