Re: [gmx-users] Adding Na ions to DPPG

2008-10-28 Thread Myunggi Yi
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Justin A. Lemkul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>
> Peyman Yamin wrote:
>
>> On Monday 27 October 2008 15:07, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
>>
>>> Peyman Yamin wrote:
>>>
 On Monday 27 October 2008 14:03, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:

 Actually I'm doing a funny mistake telling I should replace an O with an
 Na! (probably because of high adrenaline level in my blood for the
 deadline is near!) I should just put one Na beside the O I have! I
 simply
 have a PO4 where one O has no H and thus is negative. an Na+ should
 accompany this O.

>>> Well that makes more sense.  I'm assuming you have a DPPG bilayer with
>>> solvent? Or are you simulating a single DPPG in vacuo?  If it's a bilayer
>>> in solution, just use genion; you can even specify exactly how many Na+
>>> you
>>> want using -np.
>>>
>>> If the topology organization is confusing you, refer to Chapter 5 of the
>>> manual. If you make a .top for DPPG, you can specify:
>>>
>>> [ molecules ]
>>> DPPGx
>>> NA+ 1 (or whatever)
>>>
>>> after including the appropriate force field call and ions.itp; the
>>> parameters for all atom types are taken from these files.
>>>
>>
>> Well this looks great! I simulate one single DPPG in solvent. and you
>> know, this Na+ is not in solvent but a part of DPPG. So you mean I just make
>> a DPPG with an O which has no H so is minus and then use genion to add Na?
>> will it place the Na aroung O hopefully? I think if I put no H arounf O the
>> prodrg will force me to have it! so I should delete it and replace it with
>> Na? or I should never use the word "replace" at all???
>>
>>
> Well, the Na+ may be associated with DPPG electrostatically, but they are
> still distinct chemical entities.  You can have a DPPG that has a net -1
> charge; certainly all chemical species are not net neutral!  Indeed, genion
> will place Na+ in whatever solvent you choose, but may not necessarily be
> bound to DPPG. Some simulation may show the association, however.
>


Yes, keep the DPPG. The charge distribution around anionic lipid has been
studied.
http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=PRLTAO0001010303810301&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes




>
> And no, don't replace any part of your DPPG.  Because then you don't really
> have DPPG any more do you?
>
> -Justin
>
>
>  Thanks again ;)
>> Peyman
>>
>>  -Justin
>>>
>>>  Peyman Yamin wrote:
>
>> Dear GMX users,
>>
>> I want to add sodium ions (Na+) to a phospholipid (DPPG) I have the
>> structure with the Na replaced with O. I get a .top with this from
>> prodrg and try to add the Na manually at the right place by removing
>> the corresponding O. I use GROMOS 96.1 forcefield. GMX version 3.3.1.I
>> have a problem:
>>
> Are you trying to replace the O in DPPG with Na+?  Or are you simply
> trying to add ions to the surrounding solvent (water)?  If you just
> need
> ions in the solvent, use genion; you don't have to do it manually.
>
>  * In .top file, as far as I can understand, I should just replace OA
>> with NA+ and set the mass and charge.
>> DPPG has a centre:  [ O-P(O)=O ] -
>> The Na+ should be around this with +1 charge.
>> should I put charge +1 ?
>>
> Again, I'm not clear on what you're trying to accomplish.  If you
> replace one of these oxygen atoms, you will likely not have an integer
> charge within the DPPG molecule itself.
>
>  * which parameters should I place in the top as the Na+ is not
>> bonding.
>> I need LJ and Coulomb params. I have C6 and C12 them from
>> ffG43a1nb.itp. (NA+ OA) but I'm not sure where should I put it in the
>> top file. What should I insert manually in top file at all?
>>
> Simply #include "ffG43a1.itp" at the top of your .top file; it will
> include nonbonded and bonded parameters for all the atoms in the
> system.
>
> -Justin
>
>  Thanks in advance for the time,
>> I've been away for some time from GMX and might sound
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Peyman
>>
>
>>
> --
> 
>
> Justin A. Lemkul
> Graduate Research Assistant
> Department of Biochemistry
> Virginia Tech
> Blacksburg, VA
> jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
> http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
>
> 
> ___
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface
> or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>



-- 
Best wishes,

Myunggi Yi
==
KLB 419
Institute of Molecular Biophysics
Florida State University
Tallahasse

Re: [gmx-users] Adding Na ions to DPPG

2008-10-27 Thread Peyman Yamin
On Monday 27 October 2008 15:12, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
> Peyman Yamin wrote:
> > On Monday 27 October 2008 14:08, Mark Abraham wrote:
> >> Peyman Yamin wrote:
> >>> Dear GMX users,
> >>>
> >>> I want to add sodium ions (Na+) to a phospholipid (DPPG) I have the
> >>> structure with the Na replaced with O.
> >>
> >> That doesn't make sense to me.
> >>
> >>> I get a .top with this from prodrg and try to
> >>> add the Na manually at the right place by removing the corresponding O.
> >>> I use GROMOS 96.1 forcefield. GMX version 3.3.1. I have a problem:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> * In .top file, as far as I can understand, I should just replace OA
> >>> with NA+ and set the mass and charge.
> >>> DPPG has a centre:  [ O-P(O)=O ] -
> >>> The Na+ should be around this with +1 charge.
> >>> should I put charge +1 ?
> >>>
> >>> * which parameters should I place in the top as the Na+ is not bonding.
> >>> I need LJ and Coulomb params. I have C6 and C12 them from
> >>> ffG43a1nb.itp. (NA+ OA) but I'm not sure where should I put it in the
> >>> top file. What should I insert manually in top file at all?
> >>
> >> Sodium is not going to form any bond. It's a labile ion, so needs its
> >> own [ molecule ] section. The easiest approach is to construct a
> >> topology for the anion, and then use genion to add suitable amounts of
> >> Na+ afterwards. Check out some tutorial material for the approach here.
> >
> > Right, but can't I have them all included in a single top??
> > What shall I put into the topology of the cation then? I have a single
> > DPPG molecule in water/octanol. So I thought I might just embed the Na
> > inside the DPPG top. in the end DPPG HAS a Na actually, though
> > non-bonded!
>
> Alright, now I understand.  So you will have several different topologies
> to deal with.  You don't need to merge DPPG/Na+ into one!  You have
> separate topologies for water and octanol, too, don't you?  You could use
> the topology from PRODRG as dppg.itp, for example, and construct a .top
> that has the following:
>
> #include "ffG43a1.itp"
> #include "dppg.itp"
> #include "spc.itp"
> #include "octanol.itp"
> #include "ions.itp"
>
> [ molecules ]
> DPPG  x
> SOL   y
> OCT   z
> NA+   1
>
> All bonded and non-bonded parameters will then be read from the appropriate
> force field files, without merging anything!
>
> -Justin
>

Hey this looks beautiful! I'll try it right away! 

> > If I'm way away from making sense then would be happy to know the logical
> > way. about genion I thought it's mainly for adding the ions to the
> > solvent, but I should have exactly one Na.
> >
> > Be well,
> > Peyman
> >
> >> Mark
> >> ___
> >> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> >> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> >> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
> >> posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> >> www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

-- 
Peyman Yamin
Lehrstuhl fuer Thermische Verfahrenstechnik
Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg
Egerlandstr. 3
91058 Erlangen
Phone: +49(0) - 9131 - 85 27671
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Adding Na ions to DPPG

2008-10-27 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



Peyman Yamin wrote:

On Monday 27 October 2008 15:07, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:

Peyman Yamin wrote:

On Monday 27 October 2008 14:03, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:

Actually I'm doing a funny mistake telling I should replace an O with an
Na! (probably because of high adrenaline level in my blood for the
deadline is near!) I should just put one Na beside the O I have! I simply
have a PO4 where one O has no H and thus is negative. an Na+ should
accompany this O.

Well that makes more sense.  I'm assuming you have a DPPG bilayer with
solvent? Or are you simulating a single DPPG in vacuo?  If it's a bilayer
in solution, just use genion; you can even specify exactly how many Na+ you
want using -np.

If the topology organization is confusing you, refer to Chapter 5 of the
manual. If you make a .top for DPPG, you can specify:

[ molecules ]
DPPGx
NA+ 1 (or whatever)

after including the appropriate force field call and ions.itp; the
parameters for all atom types are taken from these files.


Well this looks great! 
I simulate one single DPPG in solvent. and you know, this Na+ is not in 
solvent but a part of DPPG. So you mean I just make a DPPG with an O which 
has no H so is minus and then use genion to add Na? will it place the Na 
aroung O hopefully? I think if I put no H arounf O the prodrg will force me 
to have it! so I should delete it and replace it with Na? or I should never 
use the word "replace" at all???




Well, the Na+ may be associated with DPPG electrostatically, but they are still 
distinct chemical entities.  You can have a DPPG that has a net -1 charge; 
certainly all chemical species are not net neutral!  Indeed, genion will place 
Na+ in whatever solvent you choose, but may not necessarily be bound to DPPG. 
Some simulation may show the association, however.


And no, don't replace any part of your DPPG.  Because then you don't really have 
DPPG any more do you?


-Justin


Thanks again ;)
Peyman


-Justin


Peyman Yamin wrote:

Dear GMX users,

I want to add sodium ions (Na+) to a phospholipid (DPPG) I have the
structure with the Na replaced with O. I get a .top with this from
prodrg and try to add the Na manually at the right place by removing
the corresponding O. I use GROMOS 96.1 forcefield. GMX version 3.3.1. I
have a problem:

Are you trying to replace the O in DPPG with Na+?  Or are you simply
trying to add ions to the surrounding solvent (water)?  If you just need
ions in the solvent, use genion; you don't have to do it manually.


* In .top file, as far as I can understand, I should just replace OA
with NA+ and set the mass and charge.
DPPG has a centre:  [ O-P(O)=O ] -
The Na+ should be around this with +1 charge.
should I put charge +1 ?

Again, I'm not clear on what you're trying to accomplish.  If you
replace one of these oxygen atoms, you will likely not have an integer
charge within the DPPG molecule itself.


* which parameters should I place in the top as the Na+ is not bonding.
I need LJ and Coulomb params. I have C6 and C12 them from
ffG43a1nb.itp. (NA+ OA) but I'm not sure where should I put it in the
top file. What should I insert manually in top file at all?

Simply #include "ffG43a1.itp" at the top of your .top file; it will
include nonbonded and bonded parameters for all the atoms in the system.

-Justin


Thanks in advance for the time,
I've been away for some time from GMX and might sound

Cheers,
Peyman




--


Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Adding Na ions to DPPG

2008-10-27 Thread Peyman Yamin
On Monday 27 October 2008 15:07, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
> Peyman Yamin wrote:
> > On Monday 27 October 2008 14:03, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
> >
> > Actually I'm doing a funny mistake telling I should replace an O with an
> > Na! (probably because of high adrenaline level in my blood for the
> > deadline is near!) I should just put one Na beside the O I have! I simply
> > have a PO4 where one O has no H and thus is negative. an Na+ should
> > accompany this O.
>
> Well that makes more sense.  I'm assuming you have a DPPG bilayer with
> solvent? Or are you simulating a single DPPG in vacuo?  If it's a bilayer
> in solution, just use genion; you can even specify exactly how many Na+ you
> want using -np.
>
> If the topology organization is confusing you, refer to Chapter 5 of the
> manual. If you make a .top for DPPG, you can specify:
>
> [ molecules ]
> DPPG  x
> NA+   1 (or whatever)
>
> after including the appropriate force field call and ions.itp; the
> parameters for all atom types are taken from these files.

Well this looks great! 
I simulate one single DPPG in solvent. and you know, this Na+ is not in 
solvent but a part of DPPG. So you mean I just make a DPPG with an O which 
has no H so is minus and then use genion to add Na? will it place the Na 
aroung O hopefully? I think if I put no H arounf O the prodrg will force me 
to have it! so I should delete it and replace it with Na? or I should never 
use the word "replace" at all???

Thanks again ;)
Peyman

>
> -Justin
>
> >> Peyman Yamin wrote:
> >>> Dear GMX users,
> >>>
> >>> I want to add sodium ions (Na+) to a phospholipid (DPPG) I have the
> >>> structure with the Na replaced with O. I get a .top with this from
> >>> prodrg and try to add the Na manually at the right place by removing
> >>> the corresponding O. I use GROMOS 96.1 forcefield. GMX version 3.3.1. I
> >>> have a problem:
> >>
> >> Are you trying to replace the O in DPPG with Na+?  Or are you simply
> >> trying to add ions to the surrounding solvent (water)?  If you just need
> >> ions in the solvent, use genion; you don't have to do it manually.
> >>
> >>> * In .top file, as far as I can understand, I should just replace OA
> >>> with NA+ and set the mass and charge.
> >>> DPPG has a centre:  [ O-P(O)=O ] -
> >>> The Na+ should be around this with +1 charge.
> >>> should I put charge +1 ?
> >>
> >> Again, I'm not clear on what you're trying to accomplish.  If you
> >> replace one of these oxygen atoms, you will likely not have an integer
> >> charge within the DPPG molecule itself.
> >>
> >>> * which parameters should I place in the top as the Na+ is not bonding.
> >>> I need LJ and Coulomb params. I have C6 and C12 them from
> >>> ffG43a1nb.itp. (NA+ OA) but I'm not sure where should I put it in the
> >>> top file. What should I insert manually in top file at all?
> >>
> >> Simply #include "ffG43a1.itp" at the top of your .top file; it will
> >> include nonbonded and bonded parameters for all the atoms in the system.
> >>
> >> -Justin
> >>
> >>> Thanks in advance for the time,
> >>> I've been away for some time from GMX and might sound
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Peyman

-- 
Peyman Yamin
Lehrstuhl fuer Thermische Verfahrenstechnik
Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg
Egerlandstr. 3
91058 Erlangen
Phone: +49(0) - 9131 - 85 27671
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Adding Na ions to DPPG

2008-10-27 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



Peyman Yamin wrote:

On Monday 27 October 2008 14:08, Mark Abraham wrote:

Peyman Yamin wrote:

Dear GMX users,

I want to add sodium ions (Na+) to a phospholipid (DPPG) I have the
structure with the Na replaced with O.

That doesn't make sense to me.


I get a .top with this from prodrg and try to
add the Na manually at the right place by removing the corresponding O. I
use GROMOS 96.1 forcefield. GMX version 3.3.1. I have a problem:


* In .top file, as far as I can understand, I should just replace OA with
NA+ and set the mass and charge.
DPPG has a centre:  [ O-P(O)=O ] -
The Na+ should be around this with +1 charge.
should I put charge +1 ?

* which parameters should I place in the top as the Na+ is not bonding. I
need LJ and Coulomb params. I have C6 and C12 them from ffG43a1nb.itp.
(NA+ OA) but I'm not sure where should I put it in the top file. What
should I insert manually in top file at all?

Sodium is not going to form any bond. It's a labile ion, so needs its
own [ molecule ] section. The easiest approach is to construct a
topology for the anion, and then use genion to add suitable amounts of
Na+ afterwards. Check out some tutorial material for the approach here.


Right, but can't I have them all included in a single top??
What shall I put into the topology of the cation then? I have a single DPPG 
molecule in water/octanol. So I thought I might just embed the Na inside the 
DPPG top. in the end DPPG HAS a Na actually, though non-bonded!




Alright, now I understand.  So you will have several different topologies to 
deal with.  You don't need to merge DPPG/Na+ into one!  You have separate 
topologies for water and octanol, too, don't you?  You could use the topology 
from PRODRG as dppg.itp, for example, and construct a .top that has the following:


#include "ffG43a1.itp"
#include "dppg.itp"
#include "spc.itp"
#include "octanol.itp"
#include "ions.itp"

[ molecules ]
DPPGx
SOL y
OCT z
NA+ 1

All bonded and non-bonded parameters will then be read from the appropriate 
force field files, without merging anything!


-Justin

If I'm way away from making sense then would be happy to know the logical way. 
about genion I thought it's mainly for adding the ions to the solvent, but I 
should have exactly one Na. 


Be well,
Peyman



Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php




--


Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Adding Na ions to DPPG

2008-10-27 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



Peyman Yamin wrote:

On Monday 27 October 2008 14:03, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:

Actually I'm doing a funny mistake telling I should replace an O with an Na! 
(probably because of high adrenaline level in my blood for the deadline is 
near!) I should just put one Na beside the O I have! I simply have a PO4 
where one O has no H and thus is negative. an Na+ should accompany this O.




Well that makes more sense.  I'm assuming you have a DPPG bilayer with solvent? 
 Or are you simulating a single DPPG in vacuo?  If it's a bilayer in solution, 
just use genion; you can even specify exactly how many Na+ you want using -np.


If the topology organization is confusing you, refer to Chapter 5 of the manual. 
 If you make a .top for DPPG, you can specify:


[ molecules ]
DPPGx
NA+ 1 (or whatever)

after including the appropriate force field call and ions.itp; the parameters 
for all atom types are taken from these files.


-Justin




Peyman Yamin wrote:

Dear GMX users,

I want to add sodium ions (Na+) to a phospholipid (DPPG) I have the
structure with the Na replaced with O. I get a .top with this from prodrg
and try to add the Na manually at the right place by removing the
corresponding O. I use GROMOS 96.1 forcefield. GMX version 3.3.1. I have
a problem:

Are you trying to replace the O in DPPG with Na+?  Or are you simply trying
to add ions to the surrounding solvent (water)?  If you just need ions in
the solvent, use genion; you don't have to do it manually.


* In .top file, as far as I can understand, I should just replace OA with
NA+ and set the mass and charge.
DPPG has a centre:  [ O-P(O)=O ] -
The Na+ should be around this with +1 charge.
should I put charge +1 ?

Again, I'm not clear on what you're trying to accomplish.  If you replace
one of these oxygen atoms, you will likely not have an integer charge
within the DPPG molecule itself.


* which parameters should I place in the top as the Na+ is not bonding. I
need LJ and Coulomb params. I have C6 and C12 them from ffG43a1nb.itp.
(NA+ OA) but I'm not sure where should I put it in the top file. What
should I insert manually in top file at all?

Simply #include "ffG43a1.itp" at the top of your .top file; it will include
nonbonded and bonded parameters for all the atoms in the system.

-Justin


Thanks in advance for the time,
I've been away for some time from GMX and might sound

Cheers,
Peyman




--


Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Adding Na ions to DPPG

2008-10-27 Thread Peyman Yamin
On Monday 27 October 2008 14:03, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:

Actually I'm doing a funny mistake telling I should replace an O with an Na! 
(probably because of high adrenaline level in my blood for the deadline is 
near!) I should just put one Na beside the O I have! I simply have a PO4 
where one O has no H and thus is negative. an Na+ should accompany this O.


> Peyman Yamin wrote:
> > Dear GMX users,
> >
> > I want to add sodium ions (Na+) to a phospholipid (DPPG) I have the
> > structure with the Na replaced with O. I get a .top with this from prodrg
> > and try to add the Na manually at the right place by removing the
> > corresponding O. I use GROMOS 96.1 forcefield. GMX version 3.3.1. I have
> > a problem:
>
> Are you trying to replace the O in DPPG with Na+?  Or are you simply trying
> to add ions to the surrounding solvent (water)?  If you just need ions in
> the solvent, use genion; you don't have to do it manually.
>
> > * In .top file, as far as I can understand, I should just replace OA with
> > NA+ and set the mass and charge.
> > DPPG has a centre:  [ O-P(O)=O ] -
> > The Na+ should be around this with +1 charge.
> > should I put charge +1 ?
>
> Again, I'm not clear on what you're trying to accomplish.  If you replace
> one of these oxygen atoms, you will likely not have an integer charge
> within the DPPG molecule itself.
>
> > * which parameters should I place in the top as the Na+ is not bonding. I
> > need LJ and Coulomb params. I have C6 and C12 them from ffG43a1nb.itp.
> > (NA+ OA) but I'm not sure where should I put it in the top file. What
> > should I insert manually in top file at all?
>
> Simply #include "ffG43a1.itp" at the top of your .top file; it will include
> nonbonded and bonded parameters for all the atoms in the system.
>
> -Justin
>
> > Thanks in advance for the time,
> > I've been away for some time from GMX and might sound
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Peyman

-- 
Peyman Yamin
Lehrstuhl fuer Thermische Verfahrenstechnik
Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg
Egerlandstr. 3
91058 Erlangen
Phone: +49(0) - 9131 - 85 27671
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Adding Na ions to DPPG

2008-10-27 Thread Peyman Yamin
On Monday 27 October 2008 14:08, Mark Abraham wrote:
> Peyman Yamin wrote:
> > Dear GMX users,
> >
> > I want to add sodium ions (Na+) to a phospholipid (DPPG) I have the
> > structure with the Na replaced with O.
>
> That doesn't make sense to me.
>
> > I get a .top with this from prodrg and try to
> > add the Na manually at the right place by removing the corresponding O. I
> > use GROMOS 96.1 forcefield. GMX version 3.3.1. I have a problem:
> >
> >
> > * In .top file, as far as I can understand, I should just replace OA with
> > NA+ and set the mass and charge.
> > DPPG has a centre:  [ O-P(O)=O ] -
> > The Na+ should be around this with +1 charge.
> > should I put charge +1 ?
> >
> > * which parameters should I place in the top as the Na+ is not bonding. I
> > need LJ and Coulomb params. I have C6 and C12 them from ffG43a1nb.itp.
> > (NA+ OA) but I'm not sure where should I put it in the top file. What
> > should I insert manually in top file at all?
>
> Sodium is not going to form any bond. It's a labile ion, so needs its
> own [ molecule ] section. The easiest approach is to construct a
> topology for the anion, and then use genion to add suitable amounts of
> Na+ afterwards. Check out some tutorial material for the approach here.

Right, but can't I have them all included in a single top??
What shall I put into the topology of the cation then? I have a single DPPG 
molecule in water/octanol. So I thought I might just embed the Na inside the 
DPPG top. in the end DPPG HAS a Na actually, though non-bonded!

If I'm way away from making sense then would be happy to know the logical way. 
about genion I thought it's mainly for adding the ions to the solvent, but I 
should have exactly one Na. 

Be well,
Peyman


>
> Mark
> ___
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

-- 
Peyman Yamin
Lehrstuhl fuer Thermische Verfahrenstechnik
Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg
Egerlandstr. 3
91058 Erlangen
Phone: +49(0) - 9131 - 85 27671
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Adding Na ions to DPPG

2008-10-27 Thread Peyman Yamin
Thanks a lot for the replies,

I replace the O in DPPG because I thought it's practical to get the topology 
of the quasi-DPPG (which has no charge cause the O is connected to the P) 
from prodrg, and then delete the O and replace it with Na and delete the bond 
of P with it and try to tell gromacs it's just a non-bonded Na "around" the 
P! since it's always around the P replacing the O which was bond to P made 
sense to me from the coordinates (distance to P, etc.) point of view. Am I 
doing strange things??

I'm not sure if I have to use genion since my zwitterionic DPPG has always its 
Na+ beside its O-.


On Monday 27 October 2008 14:03, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
> Peyman Yamin wrote:
> > Dear GMX users,
> >
> > I want to add sodium ions (Na+) to a phospholipid (DPPG) I have the
> > structure with the Na replaced with O. I get a .top with this from prodrg
> > and try to add the Na manually at the right place by removing the
> > corresponding O. I use GROMOS 96.1 forcefield. GMX version 3.3.1. I have
> > a problem:
>
> Are you trying to replace the O in DPPG with Na+?  Or are you simply trying
> to add ions to the surrounding solvent (water)?  If you just need ions in
> the solvent, use genion; you don't have to do it manually.
>
> > * In .top file, as far as I can understand, I should just replace OA with
> > NA+ and set the mass and charge.
> > DPPG has a centre:  [ O-P(O)=O ] -
> > The Na+ should be around this with +1 charge.
> > should I put charge +1 ?
>
> Again, I'm not clear on what you're trying to accomplish.  If you replace
> one of these oxygen atoms, you will likely not have an integer charge
> within the DPPG molecule itself.

I thought since O on P is gone it will be -1 charged, so a +1 Na will balance 
it, won't it??

>
> > * which parameters should I place in the top as the Na+ is not bonding. I
> > need LJ and Coulomb params. I have C6 and C12 them from ffG43a1nb.itp.
> > (NA+ OA) but I'm not sure where should I put it in the top file. What
> > should I insert manually in top file at all?
>
> Simply #include "ffG43a1.itp" at the top of your .top file; it will include
> nonbonded and bonded parameters for all the atoms in the system.

Well I do include it. So shouldn't I worry about the nonbonding params and 
stuff? like those in topology file? Actually an existential question for me 
always is that if everything goes OK by adding the FF itp, then why does 
prodrg give me all the params for bonds, dihedrals, angles and etc.??

So, genion or manually replace? and how please...I mean, I don't want to pass 
my task to others, but well, a bit of more detailed help would enlight me a 
great deal ;)

Cheers,
Peyman

APPENDIX!

* This is the top for the DPPG with the unwanted 
O ---> say O number 24. **

The question is if I simply change that to Na (of course in pdb as well) what 
changes should I make in other switches? I see non of non-bonding context!
(pairs?)

[ moleculetype ]
; Name nrexcl
DRG  3

[ atoms ]
;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
 1   CH3 1  DRG CBL 1   -0.019  15.0350   
 2   CH2 1  DRG CBK 10.006  14.0270   
 3   CH2 1  DRG CBJ 10.006  14.0270   
 4   CH2 1  DRG CBI 10.007  14.0270   
 5   CH2 1  DRG CBH 20.000  14.0270   
 6   CH2 1  DRG CBG 30.000  14.0270   
 7   CH2 1  DRG CBF 40.000  14.0270   
 8   CH2 1  DRG CBE 50.000  14.0270   
 9   CH2 1  DRG CBD 60.000  14.0270   
10   CH2 1  DRG CBC 70.000  14.0270   
11   CH2 1  DRG CBB 80.000  14.0270   
12   CH2 1  DRG CBA 90.000  14.0270   
13   CH2 1  DRG CAZ100.039  14.0270   
14   CH2 1  DRG CAY100.039  14.0270   
15   CH2 1  DRG CAX100.039  14.0270   
16 C 1  DRG CAV100.232  12.0110   
17 O 1  DRG OAW10   -0.377  15.9994   
18OA 1  DRG OAU10   -0.108  15.9994   
19   CH1 1  DRG CAT100.136  13.0190   
20   CH2 1  DRG CBM110.054  14.0270   
21OA 1  DRG OBN11   -0.094  15.9994   
22 P 1  DRG PBO110.954  30.9738   
23OA 1  DRG OBP11   -0.410  15.9994   
24OA 1  DRG OBQ11   -0.410  15.9994   
25OA 1  DRG OBR11   -0.094  15.9994   
26   CH2 1  DRG CBS120.034  14.0270   
27   CH1 1  DRG CBT120.070  13.0190   
28OA 1  DRG OBW12   -0.117  15.9994   
29 H 1  DRG HCQ120.013   1.0080   
30   CH2 1  DRG CBU130.069  14.0270   
31OA   

RE: [gmx-users] Adding Na ions to DPPG

2008-10-27 Thread Kukol, Andreas
Use the Gromacs program genion for that purpose. This replaces water molecules 
by the ions you specify. You may need to change the topology afterwards 
manually. Make sure, you put an #include ions.ipt near the top of the 
.top-file, this contains the force field parameters for ions.

Best wishes
Andreas

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Peyman Yamin
> Sent: 27 October 2008 12:36
> To: gmx-users
> Subject: [gmx-users] Adding Na ions to DPPG
>
> Dear GMX users,
>
> I want to add sodium ions (Na+) to a phospholipid (DPPG) I have the
> structure
> with the Na replaced with O. I get a .top with this from prodrg and try to
> add the Na manually at the right place by removing the corresponding O. I
> use
> GROMOS 96.1 forcefield. GMX version 3.3.1. I have a problem:
>
>
> * In .top file, as far as I can understand, I should just replace OA with
> NA+
> and set the mass and charge.
> DPPG has a centre:  [ O-P(O)=O ] -
> The Na+ should be around this with +1 charge.
> should I put charge +1 ?
>
> * which parameters should I place in the top as the Na+ is not bonding. I
> need
> LJ and Coulomb params. I have C6 and C12 them from ffG43a1nb.itp. (NA+ OA)
> but I'm not sure where should I put it in the top file. What should I insert
> manually in top file at all?
>
> Thanks in advance for the time,
> I've been away for some time from GMX and might sound
>
> Cheers,
> Peyman
>
>
> --
> Peyman Yamin
> Lehrstuhl fuer Thermische Verfahrenstechnik
> Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg
> Egerlandstr. 3
> 91058 Erlangen
> Phone: +49(0) - 9131 - 85 27671
> Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ___
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Adding Na ions to DPPG

2008-10-27 Thread Mark Abraham

Peyman Yamin wrote:

Dear GMX users,

I want to add sodium ions (Na+) to a phospholipid (DPPG) I have the structure 
with the Na replaced with O. 


That doesn't make sense to me.

I get a .top with this from prodrg and try to 
add the Na manually at the right place by removing the corresponding O. I use 
GROMOS 96.1 forcefield. GMX version 3.3.1. I have a problem:



* In .top file, as far as I can understand, I should just replace OA with NA+ 
and set the mass and charge. 
DPPG has a centre:  [ O-P(O)=O ] - 
The Na+ should be around this with +1 charge. 
should I put charge +1 ?


* which parameters should I place in the top as the Na+ is not bonding. I need 
LJ and Coulomb params. I have C6 and C12 them from ffG43a1nb.itp. (NA+ OA) 
but I'm not sure where should I put it in the top file. What should I insert 
manually in top file at all? 


Sodium is not going to form any bond. It's a labile ion, so needs its 
own [ molecule ] section. The easiest approach is to construct a 
topology for the anion, and then use genion to add suitable amounts of 
Na+ afterwards. Check out some tutorial material for the approach here.


Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Adding Na ions to DPPG

2008-10-27 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



Peyman Yamin wrote:

Dear GMX users,

I want to add sodium ions (Na+) to a phospholipid (DPPG) I have the structure 
with the Na replaced with O. I get a .top with this from prodrg and try to 
add the Na manually at the right place by removing the corresponding O. I use 
GROMOS 96.1 forcefield. GMX version 3.3.1. I have a problem:




Are you trying to replace the O in DPPG with Na+?  Or are you simply trying to 
add ions to the surrounding solvent (water)?  If you just need ions in the 
solvent, use genion; you don't have to do it manually.




* In .top file, as far as I can understand, I should just replace OA with NA+ 
and set the mass and charge. 
DPPG has a centre:  [ O-P(O)=O ] - 
The Na+ should be around this with +1 charge. 
should I put charge +1 ?




Again, I'm not clear on what you're trying to accomplish.  If you replace one of 
these oxygen atoms, you will likely not have an integer charge within the DPPG 
molecule itself.


* which parameters should I place in the top as the Na+ is not bonding. I need 
LJ and Coulomb params. I have C6 and C12 them from ffG43a1nb.itp. (NA+ OA) 
but I'm not sure where should I put it in the top file. What should I insert 
manually in top file at all? 



Simply #include "ffG43a1.itp" at the top of your .top file; it will include 
nonbonded and bonded parameters for all the atoms in the system.


-Justin


Thanks in advance for the time,
I've been away for some time from GMX and might sound 


Cheers,
Peyman 





--


Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Adding Na ions to DPPG

2008-10-27 Thread Peyman Yamin
Dear GMX users,

I want to add sodium ions (Na+) to a phospholipid (DPPG) I have the structure 
with the Na replaced with O. I get a .top with this from prodrg and try to 
add the Na manually at the right place by removing the corresponding O. I use 
GROMOS 96.1 forcefield. GMX version 3.3.1. I have a problem:


* In .top file, as far as I can understand, I should just replace OA with NA+ 
and set the mass and charge. 
DPPG has a centre:  [ O-P(O)=O ] - 
The Na+ should be around this with +1 charge. 
should I put charge +1 ?

* which parameters should I place in the top as the Na+ is not bonding. I need 
LJ and Coulomb params. I have C6 and C12 them from ffG43a1nb.itp. (NA+ OA) 
but I'm not sure where should I put it in the top file. What should I insert 
manually in top file at all? 

Thanks in advance for the time,
I've been away for some time from GMX and might sound 

Cheers,
Peyman 


-- 
Peyman Yamin
Lehrstuhl fuer Thermische Verfahrenstechnik
Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg
Egerlandstr. 3
91058 Erlangen
Phone: +49(0) - 9131 - 85 27671
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php