Re: [gmx-users] Barostat & Density decreasing to zero

2009-02-11 Thread Ran Friedman
Hi Omer,
You use a  dielectric constant is 80, which means that the electrostatic
interactions are screened. Perhaps that's why your density is low.
Ran.

Omer Markovitch wrote:
> Dear All,
> I have simulated a protein inside a box with water and ions. I began
> by minimizing my system (which has a total charge of zero), until the
> maximum gradient was small enough and the potential energy become
> negative.
> Then I heated it, slowly, to 300K at constant volume (using berendsen
> thermostat and tcoupl = 1 ps).
> Then I performed 500 ps NVT simulation to equilibrate the temperature,
> at 300K.
> Then, I tried to equilibrate the pressure and run NPT simulation,
> using Berendsen barostat (p=1, pcoupl=10) and Berendsen thermostat
> (T=300K, tcoupl = 0.1).
>
> My problem is, that with the barostat & thermostat both active in the
> same MD run, my density drops to a very low value (at the first MD
> steps, the density is 1000, dropping later to 100 kg/m^3). That is- my
> box dimensions increase significantly (from around 6x6x6 to 12x12x12
> nm^3. If I change the pressure coupling constant, the speed of the
> expansion changes but all simulation converged to a small density
> between 50-100 kg/m3.
>
> Your help is appreciated; Probably, I am not controlling the
> simulation like I should. I will appreciate any advice.
> Thank you, Omer Markovitch.
>
> I have used gromacs version 3.3.3, Here is my .MDP file for the NPT run:
>
> integrator   = md
> dt   = 0.001
> nsteps   = 50
> comm_grps= system
> nstxout  = 500
> nstvout  = 500
> nstcheckpoint= 1000
> nstlog   = 500
> nstenergy= 500
> nstlist  = 10
> ns_type  = simple
> pbc  = xyz
> rlist= 1.0
> coulombtype  = PME
> rcoulomb-switch  = 0
> rcoulomb = 1.0
> epsilon_r= 80
> epsilon_rf   = 80
> vdw-type = Cut-off
> rvdw-switch  = 0
> rvdw = 1.0
> table-extension  = 1
> fourierspacing   = 0.12
> pme_order= 4
> ewald_rtol   = 1e-05
> ewald_geometry   = 3d
> optimize_fft = yes
> tcoupl   = berendsen
> tc-grps  = system
> tau_t= 0.1
> ref_t= 300
> Pcoupl   = berendsen
> Pcoupltype   = Isotropic
> tau-p= 10
> compressibility  = 4.5E-5
> ref-p= 1
> andersen_seed= 815131
> constraints  = none
>
> 
>
> ___
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] Barostat & Density decreasing to zero

2009-02-11 Thread Omer Markovitch
Dear All,
I have simulated a protein inside a box with water and ions. I began by
minimizing my system (which has a total charge of zero), until the maximum
gradient was small enough and the potential energy become negative.
Then I heated it, slowly, to 300K at constant volume (using berendsen
thermostat and tcoupl = 1 ps).
Then I performed 500 ps NVT simulation to equilibrate the temperature, at
300K.
Then, I tried to equilibrate the pressure and run NPT simulation, using
Berendsen barostat (p=1, pcoupl=10) and Berendsen thermostat (T=300K, tcoupl
= 0.1).

My problem is, that with the barostat & thermostat both active in the same
MD run, my density drops to a very low value (at the first MD steps, the
density is 1000, dropping later to 100 kg/m^3). That is- my box dimensions
increase significantly (from around 6x6x6 to 12x12x12 nm^3. If I change the
pressure coupling constant, the speed of the expansion changes but all
simulation converged to a small density between 50-100 kg/m3.

Your help is appreciated; Probably, I am not controlling the simulation like
I should. I will appreciate any advice.
Thank you, Omer Markovitch.

I have used gromacs version 3.3.3, Here is my .MDP file for the NPT run:

integrator   = md
dt   = 0.001
nsteps   = 50
comm_grps= system
nstxout  = 500
nstvout  = 500
nstcheckpoint= 1000
nstlog   = 500
nstenergy= 500
nstlist  = 10
ns_type  = simple
pbc  = xyz
rlist= 1.0
coulombtype  = PME
rcoulomb-switch  = 0
rcoulomb = 1.0
epsilon_r= 80
epsilon_rf   = 80
vdw-type = Cut-off
rvdw-switch  = 0
rvdw = 1.0
table-extension  = 1
fourierspacing   = 0.12
pme_order= 4
ewald_rtol   = 1e-05
ewald_geometry   = 3d
optimize_fft = yes
tcoupl   = berendsen
tc-grps  = system
tau_t= 0.1
ref_t= 300
Pcoupl   = berendsen
Pcoupltype   = Isotropic
tau-p= 10
compressibility  = 4.5E-5
ref-p= 1
andersen_seed= 815131
constraints  = none
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php