Re: [gmx-users] CHARMM and FEP calculations

2012-08-26 Thread Mark Abraham

On 24/08/2012 11:28 PM, Wright, Louise wrote:

Hi
I asked a similar question a year ago about implementing CMAP in FEP 
calculations for gromacs 4.5.4.  At the time I could not get the simulation to 
run with CMAP as it came up with:
Fatal error:

Function type CMAP Dih. not implemented in ip_pert

Helpfully, Mark suggested a modification to the code to get round this issue, 
but I am unclear as to whether in the newer version of gromacs (4.5.5) CMAP 
terms can actually be scaled from state A to state B or whether for all values 
of lambda this part of the potential remains in state A even if I were to 
manually write state B CMAP terms in the topology file and the code no longer 
gives a warning.


I expect the latter, since 
http://www.gromacs.org/About_Gromacs/Release_Notes/Versions_4.5.x makes 
no mention of CMAP and FEP. Someone would have to want to do the coding 
and testing work to make this possible.



In addition, for CHARMM, and other FFs, there are some dihedrals which have 
multiple potentials, using the dihedral function type 9.  I have manually 
specified the state B parameters for these (and all other dihedrals) in my 
topology file but get the error message:

   Cannot automatically perturb a torsion with multiple terms to different
   form.
   Please specify perturbed parameters manually for this torsion in your
   topology!


This error pertains to what grompp can look up in ffbonded.itp for this 
interaction, and is perhaps over-zealous, but without seeing the 
relevant file fragments it's hard to say anything.


Mark



Is there a way to implement scaling of these multiply defined dihedrals in FEP 
calculations?

Many thanks for your help

Louise



--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Only plain text messages are allowed!
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] CHARMM and FEP calculations

2012-08-24 Thread Wright, Louise
Hi
I asked a similar question a year ago about implementing CMAP in FEP 
calculations for gromacs 4.5.4.  At the time I could not get the simulation to 
run with CMAP as it came up with:
Fatal error:
> Function type CMAP Dih. not implemented in ip_pert

Helpfully, Mark suggested a modification to the code to get round this issue, 
but I am unclear as to whether in the newer version of gromacs (4.5.5) CMAP 
terms can actually be scaled from state A to state B or whether for all values 
of lambda this part of the potential remains in state A even if I were to 
manually write state B CMAP terms in the topology file and the code no longer 
gives a warning.

In addition, for CHARMM, and other FFs, there are some dihedrals which have 
multiple potentials, using the dihedral function type 9.  I have manually 
specified the state B parameters for these (and all other dihedrals) in my 
topology file but get the error message:

  Cannot automatically perturb a torsion with multiple terms to different
  form.
  Please specify perturbed parameters manually for this torsion in your
  topology!

Is there a way to implement scaling of these multiply defined dihedrals in FEP 
calculations?

Many thanks for your help

Louise

--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Only plain text messages are allowed!
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists