Re: [gmx-users] Energetics in collision

2007-04-19 Thread Erik Marklund


19 apr 2007 kl. 12.50 skrev Janne Hirvi:


Hello gmx-users!

I am studying the effect of impact velocity of a water droplet in  
collision with
a frozen surface in NVE ensemble. A droplet has extra translational  
energy,
which corresponds to a specific velocity, in addition to thermal  
energy at

300K.

I supposed that at the collision extra translational energy of the  
droplet will
change to potential and kinetic energy of the droplet so that total  
energy of
the system is conserved. However, even I observe increase in  
potential and
kinetic energy, total energy of the system (~300 000kJ/mol) first  
decreases
slightly (<100kJ - exact value depends on the velocity) and just  
after that

reverts partly, but stabilizes value lower than at the beginning.



Don't know for sure, but incorrect comm removal springs to mind.

The total energy should be conserved but on the other hand it  
sounds logical
that there will be stabilizing energy from the droplet-surface  
interactions
which prevents the droplet to bounce away and makes it to  
equilibrate on the
surface. I am wondering if this is the case or have I done some  
mistake which

disturbs the energy conservation?


Wouldn't that stabilizing energy be part of the total energy?



The other question concerns about the intrusion of the droplet into  
the pores of
the structured surface. The situation is otherwise the same but now  
the total
energy continues to decrease after first touch and wont stabilize  
until the
bottom of the pore is reached. It again sounds like a consequence  
of the
stabilizing energy from the droplet-surface interactions, but now  
when these
interactions are larger than without the intrusion also slight  
increase (2-3K)
in the droplet temperature is observed. It sounds little bit  
strange that water
molecules in the pores would have higher temperature. So again is  
it really the

truth or have I done something what I shouldnt have?


Thanks for your time and assistance,

Janne
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before  
posting!

Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


___
Erik Marklund, PhD student
Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics,
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596,  75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone:  +46 18 471 4537 fax: +46 18 511 755
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://xray.bmc.uu.se/molbiophys


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Energetics in collision

2007-04-19 Thread Janne Hirvi
Hello gmx-users!

I am studying the effect of impact velocity of a water droplet in collision with
a frozen surface in NVE ensemble. A droplet has extra translational energy,
which corresponds to a specific velocity, in addition to thermal energy at
300K.

I supposed that at the collision extra translational energy of the droplet will
change to potential and kinetic energy of the droplet so that total energy of
the system is conserved. However, even I observe increase in potential and
kinetic energy, total energy of the system (~300 000kJ/mol) first decreases
slightly (<100kJ - exact value depends on the velocity) and just after that
reverts partly, but stabilizes value lower than at the beginning.

The total energy should be conserved but on the other hand it sounds logical
that there will be stabilizing energy from the droplet-surface interactions
which prevents the droplet to bounce away and makes it to equilibrate on the
surface. I am wondering if this is the case or have I done some mistake which
disturbs the energy conservation?  

The other question concerns about the intrusion of the droplet into the pores of
the structured surface. The situation is otherwise the same but now the total
energy continues to decrease after first touch and wont stabilize until the
bottom of the pore is reached. It again sounds like a consequence of the
stabilizing energy from the droplet-surface interactions, but now when these
interactions are larger than without the intrusion also slight increase (2-3K)
in the droplet temperature is observed. It sounds little bit strange that water
molecules in the pores would have higher temperature. So again is it really the
truth or have I done something what I shouldnt have?   


Thanks for your time and assistance,

Janne
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php