Re: [gmx-users] LINCS warning and segmentation fault for methane in 1-octanol simulation

2012-02-09 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



vivek sharma wrote:

Hi There,
 I was trying to run a equilibrium run (npt) for system of Methane in 
1-octanol (1 methane molecule with 200 1-octanol molecules with OPLS FF 
parameters). Following is the series of steps I followed:

1. Energy minimization with steep integrator for 5000 steps
2. Energy minimization with l-bfgs integrator for 5000 steps
3. NVT run for 100 ps with sd integrator
4. NPT run for 100 ps with sd integrator (with Pcoupl = 
Parrinello-Rahman, tau_p = 0.5, compressibility = 4.5e-05, ref_p = 1.0)


During the NPT run I am ending up with following error (too many LINCS 
warning):

-
Step 25406, time 50.812 (ps)  LINCS WARNING
relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
rms 11.778495, max 363.475445 (between atoms 2158 and 2157)
bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees:
 atom 1 atom 2  angle  previous, current, constraint length
   2152   2150   90.00.1090   1.3690  0.1090
   2152   2151   90.00.1090  36.5266  0.1090
   2158   2156   90.00.1091   0.5637  0.1090
   2158   2157   90.00.2349  39.7278  0.1090

Back Off! I just backed up step25406b_n0.pdb to ./#step25406b_n0.pdb.1#

Back Off! I just backed up step25406c_n0.pdb to ./#step25406c_n0.pdb.1#
Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates
Segmentation fault


*.mdp files for above simulation are adapted from tutorial on free 
energy calculation by Justin.


Please suggest me what could be wrong with above simulation.



The answer for LINCS warnings is always the same - the system has become 
unstable due to inappropriate geometry, bad .mdp settings, or a combination of 
both.  To troubleshoot, start by turning off the free energy code to make sure 
your system is actually stable.  If it's not, refer here:


http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Blowing_Up#Diagnosing_an_Unstable_System

If it is stable, turn back on whatever free energy settings you're using. I 
assume, based on the tutorial, that this is a simple vdW transformation?


-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] LINCS warning and segmentation fault for methane in 1-octanol simulation

2012-02-09 Thread vivek sharma
Hi Justin,
Thanks for your response. After posting my query, I tried running the
similar set with
 NPT run for 100 ps with sd integrator (with Pcoupl = berensen, tau_p
= 0.5, compressibility = 4.5e-05, ref_p = 1.0)
On giving berendsen instead of Parrinello-Rahman for pressure
coupling, job finished successfully. Can you comment on this?
As par the tutorial I am using simple vdW transformation only as mentioned below
-
couple-moltype   = Methane  ; name of moleculetype to decouple
couple-lambda0   = vdw  ; only van der Waals interactions
couple-lambda1   = none ; turn off everything, in this case only vdW
-

Thanks,
Vivek

On 09/02/2012, Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:


 vivek sharma wrote:
 Hi There,
  I was trying to run a equilibrium run (npt) for system of Methane in
 1-octanol (1 methane molecule with 200 1-octanol molecules with OPLS FF
 parameters). Following is the series of steps I followed:
 1. Energy minimization with steep integrator for 5000 steps
 2. Energy minimization with l-bfgs integrator for 5000 steps
 3. NVT run for 100 ps with sd integrator
 4. NPT run for 100 ps with sd integrator (with Pcoupl =
 Parrinello-Rahman, tau_p = 0.5, compressibility = 4.5e-05, ref_p = 1.0)

 During the NPT run I am ending up with following error (too many LINCS
 warning):
 -
 Step 25406, time 50.812 (ps)  LINCS WARNING
 relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
 rms 11.778495, max 363.475445 (between atoms 2158 and 2157)
 bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees:
  atom 1 atom 2  angle  previous, current, constraint length
2152   2150   90.00.1090   1.3690  0.1090
2152   2151   90.00.1090  36.5266  0.1090
2158   2156   90.00.1091   0.5637  0.1090
2158   2157   90.00.2349  39.7278  0.1090

 Back Off! I just backed up step25406b_n0.pdb to ./#step25406b_n0.pdb.1#

 Back Off! I just backed up step25406c_n0.pdb to ./#step25406c_n0.pdb.1#
 Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates
 Segmentation fault
 

 *.mdp files for above simulation are adapted from tutorial on free
 energy calculation by Justin.

 Please suggest me what could be wrong with above simulation.


 The answer for LINCS warnings is always the same - the system has become
 unstable due to inappropriate geometry, bad .mdp settings, or a combination
 of
 both.  To troubleshoot, start by turning off the free energy code to make
 sure
 your system is actually stable.  If it's not, refer here:

 http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Blowing_Up#Diagnosing_an_Unstable_System

 If it is stable, turn back on whatever free energy settings you're using. I
 assume, based on the tutorial, that this is a simple vdW transformation?

 -Justin

 --
 

 Justin A. Lemkul
 Ph.D. Candidate
 ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
 MILES-IGERT Trainee
 Department of Biochemistry
 Virginia Tech
 Blacksburg, VA
 jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

 
 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] LINCS warning and segmentation fault for methane in 1-octanol simulation

2012-02-09 Thread Mark Abraham

On 10/02/2012 4:41 PM, vivek sharma wrote:

Hi Justin,
Thanks for your response. After posting my query, I tried running the
similar set with
  NPT run for 100 ps with sd integrator (with Pcoupl = berensen, tau_p
= 0.5, compressibility = 4.5e-05, ref_p = 1.0)
On giving berendsen instead of Parrinello-Rahman for pressure
coupling, job finished successfully. Can you comment on this?


I suggest you read the manual section on pressure coupling, which likely 
explains this observation.


Mark


As par the tutorial I am using simple vdW transformation only as mentioned below
-
couple-moltype   = Methane  ; name of moleculetype to decouple
couple-lambda0   = vdw  ; only van der Waals interactions
couple-lambda1   = none ; turn off everything, in this case only vdW
-

Thanks,
Vivek

On 09/02/2012, Justin A. Lemkuljalem...@vt.edu  wrote:


vivek sharma wrote:

Hi There,
  I was trying to run a equilibrium run (npt) for system of Methane in
1-octanol (1 methane molecule with 200 1-octanol molecules with OPLS FF
parameters). Following is the series of steps I followed:
1. Energy minimization with steep integrator for 5000 steps
2. Energy minimization with l-bfgs integrator for 5000 steps
3. NVT run for 100 ps with sd integrator
4. NPT run for 100 ps with sd integrator (with Pcoupl =
Parrinello-Rahman, tau_p = 0.5, compressibility = 4.5e-05, ref_p = 1.0)

During the NPT run I am ending up with following error (too many LINCS
warning):
-
Step 25406, time 50.812 (ps)  LINCS WARNING
relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
rms 11.778495, max 363.475445 (between atoms 2158 and 2157)
bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees:
  atom 1 atom 2  angle  previous, current, constraint length
2152   2150   90.00.1090   1.3690  0.1090
2152   2151   90.00.1090  36.5266  0.1090
2158   2156   90.00.1091   0.5637  0.1090
2158   2157   90.00.2349  39.7278  0.1090

Back Off! I just backed up step25406b_n0.pdb to ./#step25406b_n0.pdb.1#

Back Off! I just backed up step25406c_n0.pdb to ./#step25406c_n0.pdb.1#
Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates
Segmentation fault


*.mdp files for above simulation are adapted from tutorial on free
energy calculation by Justin.

Please suggest me what could be wrong with above simulation.


The answer for LINCS warnings is always the same - the system has become
unstable due to inappropriate geometry, bad .mdp settings, or a combination
of
both.  To troubleshoot, start by turning off the free energy code to make
sure
your system is actually stable.  If it's not, refer here:

http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Blowing_Up#Diagnosing_an_Unstable_System

If it is stable, turn back on whatever free energy settings you're using. I
assume, based on the tutorial, that this is a simple vdW transformation?

-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists



--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] LINCS warning and segmentation fault for methane in 1-octanol simulation

2012-02-08 Thread vivek sharma
Hi There,
 I was trying to run a equilibrium run (npt) for system of Methane in
1-octanol (1 methane molecule with 200 1-octanol molecules with OPLS FF
parameters). Following is the series of steps I followed:
1. Energy minimization with steep integrator for 5000 steps
2. Energy minimization with l-bfgs integrator for 5000 steps
3. NVT run for 100 ps with sd integrator
4. NPT run for 100 ps with sd integrator (with Pcoupl = Parrinello-Rahman,
tau_p = 0.5, compressibility = 4.5e-05, ref_p = 1.0)

During the NPT run I am ending up with following error (too many LINCS
warning):
-
Step 25406, time 50.812 (ps)  LINCS WARNING
relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
rms 11.778495, max 363.475445 (between atoms 2158 and 2157)
bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees:
 atom 1 atom 2  angle  previous, current, constraint length
   2152   2150   90.00.1090   1.3690  0.1090
   2152   2151   90.00.1090  36.5266  0.1090
   2158   2156   90.00.1091   0.5637  0.1090
   2158   2157   90.00.2349  39.7278  0.1090

Back Off! I just backed up step25406b_n0.pdb to ./#step25406b_n0.pdb.1#

Back Off! I just backed up step25406c_n0.pdb to ./#step25406c_n0.pdb.1#
Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates
Segmentation fault


*.mdp files for above simulation are adapted from tutorial on free energy
calculation by Justin.

Please suggest me what could be wrong with above simulation.

Regards,
Vivek Sharma
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists