Re: [gmx-users] Limitations of simulations?

2013-07-24 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 7/24/13 9:16 PM, Jonathan Saboury wrote:

For the rest of us mere mortals who don't have access to specialized hardware
that allows for 10- or 20-microsecond simulations, the brute force approach is
rather futile.  Techniques like steered MD and Hamiltonian replica exchange MD
are probably more feasible.  Unbiased simulations of sufficient length, using
"standard" supercomputing hardware, would probably take years.

-Justin



Do you think implicit water with 10-20 ligands would be able to do it?
I see that the gpu accelerated implicit gets about 100-150 ns/day so a
10-20 day simulation would yield that time frame, no?

Thanks :)



In an implicit, non-periodic system, it is more likely that the ligand will 
float away from the protein.  I've tried it and that's all that ever happens. 
Moreover, the current Gromacs version does not support implicit solvent on GPU 
and the previous version that did had very limited functionality.


-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441

==
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] Limitations of simulations?

2013-07-24 Thread Jonathan Saboury
>For the rest of us mere mortals who don't have access to specialized hardware
>that allows for 10- or 20-microsecond simulations, the brute force approach is
>rather futile.  Techniques like steered MD and Hamiltonian replica exchange MD
>are probably more feasible.  Unbiased simulations of sufficient length, using
>"standard" supercomputing hardware, would probably take years.
>
>-Justin


Do you think implicit water with 10-20 ligands would be able to do it?
I see that the gpu accelerated implicit gets about 100-150 ns/day so a
10-20 day simulation would yield that time frame, no?

Thanks :)
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Limitations of simulations?

2013-07-24 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 7/24/13 6:44 AM, David van der Spoel wrote:

On 2013-07-24 01:57, Jonathan Saboury wrote:

I just finished this tutorial and found it very informative:
http://cinjweb.umdnj.edu/~kerrigje/pdf_files/trp_drug_tutor.pdf

However, This was based on a complex from a pdb.

I was wondering if it was possible to just simulate the protein without
complex and put the ligand as a solute and actually have it complex with
the protein. Obviously, if it could do this it would take a much longer
time than just simulating a complex, but if given enough time, could it
complex?

Yes, there are some examples. A paper was published by Shaw and co-worker in J.
Amer. Chem. Soc. a year or two ago.


I have no formal experience with simulations and currently have no one
around me with enough knowledge on these topic to mentor me, so any help is
very much appreciated!



For the rest of us mere mortals who don't have access to specialized hardware 
that allows for 10- or 20-microsecond simulations, the brute force approach is 
rather futile.  Techniques like steered MD and Hamiltonian replica exchange MD 
are probably more feasible.  Unbiased simulations of sufficient length, using 
"standard" supercomputing hardware, would probably take years.


-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441

==
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Limitations of simulations?

2013-07-24 Thread David van der Spoel

On 2013-07-24 01:57, Jonathan Saboury wrote:

I just finished this tutorial and found it very informative:
http://cinjweb.umdnj.edu/~kerrigje/pdf_files/trp_drug_tutor.pdf

However, This was based on a complex from a pdb.

I was wondering if it was possible to just simulate the protein without
complex and put the ligand as a solute and actually have it complex with
the protein. Obviously, if it could do this it would take a much longer
time than just simulating a complex, but if given enough time, could it
complex?
Yes, there are some examples. A paper was published by Shaw and 
co-worker in J. Amer. Chem. Soc. a year or two ago.


I have no formal experience with simulations and currently have no one
around me with enough knowledge on these topic to mentor me, so any help is
very much appreciated!

Thank you! :)




--
David van der Spoel, Ph.D., Professor of Biology
Dept. of Cell & Molec. Biol., Uppsala University.
Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone:  +46184714205.
sp...@xray.bmc.uu.sehttp://folding.bmc.uu.se
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


RE: [gmx-users] Limitations of simulations?

2013-07-23 Thread Fábio Filippi Matioli
I would like to stop to receive this e-mail, how can i procide?Thanks

Fábio Filippi MatioliGraduando em Física MédicaUNESP-BotucatuTel (19) 9291.6738

> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:57:29 -0700
> From: jsab...@gmail.com
> To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
> Subject: [gmx-users] Limitations of simulations?
> 
> I just finished this tutorial and found it very informative:
> http://cinjweb.umdnj.edu/~kerrigje/pdf_files/trp_drug_tutor.pdf
> 
> However, This was based on a complex from a pdb.
> 
> I was wondering if it was possible to just simulate the protein without
> complex and put the ligand as a solute and actually have it complex with
> the protein. Obviously, if it could do this it would take a much longer
> time than just simulating a complex, but if given enough time, could it
> complex?
> 
> I have no formal experience with simulations and currently have no one
> around me with enough knowledge on these topic to mentor me, so any help is
> very much appreciated!
> 
> Thank you! :)
> -- 
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> * Please search the archive at 
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
  --
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] Limitations of simulations?

2013-07-23 Thread Jonathan Saboury
I just finished this tutorial and found it very informative:
http://cinjweb.umdnj.edu/~kerrigje/pdf_files/trp_drug_tutor.pdf

However, This was based on a complex from a pdb.

I was wondering if it was possible to just simulate the protein without
complex and put the ligand as a solute and actually have it complex with
the protein. Obviously, if it could do this it would take a much longer
time than just simulating a complex, but if given enough time, could it
complex?

I have no formal experience with simulations and currently have no one
around me with enough knowledge on these topic to mentor me, so any help is
very much appreciated!

Thank you! :)
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists