Re: [gmx-users] Periodic Boundary Conditions g_mindist -pi

2011-02-16 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi Ifat,

I guess this is a jump over the periodic boundaries. You should remove
jumps from the trajectory (-pbc nojump) before running g_mindist -pi.

Cheers,

Tsjerk

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:19 AM, ifat shub  wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am running a simulation on the complex 1aik.pdb in 310K. I wanted to see
> if the complex is seeing its next periodic image, so I used the g_mindist
> command with the -pi option. My command line was:
>
> g_mindist -f run.xtc -s run.gro -n index.ndx -od tmp.xvg -pi
>
> The output (see below) was stable until ~344ps when there is a  jump in the
> max internal distance (third column) from ~6nm to ~22nm. After the jump the
> numbers are reduced back to ~6nm and remained stable until the run is
> completed at 1ns.
>
> Does anyone know how to explain this jump? Is this a real problem or just a
> visualization artifact? Is there a way to avoid such jumps?
>
>
>
> Here is the mdp file I used:
>
> --run.mdp--
>
> integrator  = md
>
> nsteps  = 100
>
> dt  = 0.001
>
> coulombtype = pme
>
> vdw-type    = cut-off
>
> tcoupl  = Berendsen
>
> tc-grps = protein non-protein
>
> tau-t   = 0.1 0.1
>
> ref-t   = 310 310
>
> nstxout = 100
>
> nstvout = 0
>
> nstxtcout   = 100
>
> nstenergy       = 100
>
> comm_mode     = Linear ; Angular
>
> comm_grps    = Protein
>
> xtc_grps   = Protein
>
> energygrps = Protein
>
> --
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ifat
>
>
>
> The output:
>
> 343.7   10.813 5.924   16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 343.8   10.809 5.949   16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 343.9   10.804 5.959   16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 344  10.808 5.974   16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 344.1   0.18 21.982 16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 344.2   10.778 5.977   16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 344.3   10.768 5.996   16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 344.4   10.764 6.016   16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 344.5   10.722 6.029   16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 344.6   10.774 6.01 16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 344.7   0.174   21.984 16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 344.8   0.176   21.98   16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 344.9   0.17 22.002 16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 345  0.173   21.981 16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 345.1   0.191   21.954 16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 345.2   0.183   21.958 16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 345.3   0.181   22.012 16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 345.4   0.17 22.054 16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 345.5   0.168   22.054 16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 345.6   0.189   22.039 16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 345.7   0.171   22.007 16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 345.8   0.186   22.031 16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 345.9   0.171   22.077 16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 346  0.187   21.99   16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 346.1   0.173   21.984 16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 346.2   0.181   22.02   16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 346.3   10.82   5.984   16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 346.4   10.81   6.002   16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 346.5   10.819 6.008   16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 346.6   10.813 5.996   16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 346.7   10.781 6.006   16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 346.8   10.793 6.026   16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 346.9   10.745 5.985   16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 347  10.762 5.999   16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 347.1   10.781 5.984   16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 347.2   10.784 6.002   16.445 16.445 16.445
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>



-- 
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.

post-doctoral researcher
Molecular Dynamics Group
* Groningen Institute for Biomolecular Research and Biotechnology
* Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials
University of Groningen
The Netherlands
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] Periodic Boundary Conditions g_mindist -pi

2011-02-16 Thread ifat shub
Hi,



I am running a simulation on the complex 1aik.pdb in 310K. I wanted to see
if the complex is seeing its next periodic image, so I used the g_mindist
command with the -pi option. My command line was:

g_mindist -f run.xtc -s run.gro -n index.ndx -od tmp.xvg -pi

The output (see below) was stable until ~344ps when there is a  jump in the
max internal distance (third column) from ~6nm to ~22nm. After the jump the
numbers are reduced back to ~6nm and remained stable until the run is
completed at 1ns.

Does anyone know how to explain this jump? Is this a real problem or just a
visualization artifact? Is there a way to avoid such jumps?



Here is the mdp file I used:

--run.mdp--

integrator  = md

nsteps  = 100

dt  = 0.001

coulombtype = pme

vdw-type= cut-off

tcoupl  = Berendsen

tc-grps = protein non-protein

tau-t   = 0.1 0.1

ref-t   = 310 310

nstxout = 100

nstvout = 0

nstxtcout   = 100

nstenergy   = 100

comm_mode = Linear ; Angular

comm_grps= Protein

xtc_grps   = Protein

energygrps = Protein

--



Thanks,

Ifat



The output:

343.7   10.813 5.924   16.445 16.445 16.445

343.8   10.809 5.949   16.445 16.445 16.445

343.9   10.804 5.959   16.445 16.445 16.445

344  10.808 5.974   16.445 16.445 16.445

344.1   0.18 21.982 16.445 16.445 16.445

344.2   10.778 5.977   16.445 16.445 16.445

344.3   10.768 5.996   16.445 16.445 16.445

344.4   10.764 6.016   16.445 16.445 16.445

344.5   10.722 6.029   16.445 16.445 16.445

344.6   10.774 6.01 16.445 16.445 16.445

344.7   0.174   21.984 16.445 16.445 16.445

344.8   0.176   21.98   16.445 16.445 16.445

344.9   0.17 22.002 16.445 16.445 16.445

345  0.173   21.981 16.445 16.445 16.445

345.1   0.191   21.954 16.445 16.445 16.445

345.2   0.183   21.958 16.445 16.445 16.445

345.3   0.181   22.012 16.445 16.445 16.445

345.4   0.17 22.054 16.445 16.445 16.445

345.5   0.168   22.054 16.445 16.445 16.445

345.6   0.189   22.039 16.445 16.445 16.445

345.7   0.171   22.007 16.445 16.445 16.445

345.8   0.186   22.031 16.445 16.445 16.445

345.9   0.171   22.077 16.445 16.445 16.445

346  0.187   21.99   16.445 16.445 16.445

346.1   0.173   21.984 16.445 16.445 16.445

346.2   0.181   22.02   16.445 16.445 16.445

346.3   10.82   5.984   16.445 16.445 16.445

346.4   10.81   6.002   16.445 16.445 16.445

346.5   10.819 6.008   16.445 16.445 16.445

346.6   10.813 5.996   16.445 16.445 16.445

346.7   10.781 6.006   16.445 16.445 16.445

346.8   10.793 6.026   16.445 16.445 16.445

346.9   10.745 5.985   16.445 16.445 16.445

347  10.762 5.999   16.445 16.445 16.445

347.1   10.781 5.984   16.445 16.445 16.445

347.2   10.784 6.002   16.445 16.445 16.445
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] Periodic Boundary Conditions & Location of Atoms Near Box Edges

2009-09-17 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi Darrell,

No, you just have to make sure that the bond lengths are correct in
the periodic system. The PBC are invariant under translation.

Cheers,

Tsjerk

On 9/17/09, Darrell Koskinen  wrote:
> Dear GROMACS Gurus,
>  In order to correctly model an infinite graphene sheet using periodic
> boundary conditions, should the box edges be located at the midpoints
> between the atomic bonds?
>
>  Thanks.
>
>  Darrell
>  ___
>  gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
>  http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>  Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
>  Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface
> or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
>  Can't post? Read
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>


-- 
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
Junior UD (post-doc)
Biomolecular NMR, Bijvoet Center
Utrecht University
Padualaan 8
3584 CH Utrecht
The Netherlands
P: +31-30-2539931
F: +31-30-2537623
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Periodic Boundary Conditions & Location of Atoms Near Box Edges

2009-09-17 Thread Darrell Koskinen

Dear GROMACS Gurus,
In order to correctly model an infinite graphene sheet using periodic 
boundary conditions, should the box edges be located at the midpoints 
between the atomic bonds?


Thanks.

Darrell
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


RE: [gmx-users] periodic boundary conditions in g_rdf

2008-11-03 Thread ilhan favela

Hi Berk, thanks for the answearing.

Here is my command line:

g_rdf -f file.xtc -s file.tpr -n index.ndx -com -rdf mol_com -xy

then i select 'Protein' as reference group and 'upper-leaf_&_P8' (just the P8 
atoms from the upper-leaflet) in the 1 group option.

The value of the g_rdf at the half of the box is roughly 0.5 - 0.6

In the attachment is de g(r) that i got.

Thanks in advance!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: RE: [gmx-users] periodic boundary conditions in g_rdf
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 10:20:08 +0100

Hi,

To what value does your rdf go then?

You have pbc in your system, so running with -nopbc is incorrect.
The rdf will then stop at half the box, since you molecules are in the box
and your peptide is probably in the middle, leading to a longest distance
of roughly half the box.

Berk



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:55:54 -0600
Subject: [gmx-users] periodic boundary conditions in g_rdf


Hi everybody.
I'm working a system with a peptide embedded in a lipid bilayer and I try to 
get the two-dimentional g_rdf for the upper leaflet around the peptide with the 
-xy option and periodic boundary conditions. But my RDF doesn't go to 1. When a 
used -nopbc i get almost the same result (just multiplied by a constant) and 
the RDF is always cutted at the half of size of the box.

Any help will be appreciated.

Thanks in advance.


Conoce el perfil completo de todos tus amigos de Windows Live Messenger justo 
aquí: Windows Live Spaces
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger
_
Live Search premia tus búsquedas, llévate hasta ¡Un Auto!
http://www.ganabuscando.com/Default.aspx<>___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

RE: [gmx-users] periodic boundary conditions in g_rdf

2008-11-03 Thread Berk Hess
Hi,

To what value does your rdf go then?

You have pbc in your system, so running with -nopbc is incorrect.
The rdf will then stop at half the box, since you molecules are in the box
and your peptide is probably in the middle, leading to a longest distance
of roughly half the box.

Berk



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:55:54 -0600
Subject: [gmx-users] periodic boundary conditions in g_rdf













Hi everybody.
I'm working a system with a peptide embedded in a lipid bilayer and I try to 
get the two-dimentional g_rdf for the upper leaflet around the peptide with the 
-xy option and periodic boundary conditions. But my RDF doesn't go to 1. When a 
used -nopbc i get almost the same result (just multiplied by a constant) and 
the RDF is always cutted at the half of size of the box.

Any help will be appreciated.

Thanks in advance.



Conoce el perfil completo de todos tus amigos de Windows Live Messenger justo 
aquí: Windows Live Spaces

_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] periodic boundary conditions in g_rdf

2008-10-31 Thread ilhan favela






Hi everybody.
I'm working a system with a peptide embedded in a lipid bilayer and I try to 
get the two-dimentional g_rdf for the upper leaflet around the peptide with the 
-xy option and periodic boundary conditions. But my RDF doesn't go to 1. When a 
used -nopbc i get almost the same result (just multiplied by a constant) and 
the RDF is always cutted at the half of size of the box.

Any help will be appreciated.

Thanks in advance.



_
Live Search premia tus búsquedas, llévate hasta ¡Un Auto!
http://www.ganabuscando.com/Default.aspx___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

RE: [gmx-users] Periodic Boundary conditions

2007-11-08 Thread Berk Hess

The problem is the combination of pbc=full and comm_mode = angular.
With pbc=xyz it will work.

We will add a check for this.

Anyhow, pbc=full is only useful when you have periodic molecules.

Berk.



From: "Paul Whitford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users 
To: "gmx-users@gromacs.org" 
Subject: [gmx-users] Periodic Boundary conditions
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 16:41:48 -0800

I am running v3.3.2.  I am running an RNA strand with a homemade potential.
When I run a single molecule in a periodic box, the system is fine until 
one

nucleic acid crosses the boundary.  THen the entire nucleic acid gets moved
to the opposite side of the box.  Since there are bonds this results in an
exploding system.  I am running on 4 processors and am using the following
mdp file.  Any ideas what is going on?  The system runs normally for over
20 time steps.  It runs fine until the boundary issue occurs.

title= Paul Template
;Preprocessor
cpp  = cpp
;Run control: A leap-frog algorithm for integrating Newton's equations.
integrator   = sd
:time step in femtoseconds
dt   = 0.0005
;number of stepsi
nsteps   = 1000
;frequency to write coordinates to output trajectory file
nstxout  = 0
;frequency to write velocities to output trajectory file
nstvout  = 0
;frequency to write energies to log file
nstlog   = 1000
;frequency to write energies to energy file
nstenergy= 1000
;frequency to write coordinates to xtc trajectory
nstxtcout= 1000
;group(s) to write to xtc trajectory
xtc_grps = system
;group(s) to write to energy file
energygrps   = system
;Frequency to update the neighbor list (and the long-range forces,
;when using twin-range cut-off's).
nstlist  = 50
coulombtype  = Cut-off
;Make a grid in the box and only check atoms in neighboring grid cells
;when constructing a new neighbor list every nstlist steps.
ns_type  = grid
;cut-off distance for the short-range neighbor list
rlist= 2.5
;treatment of electrostatic interactions
table_extension  = 150.0
rcoulomb = 2.5
epsilon_r= 0
;treatment of van der waals interactions
rvdw = 2.5
; Periodic boudary conditions in all the directions
pbc  = full
;Temperature coupling
tc-grps  = system
tau_t= 10.0

ref_t= 100
;Pressure coupling
Pcoupl   = no
;Velocity generation
gen_vel  = yes
gen_temp = 100
gen_seed = 12345
;Constrain all bonds
constraints  = none
;constraint_algorithm= lincs
;lincs_iter=8
comm_mode = angular


thanks

-Paul




___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


_
Talk with your online friends with Messenger 
http://www.join.msn.com/messenger/overview


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Periodic Boundary conditions

2007-11-07 Thread Paul Whitford
I am running v3.3.2.  I am running an RNA strand with a homemade potential.
When I run a single molecule in a periodic box, the system is fine until one
nucleic acid crosses the boundary.  THen the entire nucleic acid gets moved
to the opposite side of the box.  Since there are bonds this results in an
exploding system.  I am running on 4 processors and am using the following
mdp file.  Any ideas what is going on?  The system runs normally for over
20 time steps.  It runs fine until the boundary issue occurs.

title= Paul Template
;Preprocessor
cpp  = cpp
;Run control: A leap-frog algorithm for integrating Newton's equations.
integrator   = sd
:time step in femtoseconds
dt   = 0.0005
;number of stepsi
nsteps   = 1000
;frequency to write coordinates to output trajectory file
nstxout  = 0
;frequency to write velocities to output trajectory file
nstvout  = 0
;frequency to write energies to log file
nstlog   = 1000
;frequency to write energies to energy file
nstenergy= 1000
;frequency to write coordinates to xtc trajectory
nstxtcout= 1000
;group(s) to write to xtc trajectory
xtc_grps = system
;group(s) to write to energy file
energygrps   = system
;Frequency to update the neighbor list (and the long-range forces,
;when using twin-range cut-off's).
nstlist  = 50
coulombtype  = Cut-off
;Make a grid in the box and only check atoms in neighboring grid cells
;when constructing a new neighbor list every nstlist steps.
ns_type  = grid
;cut-off distance for the short-range neighbor list
rlist= 2.5
;treatment of electrostatic interactions
table_extension  = 150.0
rcoulomb = 2.5
epsilon_r= 0
;treatment of van der waals interactions
rvdw = 2.5
; Periodic boudary conditions in all the directions
pbc  = full
;Temperature coupling
tc-grps  = system
tau_t= 10.0

ref_t= 100
;Pressure coupling
Pcoupl   = no
;Velocity generation
gen_vel  = yes
gen_temp = 100
gen_seed = 12345
;Constrain all bonds
constraints  = none
;constraint_algorithm= lincs
;lincs_iter=8
comm_mode = angular


thanks

-Paul
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php