[gmx-users] Re: trjconv center problem

2013-04-19 Thread Brad Van Oosten
ahh, i thought that the program was "skipping" as in not doing the centering
command on certain frames due to one reason or another.  Ill look into your
suggestion

Thank you very much for the help.



--
View this message in context: 
http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/trjconv-center-problem-tp5007473p5007482.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Re: trjconv center problem

2013-04-19 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 4/19/13 4:37 PM, Brad Van Oosten wrote:

Ahh, yes perhaps i was unclear.  The output file also has the same number of
steps.


Checking file md50_centered.xtc
Reading frame   0 time0.000
# Atoms  27392
Precision 0.001 (nm)
Last frame  5 time 10.000


Item#frames Timestep (ps)
Step 500012
Time 500012
Lambda   0
Coords   500012
Velocities   0
Forces   0
Box  500012

The simulation is of a pure lipid bilayer, so the result of the centering
option is that 99.9% of output frames have the lipid tales centered in the
box while the 0.1% of frames seem not to be centered with the water at the
center of the box.



This is not an issue of skipping frames at all, then.  It is an issue of your 
perception of "center," one that has been discussed many times on this list. 
This often happens with systems of lipids, multimeric proteins, or 
receptor-ligand complexes.  The "center" of a system is the geometric center, so 
two molecules together at the visual center of the box and two molecules on 
opposite "sides" of the box are both considered "centered" since the geometric 
center of the group coincides with the geometric center of the box.  Several 
iterations of trjconv (including -pbc or -fit options, in separate steps) may be 
necessary to achieve the desired outcome.


http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Periodic_Boundary_Conditions#Suggested_trjconv_workflow

-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] Re: trjconv center problem

2013-04-19 Thread Brad Van Oosten
Ahh, yes perhaps i was unclear.  The output file also has the same number of
steps.


Checking file md50_centered.xtc
Reading frame   0 time0.000   
# Atoms  27392
Precision 0.001 (nm)
Last frame  5 time 10.000   


Item#frames Timestep (ps)
Step 500012
Time 500012
Lambda   0
Coords   500012
Velocities   0
Forces   0
Box  500012

The simulation is of a pure lipid bilayer, so the result of the centering
option is that 99.9% of output frames have the lipid tales centered in the
box while the 0.1% of frames seem not to be centered with the water at the
center of the box.



--
View this message in context: 
http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/trjconv-center-problem-tp5007473p5007479.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Re: trjconv center problem

2013-04-19 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 4/19/13 4:28 PM, Brad Van Oosten wrote:

Checking file md50.xtc
Reading frame   0 time0.000
# Atoms  27392
Precision 0.001 (nm)
Last frame  5 time 10.000


Item#frames Timestep (ps)
Step 500012
Time 500012
Lambda   0
Coords   500012
Velocities   0
Forces   0
Box  500012

Appears to be evenly spaced



So then, to clarify, what you're saying is trjconv skips frames when writing 
output?  That was what I was trying to determine from your original post.  What 
does gmxcheck tell you about the output trajectory?


-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] Re: trjconv center problem

2013-04-19 Thread Brad Van Oosten
Checking file md50.xtc
Reading frame   0 time0.000   
# Atoms  27392
Precision 0.001 (nm)
Last frame  5 time 10.000   


Item#frames Timestep (ps)
Step 500012
Time 500012
Lambda   0
Coords   500012
Velocities   0
Forces   0
Box  500012

Appears to be evenly spaced



--
View this message in context: 
http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/trjconv-center-problem-tp5007473p5007477.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Re: trjconv center problem

2013-04-19 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 4/19/13 4:19 PM, Brad Van Oosten wrote:

The trajectory file is from a consecutive run so i would hope the frames are
evenly spaced.



What does gmxcheck tell you?  No reason to hope when you can prove conclusively 
one way or another :)


-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] Re: trjconv center problem

2013-04-19 Thread Brad Van Oosten
The trajectory file is from a consecutive run so i would hope the frames are
evenly spaced.



--
View this message in context: 
http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/trjconv-center-problem-tp5007473p5007475.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists