Re: [gmx-users] bond lost (II)

2006-09-17 Thread Mark Abraham
zzhwise1 wrote:
>  about the second question,is that ,when i use the md as integrator,the 
> feedback show the atomnumber of gro was not the same as top which show 0 
> atom? but when i use the l-bfgs as integrator, there was no wrong,and 
> goes smoothly!
>   and i never know why!

Neither will we know, unless you can do as I suggested last time - "You
need to describe the problem fully, include contents of small files
where appropriate, and quote the feedback you get from the gromacs tools."

Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] bond lost (II)

2006-09-17 Thread zzhwise1

 about the second question,is that ,when i use the md as integrator,the feedback show the atomnumber of gro was not the same as top which show 0 atom? but when i use the l-bfgs as integrator, there was no wrong,and goes smoothly!
  and i never know why!
 
 
 

	3G 时 代 来 临 了,坚 决 对 传 统 邮 箱 说 不 !
	
	 新 一 代 极 速 3G 邮 箱 闪 亮 登 场 ,280 兆 网 盘 免 费 送 ! 点 击 此 处 注 册


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] bond lost!

2006-09-17 Thread Mark Abraham
zzhwise1 wrote:
> good everyone
>i have 2 questions :
> 1) when i optimized my system of CH3(CH2)13COOH chains with l-bfgs for 
> 5000steps,but it stopped at 467th step,and i found the conformation 
> break,8chains'lost the C-OH bonds,why there was this and what cause 
> this?was this the wrong itp or mdp?

Your topology was not correct. Compare the contents of the .top file
with the .itp file it was sourced from.

> 2) when i change the mdp with md,then show the gro atomnumber not 
> incorred with top?why?i still could not find out the reason!

I can't understand this. You need to describe the problem fully, include
contents of small files where appropriate, and quote the feedback you
get from the gromacs tools. Or you could employ a mind-reader. I know
what's cheaper :-)

Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] bond lost!

2006-09-17 Thread zzhwise1
good everyone
   i have 2 questions :
1) when i optimized my system of CH3(CH2)13COOH chains with l-bfgs for 5000steps,but it stopped at 467th step,and i found the conformation break,8chains'lost the C-OH bonds,why there was this and what cause this?was this the wrong itp or mdp?
2) when i change the mdp with md,then show the gro atomnumber not incorred with top?why?i still could not find out the reason!
can anyone help me?
  thankS!
 
 

	3G 时 代 来 临 了,坚 决 对 传 统 邮 箱 说 不 !
	
	 新 一 代 极 速 3G 邮 箱 闪 亮 登 场 ,280 兆 网 盘 免 费 送 ! 点 击 此 处 注 册


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php