RE: [gmx-users] membrane bilayer simulation by OPLS FF

2011-02-21 Thread Dallas Warren
7 and 8 have nothing to do with OPLS-AA.

As the text tells you, it is the Encad forcefield
(http://www.sklogwiki.org/SklogWiki/index.php/ENCAD_%28force_field%29)

So that then leaves you with the OPLS-AA for you to use :-)

Catch ya,

Dr. Dallas Warren
Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Action
Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University
381 Royal Parade, Parkville VIC 3010
dallas.war...@monash.edu
+61 3 9903 9304
-
When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble
a nail. 


> -Original Message-
> From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [mailto:gmx-users-
> boun...@gromacs.org] On Behalf Of mirc...@sjtu.edu.cn
> Sent: Tuesday, 22 February 2011 4:18 PM
> To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
> Subject: [gmx-users] membrane bilayer simulation by OPLS FF
> 
> Dear All:
> 
> I am using OPLS force field (OPLS FF) to do molecular dynamics
> simulations. My system contains DPPC lipid, protein and a small
> molecule. I have the following questions:
> 
> 1, where can I get the topology files for the DPPC lipids?
> 
> 2, How to prepare the topology files for the small molecules? I plan
> to calculate the charges of each atoms by QM method.After I got the
> charges and atom radius, how to prepare the topology files?
> 
> 3, I am using GROMACS 3 and I found there are three all-atom force
> fields there:
> --
>   0: GROMOS96 43a1 force field
>   1: GROMOS96 43b1 vacuum force field
>   2: GROMOS96 43a2 force field (improved alkane dihedrals)
>   3: GROMOS96 45a3 force field (Schuler JCC 2001 22 1205)
>   4: GROMOS96 53a5 force field (JCC 2004 vol 25 pag 1656)
>   5: GROMOS96 53a6 force field (JCC 2004 vol 25 pag 1656)
>   6: OPLS-AA/L all-atom force field (2001 aminoacid dihedrals)
>   7: Encad all-atom force field, using scaled-down vacuum charges
>   8: Encad all-atom force field, using full solvent charges
> -
> 
> among them, 6, 7, and 8 are all-atom force fields, right? My question
> is are 7 and 8 also OPLS force fields? If so, which one is
> recommendated to use in lipid-protein complex systems MD simulations?
> What are the differences between 6, 7 and 8.
> 
> Sincerely Yours
> 
> Ruo-Xu Gu
> 
> 
> --
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] membrane bilayer simulation by OPLS FF

2011-02-21 Thread mircial

Dear All:

I am using OPLS force field (OPLS FF) to do molecular dynamics  
simulations. My system contains DPPC lipid, protein and a small  
molecule. I have the following questions:


1, where can I get the topology files for the DPPC lipids?

2, How to prepare the topology files for the small molecules? I plan  
to calculate the charges of each atoms by QM method.After I got the  
charges and atom radius, how to prepare the topology files?


3, I am using GROMACS 3 and I found there are three all-atom force  
fields there:

--
 0: GROMOS96 43a1 force field
 1: GROMOS96 43b1 vacuum force field
 2: GROMOS96 43a2 force field (improved alkane dihedrals)
 3: GROMOS96 45a3 force field (Schuler JCC 2001 22 1205)
 4: GROMOS96 53a5 force field (JCC 2004 vol 25 pag 1656)
 5: GROMOS96 53a6 force field (JCC 2004 vol 25 pag 1656)
 6: OPLS-AA/L all-atom force field (2001 aminoacid dihedrals)
 7: Encad all-atom force field, using scaled-down vacuum charges
 8: Encad all-atom force field, using full solvent charges
-

among them, 6, 7, and 8 are all-atom force fields, right? My question  
is are 7 and 8 also OPLS force fields? If so, which one is  
recommendated to use in lipid-protein complex systems MD simulations?  
What are the differences between 6, 7 and 8.


Sincerely Yours

Ruo-Xu Gu


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists