Re: [gmx-users] positive system total-energy

2007-03-07 Thread Qiao Baofu

Hi David,

Thanks for your reply!

It is a pure ionic liquid system. I compared this energy result with that of
another system, found that the term of  Coul.-recip. is very smaller (-
4664.24) than another system's  result  (-56014.1). All other terms of the
energy are in the same order of magnitute.

What does Coul.-recip mean?

PME is used for Coulomb interaction. Switch is used for LJ interaction.

1. abnormal result
Energy  Average   RMSD Fluct.  Drift
Tot-Drift
---
Bond8121.16129.568129.564 0.000320592
3.20592
Angle   16284.9174.598174.578 -0.00090818-
9.0818
Ryckaert-Bell.   4489.18147.842144.019 -0.0115717   -115.717
LJ-141169.9734.081833.9909 -0.000861911   -
8.61912
Coulomb-14   2666.03191.396186.964 -0.0141849   -141.849
LJ-(SR)-32381.8146.511  146.4 -0.0019765-
19.765
Disper.-corr.  -2462.415.292795.28651  8.934e-05
0.8934
Coulomb-(SR)   -11046.1213.609210.484  0.0126112126.112
Coul.-recip.   -4664.24 141.26136.108  0.0130948
130.948
Potential  -17823.3250.663250.472 -0.00338716   -
33.8716
Kinetic-En.32678.4188.545188.545 -6.01562e-06 -
0.0601562
Total-Energy   14855.1163.416163.122 -0.00339318   -
33.9318
Temperature299.9651.730711.73071  0
0


2.normal results
Energy  Average   RMSD Fluct.  Drift
Tot-Drift
---
Bond3707.66103.252103.238 0.000572337
5.7156
Angle   10644.9157.095157.095 4.14791e-06
0.0414228
Ryckaert-Bell.   3215.44108.937108.932 -0.000366312   -
3.65815
LJ-14   1314.1929.530329.5302 -3.01152e-05  -
0.300743
Coulomb-14 -14049.817.410417.4061 0.0001343981.34216
LJ-(SR)-11648.8158.786 158.35 0.00408289
40.7735
Disper.-corr.  -1192.913.766083.73988 0.000153815
1.53606
Coulomb-(SR)   -31913.4149.436148.956  0.004152841.4716
Coul.-recip.   -56014.136.376436.0691 0.00163665
16.3442
Potential  -95936.8248.465 246.67  0.0103406
103.266
Kinetic-En.23457.6186.095186.095 1.29671e-05
0.129495
Total-Energy -72479.2162.228159.458  0.0103536
103.395
Temperature  399.9283.172723.17272 2.21097e-07
0.00220797




2007/3/6, David van der Spoel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


Qiao Baofu wrote:
 Hi,

 I have a 10 ns job. But when using the g_energy to calculate the
 component of the energy, I got a positive total-energy!!

 Who can give some suggestions?  Thanks a lot!

what kind of system? do you happen to have an organic solvent?
in that case you should subtract the self energy per molecule

--
David.

David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular Biophysics group,
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596,  75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone:  46 18 471 4205  fax: 46 18 511 755
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://folding.bmc.uu.se

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php





--
Sincerely yours,
**
Baofu Qiao, PhD
Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies
Max-von-Laue-Str. 1
60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany TEL:+49-69-7984-7529
**
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] positive system total-energy

2007-03-07 Thread David van der Spoel

Qiao Baofu wrote:

Hi David,

Thanks for your reply!

It is a pure ionic liquid system. I compared this energy result with 
that of another system, found that the term of  Coul.-recip. is very 
smaller (-4664.24) than another system's  result  (- 56014.1). All other 
terms of the energy are in the same order of magnitute.


What does Coul.-recip mean? 

Energy from PME.

Please do a simulation of a single ion in vacuum (same box size) and 
from that determine the single molecule energy. You have to subtract 
this N times from your potential energy.


--
David.

David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular Biophysics group,
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596,  75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone:  46 18 471 4205  fax: 46 18 511 755
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://folding.bmc.uu.se

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] positive system total-energy

2007-03-06 Thread Qiao Baofu

Hi,

I have a 10 ns job. But when using the g_energy to calculate the component
of the energy, I got a positive total-energy!!

Who can give some suggestions?  Thanks a lot!


The NTP ensemble is used. Before the final run, it has been run for 2ns to
get the equilibrium state. The system has about 1 atoms.
As shown in the following, the rmsd of the total energy and density are not
quite big.

Energy  Average   RMSD Fluct.  Drift
Tot-Drift
---
Bond8121.16129.568129.564 0.000320592
3.20592
Angle   16284.9174.598174.578 -0.00090818-
9.0818
Ryckaert-Bell.  4489.18147.842144.019 -0.0115717   -
115.717
LJ-14   1169.9734.081833.9909 -0.000861911   -
8.61912
Coulomb-14  2666.03191.396186.964 -0.0141849   -
141.849
LJ-(SR)-32381.8146.511  146.4 -0.0019765-
19.765
Disper.-corr.  -2462.415.292795.28651  8.934e-05
0.8934
Coulomb-(SR)   -11046.1213.609210.484  0.0126112
126.112
Coul.-recip.   -4664.24 141.26136.108  0.0130948
130.948
Potential  -17823.3250.663250.472 -0.00338716   -
33.8716
Kinetic-En. 32678.4188.545188.545 -6.01562e-06 -
0.0601562
Total-Energy14855.1163.416163.122 -0.00339318   -
33.9318
Temperature 299.9651.730711.73071
0  0
Pressure-(bar)  1.02259336.285336.285 -5.31626e-06 -
0.0531626
Density-(SI)1583.313.403233.39918 -5.7445e-05   -
0.57445
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php