[gmx-users] protein embedded into membrane.

2010-10-04 Thread #ZHAO LINA#
Hi,

When I tried to pack different proteins around the lipids (this protein I put 
it in the position which was nearly going to jump out of the lipids, so it's 
not exactly inserted into it, just very shallow into it), I used the vmd to see 
the system.gro, which without being inflated first, I noticed
some warnings like this:

Warning) Unusual bond between residues:  40 (protein) and 491 (none)
Warning) Unusual bond between residues:  40 (protein) and 491 (none)
Warning) Unusual bond between residues:  40 (protein) and 491 (none)

when I removed those residues such as 491 (none), not protein ones, those 
warning disappeared.

I noticed on Justine's tutorial, there were 26 iterations of scaling down. I 
did those iterations step by step manually before and cost me nearly 40 
mind-not-running minutes to finish, but later I spent crazy 2 hours or more to 
write a short and clumsy script to save mine 40 mins work in the future. This 
is not the point.  The point was that, are there some shortcuts? I wonder 
whether I could avoid doing those inflategro first, and then shrink and energy 
minimization also being avoided by simply removed those lipids (I know I still 
need a final EM).
or,
Can we locally inflated those membrane and then locally packed them together. 
Very local, or maybe just simply removed those lipids.

How could I make sure the removal ones are going to be nice, from which sides I 
should check.

Thanks and best regards,

lina

p.s  To avoid a very trivial description, I put some background information 
below, thanks for your time.

from Tieleman's website
http://moose.bio.ucalgary.ca/index.php?page=Translate_lipdis

and Justine's webpage
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/membrane_protein/03_solvate.html

 I tried pack the lipids around the protein, no doubt followed perfectly based 
on the tutorial before.


-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] protein embedded into membrane.

2010-10-04 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



#ZHAO LINA# wrote:

Hi,

When I tried to pack different proteins around the lipids (this protein 
I put it in the position which was nearly going to jump out of the 
lipids, so it's not exactly inserted into it, just very shallow into 
it), I used the vmd to see the system.gro, which without being inflated 
first, I noticed

some warnings like this:

Warning) Unusual bond between residues:  40 (protein) and 491 (none)
Warning) Unusual bond between residues:  40 (protein) and 491 (none)
Warning) Unusual bond between residues:  40 (protein) and 491 (none)

when I removed those residues such as 491 (none), not protein ones, 
those warning disappeared.




VMD is detecting close contacts, not actual bonds, but since its heuristic 
algorithm tells it there are bonds, then you get these warnings.  Perhaps a 
simple EM will resolve them, but maybe not.


I noticed on Justine's tutorial, there were 26 iterations of scaling 
down. I did those iterations step by step manually before and cost me 
nearly 40 mind-not-running minutes to finish, but later I spent crazy 2 
hours or more to write a short and clumsy script to save mine 40 mins 
work in the future. This is not the point.  The point was that, are 
there some shortcuts? I wonder whether I could avoid doing those 
inflategro first, and then shrink and energy minimization also being 
avoided by simply removed those lipids (I know I still need a final EM).

or,


What is presented in the tutorial is simply one way to build a membrane protein 
system.  If you have an easier case, then as long as you can justify your 
methods, do what you see fit.  Perhaps the iterations of InflateGRO are, in your 
case, unnecessary.  There is also a new tool called g_membed that might be 
useful.  It is far more automated than InflateGRO, but I have never used it myself.


Can we locally inflated those membrane and then locally packed them 
together. Very local, or maybe just simply removed those lipids.




Not to my knowledge, unless you write this program yourself.

How could I make sure the removal ones are going to be nice, from which 
sides I should check.




I don't understand what you're asking for here.

-Justin


Thanks and best regards,

lina

p.s  To avoid a very trivial description, I put some background 
information below, thanks for your time.


from Tieleman's website
http://moose.bio.ucalgary.ca/index.php?page=Translate_lipdis

and Justine's webpage
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/membrane_protein/03_solvate.html

 I tried pack the lipids around the protein, no doubt followed perfectly 
based on the tutorial before.





--


Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


RE: [gmx-users] protein embedded into membrane.

2010-10-04 Thread #ZHAO LINA#
Thanks for your answering. I will check those further later.

The unclear question was that, to the final .gro. How can I tell it that one 
(protein embedded in membrane) is okay or nice, so I can continue.

based on area per lipids, or after EM ... are there some criteria?

Thanks and best regards,

lina 


From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] on behalf 
of Justin A. Lemkul [jalem...@vt.edu]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 11:27 PM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] protein embedded into membrane.

#ZHAO LINA# wrote:
 Hi,

 When I tried to pack different proteins around the lipids (this protein
 I put it in the position which was nearly going to jump out of the
 lipids, so it's not exactly inserted into it, just very shallow into
 it), I used the vmd to see the system.gro, which without being inflated
 first, I noticed
 some warnings like this:

 Warning) Unusual bond between residues:  40 (protein) and 491 (none)
 Warning) Unusual bond between residues:  40 (protein) and 491 (none)
 Warning) Unusual bond between residues:  40 (protein) and 491 (none)

 when I removed those residues such as 491 (none), not protein ones,
 those warning disappeared.


VMD is detecting close contacts, not actual bonds, but since its heuristic
algorithm tells it there are bonds, then you get these warnings.  Perhaps a
simple EM will resolve them, but maybe not.

 I noticed on Justine's tutorial, there were 26 iterations of scaling
 down. I did those iterations step by step manually before and cost me
 nearly 40 mind-not-running minutes to finish, but later I spent crazy 2
 hours or more to write a short and clumsy script to save mine 40 mins
 work in the future. This is not the point.  The point was that, are
 there some shortcuts? I wonder whether I could avoid doing those
 inflategro first, and then shrink and energy minimization also being
 avoided by simply removed those lipids (I know I still need a final EM).
 or,

What is presented in the tutorial is simply one way to build a membrane protein
system.  If you have an easier case, then as long as you can justify your
methods, do what you see fit.  Perhaps the iterations of InflateGRO are, in your
case, unnecessary.  There is also a new tool called g_membed that might be
useful.  It is far more automated than InflateGRO, but I have never used it 
myself.

 Can we locally inflated those membrane and then locally packed them
 together. Very local, or maybe just simply removed those lipids.


Not to my knowledge, unless you write this program yourself.

 How could I make sure the removal ones are going to be nice, from which
 sides I should check.


I don't understand what you're asking for here.

-Justin

 Thanks and best regards,

 lina

 p.s  To avoid a very trivial description, I put some background
 information below, thanks for your time.

 from Tieleman's website
 http://moose.bio.ucalgary.ca/index.php?page=Translate_lipdis

 and Justine's webpage
 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/membrane_protein/03_solvate.html

  I tried pack the lipids around the protein, no doubt followed perfectly
 based on the tutorial before.



--


Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] protein embedded into membrane.

2010-10-04 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



#ZHAO LINA# wrote:

Thanks for your answering. I will check those further later.

The unclear question was that, to the final .gro. How can I tell it that one 
(protein embedded in membrane) is okay or nice, so I can continue.

based on area per lipids, or after EM ... are there some criteria?



Area per lipid will equilibrate with sufficient simulation.  Otherwise, use 
normal EM criteria to determine whether or not your system is in a reasonable 
configuration.


-Justin


Thanks and best regards,

lina 



From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] on behalf 
of Justin A. Lemkul [jalem...@vt.edu]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 11:27 PM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] protein embedded into membrane.

#ZHAO LINA# wrote:

Hi,

When I tried to pack different proteins around the lipids (this protein
I put it in the position which was nearly going to jump out of the
lipids, so it's not exactly inserted into it, just very shallow into
it), I used the vmd to see the system.gro, which without being inflated
first, I noticed
some warnings like this:

Warning) Unusual bond between residues:  40 (protein) and 491 (none)
Warning) Unusual bond between residues:  40 (protein) and 491 (none)
Warning) Unusual bond between residues:  40 (protein) and 491 (none)

when I removed those residues such as 491 (none), not protein ones,
those warning disappeared.



VMD is detecting close contacts, not actual bonds, but since its heuristic
algorithm tells it there are bonds, then you get these warnings.  Perhaps a
simple EM will resolve them, but maybe not.


I noticed on Justine's tutorial, there were 26 iterations of scaling
down. I did those iterations step by step manually before and cost me
nearly 40 mind-not-running minutes to finish, but later I spent crazy 2
hours or more to write a short and clumsy script to save mine 40 mins
work in the future. This is not the point.  The point was that, are
there some shortcuts? I wonder whether I could avoid doing those
inflategro first, and then shrink and energy minimization also being
avoided by simply removed those lipids (I know I still need a final EM).
or,


What is presented in the tutorial is simply one way to build a membrane protein
system.  If you have an easier case, then as long as you can justify your
methods, do what you see fit.  Perhaps the iterations of InflateGRO are, in your
case, unnecessary.  There is also a new tool called g_membed that might be
useful.  It is far more automated than InflateGRO, but I have never used it 
myself.


Can we locally inflated those membrane and then locally packed them
together. Very local, or maybe just simply removed those lipids.



Not to my knowledge, unless you write this program yourself.


How could I make sure the removal ones are going to be nice, from which
sides I should check.



I don't understand what you're asking for here.

-Justin


Thanks and best regards,

lina

p.s  To avoid a very trivial description, I put some background
information below, thanks for your time.

from Tieleman's website
http://moose.bio.ucalgary.ca/index.php?page=Translate_lipdis

and Justine's webpage
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/membrane_protein/03_solvate.html

 I tried pack the lipids around the protein, no doubt followed perfectly
based on the tutorial before.




--


Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


--


Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists