[gmx-users] table-extension in mdp ?!

2011-01-17 Thread jojo J
Dear users,

Please help me with the following problem. My simulation is crashing for an
unstability reason I guess. Can you please help me what wrong is exaclty. I
had done the simulation with exactly the same input files but with version
4.0.7 and never got this error. Thanks for your comments.


Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 0.5
Generated 332520 of the 332520 1-4 parameter combinations
Excluding 3 bonded neighbours molecule type 'solute'
Velocities were taken from a Maxwell distribution at 300 K
Number of degrees of freedom in T-Coupling group System is 8685.00


NOTE 1 [file md.mdp]:
  nstcomm  nstcalcenergy defeats the purpose of nstcalcenergy, setting
  nstcomm to nstcalcenergy


NOTE 2 [file md.mdp]:
  The sum of the two largest charge group radii (0.204120) is larger than
  rlist (1.10) - rvdw (1.00)

Analysing residue names:
There are:   240  Other residues
Analysing residues not classified as Protein/DNA/RNA/Water and splitting
into groups...
Largest charge group radii for Van der Waals: 0.102, 0.102 nm
This run will generate roughly 343 Mb of data

output.mdrun

step 7200, will finish Tue Jan 18 03:51:24 2011imb F  9%
step 7300, will finish Tue Jan 18 03:44:57 2011Warning: 1-4 interaction
between 2121 and 2128 at distance 12.290 which is larger than the 1-4 table
size 2.100 nm
These are ignored for the rest of the simulation
This usually means your system is exploding,
if not, you should increase table-extension in your mdp file
or with user tables increase the table size
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] table-extension in mdp ?!

2011-01-17 Thread TJ Mustard



  

  



  
   On January 17, 2011 at 4:32 PM jojo J joojoojo...@gmail.com wrote:
  

  
Dear users,

 Please help me with the following problem. My simulation is crashing for an unstability reason I guess. Can you please help me what wrong is exaclty. I had done the simulation with exactly the same input files but with version 4.0.7 and never got this error. Thanks for your comments.


 Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 0.5
 Generated 332520 of the 332520 1-4 parameter combinations
 Excluding 3 bonded neighbours molecule type solute
 Velocities were taken from a Maxwell distribution at 300 K
 Number of degrees of freedom in T-Coupling group System is 8685.00


 NOTE 1 [file md.mdp]:
  nstcomm  nstcalcenergy defeats the purpose of nstcalcenergy, setting
  nstcomm to nstcalcenergy


 NOTE 2 [file md.mdp]:
  The sum of the two largest charge group radii (0.204120) is larger than
  rlist (1.10) - rvdw (1.00)

 Analysing residue names:
 There are: 240 Other residues
 Analysing residues not classified as Protein/DNA/RNA/Water and splitting into groups...
 Largest charge group radii for Van der Waals: 0.102, 0.102 nm
 This run will generate roughly 343 Mb of data

 output.mdrun

 step 7200, will finish Tue Jan 18 03:51:24 2011imb F 9%
 step 7300, will finish Tue Jan 18 03:44:57 2011Warning: 1-4 interaction between 2121 and 2128 at distance 12.290 which is larger than the 1-4 table size 2.100 nm
 These are ignored for the rest of the simulation
 This usually means your system is exploding,
 if not, you should increase table-extension in your mdp file
 or with user tables increase the table size


  


I seem to have a similar problem but you are having many more than I. If I were you I would fix the two NOTES first. Once those go away the 1-4 interaction warning might disappear as well.



TJ Mustard
Email: musta...@onid.orst.edu
  

-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] table extension

2009-08-27 Thread Omer Markovitch
Thanks Mark.
I am simulating a dimer in vacuum, and it is my understanding that once a
non-bonded interaction has exceeded the table-extension cutoff this
interaction will NOT be included in the potential for the remaining
simulation, even if it will later come back to a distance within the
table-extension.
Your answer helped me.
It is now a matter of choosing the box dimensions  table extension that
will be reasonable yet not increase the computation time too much.
--Omer.

Koby Levy research group,
Weizmann Institute of Science.
FAX: 972-77-444-7905
http://www.weizmann.ac.il/sb/faculty_pages/Levy/


On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 16:03, Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au wrote:

 Probably not... if you're asking this question because you suspect
 something's not working properly, you might get enlightenment/a fix quicker
 if you're more explicit :-)

 Mark

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

RE: [gmx-users] table extension

2009-08-27 Thread Berk Hess

Hi,

No, this is not correct.
A interaction beyond the cut-off + table-extension will get a random energy and 
force
depending on what is stored in the memory of your computer beyond the table___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] table extension

2009-08-27 Thread Omer Markovitch
Thanks.
And what happens if later on it comes back to the cut-off + table-extension
range?

Koby Levy research group,
Weizmann Institute of Science.
FAX: 972-77-444-7905
http://www.weizmann.ac.il/sb/faculty_pages/Levy/


On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:13, Berk Hess g...@hotmail.com wrote:

 A interaction beyond the cut-off + table-extension will get a random energy
 and force
 depending on what is stored in the memory of your computer beyond the table

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] table extension

2009-08-27 Thread Mark Abraham

Omer Markovitch wrote:

Thanks.
And what happens if later on it comes back to the cut-off + table-extension
range?


It would look up a non-random energy and force. If the code never 
noticed the distance was out-of-range, it won't notice it come back into 
range either.


Mark


Koby Levy research group,
Weizmann Institute of Science.
FAX: 972-77-444-7905
http://www.weizmann.ac.il/sb/faculty_pages/Levy/


On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:13, Berk Hess g...@hotmail.com wrote:


A interaction beyond the cut-off + table-extension will get a random energy
and force
depending on what is stored in the memory of your computer beyond the table






___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] table extension

2009-08-27 Thread Omer Markovitch
But what if the gmx code did notice it?

Koby Levy research group,
Weizmann Institute of Science.
FAX: 972-77-444-7905
http://www.weizmann.ac.il/sb/faculty_pages/Levy/


On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:21, Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au wrote:

 It would look up a non-random energy and force. If the code never noticed
 the distance was out-of-range, it won't notice it come back into range
 either.

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

RE: [gmx-users] table extension

2009-08-27 Thread Berk Hess

There is a misunderstanding here about noticing.

For efficiency reasons, the code does not check if atoms are beyond the table 
length.
So the code does not care about or notice anything.
However, you do care, since you do not want random forces.
(Although in nearly all cases the force will be, or zero: fine, no artifacts,
or 10^30: immediate crash of mdrun).

Berk

Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:18:13 +0300
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] table extension
From: omer...@gmail.com
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org

But what if the gmx code did notice it?  
Koby Levy research group,
Weizmann Institute of Science. 
FAX: 972-77-444-7905
http://www.weizmann.ac.il/sb/faculty_pages/Levy/




On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:21, Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au wrote:

It would look up a non-random energy and force. If the code never noticed the 
distance was out-of-range, it won't notice it come back into range either.

_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] table extension

2009-08-26 Thread Omer Markovitch
Dear GMXs,
I would like to clear something out, for myself:
The table extension given in MDP file applies to nonbond_params  pairs
interactions which are specified in the TOP file (and also electrostatics)?
Is there an interaction which does not use the table extension (other then
bonds, angles  dihdrals)?
I have read the manual.
Thanks, Omer.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] table extension

2009-08-26 Thread Mark Abraham

Omer Markovitch wrote:

Dear GMXs,
I would like to clear something out, for myself:
The table extension given in MDP file applies to nonbond_params  pairs
interactions which are specified in the TOP file (and also electrostatics)?


From 7.3.12, yes. These are the nonbonded interactions.


Is there an interaction which does not use the table extension (other then
bonds, angles  dihdrals)?


Probably not... if you're asking this question because you suspect 
something's not working properly, you might get enlightenment/a fix 
quicker if you're more explicit :-)


Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] table-extension

2008-03-29 Thread jayant james
*hi !
I am getting this error with regard to table extensions. Any suggestions to
overcome this would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks
Jayant James
*
Warning: 1-4 interaction between 429 and 434 at distance 1.002 which is
larger than the 1-4 table size 1.000 nm
These are ignored for the rest of the simulation
This usually means your system is exploding,
if not, you should increase table-extension in your mdp file


On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Yang Ye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  jayant james wrote:

 *hi!
 I am attempting to run a distance  position restrained simulation in
 water. The **distance and position restraining files are called from the
 *.top file as posres.itp and disres.itp. After a 200ps run I do not see
 the distance nor position restraining kicking in. I am not sure if I have
 specified every thing correctly. I have pasted essential parts of the
 topology file, em.mdp, pr.mdp, disres.itp and posres.itp. Awaiting your
 feedback
 Thanks
 Jayant James
 *
 *TOP FILE*

 ; Include Position restraint file
 #ifdef POSRES
 ;include posre.itp
 #endif

 ;includedisres.itp

  Putting semicolon in front of the line effectively turns off that line.

 Regards,
 Yang Ye

 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php




-- 
Jayasundar Jayant James

www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0096/0096_01.asp)
Residence -24935864, cell-9841042164
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] table-extension

2008-03-29 Thread Mark Abraham
 *hi !
 I am getting this error with regard to table extensions. Any suggestions
 to
 overcome this would be greatly appreciated!
 Thanks
 Jayant James
 *
 Warning: 1-4 interaction between 429 and 434 at distance 1.002 which is
 larger than the 1-4 table size 1.000 nm
 These are ignored for the rest of the simulation
 This usually means your system is exploding,
 if not, you should increase table-extension in your mdp file

So have a look at the trajectory to see what's exploding, especially in
the region of these atoms. Probably you will need to set up your system
more carefully, with better EM, and/or equilibration protocols.

Mark

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php