Re: [gmx-users] the mdp parameters for localpressure calculation using gromacs-4.0.2_localpressure

2011-08-21 Thread Jianguo Li
Hi, Kong Xian,

It is better to use SHAKE instead of LINCS since LINCS does not directly yield 
pairwise forces, as shown in the paper: Erik Lindahl and Olle Edholm. Spatial 
and energetic-entropic decomposition of surface tension in lipid
bilayers from molecular dynamics simulations. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 
VOLUME 113, NUMBER 9, 3882–3893.

best regards,
Jianguo 





From: KONG Xian xiansh...@gmail.com
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Friday, 19 August 2011 23:50:01
Subject: [gmx-users] the mdp parameters for localpressure calculation using 
gromacs-4.0.2_localpressure

 
I have sent this email days ago, but I got no answer.
Hope someone would saw it this time. 
Sorry for disturbing.
Dear all:
 I am using gromacs-4.0.2_localpressure to calculate the local pressure 
of my system.
 I have a question.
 When rerun the mdrun from gromacs-4.0.2_localpressure I used a new 
.mdp 
file. There are some changes of the new .mdp file according the original one. I 
have 2 questions:
1.  I changed the The coulomb interaction type from PME to reaction field 
with epsilon_r=1 epsilon_rf=78;  Is this change feasible?
2.  I used LINCS for all bonds in the simulation, and I still use the LINCS 
for all bonds when calculate the local pressure. Is this way right? 

 
Thanks for any reply.
 
Best wishes, 
KONG Xian
Tsinghua, Beijing, China



__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 6393 (20110819) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

[gmx-users] the mdp parameters for localpressure calculation using gromacs-4.0.2_localpressure

2011-08-19 Thread KONG Xian
I have sent this email days ago, but I got no answer.

Hope someone would saw it this time. 

Sorry for disturbing.

Dear all:

 I am using gromacs-4.0.2_localpressure to calculate the local
pressure of my system.

 I have a question.

 When rerun the mdrun from gromacs-4.0.2_localpressure I used a new
.mdp file. There are some changes of the new .mdp file according the
original one. I have 2 questions:

1.  I changed the The coulomb interaction type from PME to reaction
field with epsilon_r=1 epsilon_rf=78;  Is this change feasible?

2.  I used LINCS for all bonds in the simulation, and I still use the
LINCS for all bonds when calculate the local pressure. Is this way right? 

 

Thanks for any reply.

 

Best wishes, 

KONG Xian

Tsinghua, Beijing, China





-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] the mdp parameters for localpressure calculation using gromacs-4.0.2_localpressure

2011-08-19 Thread Amit Choubey
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 8:50 AM, KONG Xian xiansh...@gmail.com wrote:

 I have sent this email days ago, but I got no answer.

 Hope someone would saw it this time. 

 Sorry for disturbing.

 Dear all:

  I am using gromacs-4.0.2_localpressure to calculate the local
 pressure of my system.

  I have a question.

  When rerun the mdrun from gromacs-4.0.2_localpressure I used a new
 .mdp file. There are some changes of the new .mdp file according the
 original one. I have 2 questions:

 **1.  **I changed the The coulomb interaction type from PME to
 reaction field with epsilon_r=1 epsilon_rf=78;  Is this change feasible?

Yes, you have to switch to cutoff for coulomb interaction. I have seen in
other publications that they use a regular coulomb  with cutoff as large as
2 nm. I am not sure whether there is any advantage in using Reaction field.

 

 **2.  **I used LINCS for all bonds in the simulation, and I still use
 the LINCS for all bonds when calculate the local pressure. Is this way
 right?

 I have had no problems in using LINCS during local pressure calculation.

 

 ** **

 Thanks for any reply.

 ** **

 Best wishes, 

 KONG Xian

 Tsinghua, Beijing, China



 


 __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
 signature database 6393 (20110819) __

 The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

 http://www.eset.com

 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

[gmx-users] the mdp parameters for localpressure calculation using gromacs-4.0.2_localpressure

2011-08-17 Thread KONG Xian
Dear all:

 I am using gromacs-4.0.2_localpressure to calculate the local
pressure of my system.

 I have a question.

 When rerun the mdrun from gromacs-4.0.2_localpressure I used a new
.mdp file. There are some changes of the new .mdp file according the
original one. I have 2 questions:

1.  I changed the The coulomb interaction type from PME to reaction
field with epsilon_r=1 epsilon_rf=78;  Is this change feasible?

2.  I used LINCS for all bonds in the simulation, and I still use the
LINCS for all bonds when calculate the local pressure. Is this way right? 

 

Thanks for any reply.

 

Best wishes, 

KONG Xian

Tsinghua, Beijing, China

-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists