Re: 回复: [gmx-users] Re: Some questio ns on Tabulated Dihedral Potential

2009-07-21 Thread Ran Friedman
Hi,

The numerical derivative for the Nth value y[N] is calculated as:
der = y[N+1] - y[N-1] * 0.5 * deltaX
where y is the potential deltaX is the difference between two successive
values in your input (e.g., 1 if you have a table that goes from -180 to
180 with 361 values).

I don't think you can print the number without changing the code, but
it's not difficult to calculate. You can plot your forces and -der and
see where they deviate.

Ran.

hong bingbing wrote:
 Hi, Ran,

 The potential f(x) and force -f'(x) in the table are calculated by
 myself before constructing the table. The potential can be written in
 an analytical form and the force is calculated as the analytical
 negative derivative of the potential at point x. There should not be
 so large deviation betw. the value I supplied and the value calculated
 by GROMACS. Wait. Is there something wrong in my interpretation?
 What's  your method to get the force? Is there a way to see the
 numerical derivative generated by GROMACS?

 Thanks
 CH

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: 回复: [gmx-users] Re: Some questio ns on Tabulated Dihedral Potential

2009-07-21 Thread Ran Friedman
Ran Friedman wrote:
 Hi,

 The numerical derivative for the Nth value y[N] is calculated as:
 der = y[N+1] - y[N-1] * 0.5 * deltaX
Correction:
der =  (y[N+1] - y[N-1]) * 0.5 * deltaX
 where y is the potential deltaX is the difference between two
 successive values in your input (e.g., 1 if you have a table that goes
 from -180 to 180 with 361 values).

 I don't think you can print the number without changing the code, but
 it's not difficult to calculate. You can plot your forces and -der and
 see where they deviate.

 Ran.

 hong bingbing wrote:
 Hi, Ran,

 The potential f(x) and force -f'(x) in the table are calculated by
 myself before constructing the table. The potential can be written in
 an analytical form and the force is calculated as the analytical
 negative derivative of the potential at point x. There should not be
 so large deviation betw. the value I supplied and the value
 calculated by GROMACS. Wait. Is there something wrong in my
 interpretation? What's  your method to get the force? Is there a way
 to see the numerical derivative generated by GROMACS?

 Thanks
 CH

 

 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


-- 
--
Ran Friedman
Postdoctoral Fellow
Computational Structural Biology Group (A. Caflisch)
Department of Biochemistry
University of Zurich
Winterthurerstrasse 190
CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
Tel. +41-44-639
Email: r.fried...@bioc.unizh.ch
Skype: ran.friedman
--

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php