Re: [gmx-users] About MD

2011-09-26 Thread Mark Abraham

On 26/09/2011 6:41 AM, xiaojing gong wrote:

Dear all,
A question about, in MD, in which situation you can obtain a structure 
with lowest energy.


Any dynamical simulation has a lowest-energy structure... whether this 
means anything is another question.


Can MD simulate the kinetics process, and obtain a stuctrue with the 
lowest activation barriers?


Mapping free-energy surfaces where bonds are not made or broken can be 
done with conventional MD.


Typically, are the structures we find with MD determined mainly by 
thermodynamics or by kinetics ?


MD samples the free-energy surface. Its shape and the temperature 
determine what structures might be found, and in what proportions.


Mark
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] About MD

2011-09-26 Thread xiaojing gong
Hi, many thanks for your answer.

 Any dynamical simulation has a lowest-energy structure... whether this
means anything is another question.

I am just wondering whether the structures you find with MD determined
mainly by thermodynamics  (i.e. the lowest energy structures) or by kinetics
(i.e. the structures
with the lowest activation barriers)?

I wonder to know how can I set the parameters and in which condition I
obtain the structure by thermodynamics, and in which condition (with which
parameter setting) I can obtain the structure by kinetics.

 MD samples the free-energy surface. Its shape and the temperature
determine what structures might be found, and in what proportions.

Do you mean that I can obtain the structure by thermodynamics in longer and
higher temperature ; obtain the structure by kinetics in shorter and lower
temperature?



2011/9/26 Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au

 On 26/09/2011 6:41 AM, xiaojing gong wrote:

 Dear all,
 A question about, in MD, in which situation you can obtain a structure
 with lowest energy.


 Any dynamical simulation has a lowest-energy structure... whether this
 means anything is another question.


  Can MD simulate the kinetics process, and obtain a stuctrue with the
 lowest activation barriers?


 Mapping free-energy surfaces where bonds are not made or broken can be done
 with conventional MD.


  Typically, are the structures we find with MD determined mainly by
 thermodynamics or by kinetics ?


 MD samples the free-energy surface. Its shape and the temperature determine
 what structures might be found, and in what proportions.

 Mark
 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/**
 Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore
  posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface
 or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 Can't post? Read 
 http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] About MD

2011-09-26 Thread Mark Abraham

On 26/09/2011 5:31 PM, xiaojing gong wrote:

Hi, many thanks for your answer.

 Any dynamical simulation has a lowest-energy structure... whether 
this means anything is another question.


I am just wondering whether the structures you find with MD determined 
mainly by thermodynamics  (i.e. the lowest energy structures) or by 
kinetics (i.e. the structures

with the lowest activation barriers)?

I wonder to know how can I set the parameters and in which condition I 
obtain the structure by thermodynamics, and in which condition (with 
which parameter setting) I can obtain the structure by kinetics.


 MD samples the free-energy surface. Its shape and the temperature 
determine what structures might be found, and in what proportions.


Do you mean that I can obtain the structure by thermodynamics in 
longer and higher temperature ; obtain the structure by kinetics in 
shorter and lower temperature?


You are drawing some artificial distinction whose purpose I do not 
understand.  A short simulation on a FES at a temperature low enough 
that the barriers are larger than the readily available KE will be 
kinetically trapped. I'd guess that most MD simulations that have ever 
been run have suffered from this defect. The shape of the FES will 
generally vary with temperature also.


Mark





2011/9/26 Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au 
mailto:mark.abra...@anu.edu.au


On 26/09/2011 6:41 AM, xiaojing gong wrote:

Dear all,
A question about, in MD, in which situation you can obtain a
structure with lowest energy.


Any dynamical simulation has a lowest-energy structure... whether
this means anything is another question.


Can MD simulate the kinetics process, and obtain a stuctrue
with the lowest activation barriers?


Mapping free-energy surfaces where bonds are not made or broken
can be done with conventional MD.


Typically, are the structures we find with MD determined
mainly by thermodynamics or by kinetics ?


MD samples the free-energy surface. Its shape and the temperature
determine what structures might be found, and in what proportions.

Mark
-- 
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org

mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists






-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] About MD

2011-09-26 Thread xiaojing gong
Hi, many thanks.
I am doing some simulation correlated with the growth, in experiments, there
are two kinds of growth, one is driven by kinetics and other is  by
thermodynamics. So I just wonder to know by using MD simulations, the
results I obtained is driven by  kinetics or thermodynamics.

Silly question.

XJ

2011/9/26 Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au

  On 26/09/2011 5:31 PM, xiaojing gong wrote:

 Hi, many thanks for your answer.

  Any dynamical simulation has a lowest-energy structure... whether this
 means anything is another question.

 I am just wondering whether the structures you find with MD determined
 mainly by thermodynamics  (i.e. the lowest energy structures) or by kinetics
 (i.e. the structures
 with the lowest activation barriers)?

 I wonder to know how can I set the parameters and in which condition I
 obtain the structure by thermodynamics, and in which condition (with which
 parameter setting) I can obtain the structure by kinetics.

  MD samples the free-energy surface. Its shape and the temperature
 determine what structures might be found, and in what proportions.

 Do you mean that I can obtain the structure by thermodynamics in longer and
 higher temperature ; obtain the structure by kinetics in shorter and lower
 temperature?


 You are drawing some artificial distinction whose purpose I do not
 understand.  A short simulation on a FES at a temperature low enough that
 the barriers are larger than the readily available KE will be kinetically
 trapped. I'd guess that most MD simulations that have ever been run have
 suffered from this defect. The shape of the FES will generally vary with
 temperature also.

 Mark





 2011/9/26 Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au

 On 26/09/2011 6:41 AM, xiaojing gong wrote:

 Dear all,
 A question about, in MD, in which situation you can obtain a structure
 with lowest energy.


  Any dynamical simulation has a lowest-energy structure... whether this
 means anything is another question.


  Can MD simulate the kinetics process, and obtain a stuctrue with the
 lowest activation barriers?


  Mapping free-energy surfaces where bonds are not made or broken can be
 done with conventional MD.


  Typically, are the structures we find with MD determined mainly by
 thermodynamics or by kinetics ?


  MD samples the free-energy surface. Its shape and the temperature
 determine what structures might be found, and in what proportions.

 Mark
  --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
 interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists






 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] About MD

2011-09-26 Thread Mark Abraham

On 26/09/2011 6:25 PM, xiaojing gong wrote:

Hi, many thanks.
I am doing some simulation correlated with the growth, in experiments, 
there are two kinds of growth, one is driven by kinetics and other is  
by thermodynamics.


To address this question, I think you need to seek a better description 
than driven by thermodynamics. All processes are driven by thermodynamics.


So I just wonder to know by using MD simulations, the results I 
obtained is driven by  kinetics or thermodynamics.


The two growth modes must differ somehow in the conditions that trigger 
them. For a valid model, which mode you might see will depend what 
conditions you choose.


Mark



Silly question.

XJ

2011/9/26 Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au 
mailto:mark.abra...@anu.edu.au


On 26/09/2011 5:31 PM, xiaojing gong wrote:

Hi, many thanks for your answer.

 Any dynamical simulation has a lowest-energy structure...
whether this means anything is another question.

I am just wondering whether the structures you find with MD
determined mainly by thermodynamics  (i.e. the lowest energy
structures) or by kinetics (i.e. the structures
with the lowest activation barriers)?

I wonder to know how can I set the parameters and in which
condition I obtain the structure by thermodynamics, and in which
condition (with which parameter setting) I can obtain the
structure by kinetics.

 MD samples the free-energy surface. Its shape and the
temperature determine what structures might be found, and in what
proportions.

Do you mean that I can obtain the structure by thermodynamics in
longer and higher temperature ; obtain the structure by kinetics
in shorter and lower temperature?


You are drawing some artificial distinction whose purpose I do not
understand.  A short simulation on a FES at a temperature low
enough that the barriers are larger than the readily available KE
will be kinetically trapped. I'd guess that most MD simulations
that have ever been run have suffered from this defect. The shape
of the FES will generally vary with temperature also.

Mark






2011/9/26 Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
mailto:mark.abra...@anu.edu.au

On 26/09/2011 6:41 AM, xiaojing gong wrote:

Dear all,
A question about, in MD, in which situation you can
obtain a structure with lowest energy.


Any dynamical simulation has a lowest-energy structure...
whether this means anything is another question.


Can MD simulate the kinetics process, and obtain a
stuctrue with the lowest activation barriers?


Mapping free-energy surfaces where bonds are not made or
broken can be done with conventional MD.


Typically, are the structures we find with MD determined
mainly by thermodynamics or by kinetics ?


MD samples the free-energy surface. Its shape and the
temperature determine what structures might be found, and in
what proportions.

Mark
-- 
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org

mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before
posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists







--
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists






-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] About MD

2011-09-26 Thread Jussi Lehtola
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:31:39 +0200
xiaojing gong xnz...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi, many thanks for your answer.
 
  Any dynamical simulation has a lowest-energy structure... whether
  this
 means anything is another question.
 
 I am just wondering whether the structures you find with MD determined
 mainly by thermodynamics  (i.e. the lowest energy structures) or by
 kinetics (i.e. the structures
 with the lowest activation barriers)?

The energy is NOT minimized in thermodynamics. The relevant quantity
that is minimized is the free energy. In NVT-simulations it's the
Helmholtz free energy
F = E - TS
where T is temperature and S the entropy. The minimum of F is obtained
in the struggle of minimum energy and maximal entropy. E is, however,
minimized when T=0.

In NpT you minimize the Gibbs free energy
G = E + pV -TS
where p is pressure and V is volume. Here to minimize E you would set
p=0=T.
-- 

Mr. Jussi Lehtola, M. Sc. Doctoral Student
jussi.leht...@helsinki.fi Department of Physics
http://www.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol  University of Helsinki
Office phone: +358 9 191 50 632   Finland

Jussi Lehtola, FM Tohtorikoulutettava
jussi.leht...@helsinki.fi Fysiikan laitos
http://www.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol  Helsingin Yliopisto
Työpuhelin: (0)9 191 50 632

--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] about md simulation

2007-09-11 Thread Mark Abraham

amri ta wrote:

Dear colleagues,
 
I am simulating a phosphorylated protein embedded in waterbox. 
When I try running mdrun, I get a LINCS warning.
 
Does this mean that I have go back to the CG-EM step and use the double

precision libs?


These should help.

http://wiki.gromacs.org/index.php/Errors#LINCS_warnings
http://wiki.gromacs.org/index.php/blowing_up
http://wiki.gromacs.org/index.php/Steps_to_Perform_a_Simulation

Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] about md simulation

2007-09-11 Thread amri ta
Dear colleagues,
I am simulating a phosphorylated protein embedded in waterbox. When I try 
running mdrun, I get a LINCS warning.
Does this mean that I have go back to the CG-EM step and use the double 
precision libs?
The md.log file reads:

Initializing LINear Constraint Solver
  number of constraints is 2365
  average number of constraints coupled to one constraint is 2.5

   Rel. Constraint Deviation:  Maxbetween atoms RMS
   Before LINCS 0.336565   691   696   0.033770
After LINCS 0.342830698700   0.028042

Step -1, time -0.002 (ps)  LINCS WARNING
relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
max 0.858278 (between atoms 3397 and 3398) rms 0.016634
bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees:
atom 1 atom 2  angle  previous, current, constraint length
   3395   3398   76.20.1341   0.0446  0.1470
   3398   3399   78.80.1341   0.0492  0.1470
Constraint error in algorithm Lincs at step -1
Grid: 10 x 10 x 10 cells
Configuring nonbonded kernels
Testing x86_64 SSE supports...presents
   
   Rel. Constraint Deviation:  Maxbetween atoms RMS
   Before LINCS 70.089874   1537   1456   0.559021
After LINCS 29.983810   3223   32240.787549

Like this, errors showed Constraint error in algorithm Lincs at step 0, step1 
and the simulation stops at step 1. Do I have to modify my md.mdp to remedy 
this?
Your advice is appreciated.
 Best regards,

Amrita Ghosh
National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences,
Bangalore-29.
India.


  5, 50, 500, 5000 - Store N number of mails in your inbox. Go to 
http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] about md simulation

2007-09-11 Thread chiradip chatterjee
Hi Amrita,
I have faced similar problem.before MD run, try to
minimize water box and protein seperately with both CG
and SD, then put protein in the water box and minimize
it again .., then go for MD run, I think after that
you dont have any Lincs warning..
Chiradip


--- amri ta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Dear colleagues,
 I am simulating a phosphorylated protein embedded in
 waterbox. When I try running mdrun, I get a LINCS
 warning.
 Does this mean that I have go back to the CG-EM step
 and use the double 
 precision libs?
 The md.log file reads:
 
 Initializing LINear Constraint Solver
   number of constraints is 2365
   average number of constraints coupled to one
 constraint is 2.5
 
Rel. Constraint Deviation:  Maxbetween atoms 
RMS
Before LINCS 0.336565   691   696
   0.033770
 After LINCS 0.342830698   
 700   0.028042
 
 Step -1, time -0.002 (ps)  LINCS WARNING
 relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
 max 0.858278 (between atoms 3397 and 3398) rms
 0.016634
 bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees:
 atom 1 atom 2  angle  previous, current, constraint
 length
3395   3398   76.20.1341   0.0446  0.1470
3398   3399   78.80.1341   0.0492  0.1470
 Constraint error in algorithm Lincs at step -1
 Grid: 10 x 10 x 10 cells
 Configuring nonbonded kernels
 Testing x86_64 SSE supports...presents

Rel. Constraint Deviation:  Maxbetween atoms 
RMS
Before LINCS 70.089874   1537   1456 
  0.559021
 After LINCS 29.983810   3223   3224 
   0.787549
 
 Like this, errors showed Constraint error in
 algorithm Lincs at step 0, step1 and the simulation
 stops at step 1. Do I have to modify my md.mdp to
 remedy this?
 Your advice is appreciated.
  Best regards,
 
 Amrita Ghosh
 National Institute of Mental Health and
 Neurosciences,
 Bangalore-29.
 India.
 
 
   5, 50, 500, 5000 - Store N number of mails in
 your inbox. Go to
http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html
___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the
 list. Use the 
 www interface or send it to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read
http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Chiradip Chatterjee 
Senior research fellow
Structural Biology Division
Department of Biological Science
National University of Singapore 

Phone:65-92301295
E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Home Page: www.chem.ucsb.edu/~cchatterjee/ 
I LOVE KOLKATA


  ___ 
Want ideas for reducing your carbon footprint? Visit Yahoo! For Good  
http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] about md simulation

2007-09-11 Thread TJ Piggot

Also see

http://wiki.gromacs.org/index.php/Thermostats

As you do not want to temperature couple the sodium ions independently

Tom

--On Tuesday, September 11, 2007 18:14:43 +1000 Mark Abraham 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



amri ta wrote:

Dear colleagues,

I am simulating a phosphorylated protein embedded in waterbox.
When I try running mdrun, I get a LINCS warning.

Does this mean that I have go back to the CG-EM step and use the double
precision libs?


These should help.

http://wiki.gromacs.org/index.php/Errors#LINCS_warnings
http://wiki.gromacs.org/index.php/blowing_up
http://wiki.gromacs.org/index.php/Steps_to_Perform_a_Simulation

Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php




--
TJ Piggot
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Bristol, UK.

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php