Re: Notebook Network Issues

2006-02-12 Thread Thomas M. Albright
OK, I still don't know what the problem is. The FA510 worked in RedHat 
6.2, and 8.0 but just won't work in Fedora Core 3.

I downloaded the PCMCIA package update (to a different computer) and 
used a disk to get it to the notebook. Once I upgrade PCMCIA, I tried 
again. Still got nothing (although the error when restarting pcmcia went 
away). So I tried an FA410 instead of the 510, and it worked. So that's 
what I'm going to use.

Thanks for everyones help! No I just need to figure out if I can use the 
winmodem (LT Win Modem - HSM0a19)

-- 
TARogue (Linux user number 234357)
 If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates.
 --Jay Leno
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss


Re: Notebook Network Issues

2006-02-12 Thread gerald . feldman
 OK, I still don't know what the problem is. The FA510 worked in RedHat
 6.2, and 8.0 but just won't work in Fedora Core 3.

 I downloaded the PCMCIA package update (to a different computer) and
 used a disk to get it to the notebook. Once I upgrade PCMCIA, I tried
 again. Still got nothing (although the error when restarting pcmcia went
 away). So I tried an FA410 instead of the 510, and it worked. So that's
 what I'm going to use.

 Thanks for everyones help! No I just need to figure out if I can use the
 winmodem (LT Win Modem - HSM0a19)
One big difference here is the kernel. Fedora Core 3 uses the 2.6 kernel,
and some modules were not ported to it.

While this may not be relevant, in the class I teach at NEU, we installed
Linux in class. The students had a choice of Fedora Core 4 or SuSE 10.0.
One student with a laptop had previously loaded Fedora Core 4, and was
unable to get the wireless running. When he installed SuSE 10, the
wireless (IPW2200) came right up.


___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss


Re: bash completion

2006-02-12 Thread Kevin D. Clark

Paul Lussier writes:

 I don't know how many others are aware of this, but bash's command
 line auto-completion is customizable and extensible.  

Yes, this indeed a very useful feature, especially if you are
implementing some sort of CLI based on bash.

More info here:

  http://www.caliban.org/bash/index.shtml#completion

I have found this feature to be very useful myself.

Regards,

--kevin
-- 
GnuPG ID: B280F24E

___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss