RE: Newbie needs help...

2002-08-14 Thread Brenda A. Bell

Thanks for all the responses... I think I've got it.  I had checked
several of the Mandrake groups and lists and wasn't finding a whole lot
of qmail posts... and [EMAIL PROTECTED] is pretty low volume
which doesn't help you learn a whole lot.  In my exhaustive search
through the mandrake stuff, I completely missed the link for
list.cr.yp.to... duh!!!



 -Original Message-
 From: Bill Mullen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 1:06 AM
 To: GNHLUG Mailing List
 Subject: Re: Newbie needs help...
 
 
 On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Brenda A. Bell wrote:
 
  Enough of that... I just installed qmail, have the basic 
 stuff working
  pretty well and having some trouble on some of the 
 fine-grained stuff
  like virtual domains and dashextensions.  Question is:  
 where do people
  go for help on qmail?  I tried the Mandrake list but 
 there's not a whole
  lot of activity and it's sometimes days before anyone 
 responds.  I've
  looked for other lists and/or newsgroups and haven't been 
 able to find
  an active one.
 
 Well, if you run Mandrake, you'll be hard pressed to find a 
 better all 
 around newsgroup than alt.os.linux.mandrake ... we average 
 3,200-4,000 
 posts a week, and have a very helpful bunch of regulars 
 there; some have 
 even moved on to other distros such as Debian or Gentoo, but 
 continue to 
 contribute to a.o.l.m. due to the robustness of the community therein.
 
 OTOH, I haven't seen a lot of discussion there regarding 
 qmail, as the MDK
 distros all come with both Postfix (the default) and 
 sendmail, so those
 are what most people there use; still, it's certainly worth a 
 shot to post
 your qmail questions there.
 
 The a.o.l.m. FAQ is at: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/alex.bache
 
 Have you visited these sites?
 
 http://www.lifewithqmail.org
 http://cr.yp.to/qmail.html
 http://www.flounder.net/qmail/qmail-howto.html
 http://www.faqts.com/knowledge_base/index.phtml/fid/139/
 http://www.palomine.net/qmail/relaying.html
 http://www.palomine.net/qmail/selectiverelay.html
 http://www.nrg4u.com
 
 HTH!
 
 -- 
 
 Bill Mullen
 12:47am, 2002-08-14
 
 
 
 ___
 gnhlug-discuss mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
 
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss



RE: 'My favorite platform' debate (was: Rack Mount Servers)

2002-08-12 Thread Brenda A. Bell

   The 640 KB limit arose from the original IBM-PC design, 
 circa 1980.  
 Since the 8086 didn't even have a memory manager, hardware 
 needed to be
 mapped directly into physical memory space, and IBM thought 
 640/384 was a
 good place to draw the line between software and reserved memory.

Somewhere on the Internet there's an anthology of hilarious quotes... I
believe it was someone from IBM who said why would anyone ever need
more than 640K RAM in a personal computer.  I don't think anyone knew
what was going to happen in this space.  As much as I hate to give them
credit for anything, I believe Redmond is greatly responsible for the
kind of PC hardware we have today... Windows 3.1 was a hog, but people
wanted it and the hardware vendors did what they needed to to keep up.
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss